Chatterjee, Subhasis

OBJECTIVES: Vasoplegia is a common complication of cardiac surgery that uses cardiopulmonary bypass and contributes to morbidity and mortality, yet a consensus definition does not exist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic criteria and definitions used to characterize vasoplegia and how different criteria influence incidence estimates. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform clinical trials registry. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting on vasoplegia in adults undergoing any type of cardiac surgery that used cardiopulmonary bypass. DATA EXTRACTION: Proportional meta-analysis using a random-effects model and the inverse variance method was used to calculate the pooled incidence of vasoplegia and its clinical outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 68 studies encompassing 56,580 patients were identified, from which 63 unique vasoplegia definitions were used. Blood pressure ( n = 57 studies, 84%) and cardiac output ( n = 50 studies, 74%) were among the most common criteria used in vasoplegia definitions; however, there was a vast variety of threshold values applied within these criteria and all other criteria comprising the definitions. The pooled incidence of vasoplegia was 21% (95% CI, 17–25%), acute kidney injury was 32% (95% CI, 21–45%), and mortality was 12% (95% CI, 9–16%). Subgroup analysis revealed that transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation surgeries, and those with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% had a significantly greater incidence of vasoplegia. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature varies greatly in the criteria used to define vasoplegia associated with on-pump cardiac surgery. Generation and adoption of a unified definition for vasoplegia must be an international priority.

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing DTIs to heparin in humans receiving ECMO. A total of 28 studies were identified, most of which (n = 25) used bivalirudin, while the rest (n = 3) used argatroban. In random-effects meta-analysis, DTIs achieved the therapeutic anticoagulation range faster (mean difference = −6.96 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −11.98 to −1.95, p = 0.006) and maintained the therapeutic range for a greater proportion of time (mean difference = 18.6%, 95% CI = 8.78–28.42, p < 0.001) than heparin. Subgroup analysis revealed these effects were similarly significant in adult patients and when bivalirudin was the DTI; however, they were not significant in pediatric patients or when argatroban was the DTI. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the primary findings in only low-risk of bias studies and in only studies published as full papers. In summary, DTIs—specifically bivalirudin—were associated with faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and maintained the goal range for a greater percentage of time than heparin during ECMO support.

Abstract Background Preoperative risk scores facilitate patient selection, but postoperative risk scores may offer valuable information for predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that the postoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score would predict mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 294 continuous‐flow LVAD implantations performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester during 2007 to 2015. We calculated the EuroSCORE, HeartMate‐II Risk Score, and RV Failure Risk Score from preoperative data and the APACHE III and Post Cardiac Surgery (POCAS) risk scores from postoperative data. Daily, maximum, and mean SOFA scores were calculated for the first 5 postoperative days. The area under receiver‐operator characteristic curves (AUC) was calculated to compare the scoring systems' ability to predict 30‐day, 90‐day, and 1‐year mortality. Results For the entire cohort, mortality was 5% at 30 days, 10% at 90 days, and 19% at 1 year. The Day 1 SOFA score had better discrimination for 30‐day mortality (AUC 0.77) than the preoperative risk scores or the APACHE III and POCAS postoperative scores. The maximum SOFA score had the best discrimination for 30‐day mortality (AUC 0.86), and the mean SOFA score had the best discrimination for 90‐day mortality (AUC 0.82) and 1‐year mortality (AUC 0.76). Conclusions We observed that postoperative mean and maximum SOFA scores in LVAD recipients predict short‐term and intermediate‐term mortality better than preoperative risk scores do. However, because preoperative and postoperative risk scores each contribute unique information, they are best used in concert to predict outcomes after LVAD implantation.