Citations

Background: Evaluation of the performance of Cobas ® Pulse (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), a new blood glucose (BG) monitoring system (BGMS; referred to here as BGMSA) intended for point-of-care testing using samples from patients in diverse clinical settings by intended point-of-care test operators. Methods: Arterial, capillary, venous, or heel stick whole blood (WB) samples from patients in non-critical and critical care settings were collected and analyzed using BGMSA and the Nova StatStrip ® BGMS (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA; referred to here as BGMSB), and a hexokinase comparator (Cobas 6000 Analyzer Series; Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The blood glucose measurement accuracy was assessed by the Food and Drug Administration guidance criteria. Results: Two studies are presented. In the first, 2678 samples (622 arterial, 706 capillary, 1203 venous, 147 heel stick) were collected from 1577 patients in 14 US and three European sites. All accuracy criteria were met for arterial and venous samples considering all data combined. BGMSA showed better accuracy than BGMSB for arterial, venous, and heel stick, and similar results to BGMSB for capillary WB vs venous comparator. No endogenous interference from pO 2 , hematocrit, and sodium was identified. BGMSA was also accurate when analyzing contrived samples used to show accuracy over a wide range of glucose concentrations, alone and when combined with extreme hematocrit. In the second study, 117 capillary fingerstick samples collected at one US site were measured on both BGMSA and the comparator, and all accuracy criteria were met. No clinically significant medical risks were observed via Diabetes Technology Society Error Grids. Conclusions: BGMSA was effective for determining blood glucose in venous, arterial, neonatal arterial, neonatal heel stick, and capillary WB samples.

Abstract Objectives Free light chain (FLC) assays and the ratio of κ/λ are recommended for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD). Limited data exists on FLC clinical specificity in patients diagnosed with other conditions. Methods We assessed the κ, λ, and κ/λ FLC ratio using the FreeLite assay and the Sebia FLC ELISA assay in 176 patients with clinical presentations of fatigue, anemia, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, joint disorders, kidney disease and non PCD-cancers with no monoclonal protein observed on serum protein electrophoresis or MASS-FIX immunoglobulin isotyping. Manufacturer defined reference intervals (RI) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) specific RI (renal RI) were utilized. Results For the κ/λ ratio, 68.7 % (121/176) of specimens on the FreeLite and 87.5 % (154/176) of specimens on the Sebia assay were within RI. For κ, 68.2 % (120/176) and 72.2 % (127/176) of results were outside RI for FreeLite and Sebia respectively. For λ, 37.5 % (66/176) and 84.1 % (148/176) of FreeLite and Sebia results were outside RI. With FreeLite and Sebia, patients with kidney disease (n=25) had the highest κ/λ ratios. 44 patients (25.0 %) had GFR <60 mL/min/BSA. When renal RI were applied, 13.6 % had a FLCr outside the renal RI with FreeLite, and 4.5 % with Sebia. Conclusions In a cohort of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of PCDs, but ultimately diagnosed with other conditions, Sebia FLC had improved clinical specificity relative to FreeLite, if one was using an abnormal κ/λ ratio as a surrogate for monoclonality.

Abstract Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has been accompanied by the largest mobilization of therapeutic convalescent plasma (CCP) in over a century. Initial identification of high titer units was based on dose–response data using the Ortho VITROS IgG assay. The proliferation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 serological assays and non‐uniform application has led to uncertainty about their interrelationships. The purpose of this study was to establish correlations and analogous cutoffs between multiple serological assays. Methods We compared the Ortho, Abbott, Roche, an anti‐spike (S) ELISA, and a virus neutralization assay. Relationships relative to FDA‐approved cutoffs under the CCP emergency use authorization were identified in convalescent plasma from a cohort of 79 donors from April 2020. Results Relative to the neutralization assay, the spearman r value of the Ortho Clinical, Abbott, Roche, anti‐S ELISA assays was 0.65, 0.59, 0.45, and 0.76, respectively. The best correlative index for establishing high‐titer units was 3.87 signal‐to‐cutoff (S/C) for the Abbott, 13.82 cutoff index for the Roche, 1:1412 for the anti‐S ELISA, 1:219 by the neutralization assay, and 15.9 S/C by the Ortho Clinical assay. The overall agreement using derived cutoffs compared to a neutralizing titer of 1:250 was 78.5% for Abbott, 74.7% for Roche, 83.5% for the anti‐S ELISA, and 78.5% for Ortho Clinical. DISCUSSION Assays based on antibodies against the nucleoprotein were positively associated with neutralizing titers and the Ortho assay, although their ability to distinguish FDA high‐titer specimens was imperfect. The resulting relationships help reconcile results from the large body of serological data generated during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Abstract Background Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid associated with illicit drug use and overdose deaths. The SEFRIA Immunalysis (IAL) and ARK fentanyl assays are both FDA-cleared, open channel immunoassays for fentanyl detection in urine. However, limited data are available in the literature comparing these assays. The objective of this study was to perform a direct comparison of these two fentanyl immunoassays. Methods IAL and ARK fentanyl immunoassays were performed on a Roche Cobas e602 automated chemistry analyzer. Repeatability and total imprecision were compared by diluting fentanyl into urine at concentrations above, below, and at the manufacturers’ cutoffs of 1.0 ng/mL. Cross-reactivity was assessed for norfentanyl and the fentanyl analogs acetylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, and furanylfentanyl. Concordance was assessed in 90 patient samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. Results Repeatability varied from 11.4%–17.8% on the IAL assay and 2.8%–5.5% on the ARK assay. Total imprecision was 18.9%–40.7% on the IAL assay and 2.9%–6.4% on the ARK assay. Both assays cross-reacted with acetylfentanyl (∼100%), acrylfentanyl (∼100%), and furanylfentanyl (∼20%), but only the ARK assay cross-reacted with norfentanyl (∼3%). An admixture of 0.5 ng/mL fentanyl and 6 ng/mL norfentanyl produced a positive result on the ARK assay. Total concordance between IAL and ARK for 90 tested patient samples was 93% (kappa = 0.85). Relative to LC-MS/MS, the IAL assay had a concordance of 90% (kappa = 0.79) and the ARK assay had a concordance of 94% (kappa = 0.88). Including norfentanyl in the LC-MS/MS confirmation increased the concordance of the ARK to 96% (kappa = 0.90). Conclusions The ARK assay recognized the metabolite norfentanyl, demonstrated superior precision, and had better concordance with LC-MS/MS compared to the IAL assay.

Abstract Background Serum free light chain (FLC) assays are used clinically to measure the concentration of κ and λ FLC in patients with suspected or diagnosed plasma cell proliferative disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated a loss of linearity in low concentration ranges of these assays. We hypothesized that this result could be caused by a matrix effect. Methods Recovery studies were performed for κ and λ FLC in both serum and saline using the Freelite assay (Binding Site) on a Cobas c502 system (Roche). Samples were analyzed either at the recommended dilution or undiluted. Follow-up studies were performed in varying matrices ranging from 0% to 100% saline. Retrospective patient data were analyzed to assess the impact on reported κ FLC, λ FLC, and κ/λ ratio. Results FLC in a serum matrix demonstrated underrecovery relative to samples diluted in saline for both κ and λ FLC. Of 255 patient samples with λ FLC measured undiluted (λ FLC &lt;6.0 mg/L), an unexpected gap was observed in patient results between 2.0 and 6.0 mg/L. In addition, 23 patients measured serially with λ FLC between 2.0 and 6.0 mg/L demonstrated dramatic changes in κ/λ ratio, with no changes in κ FLC, likely because of the matrix effect. Conclusions The κ and λ Freelite assays exhibit a matrix effect when samples are tested undiluted, which has the potential to affect the κ/λ ratio. Consequently, our laboratory has stopped reporting λ FLC &lt;6.0 mg/L.