Citations

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing DTIs to heparin in humans receiving ECMO. A total of 28 studies were identified, most of which (n = 25) used bivalirudin, while the rest (n = 3) used argatroban. In random-effects meta-analysis, DTIs achieved the therapeutic anticoagulation range faster (mean difference = −6.96 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −11.98 to −1.95, p = 0.006) and maintained the therapeutic range for a greater proportion of time (mean difference = 18.6%, 95% CI = 8.78–28.42, p < 0.001) than heparin. Subgroup analysis revealed these effects were similarly significant in adult patients and when bivalirudin was the DTI; however, they were not significant in pediatric patients or when argatroban was the DTI. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the primary findings in only low-risk of bias studies and in only studies published as full papers. In summary, DTIs—specifically bivalirudin—were associated with faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and maintained the goal range for a greater percentage of time than heparin during ECMO support.

AbstractDocumentation burden contributes to health professional burnout and negatively impacts health professional well-being and patient care quality. Yet, there is a gap in the literature regarding an effective measure to assess the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in a wide range of care settings over time.We developed and administered a pulse survey to trend, with subsequent administrations, the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in all care settings in the United States over time.A multimethods approach was used which included conducting a scoping review of the literature to identify and then curate a set of potential survey items based on scoping review results. Next, a modified Delphi approach was used with clinical informatics experts for consensus-driven item selection and pulse survey development. Finally, we administered the pulse survey nationally using snowball sampling through professional listservs and networks of organizations.The scoping review helped to identify constructs and items to include on the pulse survey. After four iterations of the modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached on five final items for the pulse survey, labeled “TrendBurden.” The first administration of “TrendBurden” was completed by 1,253 healthcare professionals in April 2024. Most respondents (73.26%) disagreed that the time and effort spent documenting patient care is appropriate, with 77.42% reporting finishing work later or needing to work from home due to excessive documentation tasks. Seventy-four point three-eight percent agreed that the effort or time required to complete documentation tasks impedes patient care, and less than one-third (31.76%) agreed that the EHR is easy to use.The “TrendBurden” Pulse Survey was developed through a scoping review of the literature and expert consensus. The resulting five-question pulse survey was administered nationally and provided insight into current perceptions of documentation burden among healthcare professionals.

ImportanceIdentifying factors associated with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation for groups disproportionately affected by systemic inequities.ObjectiveTo examine factors associated with self-reported resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in racially and ethnically diverse, community-dwelling US adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) study, which assessed the associations of the pandemic with self-reported resilience of participants from 14 established US prospective cohorts since January 2021. This report includes participants who responded to the self-reported resilience question on C4R questionnaires. Data was initially analyzed from October 2023 to May 2024, with updated analyses performed from August 2024 to April 2025.ExposureRace and ethnicity, behavior factors, health conditions, and social determinants of health measurements accessed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through cohort visits and C4R questionnaires.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported resilience was collected via 1 question (from the Brief Resilience Scale) in C4R questionnaires, “I tend to bounce back quickly after hard times.” Participants who answered agree or strongly agree were classified as resilient, and those who reported neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree were classified as not resilient. Modified Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and access multivariable-adjusted associations with resilience.ResultsOf 31 045 participants (18 672 [60%] women; 10 746 [34.6%] aged &amp;lt;65 years), 1185 (3.8%) identified as American Indian, 6728 (21.7%) as Black, 293 (0.9%) as East Asian, 6311 (20.3%) as Hispanic, 565 (1.8%) as South Asian, and 15 961 (51.3%) as White; a total of 23 103 participants (74.4%) self-identified as resilient. Compared with White participants, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence of self-reported resilience (adjusted PR [aPR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; aPR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11; respectively) and American Indian and East Asian participants had lower prevalence (aPR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; aPR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; respectively). Higher education, being married or living as married, higher income, and overweight were also associated with higher prevalence of resilience. Being female, having diabetes, and being unemployed were associated with lower prevalence of self-reported resilience. Compared with participants with public insurance only, participants with private insurance had higher prevalence of resilience (aPR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10). COVID-19 vaccination and infection statuses were not significantly associated with resilience. Modification analyses showed important racial and ethnic differences in how factors such as hypertension, marital status, and insurance status were associated with resilience.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 31 045 adults, self-reported resilience varied by race, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual and social factors in shaping the perception of resilience.

Abstract Twenty percent of patients with follicular lymphoma relapse early with poor outcomes; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying this aggressive behavior are unknown. Using a multiomic approach, we show that patients with follicular lymphoma with elevated IRF4 expression (IRF4hi) have increased transformation risk, dysregulated immune signaling, and a suppressive tumor microenvironment. Loss- and gain-of-function experiments in IRF4hi lymphoma cells, along with chromatin profiling, demonstrate that IRF4 impairs their interaction with T cells by repressing antigen presentation and co-receptor gene modules while promoting the expression of cytokines that antagonize T-follicular helper cell and regulatory T-cell functions. Additionally, IRF4 rewires tumor metabolism and restricts glucose availability to immune cells. Silencing of IRF4 inhibits tumor cell growth and restores immune surveillance mechanisms, thus representing a promising target for therapy. Our data suggest that IRF4hi lymphoma cells co-opt a developmental mechanism used to exit the germinal center response in promoting a more aggressive cancer via engagement of multiple immune-evasive mechanisms. Significance: We show that IRF4 controls immune and metabolic signaling with functional effects on the cross-talk between B and T cells, resulting in a suppressive immune microenvironment when IRF4 is overexpressed in lymphoma. This underscores the importance of IRF4 as a pivotal therapeutic target to restore antitumor immunosurveillance for IRF4-associated lymphomas.

Abstract Epcoritamab and glofitamab are CD20-directed bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved in the United States for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Limited data exist for patients treated outside of trials. Patients with R/R DLBCL receiving commercial epcoritamab or glofitamab between 1 January 2023 and 15 October 2024 were collected from 21 United States institutions. Among 245 patients, 156 received epcoritamab and 89 received glofitamab, 113 were refractory to front-line therapy, 40 had MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, 147 received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and 174 patients would have been ineligible for registrational trials. The overall response rate (ORR) for epcoritamab and glofitamab was 51% (23% complete response, [CR]) and 53% (30% CR), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.8 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-11.0 months). The 6-month PFS was 36% (95% CI, 30-44) and the 6-month OS was 60% (95% CI, 54-67). Both trial ineligibility and undetectable CD20 pre-BsAbs portended shorter PFS and OS. Of 17 individuals with paired biopsies, 15 (88.2%) lost CD20 expression after BsAbs with a median time to progression of 3.7 months. This analysis including patients with R/R DLBCL shows the ORR to CD3/CD20 BsAbs was comparable to pivotal trials, although PFS and OS were lower. Baseline undetectable levels of CD20 were associated with poor outcomes. These results demonstrate the activity of BsAbs in R/R DLBCL, and underscore the importance of target antigen expression.

Abstract Aims Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening and preventive care in the early postpartum are recommended for women with prior gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), certain barriers limit access to such services. We conducted a scoping review to summarize evidence on the barriers and facilitators of CVD prevention services among women with prior GDM or HDP. Methods and results A comprehensive search strategy was used to search articles published in three databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase). Studies published in English or French that investigated and reported barriers or facilitators to postpartum CVD screening and preventive care among women with previous GDM and HDP were included. Out of 18 565 studies we screened, 29 studies (12 qualitative, 17 quantitative) were included. Main individual level barriers including lack of knowledge, health, and emotional factors were identified. Competing priorities, lack of family/friend support, and mistrust of healthcare providers were the most reported interpersonal level barriers, while gaps in communication were the most significant organizational barrier, and gaps in insurance coverage was the most reported system barrier. Individual level facilitators included a personal desire for better health and availability of postpartum programmes, and the most reported interpersonal facilitator was women's commitment to modelling a healthy lifestyle for their children. Organizational level facilitators were access to primary care providers and follow-up visit reminders, and programme availability in native languages. Conclusion Women with prior GDM or HDP face significant barriers to accessing postpartum CVD prevention services. These barriers ranged from individual-level knowledge gaps to system-level healthcare disparities.

ABSTRACT Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler‐Weber‐Rendu disease) is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 1 in 5000 people. Development of disease‐modifying and efficacious hemostatic agents to treat HHT has finally begun after decades without such medical therapies. However, the lack of consensus on standardized severity definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology remains a major obstacle to clinical investigation and therapeutic development in HHT. Additionally, with the ongoing repurposing of antiangiogenic agents and emerging development of novel HHT‐specific therapies, comparative clinical trials are expected in the future. Therefore, to end the problematic heterogeneity hindering these efforts, the Global Research and Medical Advisory Board (GRMAB) of the Cure HHT Foundation, an international group of recognized HHT experts, convened a conference of expert HHT clinician‐investigators from within GRMAB as well as invited external experts in HHT and bleeding disorders generally, patients with HHT, and patient advocates to define standard terminology and definitions for outcomes and severity classification for bleeding and anemia in HHT. These criteria and definitions should be adopted by regulators, investigators, and the pharmaceutical industry in the development and performance of interventional clinical trials and cohort studies to allow improved comparability between clinical trials, facilitate communication between clinicians and investigators, improve therapeutic guideline development, and provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria Evidence for this report was systematically identified and evaluated utilizing two search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE, described in full detail in the Appendix, pp.4–13. The searches were conducted on January 7, 2025. The titles and abstracts of each record were reviewed, and the inclusion criteria were applied to all search results to identify full text articles to be retrieved for further review. All retrieved full texts were then reviewed to reach a final determination if a study met the inclusion criteria. Included references were then compiled into evidence tables, which were then utilized by the International Consensus Report Working Group throughout the development of report recommendations.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Monoclonal anti‐amyloid therapies are now accessible, but how these treatments influence changes within the brain is still not clear. We investigated overall and regional change in amyloid removal, glucose metabolism, and atrophy in trial participants with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD). METHODS In the DIAN‐TU‐001 trial, 92 carriers received gantenerumab or placebo and underwent serial neuroimaging assessments including [ 11 C]‐Pittsburgh compound‐B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET), [ 18 F]‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (FDG) PET, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS Gantenerumab significantly reduced PiB‐PET uptake overall and in most regions and showed no changes in FDG‐PET or MRI measures. Drug effects were associated with baseline PiB‐PET uptake, and the largest effects occurred in medial regions. DISCUSSION Treated DIAD participants, and especially those with higher amyloid burden, showed a decrease in PiB‐PET uptake, which was more pronounced in the basal ganglia and medial frontal structures. These results may inform patient response and future drug trial design. Highlights Gantenerumab unevenly decreased Aβ burden as measured by PiB‐PET across brain regions. The strongest decrease in PiB‐PET uptake was in basal ganglia and medial frontal structures. Variable drug effect on Aβ was partly due to the amount of burden present before treatment. There was no regional effect on FDG‐PET metabolism or MRI volumetrics after 4 years.