Back to Authors

Pike, Malcolm C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-1199

Mayo Clinic

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Citations 29

Abstract 2722: The genomic landscape of high-grade serous ovarian cancer in long-term survivors
Garsed, Dale W. , Beach, Jessica A. , Hendley, Joy , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Pike, Malcolm C. , Group, Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes, Goode, Ellen L. , Garsed, Dale W , Pandey, Ahwan , Fereday, Sián , Alsop, Kathryn , Wouters, Maartje C.A. , Saner, Flurina A.M. , Milne, Katy , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Traficante, Nadia , Group, Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes, Ramus, Susan J. , Köbel, Martin , Nelson, Brad H. , DeFazio, Anna , Bowtell, David D.L.

Cancer Research | August 7, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 2722-2722

10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-2722 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The majority of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) develop progressive disease following primary treatment, with a five-year survival rate of ~30%. However, a subset of patients have an extraordinary response to treatment and ~15% survive more than ten years (long-term survivors). The Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (MOCOG) aims to uncover factors that influence long-term survival of HGSC patients. Here, we investigated the genomic and immunologic determinants of exceptional survival of this deadly disease. Experimental Design: Patient characteristics and clinical histories were evaluated to identify patients diagnosed with advanced stage (Stage IIIC/IV) and histopathologically confirmed HGSC with greater than 10-year overall survival. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on primary tumors (median 78x coverage) and germline samples (median 39x coverage) of 55 long-term survivors. Primary tumor samples were also characterised by RNA sequencing, DNA methylation profiling and immunohistochemistry. Results: A total 38 (69%) of long-term surviving patients had residual disease following surgery, suggestive of highly chemo-sensitive disease. Most patients (41, 75%) were alive at last follow-up and 26 (47%) were progression-free. Somatic mutation burden was higher in primary tumors of long-term survivors relative to controls (316 unselected HGSC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas). Genome-wide mutational signatures were predominantly Signature 3 (associated with homologous recombination deficiency), Signature 1 (age related) and Signatures 5, 8 and 16 (unknown etiology). Inactivation of the tumor suppressor RB1 by structural rearrangements or homozygous deletion was frequent in long-term survivors, with 33% of tumors showing associated loss of RB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry compared to 13% of unselected HGSC controls (n=207; P = 0.001). Staining of adjacent tumor tissue revealed that RB1 loss was associated with increased numbers of PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (P = 0.015) and MHC class I on tumor cells (P = 0.002). In an independent HGSC cohort (n=847), RB1 protein loss was associated with prolonged survival (HR: 0.75, P < 0.001) compared to patients with RB1 positive tumors. Furthermore, co-occurrence of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and RB1 loss was associated with a significantly longer overall survival compared to patients with retained RB1 protein expression and no germline BRCA mutation (HR: 0.44, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study delineates the full landscape of genomic alterations in HGSC of long-term survivors. Our findings indicate that specific mutations might be associated with enhanced host immune responses and long-term survival. Citation Format: Dale W. Garsed, Ahwan Pandey, Sian Fereday, Kathryn Alsop, Maartje C. Wouters, Flurina Saner, Jessica A. Beach, Katy Milne, Catherine J. Kennedy, Joy Hendley, Nadia Traficante, Celeste L. Pearce, Malcolm C. Pike, Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group, Susan J. Ramus, Martin Köbel, Brad H. Nelson, Ellen L. Goode, Anna deFazio, David D. Bowtell. The genomic landscape of high-grade serous ovarian cancer in long-term survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2722.
Genetic Data from Nearly 63,000 Women of European Descent Predicts DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
Yang, Yaohua , Wu, Lang , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Lu, Yingchang , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Li, Bingshan , Ye, Fei , Banerjee, Susana , Benı́tez, Javier , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chen, Kexin , DeFazio, Anna , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana M., Edwards, Digna Velez, Fasching, Peter A. , Fortner, Renée T. , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Huntsman, David G. , Kar, Siddhartha , Kelemen, Linda E. , Koushik, Anita , Lambrechts, Diether , Le, Nhu D. , Levine, Douglas A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , May, Taymaa, McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Moorman, Patricia G. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Ness, Roberta B., Olsson, Håkan , Onland‐Moret, N. Charlotte , Park, Sue K. , Paul, James , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Ríboli, Elio , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Romieu, Isabelle, Sandler, Dale P. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Shan, Kang, Sieh, Weiva , Stampfer, Meir J. , Sutphen, Rebecca , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Szafron, Lukasz M. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Anna H. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Sellers, Thomas A. , Long, Jirong , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Chen, Kexin , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Brenton, James D , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Fazio, Anna de , Dennis, Joe , Fasching, Peter A , Fortner, Renée T , Giles, Graham G , Harris, Holly R , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , Koushik, Anita , McNeish, Iain A , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Nevanlinna, H , Park, Sue K , Paul, James , Ramus, Susan J , Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina , Sandler, Dale P , Szafron, Lukasz M , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Wolk, Alicja , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Eccles, Diana , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Benitez, Javier , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Riboli, Elio , Goodman, Marc T , Cai, Qiuyin , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Berchuck, Andrew , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Campbell, Ian , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Shan, Kang, Siddiqui, Nadeem , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , White, Emily , Willett, Walter C. , Wolk, Alicja , Li, Yan , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Yaohua

Cancer Research | December 17, 2018 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 505-517

10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2726 Get It

Abstract DNA methylation is instrumental for gene regulation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape have been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the role of DNA methylation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In this study, high-density genetic and DNA methylation data in white blood cells from the Framingham Heart Study (N = 1,595) were used to build genetic models to predict DNA methylation levels. These prediction models were then applied to the summary statistics of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer including 22,406 EOC cases and 40,941 controls to investigate genetically predicted DNA methylation levels in association with EOC risk. Among 62,938 CpG sites investigated, genetically predicted methylation levels at 89 CpG were significantly associated with EOC risk at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 7.94 × 10−7. Of them, 87 were located at GWAS-identified EOC susceptibility regions and two resided in a genomic region not previously reported to be associated with EOC risk. Integrative analyses of genetic, methylation, and gene expression data identified consistent directions of associations across 12 CpG, five genes, and EOC risk, suggesting that methylation at these 12 CpG may influence EOC risk by regulating expression of these five genes, namely MAPT, HOXB3, ABHD8, ARHGAP27, and SKAP1. We identified novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk and propose that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk via regulation of gene expression. Significance: Identification of novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk suggests that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk through regulation of gene expression.
A comprehensive gene–environment interaction analysis in Ovarian Cancer using genome‐wide significant common variants
Jensen, Allan , Wiensch, Ashley , Lee, Alice W. , Ness, Roberta B., Salvatore, Maxwell , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Whittemore, Alice S. , Sieh, Weiva , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Rossing, Mary Anne, Webb, Penelope M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Fortner, Renée T. , Menon, Usha , Gayther, Simon A. , Wu, Anna H. , Song, Honglin , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Thompson, Pamela J., Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Le, Nhu D. , Wentzensen, Nico, Trabert, Britton , Høgdall, Estrid , Huntsman, David G. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Salvatore, Maxwell , Anton-Culver, Hoda , Goode, Ellen L , Fortner, Renée T , Wu, Anna H. , Cramer, Daniel W , Modugno, Francesmary , Trabert, B , Pike, Malcolm C , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Menon, Usha , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Sieh, Weiva , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Goodman, Marc T , Kim, Sehee , Wang, Miao , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Liu, Gang , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Olson, Sara H. , Berchuck, Andrew , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Giles, Graham G. , Ziogas, Argyrios , Bandera, Elisa V. , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Milne, Roger L. , Winham, Stacey J. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Harris, Holly R. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Mukherjee, Bhramar

International Journal of Cancer | November 30, 2018 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2192-2205

10.1002/ijc.32029 Get It

As a follow‐up to genome‐wide association analysis of common variants associated with ovarian carcinoma (cancer), our study considers seven well‐known ovarian cancer risk factors and their interactions with 28 genome‐wide significant common genetic variants. The interaction analyses were based on data from 9971 ovarian cancer cases and 15,566 controls from 17 case–control studies. Likelihood ratio and Wald tests for multiplicative interaction and for relative excess risk due to additive interaction were used. The top multiplicative interaction was noted between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use (ever vs. never) and rs13255292 (p value = 3.48 × 10−4). Among women with the TT genotype for this variant, the odds ratio for OCP use was 0.53 (95% CI = 0.46–0.60) compared to 0.71 (95%CI = 0.66–0.77) for women with the CC genotype. When stratified by duration of OCP use, women with 1–5 years of OCP use exhibited differential protective benefit across genotypes. However, no interaction on either the multiplicative or additive scale was found to be statistically significant after multiple testing correction. The results suggest that OCP use may offer increased benefit for women who are carriers of the T allele in rs13255292. On the other hand, for women carrying the C allele in this variant, longer (5+ years) use of OCP may reduce the impact of carrying the risk allele of this SNP. Replication of this finding is needed. The study presents a comprehensive analytic framework for conducting gene–environment analysis in ovarian cancer.
rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology
Kelemen, Linda E. , Earp, Madalene A. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Group, On behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Ekici, Arif B. , Hein, Alexander , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Moysich, Kirsten, Cannioto, Rikki , Lele, Shashikant , Odunsi, Kunle , Goodman, Marc T. , Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Thompson, Pamela J., Dörk, Thilo , Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia , Hillemanns, Peter , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Harter, Philipp , Heitz, Florian , Schwaab, Ira, Edwards, Robert P., Kelley, Joseph L., Ness, Roberta B., Lester, Jenny, Oršulić, Sandra , Walsh, Christine M. , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Bruinsma, Fiona , Hildebrandt, Michelle, Liang, Dong , Lu, Karen H., Wu, Xifeng , Sellers, Thomas A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Iversen, Edwin S., Terry, Kathryn L. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Thomsen, Liv Vestrheim, Krakstad, Camilla , Tangen, Ingvild L. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Altena, Anne M. van , Bean, Yukie T., Kellar, Melissa, Le, Nhu D. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Brinton, Louise A. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Høgdall, Estrid , Engelholm, Svend Aage, Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte , Dicks, Ed , Song, Honglin , McNeish, Iain A. , Carty, Karen , Eccles, Diana , Whittemore, Alice S. , McGuire, Valerie , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Sieh, Weiva , Narod, Steven A., Phelan, Catherine, McLaughlin, John, Ziogas, Argyrios, Menon, Usha , Gayther, Simon A. , Ramus, Susan J. , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Lee, Alice W. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Podgórska, Agnieszka , Plisiecka-Hałasa, Joanna, Sawicki, Włodzimierz , Goode, Ellen L. , Berchuck, Andrew, Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Earp, Madalene, Hein, Alexander , Behrens, Sabine , Hillemanns, Peter , Nevanlinna, H , Kjaer, Susanne K , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M , Vierkant, Robert A , Bjorge, Line , Gronwald, Jacek , Brinton, Louise A , Pharoah, Paul D P , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , McNeish, Iain A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Ramus, Susan J , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Tworoger, Shelley S , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T , Fridley, Brooke L. , Group, On behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Doherty, Jennifer A. , Behrens, Sabine , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bois, Andreas du , Bützow, Ralf C. , Pelttari, Liisa M. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Modugno, Francesmary , Karlan, Beth Y. , Walsh, Christine, Kjær, Susanne K. , Giles, Graham G. , Southey, Melissa C. , Levine, Douglas A. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Bjørge, Line , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Cook, Linda S. , Gronwald, Jacek , Cybulski, Cezary , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Glasspool, Rosalind , Paul, James , Campbell, Ian , McLaughlin, John, Risch, Harvey A. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra

International Journal of Molecular Sciences | August 21, 2018 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2473

10.3390/ijms19092473 Get It

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3′ gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97–1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03–1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10−28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
Chronic Recreational Physical Inactivity and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Cannioto, Rikki , LaMonte, Michael J. , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Eng, Kevin H., Szender, J. Brian, Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Schmalfeldt, Barbara , Klapdor, R, Gower, Emily, Minlikeeva, Albina N. , Zirpoli, Gary , Edwards, Robert P., Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Hosono, Satoyo , Jensen, Allan , Jordan, Susan J. , Group, on behalf of The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Matsuo, Keitaro , Ness, Roberta B., Olsen, Catherine M. , Olson, Sara H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Pike, Malcolm C. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Szamreta, Elizabeth A. , Thompson, Pamela J., Tseng, Chiu-Chen , Vierkant, Robert A. , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Winham, Stacey J. , Wu, Anna H. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Hong, Chi‐Chen , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Group, on behalf of The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Winham, Stacey J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Moysich, Kirsten , Matsuo, Keitaro , Høgdall, Estrid , Zirpoli, Gary , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 7, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1114-1124

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1330 Get It

Abstract Background: Despite a large body of literature evaluating the association between recreational physical activity and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, the extant evidence is inconclusive, and little is known about the independent association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. We conducted a pooled analysis of nine studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to investigate the association between chronic recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. Methods: In accordance with the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, women reporting no regular, weekly recreational physical activity were classified as inactive. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to estimate the ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between inactivity and EOC risk overall and by subgroups based upon histotype, menopausal status, race, and body mass index. Results: The current analysis included data from 8,309 EOC patients and 12,612 controls. We observed a significant positive association between inactivity and EOC risk (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14–1.57), and similar associations were observed for each histotype. Conclusions: In this large pooled analysis examining the association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk, we observed consistent evidence of an association between chronic inactivity and all EOC histotypes. Impact: These data add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that inactivity is an independent risk factor for cancer. If the apparent association between inactivity and EOC risk is substantiated, additional work via targeted interventions should be pursued to characterize the dose of activity required to mitigate the risk of this highly fatal disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1114–24. ©2016 AACR.
Assessment of Multifactor Gene–Environment Interactions and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Candidate Genes, Obesity, and Hormone-Related Risk Factors
Usset, Joseph , McGuire, Valerie , Sieh, Weiva , Webb, Penelope M. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Brinton, Louise A. , Cunningham, Julie M. , DeFazio, Anna , Edwards, Robert P., Gayther, Simon A. , Goodman, Marc T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jensen, Allan , Johnatty, Sharon E., Lurie, Galina, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Ness, Roberta B., Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Song, Honglin , Thompson, Pamela J., Berg, David J. Van Den, Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Fazio, Anna de , Raghavan, Rama , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Rudolph, Anja , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Berchuck, Andrew , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Larson, Melissa C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Sieh, Weiva , Høgdall, Estrid , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 14, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 780-790

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1039 Get It

Abstract Background: Many epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk factors relate to hormone exposure and elevated estrogen levels are associated with obesity in postmenopausal women. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene–environment interactions related to hormone-related risk factors could differ between obese and non-obese women. Methods: We considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women. Interactions were assessed using logistic regression models and data from 14 case–control studies (6,247 cases; 10,379 controls). Histotype-specific analyses were also completed. Results: SNPs in the following candidate genes showed notable interaction: IGF1R (rs41497346, estrogen plus progesterone hormone therapy, histology = all, P = 4.9 × 10−6) and ESR1 (rs12661437, endometriosis, histology = all, P = 1.5 × 10−5). The most notable obesity–gene–hormone risk factor interaction was within INSR (rs113759408, parity, histology = endometrioid, P = 8.8 × 10−6). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of assessing multifactor interactions in large genetic epidemiology studies. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the robustness of our findings for ESR1, CYP11A1, IGF1R, CYP11B1, INSR, and IGFBP2. Future work is needed to develop powerful statistical methods able to detect these complex interactions. Impact: Assessment of multifactor interaction is feasible, and, here, suggests that the relationship between genetic variants within candidate genes and hormone-related risk factors may vary EOC susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 780–90. ©2016 AACR.
A targeted genetic association study of epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility
Earp, Madalene A. , Winham, Stacey J. , Sicotte, Hugues , Chien, Jeremy , Goodman, Marc T. , Levine, Douglas A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Ness, Roberta B., Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Rossing, Mary Anne, Tworoger, Shelley S. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise A. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Carney, Michael E. , Cunningham, Julie M. , Edwards, Robert P., Fogarty, Zachary C. , Iversen, Edwin S., Kraft, Peter , Le, Nhu D. , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lissowska, Jolanta , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Olson, Sara H. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Rider, David N., Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Vierkant, Robert A. , Vitonis, Allison F., Wu, Anna H. , Phelan, Catherine M., Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Chen, Y. Ann , Sellers, Thomas A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Earp, Madalene, Larson, Nicholas, Larson, Nicholas B. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Larson, Melissa C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Berg, David Van Den , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Fridley, Brooke L. , Winham, Stacey J , Tworoger, Shelley S , Vierkant, Robert A , Chien, Jeremey , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Kraft, Peter , Goodman, Marc T

Oncotarget | February 2, 2016 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 7381-7389

10.18632/oncotarget.7121 Get It

Investigation of Exomic Variants Associated with Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer
Winham, Stacey J. , Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Y. Ann , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Earp, Madalene A. , Goodman, Marc T. , Levine, Douglas A. , Menon, Usha , Ness, Roberta B., Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Rossing, Mary Anne, Wentzensen, Nicolas , Bean, Yukie T., Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise A. , Carney, Michael E. , Cunningham, Julie M. , DeFazio, Anna , Dicks, Ed , Edwards, Robert P., Gayther, Simon A. , Gore, Martin, Iversen, Edwin S., Jensen, Allan , Johnatty, Sharon E., Lester, Jenny, Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lubiński, Jan , Menkiszak, Janusz , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Song, Honglin , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Berg, David J. van den , Vierkant, Robert A. , Vitonis, Allison F., Walsh, Christine M. , Wu, Anna H. , Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M., Sellers, Thomas A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Webb, Penelope M. , Whiteman, David C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Bowtell, David D.L. , Ewing, Ailith , Fazio, Anna de , Larson, Melissa C. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Gronwald, Jacek , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Cybulski, Cezary , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Modugno, Francesmary , Orlow, Irene , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Berchuck, Andrew , Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Winham, Stacey J , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Menkiszak, Janusz , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Ewing, Ailith , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Whiteman, David C , Bowtell, David D , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 8, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 446-454

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0240 Get It

Abstract Background: While numerous susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been identified, few associations have been reported with overall survival. In the absence of common prognostic genetic markers, we hypothesize that rare coding variants may be associated with overall EOC survival and assessed their contribution in two exome-based genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Methods: The primary patient set (Set 1) included 14 independent EOC studies (4,293 patients) and 227,892 variants, and a secondary patient set (Set 2) included six additional EOC studies (1,744 patients) and 114,620 variants. Because power to detect rare variants individually is reduced, gene-level tests were conducted. Sets were analyzed separately at individual variants and by gene, and then combined with meta-analyses (73,203 variants and 13,163 genes overlapped). Results: No individual variant reached genome-wide statistical significance. A SNP previously implicated to be associated with EOC risk and, to a lesser extent, survival, rs8170, showed the strongest evidence of association with survival and similar effect size estimates across sets (Pmeta = 1.1E−6, HRSet1 = 1.17, HRSet2 = 1.14). Rare variants in ATG2B, an autophagy gene important for apoptosis, were significantly associated with survival after multiple testing correction (Pmeta = 1.1E−6; Pcorrected = 0.01). Conclusions: Common variant rs8170 and rare variants in ATG2B may be associated with EOC overall survival, although further study is needed. Impact: This study represents the first exome-wide association study of EOC survival to include rare variant analyses, and suggests that complementary single variant and gene-level analyses in large studies are needed to identify rare variants that warrant follow-up study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(3); 446–54. ©2016 AACR.
Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Ovarian Cancer Outcomes: Findings from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
Johnatty, Sharon E. , Kar, Siddhartha , Beesley, Jonathan, Lu, Yi , Gao, Bo , Fasching, Peter A. , Hein, Alexander , Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Lambrechts, Diether , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Ness, Roberta B., Moysich, Kirsten B., Levine, Douglas A. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Lubiński, Jan , Jakubowska, Anna , Brinton, Louise A. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Song, Honglin , Rhenius, Valerie , Campbell, Ian , Eccles, Diana , Sieh, Weiva , Whittemore, Alice S. , McGuire, Valerie , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Sutphen, Rebecca , Gayther, Simon A. , Menon, Usha , Ramus, Susan J. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C. , Wu, Anna H. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Goodman, Marc T. , Carney, Michael E., Thompson, Pamela J., Heitz, Florian , Schwaab, Ira, Harter, Philipp , Pisterer, Jacobus, Hillemanns, Peter , Group, on behalf of the AGO Study, Walsh, Christine M. , Lester, Jenny, Oršulić, Sandra , Winham, Stacey J. , Earp, Madalene A. , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Iversen, Edwin S., Terry, Kathryn L. , Orlow, Irene , Bean, Yukie T., Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, McNeish, Iain A. , Paul, James, Carty, Karen , Glasspool, Rosalind , Sellers, Thomas , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Chiew, Yoke-Eng , MacGregor, Stuart , Goode, Ellen L. , DeFazio, Anna , Webb, Penelope M. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Lambrechts, Diether , Earp, Madalene, Fazio, Anna de , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Beesley, Jonathan, Doherty, Jennifer A. , Modugno, Francesmary , Gronwald, Jacek , Cybulski, Cezary , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Stram, Daniel O. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bois, Andreas du , Group, on behalf of the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y. , Lester, Jenny, Larson, Melissa C. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Berchuck, Andrew , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Winham, Stacey J , Lambrechts, Diether , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Glasspool, Rosalind , Kennedy, Catherine J , Fogarty, Zachary C , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Lu, Yi , MacGregor, Stuart , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Clinical Cancer Research | July 7, 2015 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 5264-5276

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0632 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with ≥4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 1.0 × 10−5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11-284F21.8, respectively (P ≤ 7.1 × 10−6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≤6 × 10−3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novel EOC therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5264–76. ©2015 AACR.
Abstract 2167: Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium
Weiderpass, Elisabete , Adami, Hans‐Olov , Anderson, Kristin E. , Cai, Hui , Clendenen, Tess V. , Felix, Ashley S. , Goodman, Marc T. , Liang, Xiaolin , Lissowska, Jolanta , Magliocco, Anthony M., McCann, Susan E. , Moysich, Kristen B., Pike, Malcolm C. , Shu, Xiao Ou , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Anne , Brinton, Louise A. , Yang, Hannah , Cook, Linda S. , Cerhan, James R. , Friedenreich, Christine M , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Lu, Lingeng , Olson, Sara H. , Polidoro, Silvia , Ricceri, Fulvio , Risch, Harvey A. , Sacerdote, Carlotta , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Trabert, Britton , Webb, Penelope M. , Xiang, Yong‐Bing , Xu, Y. , Yu, Kai , Weiderpass, Elisabete , Lissowska, Jolanta , Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Research | May 1, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 2167-2167

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2167 Get It

Abstract Background: Nulliparity is an established endometrial cancer risk factor, but whether this association is related to infertility is unclear. Although there are many underlying causes of infertility, few studies have assessed risk relationships according to specific causes. Despite concerns that most treatments induce ovulation and that the endometrium is highly hormonally-responsive, previous studies have provided conflicting results on treatment associations. Methods: To address these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of 8,151 cases and12,471 controls from 2 cohort and 12 case-control studies conducted in 1982 to 2009 (N. America, Europe, Australia, Asia). All studies provided self-reported infertility, causes and treatments, except for 1 study that relied on data from national registries. Study-specific exposures and covariate data were harmonized across studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for study, age, interview year, race, parity, oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone use, and body mass index. If data were not reported for a particular variable, that study was excluded from the variable-specific analysis. Results: Nulliparous women had an elevated endometrial cancer risk compared with parous women (adjusted OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.58-1.90).Women with self-reported infertility also had an increased risk (adjusted OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.13-1.32) compared with those without infertility issues, even after adjusting for parity; the strongest associations was seen among studies that defined infertility as unsuccessfully trying to conceive for 2+ years (adjusted OR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). Infertility was associated with similar risks among nulliparous (1.22; 1.10-1.48) and parous (1.22; 1.12-1.34) women, although there was no increased risk associated with infertility among those who had given birth to 3+ children. Two infertility causes associated with risk elevation were endometriosis (adjusted OR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.46-2.95 compared with women no infertility problems) and anovulation (adjusted OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.16-1.70). Based on relatively small numbers, none of the individual treatments (in vitro fertilization, selective estrogen response modulators, gonatropins, progestins, estrogens) were substantially related to risk. Conclusion: Based on mainly self-reported infertility data, we found that parity and infertility independently contribute to endometrial cancer risk, with parity seemingly being the predominant risk predictor. Understanding residual endometrial cancer relationships related to causes of infertility and infertility treatment may benefit from documented medical information on causes of infertility and treatment parameters. Citation Format: Hannah P. Yang, Linda S. Cook, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans-Olov Adami, Kristin E. Anderson, Hui Cai, James R. Cerhan, Tess Clendenen, Ashley S. Felix, Christine Friedenreich, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Marc T. Goodman, Xiaolin Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Lingeng Lu, Anthony M. Magliocco, Susan E. McCann, Kristen B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Malcolm C. Pike, Silvia Polidoro, Fulvio Ricceri, Harvey Risch, Carlotta Sacerdote, V. Wendy Setiawan, Xiao Ou Shu, Amanda B. Spurdle, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Youming Xu, Herbert Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Louise A. Brinton. Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2167. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2167