Lu, Yi

Background Suicidal behaviour shows notable sex differences, and understanding whether genetic factors contribute to these differences is critical for identifying at-risk individuals and prevention. Objective We aim to investigate the genetic contribution to suicide attempts and examine whether genetics account for sex differences in incidence. Methods This population-based cohort study includes 3.1 million individuals born 1963–1998 and followed through Swedish National Registers, including hospitals and specialist outpatient diagnoses and cause of death data. Suicide attempts were identified using ICD codes, indicating intentional self-harm, self-harm using lethal methods or leading to hospitalisation, or resulting in death. Familial aggregation, coaggregation, pedigree heritability and genetic correlations were estimated using genealogical data. For sex-specific analyses, we examined mother–daughter, female sibling, father–son and male sibling pairs, separately. Findings Suicide attempts were more common among females than males (3.3% vs 2.6%). In both sexes, risk aggregated within families (ORs ranged 1.6–3.4 across relative types) and was higher in first-degree than second-degree relatives. Familial aggregation was stronger in females than in males, and in same-sex first degree relatives compared with cross-sex pairs. Pedigree heritability was 41.9% (95% CI 36.0 to 48.4%) and did not differ significantly by sex (female 51.4% (95% CI 40.1% to 58.6%), male 45.1% (95% CI 32.3% to 52.5%), Bootstrap p value 0.40). Suicide attempt showed moderate to high pedigree genetic correlations with psychiatric disorders, strongest with substance use disorders (SUD, r g =0.85 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96)), with no significant sex differences. The genetic correlation between female and male suicide attempts was high (0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99)), suggesting a substantial genetic overlap. Conclusions Suicide attempt has a moderate heritable component that largely overlaps between females and males and with other psychiatric disorders, particularly SUD. Stronger familial aggregation in females and in same-sex pairs highlights the potential role of sex-specific environmental or social factors. Future research should focus on non-genetic contributors and their potential interaction with genetic factors to better understand and address sex disparities in suicidal behaviour Clinical implications Genetic risk for suicide attempt is substantial but does not fully explain sex differences in incidence. Clinicians should, therefore, consider non-genetic, including sex-specific environmental and social factors, alongside family history and psychiatric comorbidity when assessing suicidal risk.

Objective To provide a comprehensive analysis of initial suicide attempts, covering incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and healthcare use in the month before and the month after the attempts. Design Comprehensive analysis of the Swedish population that included three designs: a retrospective cohort study to investigate incidence and healthcare use, a nested case-control study to investigate risk factors, and a matched cohort study to examine subsequent suicide attempts and mortality. Setting Comprehensive Swedish national registers that include patient diagnoses from hospitals and specialist outpatient care, and cause of death information updated to the end of 2019. Participants 3.7 million people born in Sweden in 1963-98 and followed from age 10 to 57 years. Main outcome measure First lifetime suicide attempt identified in patient and death registers using ICD (international classification of diseases) codes for intentional self-harm, any self-harm with lethal methods or requiring hospital admission, or any self-harm resulting in death. Results The lifetime risk of an initial suicide attempt in the study population was 4.6%, with greater risk in females and highest risk between ages 18 and 24. One in 10 families in Sweden had at least one family member who attempted suicide. Overdose and poisoning were the most common methods. Previous psychiatric disorders, general medical diseases, and adverse life events were associated with increased risk of initial suicide attempt, while higher socioeconomic status was associated with decreased risk. People with an initial suicide attempt were at substantially increased risk of subsequent attempts (hazard ratio 23.4), death by suicide (16.4), and all cause mortality (7.3). At least 60% of those who made an initial suicide attempt had a healthcare contact in the month before the attempt. Conclusions This study provides comprehensive data on the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and healthcare use of initial suicide attempts in the Swedish population, highlighting the need for systematic prevention efforts for people who have attempted suicide for the first time.

Abstract Background: Many loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance. Methods: We carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Results: We found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10–8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15–1.34; P = 1.47 × 10–8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro. Conclusions: The locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association. Impact: This finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options. See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604

Abstract Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with ≥4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 1.0 × 10−5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11-284F21.8, respectively (P ≤ 7.1 × 10−6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≤6 × 10−3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novel EOC therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5264–76. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Primary and acquired chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that heritable polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Through the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we have collected detailed clinical data from a large number of ovarian cancer patients. We have conducted association analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for 2,901 European women with ovarian carcinoma for ∼8 million imputed SNPs with minor allele frequency ≥ 0.02 and good imputation quality (imputation r2 ≥ 0.3) from the iCOGS experiment (Pharoah et al Nat Genet. 2013). Cox regression models adjusted for known prognostic factors were used to assess the log-additive effects of SNPs on PFS and OS in 2,825 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and received any chemotherapy (‘all chemo’) and in the subset of 1,098 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery followed by ≥ 4 cycles of carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 or 135 mg/m2 intravenously (‘standard chemo’). We identified five SNPs at four loci that were significantly associated with outcome (p ≤ 10-7) in at least one of four analyses (Table). Analysis of expression data for genes within a 1Mb region flanking each lead SNP indicates significant associations between nearby genes and ovarian cancer survival. Of particular interest is the heat shock protein crystalline αB (CRYAB) at 11q23.1. We have also identified significant associations with KIAA1598 and RAVER2. Further analysis of these loci in a larger genotyped sample is necessary to definitively identify SNP(s) associated with outcome. Our study adds to the growing evidence that genetic variants are associated with ovarian cancer prognosis. Table: SNPs associated with ovarian cancer outcome and gene expression Overall Survival (P)*Progression-Free Survival (P)*Lead SNPChromosome LocusImputation R²Expression AnalysisAll chemoStandard chemoAll chemoStandard chemors1429768671p31.30.742.14E-0512.69E-044.68E-055.11E-073.64E-09rs559375217q32.30.600.198.58E-082.32E-052.80E-031.85E-03rs7885346210q26.110.602.23E-0724.57E-036.57E-081.65E-016.85E-03rs1089121911q23.10.841.53E-0531.51E-059.50E-081.50E-042.32E-04rs3579103211q23.10.811.53E-0531.66E-055.88E-086.46E-051.87E-04*P-values are adjusted for known confounders of ovarian cancer outcomes; FIGO stage, grade, histology, residual disease, and additionally for age at diagnosis for OS.1 RAVER2; 2 KIAA1598; 3 CRYAB Citation Format: Sharon E. Johnatty, Jonathan Tyrer, Jonathan Beesley, Bo Gao, Yi Lu, Stuart MacGregor, Anna deFazio, Paul Pharoah, Ellen Goode, Georgia Chenevix-Trench. Identification of genetic loci associated with ovarian cancer prognosis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3286

Abstract We performed a multi-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) for drug response in ovarian cancer. We selected 313 chemotherapy treated patients from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS). Patients were treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin and the trait of interest was Progression Free Survival (PFS). We maximized power for a fixed genotyping budget by genotyping individuals from the tails of the distribution: 94 with good survival and 94 with poor survival, taking into account extent of residual disease following surgery. Patients were genotyped on Illumina HumanOmni1-Quad arrays (1140419 loci).Two further cohorts with measures of PFS and whole genome data available; 134 ovarian patients from the Mayo clinic (genotyped on Illumina HumanHap 610 arrays, 620901 loci) and 68 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer set (genotyped on Illumina Human1M arrays, 1199187 loci) were meta-analyzed with the AOCS set (stage 1). We have imputed all the stage 1 samples with reference of the 1000 Genome data to allow more direct comparison of SNPs not common to all of the arrays used (up to 6 million SNPs with good imputation quality). Based on the chemotherapy treatment received by each patient, we assigned the patients into primary and secondary analysis, with primary analysis using a more strictly defined treatment subgroup. We followed up the stage 1 findings by genotyping 26 SNPs in more than 3,000 samples collected from 8 study sites of Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). These 26 SNPs were mainly genotyped SNPs, chosen from 23 distinct regions showing the strongest association with chemotherapy response from either primary or secondary analysis. 2 SNPs showed nominal significance in the replication sample (chr 12: rs1861932, chr 22: rs708444). We are currently genotyping more regions to seek replication of the initial findings. In summary, we sought to identify genes that underlie individual differences in chemoresistance. In the future, typing variations in these genes will be important for personalizing drug regimes for patients. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4679. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4679

Abstract Purpose: Cell-based approaches were used to identify genetic markers predictive of patients' risk for poor response prior to chemotherapy. Experimental Design: We conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with cellular sensitivity to carboplatin through their effects on mRNA expression using International HapMap lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) and replicated them in additional LCLs. SNPs passing both stages of the cell-based study were tested for association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients. Phase 1 validation was based on 377 ovarian cancer patients receiving at least four cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS). Positive associations were then assessed in phase 2 validation analysis of 1,326 patients from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Results: In the initial GWAS, 342 SNPs were associated with carboplatin-induced cytotoxicity, of which 18 unique SNPs were retained after assessing their association with gene expression. One SNP (rs1649942) was replicated in an independent LCL set (Bonferroni adjusted P < 0.05). It was found to be significantly associated with decreased PFS in phase 1 AOCS patients (Pper-allele = 2 × 10−2), with a stronger effect in the subset of women with optimally debulked tumors (Pper-allele = 4 × 10−3). rs1649942 was also associated with poorer overall survival in women with optimally debulked tumors (Pper-allele = 9 × 10−3). However, this SNP was not significant in phase 2 validation analysis with patients from numerous cohorts. Conclusion: This study shows the potential of cell-based, genome-wide approaches to identify germline predictors of treatment outcome and highlights the need for extensive validation in patients to assess their clinical effect. Clin Cancer Res; 17(16); 5490–500. ©2011 AACR.