Delano‐Wood, Lisa

Abstract Objective: Subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) can precede cognitive decline and are associated with demographic, exposure, lifestyle, and psychological factors. Prevalences of SCC and their correlates in individuals with repetitive head impacts (RHI) are poorly understood. This study characterized SCC in former elite American football players by frequency, mood and behavioral correlates, concordance with informant reports, and associations with neuropsychological test performance, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of neurodegeneration. Method: Former American football players ( n = 180) completed measures of global and domain-specific SCC, neuropsychiatric symptom questionnaires, neuropsychological testing, lumbar puncture, and MRI. Elastic net regression evaluated the relative importance of potential SCC correlates. Intraclass correlation coefficients measured concordance between self and informant reports. Multiple linear regressions tested associations between SCC and verbal memory and executive functioning scores. CSF Aβ 1-42 , p-tau 181 , t-tau, neurofilament light (NfL), hippocampal volume, and regional cortical thickness were examined for their potential associations with SCC. Results: Rates of SCC ranged from 43 to 77% depending on the domain. Symptoms of depression, impulsivity, and anxiety were strongly associated with SCC. Self- and informant-reported SCC showed moderate inter-rater agreement. Adjusting for age, race, education, APOE ϵ4 carrier status, and depressive symptoms, SCC were associated with lower objective verbal memory and executive functioning performance. SCC were associated with lower parahippocampal cortical thickness but not with hippocampal volume or any of the measured CSF tests. Conclusions: SCC are strongly associated with neuropsychiatric factors in former American football players. SCC may also be a marker of cognitive decline and neurodegeneration.

AbstractBackgroundClinically meaningful cognitive impairment has typically been defined as a single impaired test score, but this approach is prone to false‐positive errors. Examining two test scores at a lower threshold (i.e., using neuropsychological criteria) can improve diagnostic reliability and has shown stronger associations with biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive impairment in episodic memory and/or executive functioning is a core feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). However, there remains a need to improve the specificity of TES criteria. We applied 1‐ vs. 2‐test criteria for cognitive impairment in former American football players to examine whether 2‐test criteria showed stronger associations with biomarkers of tau, axonal injury, and neurodegeneration.Method169 male former American football players from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project completed neuropsychological assessment, lumbar puncture, and MRI (see Table). Episodic memory measures were delayed recall from Craft Story, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, and NAB List Learning. Executive functioning measures were FAS, Stroop Interference, NAB Mazes, and Trails B. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was measured using Lumipulse technology (p‐tau, t‐tau) and an in‐house ELISA (neurofilament light [NfL]). Hippocampal volumes were extracted from structural MRI using Freesurfer 7.1. Cognitive impairment was identified by 1‐test criteria (≥1.5 SD below norms on one test in either domain) and 2‐test criteria (>1 SD below norms on two tests within a domain). Regressions adjusting for age, race, education, and APOE ε4 status assessed whether meeting 1‐ or 2‐test criteria, separately, predicted log‐transformed CSF p‐tau181, p‐tau231, t‐tau, and NfL, and hippocampal volumes.Result37 of the 99 football players that were impaired by 1‐test criteria did not meet 2‐test criteria, and four uniquely met 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria (see Figure). Cognitive impairment by 2‐test but not 1‐test criteria predicted higher log‐CSF NfL (2‐test: B = 0.24, p = .007; 1‐test: B = 0.06, p = .53), smaller left hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐195.84, p = .01; 1‐test: B = ‐131.52, p = .08), and smaller right hippocampal volume (2‐test: B = ‐161.19, p = .045; 1‐test: B = ‐134.88, p = .08). Neither criterion predicted p‐tau181, p‐tau231, or t‐tau.Conclusion2‐test criteria demonstrated stronger associations between cognitive impairment and markers of axonal injury and neurodegeneration. Incorporating multiple test scores to identify cognitive impairment could improve diagnostic specificity in TES.

Importance Since 2018, a movement has emerged to define Alzheimer disease (AD) as a purely biological entity based on biomarker findings. The recent revision of the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) criteria for AD furthers this direction. However, concerns about a purely biological definition of AD being applied clinically, the understanding of AD by society at large, and the translation of blood-based biomarkers into clinical practice prompt these International Working Group (IWG) updated recommendations. Objective To consider the revised AA criteria and to offer an alternative definitional view of AD as a clinical-biological construct for clinical use. The recommendations of the 2021 IWG diagnostic criteria are updated for further elaborating at-risk and presymptomatic states. Evidence Review PubMed was searched for articles published between July 1, 2020, and March 1, 2024, using the terms “biomarker” OR “amyloid” OR “tau” OR “neurodegeneration” OR “preclinical” OR “CSF” OR “PET” OR “plasma” AND “Alzheimer’s disease.” The references of relevant articles were also searched. Findings In the new AA diagnostic criteria, AD can be defined clinically as encompassing cognitively normal people having a core 1 AD biomarker. However, recent literature shows that the majority of biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals will not become symptomatic along a proximate timeline. In the clinical setting, disclosing a diagnosis of AD to cognitively normal people with only core 1 AD biomarkers represents the most problematic implication of a purely biological definition of the disease. Conclusions and Relevance The ultimate aim of the field was to foster effective AD treatments, including preventing symptoms and dementia. The approach of diagnosing AD without a clinical and biological construct would be unwarranted and potentially concerning without a clear knowledge of when or whether symptoms will ever develop. It is recommended that those who are amyloid-positive only and, more generally, most biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals, should not be labeled as having AD. Rather, they should be considered as being at risk for AD. The expansion of presymptomatic AD is viewed as a better diagnostic construct for those with a specific pattern of biomarkers, indicating that they are proximate to the expression of symptoms in the near future.

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive head impacts (RHI) from American football can lead to tau and non‐tau pathologies that might present as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on FLAIR MRI. In 2022, we published a study in Alzheimer’s & Dementia that examined WMH and their association with risk factors and clinical function in former elite football players. That study will be presented during this symposium along with new unpublished data that used imaging and fluid biomarkers to examine etiological correlates (tau, amyloid, neurodegeneration, axonal injury, neuroinflammation) of WMH in the same cohort.MethodsThe multi‐site DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project recruited 180 football players and 60 asymptomatic males without RHI (“controls”), all 45‐74 years (Table 1). Participants completed MRI, lumbar puncture, and neuropsychological testing. Lesion Segmentation Toolbox estimated FLAIR WMH, FreeSurfer derived total cortical thickness, and a diffusion pipeline derived average global FA. CSF was analyzed for p‐tau181, Aβ1‐42, NfL, and sTREM2. Tobit regressions compared football players (n = 149) and controls (n = 53) on total and regional log‐WMH and estimated the effects of years of football and age of first exposure (AFE) to football on log‐WMH. Linear regressions evaluated log‐WMH and clinical associations in football players. Structural equation modeling (SEM) examined effects between log‐WMH and cortical thickness, FA, and the CSF biomarkers. Analyses accounted for age, race, revised Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (rFSRP), body mass index, APOE ε4, and evaluation site.ResultsAlosco et al. (2022) found older (i.e., 60+) but not younger football players had greater total, frontal, temporal and parietal log‐WMH compared to controls (FDR‐adjusted p‐values<0.05; Table 2). Among older football players, younger AFE was associated with greater log‐WMH (beta = ‐0.13, 95% CI = ‐0.23,‐0.02). Greater log‐WMH corresponded to worse Trails A‐B (beta = ‐4.32, 95% CI = ‐8.59,‐0.05) and List Learning Long Delay scores (beta = ‐0.56, 95% CI = ‐0.93,‐0.19). Subsequent unpublished SEM analyses in football players (Figure 1) showed the following direct effects on log‐WMH: higher rFSRP, higher CSF p‐tau181, lower FA, and reduced cortical thickness. There were no indirect effects. Compared to controls, SEM associations were stronger in football players exception for cortical thickness.ConclusionsFLAIR WMH might have unique imaging characteristics, risk factors, and pathological underpinnings in people exposed to RHI.