Manganelli, F

Abstract Backgrounds Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) identifies a peculiar hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with high resting left ventricular (LV) elastance (also called force). Objectives To assess the functional response and its prognosis associated with HP in HFpEF by stress echocardiography (SE). Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 1213 patients with HFpEF were divided into two groups based on the highest quartile of rest force: non-hypercontractile phenotype group (non-HP, < 5.64 mmHg/mL, Group 1, n= 910), and HP group (≥5.64 mmHg/mL, Group 2, n= 303). All patients underwent SE with at least 4 of the following stress parameters assessed: wall motion score index (WMSI), B-lines (4-site score), force-based LV contractile reserve, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and heart rate reserve (HRR). The employed stress was exercise (n=687), dobutamine (n=195), or vasodilators (n=331). SE score ranged from 0 (all steps normal) to 1-5, according to the number of abnormal steps. Follow-up was completed in a subset of 260 patients. Results The 2 groups showed similar values of peak stress WMSI but the global functional burden was higher in Group 2 patients: see table. In a subset of 260 patients who finished follow-up, there were 212 non-HP patients and 48 HP patients. During a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range: 10-20), 26 deaths, 20 heart failure (HF) rehospitalizations, and 64 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred. The cumulative HF rehospitalization rate and MACEs rate were higher in HP group (log-rank p<0.01): see figure. Rest force (HR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.29; P: 0.040), rest SPAP (HR, 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14; P: 0.007) and ABCDE score (HR, 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.66; P: 0.032) were independently associated with MACEs. Conclusions HFpEF patients with HP are functionally weaker with multiple vulnerabilities during stress and at higher risk of subsequent events compared to non-HP patients.Relation between resting values of force

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Abstract Background Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of reduced, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024 by 35 certified laboratories of 15 countries. HFpEF was diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed wall motion score index (WMSI), LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE, SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. In 271 (11.4%) patients, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was assessed. Patients were divided into three groups based on rest force: low rest force group (< 25% percentile, Group 1), median rest force group (≥ 25% percentile & ≤ 75% percentile, Group 2), and high rest force group (> 75% percentile, Group 3). Results 330 (13.9%) patients presented with ischemic RWMA. The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, SV, SVi, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). Patients in Group 3 have higher NTproBNP level and higher percentage of B-line compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). The 3 groups were similar for values of coronary flow velocity, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and E/e’ (see table). Univariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was correlated with force (r = 0.271, p < 0.001), VAC (r = 0.194, p = 0.001), LAVI (r = 0.327, p < 0.001), LVEDV (r = -0.245, p < 0.001), LVEDVi (r = -0.261, p < 0.001), LVESVi (r = -0.190, p = 0.002) and LVESV (r = -0.187, p = 0.002) (see figure). However, multivariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was independently associated with LAVI (β= 0.211, p < 0.001) and force (β= 1.804, p = 0.002). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. LV force is linearly correlated with cardiac natriuretic peptide levels. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with dilation of LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. heat map

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) with abnormal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) manifests in multiple phenotypes, each presenting distinct and potentially actionable therapeutic targets. This study aimed to assess the potential of the ABCDE+ stress echocardiography (SE) protocol in uncovering different phenotypes of non-ischemic HF. Methods With a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data, we identified 265 patients (mean age: 65.7±12.6 years; 154 males, 59.9%) with non-ischemic HF with EF<50% (mean =41.4±7.5) enrolled by 23 certified laboratories between 2021 and 2023. Ischemic origin was excluded based on data of angiography and medical history. ABCDE-SE was evaluated with exercise (n=98, 37.0%), dobutamine (n=50, 18.9%), or vasodilators (n=117, 44.1%). The protocol consisted of several steps: A assessed regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA); B evaluated number of B-lines; C measured left ventricular contractile reserve; Step D with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was completed in 102 patients (38.5%); step E assessed heart rate reserve. Additionally, step F (evaluated in 188 patients at rest and 107 at peak stress) noted the presence of rest or stress-induced moderate-to-severe secondary mitral regurgitation. The SE response was graded on a scale from 0 (all steps normal) to 5 (all ABCDE+ steps abnormal). Results The mean ABCDE score was 1.5±1.2, ranging from 0 (n=59, 22.3%) to 5 (n=2, 0.8%) (see distribution of scores in Figure 1A). Abnormal results were observed in 21 subjects (7.9%) for A, 86 (32.5 %) for B, 147 (55.5%) for C, 42/102 (41.2%) for D, and 101 (38.1%) for E steps. Step F was abnormal in 22/188 (11.8%) at rest and in 16/107 (14.9%) at peak stress. The predominant "solitary phenotypes" (only one step abnormal) were impaired LV contractile function phenotype (step C in 47, 51.1%) followed by chronotropic insufficiency (step E in 17, 18.5%) and congestive phenotype (step B in 17, 18.5%) (see Figure 1B). The most frequent combined phenotype was BCE – congestive phenotype with impaired ventricular and heart rate reserves (28 [62.2%]). Notably, 38 patients (14.3%) demonstrated improved regional contractility, while 27 patients (10.2%) showed new regional wall motion abnormality (see Table). Conclusion Non-ischemic HF patients with abnormal EF exhibit a broad spectrum of phenotypes. Impaired left ventricular contractility, interstitial congestion, and chronotropic insufficiency are the most frequent abnormalities detected by ABCDE-SE. Up to one-quarter of such patients demonstrate normal SE results. This comprehensive approach paves the way for personalized, SE-guided therapy.

Abstract Background/Introduction Cardiac stress tests are carried out in populations with a low probability of ischemic heart disease (IHD) much more frequently than in the past. Stress ECG remains a frequently used modality for the diagnosis of IHD in vast areas of the world with limited facilities. Purpose To assess the diagnostic value of stress ECG for diagnosing IHD using inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) on stress echocardiography (SE) as the gold standard method of diagnosis. Methods The 12-lead ECG response was retrospectively analyzed in 4317 patients (age 64±13 years, 59.6% males) undergoing SE for chronic coronary syndromes who were prospectively recruited from 39 cardiac centers between March 2021 and February 2024. Exclusion criteria were left bundle branch block or pacemaker rhythm. ECG response was considered ischemic according to standard criteria (if ST-segment deviated >1.0 mm from baseline in ≥2 contiguous leads at 80 ms from J point) during an exercise (n=2980, 69.8%), dobutamine (n = 766, 18.0%), or vasodilator (n=519, 12.2%) SE. All patients underwent a comprehensive SE protocol with an assessment of wall motion score index (WMSI), B-lines (4-site simplified score), left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) based on force, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery (LAD), and heart rate reserve (HRR). Results ECG changes occurred in 641 patients (14.8%, Group 1) for the overall studied population. Compared to patients without ECG changes (Group 2, n=3676, 85.2%), patients with ECG changes showed higher values of peak WMSI and lower values of CFVR and LVCR (see table).Amongst patients without inducible RWMA (n=3553), there were 392 (11%) patients with an ischemic ECG at stress (89% specificity). Of 764 patients with inducible RWMA during SE, 249 had an ischemic ECG trace (sensitivity 33%). In patients without inducible RWMA, those with ischemic ECG changes showed similar abnormal stress B-lines (23% vs. 21%, p=0.719), LVCR (61% vs. 63%, p=0.602), CFVR (31% vs 33%, p=0.607) and HRR (37% vs 41%, p=0.097) compared to those without ECG changes. Amongst patients with inducible RWMA and ECG changes, CFVR was significantly lower in patients with ECG changes (39.2% and 60.8%, respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions Simple standard stress ECG diagnostic value in the current era in populations with a low probability of IHD seems to be low. However, during SE, stress-induced ischemic ECG changes are associated with more extensive RWMA and blunted global LVCR, with reduced CFVR in the LAD. Therefore, analysis of ST segment changes during stress imaging studies can offer additional, significant information.