Saad, A S Ariel

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is recommended in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) when resting echocardiographic findings and symptoms do not align. However, the role of MR assessment in patients undergoing ESE for any indication remains uncertain. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the assessment of MR during ESE provides prognostic value beyond the evaluation of inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in patients undergoing ESE for any clinical indication, including suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Data were analyzed from a large multicenter and multinational prospective study. Current analysis included patients who underwent ESE for any indication and had MR (from 0= absent, to 3= severe) assessed at rest and peak exercise with an integrated qualitative, semi-quantitative, and (in selected cases) quantitative assessment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Of 1,351 included patients (age 56±16 years; 66% women; 30% with known CAD). MR score increased during exercise (rest=0.74±0.7 vs. peak=0.89±0.8, p<0.001), with severe MR present in 2% of patients at rest and 7% at peak ESE. Patients with severe MR during exercise (n=96, Group 1) compared to those with non-severe MR during exercise (n=1255, Group 2) showed more B-lines, lower left ventricular contractile and chronotropic reserve, and trend (p=0.09) to more frequent decrease in ejection fraction during ESE (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 1.0–6.9), 99 patients (7%) had died. Severe MR at rest was associated with increased mortality (log-rank p<0.001). Patients with severe MR at peak ESE had a higher risk of death compared to the other patients (log-rank p 0.035) (Figure 1). After adjusting for age, CAD, and inducible RWMA, severe MR with exercise remained strongly associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted-HR: 2.2, 95%CI 1.3-3.8, p=0.002). Similar results were seen with further adjustment for rest MR severity (adjusted-HR:1.9, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.004). Conclusion Patients, with and without CAD, with severe MR during ESE have greater functional impairment expressed by more pulmonary congestion, blunted heart rate reserve, and lower left ventricular contractile reserve. The assessment of MR during ESE provides significant prognostic information, independent of resting RWMA or inducible ischemia. Incorporating MR evaluation into routine ESE protocols may improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.Fig 1 Survival by MR at peak exercise Table 1

Abstract Background Inducible ST-segment depression during stress echocardiography (SE) is associated with a higher risk in patients with inducible regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA). Objective To assess ST segment elevation's prevalence and functional correlates during SE. Methods ECG response was analyzed in 1712 patients (age 63±12 years; 1011 men, 59%) undergoing SE for chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) prospectively recruited at 39 laboratories. Among the patients analyzed, 1286 (75%) performed SE with exercise, 306 (18%) with dobutamine and 120 (7%) with a vasodilator. ECG response was considered abnormal in case of ST-segment shift >1.0 mm from baseline at 80 ms from the J point developed in ≥2 contiguous leads during SE. The stress to rest (∆) change in the wall motion score index (WMSI) was assessed in all patients. Coronary angiography was available in 765 patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were the outcome measure in 746 patients with follow-up information. Results No significant ST segment shift was observed in 1000 patients (58%, Group 1), ST-segment depression occurred in 609 patients (35.5%, Group 2), and ST-segment elevation in 103 patients (6%, Group 3). ST-segment elevation occurred in 66/1286 patients (5.2%) with exercise, 30/306 with dobutamine (10%), and 7/120 with vasodilators (6%, p = ns vs. exercise and p<0.01 vs. dobutamine). The prevalence of stress-induced RMWA was higher in Group 2 (38.1%) compared to Group 3 (33%) and Group 1 (11.9%. P< 0.001 vs. Groups 2 and 3); however, the ΔWMSI was more pronounced in Group 3 compared to Group 2 and Group 1 (p = ns vs. Group 2 and p<0.001 vs. Group 1). (Figure, left panel). Non-significant CAD (defined as coronary stenosis <50% on coronary angiography) was more prevalent in Group 1 (36%) and 3 (40%) compared to Group 2 (17.5%, p<0.01 vs. Group 1 and 3). . During a median follow-up of 387 days (IQ range 314-603 days), 150 events occurred in 112 patients: 14 all-cause deaths, 39 acute myocardial infarctions, 19 atrial fibrillations, 34 late coronary revascularizations, and 44 acute heart failure hospitalizations. The exposure-adjusted event rate was the lowest in Group 1 compared to Groups 2 and 3 (Figure, right panel). Conclusion In all-comers with CCS, the electrocardiographic pattern of ST-segment elevation is not rare, more frequent with dobutamine, associated with more stress-to-rest change in RWMA and more events despite less extensive underlying anatomic CAD. The paradox of more ischemia with less coronary stenosis is consistent with a coronary vasospastic origin as an important yet frequently overlooked cause of stress-induced ST segment elevation.Figure

Abstract Background Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of coronary artery disease (CAD), often occurring after myocardial infarction (MI). Even when moderate in severity, IMR is associated with adverse outcomes, including a twofold increase in mortality rates. Aim To assess the functional correlates of resting IMR during stress echocardiography (SE) in patients with CAD. Methods This prospective multicenter study included 192 patients with CAD (143 males; mean age 65 ± 10 years) from eight cardiology institutions. Exclusion criteria included a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, more than moderate IMR, and other significant valvular diseases. Patients were divided into two groups based on semiquantitative- quantitative assessment at rest based on EACVI-ASE criteria: Group 1: Patients with moderate IMR, Group 2: Patients without IMR or with trivial IMR. All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE) using the ABCE protocol. Patients underwent exercise tests, if execise echocardiography was not possible, dobutamine stress tests were performed. At rest and peak SE, we assessed: Left atrial volume index (LAVi), Left ventricular end-diastolic (LV EDV) and end-systolic volumes (LV ESV), ejection fraction (EF), wall motion score index (WMSI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), B-lines (4-site simplified scan), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), LV contractile reserve (LVCR) and heart rate reserve (HRR). Results Despite similar EF at rest, Group 1 patients showed more pronounced functional impairment at rest, which increased during stress. Stress-induced functional worsening affected indices of MR (more frequently becoming severe), ischemic burden (WMSI), diastolic function (LAVI and LVEDV dilation), LV systolic function (LVCR), pulmonary congestion (B-lines), cardiac sympathetic reserve (reduced HRR) and right ventricular/pulmonary artery coupling (reduced TAPSE/SPAP): table 1. Conclusion Compared to CAD patients with absent-to-trivial resting IMR, patients with moderate IMR at rest show a constellation of functional vulnerabilities during SE involving more frequent exercise-induced worsening of MR, blunted LV diastolic and systolic reserve, more pulmonary congestion, impaired cardiac autonomic reserve, and worse right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling. The individual patient's functional response heterogeneity can be identified with comprehensive exercise SE, possibly a roadmap to personalized and targeted therapeutic interventions.