Villari, Bruno

Abstract Introduction Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) identifies a hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), characterized by elevated resting left ventricular (LV) elastance (force = systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume). To evaluate the prognostic significance and functional correlates of HP. Methods In a prospective multicentre study, 10 677 patients with CCS underwent resting TTE to assess LV ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume, and force by quantitative volumetric echocardiography. All patients were followed for the endpoint of all-cause mortality. In a subset of 5834 patients, stress echocardiography (exercise or dobutamine) was performed for LV contractile reserve and heart rate reserve. Results Patients were stratified into Force quintiles (Q1–Q5). Patients with hypercontractile phenotype exhibited lower stroke volume at rest (Q5 = 34.8 ± 12.3 vs Q1–Q4 = 57.4 ± 19.1 mL; P < .01) and higher EF at rest (Q5 = 64.8 ± 6.9% vs Q1–Q4 = 58.1 ± 8.7%, P < .01). During a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range = 12–40 months), 509 deaths occurred. The exposure-adjusted death rate was lowest in Q3 (3.53–4.51 mmHg/mL; 1.03 per 100 person/years) and higher in Q1 (≤2.62 mmHg/mL, 2.88), Q2 (2.63–3.52 mmHg/mL, 1.86), Q4 (4.52–6.11 mmHg/mL, 1.56), and Q5 (HP, >6.11 mmHg/mL; 1.88; P < .0001 vs Q1 and Q3). Multivariable analysis identified HP (Q5; HR 1.531 vs Q3, 95% CI 1.116–2.099; P = .006) and EF (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.953–0.972; P < .0001) as independent predictors of death. During exercise or dobutamine stress, HP showed reduced LV contractile reserve (ΔEF: Q5 = 4.3 ± 9.4% vs Q1–Q4 = 7.0 ± 9.3%; P < .001) and blunted heart rate reserve (Q5 = 1.77 ± 0.33 vs Q1–Q4 = 1.85 ± 0.39; P < .01). All patients with force-based LV contractile reserve >4.1 (present in 185, 3.2% of the population) survived. Conclusion Patients with CCS with HP assessed by resting TTE demonstrate higher mortality and multilayered functional impairment, including reduced LV contractile and chronotropic reserves. Hypercontractile phenotype improved the prediction of mortality by EF. A ‘stronger’ heart is, in fact, functionally and prognostically weaker.

Abstract Background Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. Aim To assess the risk stratification value of CI during physical or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study design, we enrolled 13,445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echo in 19 sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n=2,594), dobutamine (n=2,440), or dipyridamole (n=8,411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echo monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) <1.22 (<1.17 in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole. All-cause death was the outcome measure. Results Heart rate reserve was available in all patients; there was no extra imaging or analysis time, and no intra- and inter-observer variability. CI was observed in 5,045 patients (38%); abnormal regional wall motion abnormality in 1,648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.5 years, there were 2,426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (p<0.0001). CI was associated with a significant (p<0.0001) increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from <54 years to >75 years. In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (p<0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use (Figure). Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was a significant predictor of mortality (HR 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.74; p<0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during physical or pharmacological stress is a simple, inexpensive, quantitative, and objective predictor of survival.

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Abstract Background Abnormal (<50%) ejection fraction (EF) is a cornerstone of risk stratification and therapy, but also an imperfect proxy of left ventricular (LV) cardiac pump function, better assessed with stroke volume (SV). Aim To assess the value of SV in stratifying risk of patients with abnormal EF. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 746 patients (age 66± 11 years, 536 males, 72%, 359 with previous myocardial infarction, 48%) with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and EF <50% referred for resting transthoracic echocardiography with technically successful 2-dimensional volumetric echocardiography in 17 accredited laboratories. We quantitatively assessed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by Simpson’s biplane method. EF (EDV-ESV/EDV) and SV (EDV-ESV) were calculated from LV volumes. The outcome end-point was all-cause death. Results EF was 39±9%, SV 48±20 ml. There were 100 all-cause deaths during a median follow-up of 796 days (interquartile range 420-1286 days). Receiver-operating curve analysis identified SV≤31.4 ml/b as the best cut-off for predicting mortality. At multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age and prior myocardial infarction, EF <40% and SV ≤31.4 ml/b were significantly associated with decreased survival (HR 2.09, 95%, confidence intervals 1.09-4.01, p=0.024). The annual mortality was lowest (3.19%) in the group with mildly reduced (40-49%) EF and normal (>31.4 ml) SV, and highest (8.30%) in patients with both reduced EF and abnormal SV: see figure. Conclusion Patients with CCS and abnormal EF are a prognostically heterogeneous group, and the mortality rate is almost 3-times worse in patients with reduced EF and abnormal SV compared to patients with mildly reduced EF and normal SV. A simple resting volumetric two-dimensional echocardiography can offer an efficient risk stratification, beyond EF, with no extra imaging or analysis time.Figure

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B-lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, EKG-based heart rate reserve. Aim: to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicenter, international, effectiveness study. Methods From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3,574 all-comers (age 65±11 years, 2,070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60±10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n=952, with semi-supine bike, n=887, or treadmill, n=65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n=2,622, with vasodilator, n=2,151; or dobutamine, n=471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only end-point. Results Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D and 37% for E step. During a median follow-up of 21 months, 73 deaths occurred. At univariable analysis, predictors of all-cause mortality were step B (hazard ratio, HR: 2.621, 95% Confidence Intervals, CI: 1.654–4.152, p<0.001), step D (HR: 2.578, 95% CI: 1.624–4.093, p<0.001), and step E (HR: 2.955, 95% CI: 1.848–4.725, p<0.001), but not step A (HR: 1.333, 95% CI: 0.731–2.430, p=0.349) and step C (HR1.581, 95% CI: 0.997–2.506, p=0.051). At multivariable analysis, ABCDE-SE was an independent predictor of mortality with score 3 (HR: 3.472, 95% CI: 1.483–8.135, p=0.004), 4 (HR: 4.045, 95% CI: 1.595–10.259, p=0.003) and 5 (HR: 5.678, 95% CI: 2.106–15.313, p=0.001) (Figure). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person/year for score 0 up to 2.4% person/year for score 5. Conclusion ABCDE-SE allows an effective risk stratification of patient global vulnerability. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Survival curves based on ABCDE score

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2-SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4-SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5-Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6-Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7-SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF); 8-SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10-SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11-SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12-SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021–2025) ≥10,000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time, and in any patient.

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicentre, international, effectiveness study. Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. Methods and results From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3574 all-comers (age 65 ± 11 years, 2070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60 ± 10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n = 952, with semi-supine bike, n = 887, or treadmill, n = 65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n = 2622, with vasodilator, n = 2151; or dobutamine, n = 471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D, and 37% for E steps. During a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range: 13–36), 73 deaths occurred. Global X 2 was 49.5 considering clinical variables, 50.7 after step A only (P = NS (not significant)) and 80.6 after B–E steps (P < 0.001 vs. step A). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person-year for score 0 up to 2.7% person-year for score 5. Conclusion ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.