Cortigiani, L

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B-lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, EKG-based heart rate reserve. Aim to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, international, effectiveness study. Methods From July 2016 to November 2024, we enrolled 7896 all-comers (age 65±11 years, 4742 [60.0%] males, ejection fraction 59±10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) referred from 27 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE, with ACE in all patients, step D in 6286, step B in 5951 and all 5 steps in 5918 pts. The employed stress modality was exercise (n=2407) or pharmacological stress (n=5489; with vasodilator, n=4503; or dobutamine, n=986). Each step was scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severely abnormal) following EACVI recommendations 2024. SE response ranged from a score of 0 (all steps normal) to a score of 15 (all steps severely abnormal). All-cause death was the only end-point. Results During a median follow-up of 685 days (interquartile range: 387-1227), 370 deaths occurred. Step A negativity was associated with a 1.5% annual mortality. Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% persons/year for score 0 (n=958, 12.1%) up to 6.19% person/year for score ≥10 (n=346, 4.3%). (Figure). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.008, 95% interquartile range [IQ]: 1.006-1.010, p<0.001), diabetes (HR 1.564, 95% CI: 1.263-1.936, p<0.001), resting ejection fraction (HR 0.983, 95% CI: 0.974-0.993, p=0.001), and ABCDE score 3-5 (HR 3.111, 95% CI 1.597-6.060, p=0.001), score 6-9 (HR 5.442, 95% CI 2.761-10.729, p<0.001), and score ≥10 (HR 8.826, CI 4.197-18.654, p<0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion In patients with known or suspected CCS, SE negativity by simple wall motion criterion is unable to identify a low-risk group. ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival.Figure

Abstract Background Hypercontractile phenotype of the left ventricle (LV) is an actionable therapeutic target in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), but its clinical recognition remains elusive. Purpose To assess the clinical variables associated with the hypercontractile phenotype of the LV, identified with supernormal values of an index of LV contractility such as LV force, also known as ventricular elastance. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 5,122 patients (age 65± 11.1 years, 2974 males, 58%) with CCS referred for resting transthoracic echocardiography with technically successful volumetric echocardiography in 17 accredited laboratories. We measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) with a cuff sphygmomanometer. We assessed semi-quantitatively wall motion score index (WMSI), and quantitatively LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and cardiac output (CO = SV*heart rate).Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed independent factors associated with the highest force sextile. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results For all the studied patients, EF was 59±11%. Force was 4.51±2.11 mmHg/ml, with reference sextile = 3.50-4.26 mmHg/ml, lowest sextile (Group 1) <2.60 mmHg/ml and highest sextile (Group 6) > 6.36 mmHg/ml. The correlation between the log of EF and the log of Force was significant with linear regression (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Patients in the highest sextile of force showed lower values of WMSI, SV, EDV, and ESV, and higher values of arterial elastance and VAC (Table). By multivariable logistic regression model, the highest sextile of force was associated with age > 71 years (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.06-6.18, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 4.48, 95% CI 3.62-5.54, p < 0.001), absence of beta-blocker therapy (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.27-1.91), rest SBP> 159 mmHg (OR 6.86, 95% CI 5.03-9.35, p < 0.001), high heart rate (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001), absence of prior MI (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1-1.72, p = 0.049), and higher LV EF at rest (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26, p < 0.001). Conclusions A hypercontractile phenotype of the LV with high force is associated with a small heart, reduced SV, and higher arterial elastance. It was clinically associated with advanced age, female sex, history of hypertension, absence of beta-blocker therapy, and high resting SBP.

Abstract Background Abnormal (<50%) ejection fraction (EF) is a cornerstone of risk stratification and therapy, but also an imperfect proxy of left ventricular (LV) cardiac pump function, better assessed with stroke volume (SV). Aim To assess the value of SV in stratifying risk of patients with abnormal EF. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 746 patients (age 66± 11 years, 536 males, 72%, 359 with previous myocardial infarction, 48%) with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and EF <50% referred for resting transthoracic echocardiography with technically successful 2-dimensional volumetric echocardiography in 17 accredited laboratories. We quantitatively assessed LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by Simpson’s biplane method. EF (EDV-ESV/EDV) and SV (EDV-ESV) were calculated from LV volumes. The outcome end-point was all-cause death. Results EF was 39±9%, SV 48±20 ml. There were 100 all-cause deaths during a median follow-up of 796 days (interquartile range 420-1286 days). Receiver-operating curve analysis identified SV≤31.4 ml/b as the best cut-off for predicting mortality. At multivariable analysis, after adjustment for age and prior myocardial infarction, EF <40% and SV ≤31.4 ml/b were significantly associated with decreased survival (HR 2.09, 95%, confidence intervals 1.09-4.01, p=0.024). The annual mortality was lowest (3.19%) in the group with mildly reduced (40-49%) EF and normal (>31.4 ml) SV, and highest (8.30%) in patients with both reduced EF and abnormal SV: see figure. Conclusion Patients with CCS and abnormal EF are a prognostically heterogeneous group, and the mortality rate is almost 3-times worse in patients with reduced EF and abnormal SV compared to patients with mildly reduced EF and normal SV. A simple resting volumetric two-dimensional echocardiography can offer an efficient risk stratification, beyond EF, with no extra imaging or analysis time.Figure