Citations

Abstract Introduction Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) identifies a hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), characterized by elevated resting left ventricular (LV) elastance (force = systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume). To evaluate the prognostic significance and functional correlates of HP. Methods In a prospective multicentre study, 10 677 patients with CCS underwent resting TTE to assess LV ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume, and force by quantitative volumetric echocardiography. All patients were followed for the endpoint of all-cause mortality. In a subset of 5834 patients, stress echocardiography (exercise or dobutamine) was performed for LV contractile reserve and heart rate reserve. Results Patients were stratified into Force quintiles (Q1–Q5). Patients with hypercontractile phenotype exhibited lower stroke volume at rest (Q5 = 34.8 ± 12.3 vs Q1–Q4 = 57.4 ± 19.1 mL; P < .01) and higher EF at rest (Q5 = 64.8 ± 6.9% vs Q1–Q4 = 58.1 ± 8.7%, P < .01). During a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range = 12–40 months), 509 deaths occurred. The exposure-adjusted death rate was lowest in Q3 (3.53–4.51 mmHg/mL; 1.03 per 100 person/years) and higher in Q1 (≤2.62 mmHg/mL, 2.88), Q2 (2.63–3.52 mmHg/mL, 1.86), Q4 (4.52–6.11 mmHg/mL, 1.56), and Q5 (HP, >6.11 mmHg/mL; 1.88; P < .0001 vs Q1 and Q3). Multivariable analysis identified HP (Q5; HR 1.531 vs Q3, 95% CI 1.116–2.099; P = .006) and EF (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.953–0.972; P < .0001) as independent predictors of death. During exercise or dobutamine stress, HP showed reduced LV contractile reserve (ΔEF: Q5 = 4.3 ± 9.4% vs Q1–Q4 = 7.0 ± 9.3%; P < .001) and blunted heart rate reserve (Q5 = 1.77 ± 0.33 vs Q1–Q4 = 1.85 ± 0.39; P < .01). All patients with force-based LV contractile reserve >4.1 (present in 185, 3.2% of the population) survived. Conclusion Patients with CCS with HP assessed by resting TTE demonstrate higher mortality and multilayered functional impairment, including reduced LV contractile and chronotropic reserves. Hypercontractile phenotype improved the prediction of mortality by EF. A ‘stronger’ heart is, in fact, functionally and prognostically weaker.

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is recommended in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) when resting echocardiographic findings and symptoms do not align. However, the role of MR assessment in patients undergoing ESE for any indication remains uncertain. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the assessment of MR during ESE provides prognostic value beyond the evaluation of inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in patients undergoing ESE for any clinical indication, including suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Data were analyzed from a large multicenter and multinational prospective study. Current analysis included patients who underwent ESE for any indication and had MR (from 0= absent, to 3= severe) assessed at rest and peak exercise with an integrated qualitative, semi-quantitative, and (in selected cases) quantitative assessment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Of 1,351 included patients (age 56±16 years; 66% women; 30% with known CAD). MR score increased during exercise (rest=0.74±0.7 vs. peak=0.89±0.8, p<0.001), with severe MR present in 2% of patients at rest and 7% at peak ESE. Patients with severe MR during exercise (n=96, Group 1) compared to those with non-severe MR during exercise (n=1255, Group 2) showed more B-lines, lower left ventricular contractile and chronotropic reserve, and trend (p=0.09) to more frequent decrease in ejection fraction during ESE (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 1.0–6.9), 99 patients (7%) had died. Severe MR at rest was associated with increased mortality (log-rank p<0.001). Patients with severe MR at peak ESE had a higher risk of death compared to the other patients (log-rank p 0.035) (Figure 1). After adjusting for age, CAD, and inducible RWMA, severe MR with exercise remained strongly associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted-HR: 2.2, 95%CI 1.3-3.8, p=0.002). Similar results were seen with further adjustment for rest MR severity (adjusted-HR:1.9, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.004). Conclusion Patients, with and without CAD, with severe MR during ESE have greater functional impairment expressed by more pulmonary congestion, blunted heart rate reserve, and lower left ventricular contractile reserve. The assessment of MR during ESE provides significant prognostic information, independent of resting RWMA or inducible ischemia. Incorporating MR evaluation into routine ESE protocols may improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.Fig 1 Survival by MR at peak exercise Table 1

Abstract Background Inducible ST-segment depression during stress echocardiography (SE) is associated with a higher risk in patients with inducible regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA). Objective To assess ST segment elevation's prevalence and functional correlates during SE. Methods ECG response was analyzed in 1712 patients (age 63±12 years; 1011 men, 59%) undergoing SE for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) prospectively recruited at 39 laboratories. Among the patients analyzed, 1286 (75%) performed SE with exercise, 306 (18%) with dobutamine and 120 (7%) with a vasodilator. ECG response was considered abnormal in case of ST-segment shift >1.0 mm from baseline at 80 ms from the J point developed in ≥2 contiguous leads during SE. The stress to rest (∆) change in the wall motion score index (WMSI) was assessed in all patients. Coronary angiography was available in 765 patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were the outcome measure in 746 patients with follow-up information. Results No significant ST segment shift was observed in 1000 patients (58%, Group 1), ST-segment depression occurred in 609 patients (35.5%, Group 2), and ST-segment elevation in 103 patients (6%, Group 3). ST-segment elevation occurred in 66/1286 patients (5.2%) with exercise, 30/306 with dobutamine (10%), and 7/120 with vasodilators (6%, p = ns vs. exercise and p<0.01 vs. dobutamine). The prevalence of stress-induced RMWA was higher in Group 2 (38.1%) compared to Group 3 (33%) and Group 1 (11.9%. P< 0.001 vs. Groups 2 and 3); however, the ΔWMSI was more pronounced in Group 3 compared to Group 2 and Group 1 (p = ns vs. Group 2 and p<0.001 vs. Group 1). (Figure, left panel). Non-significant CAD (defined as coronary stenosis <50% on coronary angiography) was more prevalent in Group 1 (36%) and 3 (40%) compared to Group 2 (17.5%, p<0.01 vs. Group 1 and 3). . During a median follow-up of 387 days (IQ range 314-603 days), 150 events occurred in 112 patients: 14 all-cause deaths, 39 acute myocardial infarctions, 19 atrial fibrillations, 34 late coronary revascularizations, and 44 acute heart failure hospitalizations. The exposure-adjusted event rate was the lowest in Group 1 compared to Groups 2 and 3 (Figure, right panel). Conclusion In all-comers with CCS, the electrocardiographic pattern of ST-segment elevation is not rare, more frequent with dobutamine, associated with more stress-to-rest change in RWMA and more events despite less extensive underlying anatomic CAD. The paradox of more ischemia with less coronary stenosis is consistent with a coronary vasospastic origin as an important yet frequently overlooked cause of stress-induced ST segment elevation.Figure

Abstract Background Obese patients often exhibit a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors and are frequently referred for noninvasive cardiac imaging. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) represents an early indicator of cardiovascular disease that can be noninvasively diagnosed using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements obtained during stress echocardiography (SE) in patients without evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of CFVR in overweight and obese patients within a prospective multicenter cohort. Methods 2273 patients (mean age 65 ± 11 years; 51% women) classified as overweight or obese (for definition see Table) were included in 27 sites from 11 countries. All patients had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (EF ≥ 50%), no prior history of CAD, and underwent exercise or pharmacological SE, which was negative for inducible ischemia. CFVR of the left anterior descending coronary artery was assessed, with CMD defined as CFVR >2.0. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (Group 1) or absence (Group 2) of CMD. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Results CMD was identified in 492 patients (22%), with a mean CFVR of 2.3 ± 0.5 across the study population. Group 1 patients (CMD) were older, with a greater prevalence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome compared to group 2 (no CMD) (Table). During a median follow-up period of 2.1 years (IQR: 1.2-3.7 years), 103 patients (5%) died. Patients with CMD had significantly worse late survival compared to those without CMD (3-year survival: 96 ± 1% vs. 96 ± 1%, p=ns; 6-year survival: 79 ± 4% vs. 93 ± 1%, p < 0.0001): see Figure. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, EF, body mass index, smoking habits, diabetes, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, and type of stress confirmed CMD as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.1–2.8], p = 0.01). Conclusions CMD, assessed via CFVR during SE, was a robust and independent prognostic marker of long-term mortality in obese patients with preserved EF and no evidence of inducible ischemia. These findings underscore the pivotal role of noninvasive assessment of CMD in refining risk stratification and guiding clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.

Abstract Background Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of coronary artery disease (CAD), often occurring after myocardial infarction (MI). Even when moderate in severity, IMR is associated with adverse outcomes, including a twofold increase in mortality rates. Aim To assess the functional correlates of resting IMR during stress echocardiography (SE) in patients with CAD. Methods This prospective multicenter study included 192 patients with CAD (143 males; mean age 65 ± 10 years) from eight cardiology institutions. Exclusion criteria included a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, more than moderate IMR, and other significant valvular diseases. Patients were divided into two groups based on semiquantitative- quantitative assessment at rest based on EACVI-ASE criteria: Group 1: Patients with moderate IMR, Group 2: Patients without IMR or with trivial IMR. All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE) using the ABCE protocol. Patients underwent exercise tests, if execise echocardiography was not possible, dobutamine stress tests were performed. At rest and peak SE, we assessed: Left atrial volume index (LAVi), Left ventricular end-diastolic (LV EDV) and end-systolic volumes (LV ESV), ejection fraction (EF), wall motion score index (WMSI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), B-lines (4-site simplified scan), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), LV contractile reserve (LVCR) and heart rate reserve (HRR). Results Despite similar EF at rest, Group 1 patients showed more pronounced functional impairment at rest, which increased during stress. Stress-induced functional worsening affected indices of MR (more frequently becoming severe), ischemic burden (WMSI), diastolic function (LAVI and LVEDV dilation), LV systolic function (LVCR), pulmonary congestion (B-lines), cardiac sympathetic reserve (reduced HRR) and right ventricular/pulmonary artery coupling (reduced TAPSE/SPAP): table 1. Conclusion Compared to CAD patients with absent-to-trivial resting IMR, patients with moderate IMR at rest show a constellation of functional vulnerabilities during SE involving more frequent exercise-induced worsening of MR, blunted LV diastolic and systolic reserve, more pulmonary congestion, impaired cardiac autonomic reserve, and worse right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling. The individual patient's functional response heterogeneity can be identified with comprehensive exercise SE, possibly a roadmap to personalized and targeted therapeutic interventions.

Importance The choice of induction agent during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of critically ill adults may affect clinical outcomes. Although ketamine and etomidate are frequently used for RSI, their comparative effectiveness remains controversial. Objective To compare the safety of etomidate vs ketamine for emergency RSI in critically ill adults. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used a target trial emulation with observational data collected between March 1, 2022, and April 30, 2024, from 18 emergency departments across Brazil, with data from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation. Adults who underwent RSI and received either etomidate or ketamine as a sole hypnotic agent were included; those with preintubation cardiac arrest or immediate postintubation transfer were excluded. Exposure Administration of etomidate or ketamine as the induction agent for RSI. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 7-day in-hospital mortality, first-attempt intubation success, and major adverse events (new hemodynamic instability, severe hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest) within 30 minutes after intubation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% CIs were used to compare outcomes between groups. Results Among 1810 patients (median age, 64 years [IQR, 50-74 years]; 1048 men [57.9%]), 514 received ketamine and 1296 received etomidate. The median shock index was higher in the ketamine group than the etomidate group (0.81 [IQR, 0.65-1.01] vs 0.76 [IQR, 0.59-0.99]), and preintubation vasopressor use was more common in the ketamine group than the etomidate group (191 of 514 [37.2%] vs 391 of 1296 [30.2%]). Weighted 28-day mortality was higher with etomidate than ketamine (60.5% [95% CI, 57.2%-63.8%] vs 54.4% [95% CI, 45.0%-63.9%]; RR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.27]; RD, 7.6% [95% CI, 2.0%-13.3%]). Seven-day mortality was also higher with etomidate than ketamine (35.2% [95% CI, 32.0%-38.3%] vs 30.1% [95% CI, 23.5%-36.7%]; RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]). New hemodynamic instability within 30 minutes after intubation was more frequent with ketamine (24.2% [95% CI, 20.4%-28.0%] vs 18.9% [95% CI, 16.7%-21.0%]; RR, 0.78 [0.64-0.95]). There were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of critically ill adults undergoing RSI, etomidate use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality at 7 and 28 days compared with ketamine. These findings highlight the need for definitive randomized clinical trials to compare both agents.

Abstract Background Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is increasingly recognized in clinical practice but effective therapy is difficult to apply due to the heterogeneity of pathophysiological substrates: structural coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), functional (vasospastic) CMD, epicardial artery vasospasm, non-cardiac chest pain. Current guidelines recommend invasive coronary function testing with inherent limitations in cost, risk, and access. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a step-wise, multi-marker, multi-stress assessment of ANOCA patients by stress echocardiography (SE). Methods In an observational, prospective, multicenter, international study, we enrolled 1146 ANOCA patients (age =65.6±11.6years, 636 men, 55, %). All patients underwent a vasodilator SE (adenosine or dipyridamole) with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery (LAD). In a subset of patients with a normal CFVR and strong clinical suspicion for vasospasm, a hyperventilation (HYPER) test (30 deep breaths/min for 5 min) was performed, followed by semi-supine exercise (EX) if negative. Positivity criteria were stress-specific: CFVR < 2.0 for vasodilators; coronary flow velocity (CFV) reduction ≤ 10% from baseline with HYPER; inducible RWMA 2.for HYPER and HYPER-EX Results Of the 1146 patients, 244 (21%) showed abnormal CFVR i.e. structural CMD (Figure 1). In the subset of 68 patients with normal vasodilator CFVR , entering a strategy of sequential stepwise approach, 40 pts underwent HYPER showing a paradoxical vasoconstrictor response despite the increase in the double product (59 %), with RWMA in 11 (16%). Of the remaining patients with normal CFVR and normal response to HYPER, 28 underwent HYPER-EX showing inducible RWMA in 7 (10%) patients. The remaining 21 patients (31%) showed all 3 tests normal: see figure 2. Conclusion In patients with ANOCA, a stepwise multi-marker (CFVR and RWMA) and multi-stress (vasodilators, HYPER, and EX) SE identifies 4 distinct phenotypes and actionable therapeutic targets: structural CMD (reduced CFVR with vasodilator); functional vasospastic CMD (paradoxical decrease of CFV with HYPER), epicardial artery vasospasm (inducible RWMA with HYPER or HYPER-EX); non-cardiac chest pain with normal response all tests and all markers. Our research emphasizes the usefulness of versatile, patient-tailored noninvasive testing in patients with ANOCA to unmask the functional heterogeneity of the endotypes underlying the same phenotype. Figures: 1. Overall population of ANOCA (N=1146)-vasodilator CFVR 2. Pilot study in ANOCA with CFVR>2.0 (N=68)Overall population of ANOCA (N=1146) Pilot study in ANOCA with CFVR>2.0

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B-lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, EKG-based heart rate reserve. Aim to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, international, effectiveness study. Methods From July 2016 to November 2024, we enrolled 7896 all-comers (age 65±11 years, 4742 [60.0%] males, ejection fraction 59±10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) referred from 27 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE, with ACE in all patients, step D in 6286, step B in 5951 and all 5 steps in 5918 pts. The employed stress modality was exercise (n=2407) or pharmacological stress (n=5489; with vasodilator, n=4503; or dobutamine, n=986). Each step was scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severely abnormal) following EACVI recommendations 2024. SE response ranged from a score of 0 (all steps normal) to a score of 15 (all steps severely abnormal). All-cause death was the only end-point. Results During a median follow-up of 685 days (interquartile range: 387-1227), 370 deaths occurred. Step A negativity was associated with a 1.5% annual mortality. Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% persons/year for score 0 (n=958, 12.1%) up to 6.19% person/year for score ≥10 (n=346, 4.3%). (Figure). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.008, 95% interquartile range [IQ]: 1.006-1.010, p<0.001), diabetes (HR 1.564, 95% CI: 1.263-1.936, p<0.001), resting ejection fraction (HR 0.983, 95% CI: 0.974-0.993, p=0.001), and ABCDE score 3-5 (HR 3.111, 95% CI 1.597-6.060, p=0.001), score 6-9 (HR 5.442, 95% CI 2.761-10.729, p<0.001), and score ≥10 (HR 8.826, CI 4.197-18.654, p<0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion In patients with known or suspected CCS, SE negativity by simple wall motion criterion is unable to identify a low-risk group. ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival.Figure

Abstract Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of near normal, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance (also known as force) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. 680 patients finished follow-up with a composite end-point of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Patients were divided into three groups: low force (< 25th percentile, Group 1, < 3.24 mmHg/ml), intermediate force (≥ 25th percentile and ≤ 75 thpercentile, Group 2, 3.24-5.48 mmHg/ml), and high force (> 75 th percentile, Group 3, >5.48 mmHg/ml). Results The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, ESV, SV, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 16 months, 205 MACEs occurred in 138 patients. Cumulative MACEs rate was lowest in group 2 (14.7% person-year), higher in group 1 (16.1% person-year) and 3 (22.9% person-year, log rank p = 0.036). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with larger LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. The hypercontractile and hypocontractile phenotypes are associated with a higher risk of subsequent events.