Citations

AbstractBackgroundClinically meaningful cognitive impairment has typically been defined as a single impaired test score, but this approach is prone to false‐positive errors. Examining two test scores at a lower threshold (i.e., using neuropsychological criteria) can improve diagnostic reliability and has shown stronger associations with biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive impairment in episodic memory and/or executive functioning is a core feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). However, there remains a need to improve the specificity of TES criteria. We applied 1‐ vs. 2‐test criteria for cognitive impairment in former American football players to examine whether 2‐test criteria showed stronger associations with biomarkers of tau, axonal injury, and neurodegeneration.Method169 male former American football players from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project completed neuropsychological assessment, lumbar puncture, and MRI (see Table). Episodic memory measures were delayed recall from Craft Story, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, and NAB List Learning. Executive functioning measures were FAS, Stroop Interference, NAB Mazes, and Trails B. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was measured using Lumipulse technology (p‐tau, t‐tau) and an in‐house ELISA (neurofilament light [NfL]). Hippocampal volumes were extracted from structural MRI using Freesurfer 7.1. Cognitive impairment was identified by 1‐test criteria (≥1.5 SD below norms on one test in either domain) and 2‐test criteria (>1 SD below norms on two tests within a domain). Regressions adjusting for age, race, education, and APOE ε4 status assessed whether meeting 1‐ or 2‐test criteria, separately, predicted log‐transformed CSF p‐tau181, p‐tau231, t‐tau, and NfL, and hippocampal volumes.Result37 of the 99 football players that were impaired by 1‐test criteria did not meet 2‐test criteria, and four uniquely met 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria (see Figure). Cognitive impairment by 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria predicted higher log‐CSF NfL (2‐test: B = 0.24, p = .007; 1‐test: B = 0.06, p = .53), smaller left hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐195.84, p = .01; 1‐test: B = ‐131.52, p = .08), and smaller right hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐161.19, p = .045; 1‐test: B = ‐134.88, p = .08). Neither criterion predicted p‐tau181, p‐tau231, or t‐tau.Conclusion2‐test criteria demonstrated stronger associations between cognitive impairment and markers of axonal injury and neurodegeneration. Incorporating multiple test scores to identify cognitive impairment could improve diagnostic specificity in TES.

AbstractBackgroundTraumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) is the proposed clinical syndrome of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative disease associated with repetitive head impacts in contact/collision sports. A core clinical feature of TES is cognitive impairment, particularly in memory and executive functions. Cognitive intraindividual variability (IIV) is the extent of variability in neuropsychological test performance (i.e., dispersion of test scores) and is believed to be an indicator of disruption in executive control, linked to altered fronto‐subcortical circuits. Here, we examined cognitive IIV as a method to detect subtle executive dysfunction in TES that may not be captured by traditional neuropsychological measures.MethodThe sample included former American football players (120 professional, 60 college); participants were males, aged 45‐74. Participants completed a baseline neuropsychological test battery (n = 8 excluded for suboptimal performance validity). A multidisciplinary diagnostic consensus conference classified participants using the 2021 NINDS Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for TES (see Table‐1): (1) No‐TES (n = 62); (2) TES‐CTE Suggestive (n = 35); (3) TES‐CTE Possible (n = 21); (4) TES‐CTE Probable (n = 54). TES‐CTE Possible and Probable were combined. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was used to measure cognitive IIV (CoV = iSD/iOTBM, iOTBM = average T‐score across neuropsychological tests; iSD = standard deviation of iOTBM). A higher CoV indicates greater score dispersion. To avoid circularity, memory and executive tests used for classifying TES groups were intentionally excluded from the CoV calculation. Analysis of covariance compared the TES groups on CoV, controlling for age, education, and race.ResultResults showed a significant difference in CoV between TES groups, F(2, 165) = 8.20 p<.001, partial η2 = .09. The TES‐CTE Possible/Probable group had the highest CoV (M = .226, SE = .007), compared with the TES‐no (M = .192, SE = .008, p<.001) and TES‐CTE Suggestive groups (M = .178, SE = .011, p<.001). CoV did not significantly differ between the TES‐no and TES‐CTE suggestive groups (Mdiff = 0.014, SE = .013, p = .293).ConclusionThe TES‐CTE possible/probable group had the highest cognitive IIV with ∼23% dispersion (vs. ∼18‐19% in TES‐no and TES‐CTE suggestive groups), suggesting greater cognitive variability in those with the greatest likelihood for having underlying CTE (based on TES criteria). This finding emphasizes the potential utility of exploring cognitive IIV as a method for detecting nuanced executive dysfunction in TES.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have linked impaired odor identification and global cognition with increased risk of cognitive decline and transition to dementia. However, the reverse question remains: if individuals have intact performance on these measures, are they at reduced risk for transition? We aimed to examine the accuracy of intact odor identification and global cognition for identifying lack of transition to dementia/cognitive decline using the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and compare their accuracy against and in combination with amyloid PET (Positron Emission Tomography).Methodn = 647 participants age≥55 without dementia completed at baseline the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT; ‘Intact’ = 9‐12), Blessed Information‐Memory‐Concentration Test (BIMCT; ‘Intact’ = 18‐20,), and amyloid PET (‘Normal/Intact’ SUVR<1.48). We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for these measures, with “lack of transition to dementia” as the gold standard/target. “Lack of cognitive decline” (cognitively unimpaired to mild cognitive impairment [MCI]; cognitively unimpaired to dementia; or MCI to dementia) was a secondary target.Result94.7% of participants (613/647) did not transition to dementia and 84.2% (545/647) did not cognitively decline over 11.25‐year‐follow‐up. The combination of intact BSIT+BIMCT had high rates of lack of transition to dementia (98.3%, 355/361) and lack of cognitive decline (93.1%, 336/361). This combination yielded mixed sensitivity (0.579) and specificity (0.824) though had high positive predictive value (0.983) for identifying lack of transition to dementia. Intact amyloid PET alone exhibited comparable rates of lack of transition to dementia (99.0%, 418/423) and lack of cognitive decline (92.4%, 391/423). When evaluated conjointly, the combination of all three intact measures also had mixed sensitivity (0.421) and specificity (0.962) though higher positive predictive value (PPV = 0.996) for lack of transition to dementia. 99.6% (258/259) of participants with intact/normal status on all three did not transition to dementia and 96.5% (250/259) did not cognitively decline.ConclusionThis replicates prior reports that intact olfaction/global cognition have strong utility for identifying individuals unlikely to develop MCI/dementia. Intact/normal amyloid PET further enhances the positive predictive value. Clinically, identifying individuals at low risk of transition can shorten diagnostic workups, reduce need for early follow‐up visits, and screen patients in‐or‐out of clinical trials.

PURPOSE In light of evolving evidence that some patients with node-positive estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) disease may receive less benefit from chemotherapy, this study reports 12-year outcomes of the C9741 trial overall, and by the sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3) test index, a biomarker measuring endocrine transcriptional activity, to identify patients most likely to benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy. METHODS In all, 1,973 patients were randomly assigned to dose-dense versus conventional chemotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) for prognosis and for predictive interaction with chemotherapy schedule were estimated from Cox models of long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). SET2,3 was tested on the 682 banked RNA samples from ER+ cancers. RESULTS Dose-dense chemotherapy improved DFS in the overall study population by 23% (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.90]) and OS by 20% (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95]); the benefits of dose-dense therapy were seen for ER+ and ER-negative subsets, without significant interaction between treatment arm and ER status. Low SET2,3 status was highly prognostic, but also predicted improved outcomes from dose-dense chemotherapy (interaction P = .0998 for DFS; 0.027 for OS), independent of menopausal status. Specifically, low endocrine transcriptional activity predicted benefit from dose-dense chemotherapy, whereas tumor burden and proliferation-driven signatures for molecular subtype classification did not. CONCLUSION At 12-year follow-up, C9741 confirmed the sustained long-term benefit of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. SET2,3 identified patients with ER+ breast cancer who benefited from dose-dense chemotherapy, and specifically, this benefit was predicted by low endocrine activity in the cancer, rather than tumor burden, molecular subtype, or menopausal status.

Energy drinks are a commonly consumed beverage, and studies suggest a possible performance-enhancing effect. A Google Scholar search using the keywords “energy drinks” and “exercise” yields numerous results, underscoring the voluminous research on this topic. However, there are questions regarding the effectiveness and safety of energy drinks. These questions include, but are not limited to: (1) What are the main active ingredients in energy drinks? (2) Do energy drinks assist in weight management? (3) Do energy drinks enhance aerobic performance? (4) Do energy drinks enhance athletic speed? (5) Do energy drinks improve reaction time? (6) Do energy drinks enhance lean tissue mass? (7) Can energy drinks improve cognitive performance? (8) Does the acute consumption of energy drinks elevate resting energy expenditure? (9) Is there any evidence to suggest that energy drinks are more effective than an identical serving of caffeine alone? (10) Are there sex differences in the response to energy drink consumption? (11) Do energy drinks affect sleep or sleepiness? (12) Should pregnant women avoid energy drinks? (13) Do energy drinks adversely affect cardiovascular function? (14) Does consuming energy drinks cause brain damage? (15) What are other safety considerations regarding energy drinks? (16) Is there any evidence to suggest that energy drinks are more effective than an identical serving of caffeine alone? (17) If caffeine is the main active ingredient in energy drinks and coffee, why is there a discrepancy in the adverse events reported for each? To address these questions, we performed an evidence-based scientific evaluation of the literature on energy drink supplementation.

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose In idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow is typically evaluated with a cardiac‐gated two‐dimensional (2D) phase‐contrast (PC) MRI through the cerebral aqueduct. This approach is limited by the evaluation of a single location and does not account for respiration effects on flow. In this study, we quantified the cardiac and respiratory contributions to CSF movement at multiple intracranial locations using a real‐time 2D PC‐MRI and evaluated the diagnostic value of CSF dynamics biomarkers in classifying iNPH patients. Methods This study included 37 participants: 16 iNPH, 10 Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 11 cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls. Anatomical and real‐time (non‐gated) PC images were acquired in a 3T Philips scanner. CSF flow was assessed at the foramen magnum, fourth ventricle, Sylvian fissure, lateral ventricle, and cerebral aqueduct. We calculated three CSF dynamics biomarkers: mean velocity amplitude, cardiac signal power, and respiratory signal power. Biomarkers from each location were evaluated for classifying iNPH versus AD and CU using support vector machine (SVM). A p ‐value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Results The velocity amplitude and cardiac signal power were significantly reduced in iNPH compared to CU ( p < 0.005) and AD ( p < 0.05) at the lateral ventricle. The SVM model using biomarkers from the lateral ventricle performed significantly better at classifying iNPH than the other locations in terms of accuracy ( p < 0.005) and diagnostic odds ratio ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Evaluation of CSF movement beyond the cerebral aqueduct may aid in identifying patients with and understanding the pathophysiology of iNPH.

Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma progressing after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy have dismal outcomes. The prespecified post–CAR-T expansion cohort of the ELM-1 study investigated the efficacy and safety of odronextamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with disease progression after CAR-Ts. Sixty patients received IV odronextamab weekly for 4 cycles followed by maintenance until progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 2-9), 71.7% were refractory to CAR-Ts, and 48.3% relapsed within 90 days of CAR-T therapy. After a median follow-up of 16.2 months, ORR and complete response (CR) rate were 48.3% and 31.7%, respectively. Responses were similar across prior CAR-T products and time to relapse on CAR-T therapy. Median duration of response was 14.8 months and median duration of CR was not reached. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 and 10.2 months, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (48.3%; no grade ≥3 events). No cases of immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome were reported. Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 12 patients (20.0%), 2 of which were COVID-19. Odronextamab monotherapy demonstrated encouraging efficacy and generally manageable safety, supporting its potential as an off-the-shelf option for patients after CAR-T therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02290951.

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has emerged as a valuable liquid biopsy source for glioma biomarker discovery and validation. CSF produced within the ventricles circulates through the subarachnoid space, where the composition of glioma-derived analytes is influenced by the proximity and anatomical location of sampling relative to tumor, in addition to underlying tumor biology. The substantial gradients observed between lumbar and intracranial CSF compartments for tumor-derived analytes underscore the importance of sampling site selection. Moreover, radiographic features, such as tumor-CSF contact and blood-brain barrier disruption, are critical covariates that may affect biomarker detection and the abundance of plasma-derived analytes in CSF, respectively. Longitudinal intracranial CSF sampling, enabled by access devices like Ommaya reservoirs, may offer a window into treatment response and disease progression, though variability in analyte yield, sample volumes, and the dynamic effects of surgical resection pose challenges. This review critically evaluates the anatomic, radiographic, and longitudinal factors, or “time-space continuum,” that impact glioma CSF biomarker abundance. Practical considerations for longitudinal CSF biobanking, including access device placement and collection, are also reviewed. Key takeaways and recommendations for CSF glioma biomarker discovery and validation are provided as a “hitchhiker’s guide” based on our collective experience, along with resources for investigators aiming to develop CSF biobanking at their institutions.