Zagatina, A

Abstract Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is recommended in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) when resting echocardiographic findings and symptoms do not align. However, the role of MR assessment in patients undergoing ESE for any indication remains uncertain. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the assessment of MR during ESE provides prognostic value beyond the evaluation of inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in patients undergoing ESE for any clinical indication, including suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Data were analyzed from a large multicenter and multinational prospective study. Current analysis included patients who underwent ESE for any indication and had MR (from 0= absent, to 3= severe) assessed at rest and peak exercise with an integrated qualitative, semi-quantitative, and (in selected cases) quantitative assessment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Of 1,351 included patients (age 56±16 years; 66% women; 30% with known CAD). MR score increased during exercise (rest=0.74±0.7 vs. peak=0.89±0.8, p<0.001), with severe MR present in 2% of patients at rest and 7% at peak ESE. Patients with severe MR during exercise (n=96, Group 1) compared to those with non-severe MR during exercise (n=1255, Group 2) showed more B-lines, lower left ventricular contractile and chronotropic reserve, and trend (p=0.09) to more frequent decrease in ejection fraction during ESE (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 1.0–6.9), 99 patients (7%) had died. Severe MR at rest was associated with increased mortality (log-rank p<0.001). Patients with severe MR at peak ESE had a higher risk of death compared to the other patients (log-rank p 0.035) (Figure 1). After adjusting for age, CAD, and inducible RWMA, severe MR with exercise remained strongly associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted-HR: 2.2, 95%CI 1.3-3.8, p=0.002). Similar results were seen with further adjustment for rest MR severity (adjusted-HR:1.9, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.004). Conclusion Patients, with and without CAD, with severe MR during ESE have greater functional impairment expressed by more pulmonary congestion, blunted heart rate reserve, and lower left ventricular contractile reserve. The assessment of MR during ESE provides significant prognostic information, independent of resting RWMA or inducible ischemia. Incorporating MR evaluation into routine ESE protocols may improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.Fig 1 Survival by MR at peak exercise Table 1

Abstract Background Obese patients often exhibit a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors and are frequently referred for noninvasive cardiac imaging. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) represents an early indicator of cardiovascular disease that can be noninvasively diagnosed using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements obtained during stress echocardiography (SE) in patients without evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of CFVR in overweight and obese patients within a prospective multicenter cohort. Methods 2273 patients (mean age 65 ± 11 years; 51% women) classified as overweight or obese (for definition see Table) were included in 27 sites from 11 countries. All patients had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (EF ≥ 50%), no prior history of CAD, and underwent exercise or pharmacological SE, which was negative for inducible ischemia. CFVR of the left anterior descending coronary artery was assessed, with CMD defined as CFVR >2.0. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (Group 1) or absence (Group 2) of CMD. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Results CMD was identified in 492 patients (22%), with a mean CFVR of 2.3 ± 0.5 across the study population. Group 1 patients (CMD) were older, with a greater prevalence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome compared to group 2 (no CMD) (Table). During a median follow-up period of 2.1 years (IQR: 1.2-3.7 years), 103 patients (5%) died. Patients with CMD had significantly worse late survival compared to those without CMD (3-year survival: 96 ± 1% vs. 96 ± 1%, p=ns; 6-year survival: 79 ± 4% vs. 93 ± 1%, p < 0.0001): see Figure. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, EF, body mass index, smoking habits, diabetes, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, and type of stress confirmed CMD as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.1–2.8], p = 0.01). Conclusions CMD, assessed via CFVR during SE, was a robust and independent prognostic marker of long-term mortality in obese patients with preserved EF and no evidence of inducible ischemia. These findings underscore the pivotal role of noninvasive assessment of CMD in refining risk stratification and guiding clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.