Boshchenko, Alla

Abstract Aims Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a biomarker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to assess the risk stratification value of CI during exercise or pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Methods and results In a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study, we enrolled 13 445 patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes who underwent stress echocardiography in 19 clinical sites from 10 countries using either exercise (n = 2594), dobutamine (n = 2440), or dipyridamole (n = 8411). Heart rate was automatically measured from the 1-lead ECG in the echocardiography monitor. We considered CI as failure to reach 85% of the maximal predicted (220-age) heart rate for exercise and dobutamine, and heart rate reserve (peak/rest heart rate) ≤ 1.22 (≤1.17 if in permanent atrial fibrillation) for dipyridamole stress. The primary outcome was all-cause death. CI was observed in 5045 patients (38%) and stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities in 1648 (13%). Over a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.6–9.1 years), there were 2426 (18%) deaths. The 10-year mortality was 39% in patients with and 21% in patients without CI (P < 0.0001). CI was associated with a significant increase in 10-year mortality in all age groups ranging from ≤54 years to ≥75 years (P < 0.0001). In addition, it was associated with increased mortality (P < 0.0001) irrespective of β-blocker use. Cox multivariable analysis revealed that CI was an independent predictor of mortality (HR: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.47–1.74; P < 0.0001) together with age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction, and resting heart rate. Conclusion In patients with chronic coronary syndromes, CI during exercise or pharmacological stress is a simple and objective predictor of survival.

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Abstract Background Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of reduced, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024 by 35 certified laboratories of 15 countries. HFpEF was diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed wall motion score index (WMSI), LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE, SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. In 271 (11.4%) patients, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was assessed. Patients were divided into three groups based on rest force: low rest force group (< 25% percentile, Group 1), median rest force group (≥ 25% percentile & ≤ 75% percentile, Group 2), and high rest force group (> 75% percentile, Group 3). Results 330 (13.9%) patients presented with ischemic RWMA. The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, SV, SVi, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). Patients in Group 3 have higher NTproBNP level and higher percentage of B-line compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). The 3 groups were similar for values of coronary flow velocity, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and E/e’ (see table). Univariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was correlated with force (r = 0.271, p < 0.001), VAC (r = 0.194, p = 0.001), LAVI (r = 0.327, p < 0.001), LVEDV (r = -0.245, p < 0.001), LVEDVi (r = -0.261, p < 0.001), LVESVi (r = -0.190, p = 0.002) and LVESV (r = -0.187, p = 0.002) (see figure). However, multivariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was independently associated with LAVI (β= 0.211, p < 0.001) and force (β= 1.804, p = 0.002). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. LV force is linearly correlated with cardiac natriuretic peptide levels. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with dilation of LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. heat map

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) with abnormal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) manifests in multiple phenotypes, each presenting distinct and potentially actionable therapeutic targets. This study aimed to assess the potential of the ABCDE+ stress echocardiography (SE) protocol in uncovering different phenotypes of non-ischemic HF. Methods With a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data, we identified 265 patients (mean age: 65.7±12.6 years; 154 males, 59.9%) with non-ischemic HF with EF<50% (mean =41.4±7.5) enrolled by 23 certified laboratories between 2021 and 2023. Ischemic origin was excluded based on data of angiography and medical history. ABCDE-SE was evaluated with exercise (n=98, 37.0%), dobutamine (n=50, 18.9%), or vasodilators (n=117, 44.1%). The protocol consisted of several steps: A assessed regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA); B evaluated number of B-lines; C measured left ventricular contractile reserve; Step D with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was completed in 102 patients (38.5%); step E assessed heart rate reserve. Additionally, step F (evaluated in 188 patients at rest and 107 at peak stress) noted the presence of rest or stress-induced moderate-to-severe secondary mitral regurgitation. The SE response was graded on a scale from 0 (all steps normal) to 5 (all ABCDE+ steps abnormal). Results The mean ABCDE score was 1.5±1.2, ranging from 0 (n=59, 22.3%) to 5 (n=2, 0.8%) (see distribution of scores in Figure 1A). Abnormal results were observed in 21 subjects (7.9%) for A, 86 (32.5 %) for B, 147 (55.5%) for C, 42/102 (41.2%) for D, and 101 (38.1%) for E steps. Step F was abnormal in 22/188 (11.8%) at rest and in 16/107 (14.9%) at peak stress. The predominant "solitary phenotypes" (only one step abnormal) were impaired LV contractile function phenotype (step C in 47, 51.1%) followed by chronotropic insufficiency (step E in 17, 18.5%) and congestive phenotype (step B in 17, 18.5%) (see Figure 1B). The most frequent combined phenotype was BCE – congestive phenotype with impaired ventricular and heart rate reserves (28 [62.2%]). Notably, 38 patients (14.3%) demonstrated improved regional contractility, while 27 patients (10.2%) showed new regional wall motion abnormality (see Table). Conclusion Non-ischemic HF patients with abnormal EF exhibit a broad spectrum of phenotypes. Impaired left ventricular contractility, interstitial congestion, and chronotropic insufficiency are the most frequent abnormalities detected by ABCDE-SE. Up to one-quarter of such patients demonstrate normal SE results. This comprehensive approach paves the way for personalized, SE-guided therapy.

Abstract Background Hypercontractile phenotype of the left ventricle (LV) is an actionable therapeutic target in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), but its clinical recognition remains elusive. Purpose To assess the clinical variables associated with the hypercontractile phenotype of the LV, identified with supernormal values of an index of LV contractility such as LV force, also known as ventricular elastance. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 5,122 patients (age 65± 11.1 years, 2974 males, 58%) with CCS referred for resting transthoracic echocardiography with technically successful volumetric echocardiography in 17 accredited laboratories. We measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) with a cuff sphygmomanometer. We assessed semi-quantitatively wall motion score index (WMSI), and quantitatively LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and cardiac output (CO = SV*heart rate).Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed independent factors associated with the highest force sextile. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results For all the studied patients, EF was 59±11%. Force was 4.51±2.11 mmHg/ml, with reference sextile = 3.50-4.26 mmHg/ml, lowest sextile (Group 1) <2.60 mmHg/ml and highest sextile (Group 6) > 6.36 mmHg/ml. The correlation between the log of EF and the log of Force was significant with linear regression (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Patients in the highest sextile of force showed lower values of WMSI, SV, EDV, and ESV, and higher values of arterial elastance and VAC (Table). By multivariable logistic regression model, the highest sextile of force was associated with age > 71 years (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.06-6.18, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 4.48, 95% CI 3.62-5.54, p < 0.001), absence of beta-blocker therapy (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.27-1.91), rest SBP> 159 mmHg (OR 6.86, 95% CI 5.03-9.35, p < 0.001), high heart rate (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001), absence of prior MI (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1-1.72, p = 0.049), and higher LV EF at rest (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26, p < 0.001). Conclusions A hypercontractile phenotype of the LV with high force is associated with a small heart, reduced SV, and higher arterial elastance. It was clinically associated with advanced age, female sex, history of hypertension, absence of beta-blocker therapy, and high resting SBP.

Abstract Background Hypercontractile phenotype (HP) of the left ventricle (LV) is an actionable therapeutic target in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) or heart failure (HF), but its clinical recognition remains difficult. Objectives To assess the clinical variables associated with the HP. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 5,122 patients (age 65 ± 11 years, 2974 males, 58%) with CCS and/or HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed wall motion score index (WMSI), LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (SBP/SV), and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed independent factors associated with the highest force sextile. Results For all the studied patients, force was 4.51 ± 2.11 mmHg/ml, with the highest sextile (Group 6) > 6.36 mmHg/ml. By multivariable logistic regression model, the highest sextile of force was associated with age > 65 years (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36–1.93, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.40–2.21, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 4.52, 95% CI 3.77–5.42, p < 0.001), absence of beta-blocker therapy (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16–1.68), rest SBP ≥ 160 mmHg (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.21–3.56, p < 0.001), high heart rate (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.61–2.67, p < 0.001), and absence of prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07–1.68, p = 0.012). Patients in the highest sextile of force showed lower values of WMSI, SV, EDV, and ESV, and higher values of arterial elastance and VAC. Conclusions HP of the LV with high force was clinically associated with advanced age, female sex, high resting SBP, and the absence of 𝛽-blocker therapy. By transthoracic echocardiography, HP was associated with a small heart with reduced EDV, reduced SV despite high EF, and higher arterial elastance.

Background: Left atrial (LA) myopathy with paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) but sometimes occult at rest and elicited by stress. Aim: This study sought to assess LA volume and function at rest and during stress across the spectrum of AF. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study design, we enrolled 3042 patients [age = 64 ± 12; 63.8% male] with known or suspected CCS: 2749 were in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1); 191 in SR with a history of paroxysmal AF (Group 2); and 102 were in permanent AF (Group 3). All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE). We measured left atrial volume index (LAVI) in all patients and LA Strain reservoir phase (LASr) in a subset of 486 patients. Results: LAVI increased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 27.6 ± 12.2, Group 2 = 31.6 ± 12.9, Group 3 = 43.3 ± 19.7 mL/m2, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.2 ± 12.0, Group 2 = 31.2 ± 12.2, Group 3 = 43.9 ± 19.4 mL/m2, p < 0.001). LASr progressively decreased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 26.0 ± 8.5%, Group 2 = 23.2 ± 11.2%, Group 3 = 8.5 ± 6.5%, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.9 ± 10.1, Group 2 = 23.8 ± 11.0 Group 3 = 10.7 ± 8.1%, p < 0.001). Stress B-lines (≥2) were more frequent in AF (Group 1 = 29.7% vs. Group 2 = 35.5% vs. Group 3 = 57.4%, p < 0.001). Inducible ischemia was less frequent in SR (Group 1 = 16.1% vs. Group 2 = 24.7% vs. Group 3 = 24.5%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In CCS, rest and stress LA dilation and reservoir dysfunction are often present in paroxysmal and, more so, in permanent AF and are associated with more frequent inducible ischemia and pulmonary congestion during stress.

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2-SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4-SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5-Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6-Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7-SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF); 8-SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10-SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11-SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12-SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021–2025) ≥10,000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time, and in any patient.

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicentre, international, effectiveness study. Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. Methods and results From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3574 all-comers (age 65 ± 11 years, 2070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60 ± 10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n = 952, with semi-supine bike, n = 887, or treadmill, n = 65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n = 2622, with vasodilator, n = 2151; or dobutamine, n = 471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D, and 37% for E steps. During a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range: 13–36), 73 deaths occurred. Global X 2 was 49.5 considering clinical variables, 50.7 after step A only (P = NS (not significant)) and 80.6 after B–E steps (P &lt; 0.001 vs. step A). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person-year for score 0 up to 2.7% person-year for score 5. Conclusion ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.