Back to Authors

Horiuchi, Yu

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-1099

Mayo Clinic

University of California San Diego

Citations 2

Prognosis is worse with elevated cardiac troponin in nonacute coronary syndrome compared with acute coronary syndrome
Horiuchi, Yu , Patel, Mitul , Mueller, Christian, Neath, Sean‐Xavier , Christenson, Robert H. , Morgenthaler, Nils G., McCord, James , Nowak, Richard M. , Vilke, Gary M. , Daniels, Lori B. , Apple, Fred S. , Cannon, Chad , Nagurney, John T., Schreiber, Donald , Diercks, Deborah B. , Headden, Gary , Limkakeng, Alexander T. , Wu, Alan H.B. , Ebmeyer, Stefan , Jaffe, Allan S. , Maisel, Alan S. , Daniels, Lori B , Wettersten, Nicholas , Hollander, Judd E. , deFilippi, Christopher R. , Hogan, Christopher , Anand, Inder S. , Jaffe, Allan S. , Peacock, William Frank

Coronary Artery Disease | July 26, 2022 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 376-384

10.1097/mca.0000000000001135 Get It

Background Cardiac troponin (cTn) can be elevated in many patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain but without a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We compared the prognostic significance of cTn in these different populations. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the CHOPIN study, which enrolled patients who presented to the ED with chest pain. Patients were grouped as ACS, non-ACS cardiovascular disease, noncardiac chest pain and chest pain not otherwise specified (NOS). We examined the prognostic ability of cTnI for the clinical endpoints of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, reinfarction, and congestive heart failure and stroke) at 180-day follow-up. Results Among 1982 patients analyzed, 14% had ACS, 21% had non-ACS cardiovascular disease, 31% had a noncardiac diagnosis and 34% had chest pain NOS. cTnI elevation above the 99th percentile was observed in 52, 18, 6 and 7% in these groups, respectively. cTnI elevation was associated with mortality and MACE, and their relationships were more prominent in noncardiac diagnosis and chest pain NOS than in ACS and non-ACS cardiovascular diagnoses for mortality, and in non-ACS patients than in ACS patients for MACE (hazard ratio for doubling of cTnI 1.85, 2.05, 8.26 and 4.14, respectively; P for interaction 0.011 for mortality; 1.04, 1.23, 1.54 and 1.42, respectively; P for interaction <0.001 for MACE). Conclusion In patients presenting to the ED with chest pain, cTnI elevation was associated with a worse prognosis in non-ACS patients than in ACS patients.
Biomarkers Enhance Discrimination and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction
Horiuchi, Yu , Wettersten, Nicholas , Patel, Mitul , Mueller, Christian, Neath, Sean‐Xavier , Christenson, Robert H. , Morgenthaler, Nils G., McCord, James , Nowak, Richard M. , Vilke, Gary M. , Daniels, Lori B. , Apple, Fred S. , Cannon, Chad , Nagurney, John Tobias , Schreiber, Donald , Diercks, Deborah B. , Headden, Gary , Limkakeng, Alexander T. , Wu, Alan H.B. , Ebmeyer, Stefan , Jaffe, Allan S. , Peacock, W. Frank, Maisel, Alan , Müller, Christian , Mueller, Christian , Daniels, Lori B , Hollander, Judd E. , deFilippi, Christopher R. , Hogan, Christopher J. , Anand, Inder S. , Jaffe, Allan S.

Circulation | August 21, 2020 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 1532-1544

10.1161/circulationaha.120.046682 Get It

Background: The observed incidence of type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is expected to increase with the implementation of increasingly sensitive cTn assays. However, it remains to be determined how to diagnose, risk-stratify, and treat patients with T2MI. We aimed to discriminate and risk-stratify T2MI using biomarkers. Methods: Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, enrolled in the CHOPIN study (Copeptin Helps in the early detection Of Patients with acute myocardial INfarction), were retrospectively analyzed. Two cardiologists adjudicated type 1 MI (T1MI) and T2MI. The prognostic ability of several biomarkers alone or in combination to discriminate T2MI from T1MI was investigated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The biomarkers analyzed were cTnI, copeptin, MR-proANP (midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide), CT-proET1 (C-terminal proendothelin-1), MR-proADM (midregional proadrenomedullin), and procalcitonin. The prognostic utility of these biomarkers for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, reinfarction, heart failure, and stroke) at 180-day follow-up was also investigated. Results: Among the 2071 patients, T1MI and T2MI were adjudicated in 94 and 176 patients, respectively. Patients with T1MI had higher levels of baseline cTnI, whereas those with T2MI had higher baseline levels of MR-proANP, CT-proET1, MR-proADM, and procalcitonin. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of T2MI was higher for CT-proET1, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP (0.765, 0.750, and 0.733, respectively) than for cTnI (0.631). Combining all biomarkers resulted in a similar accuracy to a model using clinical variables and cTnI (0.854 versus 0.884, P =0.294). Addition of biomarkers to the clinical model yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.917). Other biomarkers, but not cTnI, were associated with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event at 180 days among all patients, with no interaction between the diagnosis of T1MI or T2MI. Conclusions: Assessment of biomarkers reflecting pathophysiologic processes occurring with T2MI might help differentiate it from T1MI. All biomarkers measured, except cTnI, were significant predictors of prognosis, regardless of the type of myocardial infarction.