Citations

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies, but have proven challenging in solid tumors, in part owing to a lack of tumor-specific targets and unmanageable toxicity. Mesothelin (MSLN) expression normally is limited to the mesothelium of major body cavities but can be upregulated in diverse solid tumor types (cancer.gov/tcga), making it a potential target for cancer therapy. MSLN-targeted cell therapy approaches, including CAR T and T-cell receptor fusion therapies, have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity including fatal events have occurred (Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018.; Haas, et al. Mol Ther. 2023.; Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstract 9590.). A2B694 is an autologous logic-gated, MSLN-targeted Tmod CAR T therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: an activating and blocking receptor. The activator recognizes MSLN present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker inhibits the CAR T activator when it binds human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02, which is present in normal cells and often lost in tumor cells. Thus, in patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH), the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020). Through this unique selective mechanism, A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 in adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other solid tumors with MSLN expression. Eligible patients must have progressed following standard of care therapy. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), which identifies patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc). Eligible patients enroll in the BASECAMP-1 study and undergo leukapheresis. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. The first patient was enrolled on EVEREST-2 in April 2024. Dose escalation is ongoing. Citation Format: Julian R. Molina, Antonious Hazim, Oliver Dorigo, Salman R. Punekar, Monica Avila, Diane M. Simeone, Kedar Kirtane, Gottfried E. Konecny, Jeffrey Ward, Matthew Block, Jennifer Specht, Leslie Boyd, Yanyan Lou, Jong Chul Park, Jacqueline D. Xuan, Ramez N. Eskander, Gayanie Ong, Marco Davila, Wendy Langeberg, Marcela Maus, Armen Mardiros, Frederick L. Locke, Andrea Wise, David G. Maloney, John Welch, J. Randolph Hecht. EVEREST-2: A seamless phase 1/2 study of A2B694, a logic-gated Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with mesothelin-expressing solid tumors with human leukocyte antigen-A*02 loss of heterozygosity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT186.

Background: Cervical cancer screening with a self-collected vaginal specimen for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2024, offering a potential solution to declining screening rates. Objective: We aimed to assess acceptability of clinic-based vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing and to evaluate associations between participants’ sociodemographics and their likelihood of choosing self-collection for future screening and the overall acceptability of using the Evalyn® brush device. We also evaluated associations between specific acceptability constructs and reported likelihood to use the device in the future and overall acceptability. Methods: Following self-collection of a vaginal specimen, participants completed an electronic survey that measured constructs from the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Associations were assessed using logistic regressions. The study was conducted at a colposcopy clinic in the Gynecology department of a midwestern academic medical center in the United States from November 2022 through July 2023. Results: Participants ( n = 81) reported high likelihood (98% likely or very likely) of choosing in-home self-collection for future screening and unanimity on overall acceptability (100% acceptable or completely acceptable) of using the device. More affirmative responses to measures on instruction understandability, ease of device use, understanding the device is used for cervical cancer screening, and perceiving self-collection improves screening rates were associated with a higher likelihood to choose self-collection for future screenings and overall acceptability of the device (all p values <0.05). Conclusion: Vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing was well-received in the studied population, with high acceptability and likelihood of uptake. Implementation efforts should provide user-friendly instructions and emphasize the benefits of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, particularly among people less likely to engage with clinician-collected speculum-based screening.

ABSTRACTBackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has arisen as a revolutionary treatment for hematologic malignancies. Our study aimed to evaluate how sex differences affect outcomes and complications following CAR T‐cell therapy.MethodsUtilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2018–2020), we identified patients and divided them into male and female groups. Hospital outcomes and complications were compared among these two groups after propensity score matching to match groups based on comorbidities, producing two comparable cohorts.ResultsWe analyzed 2928 patients (1832 males, 62.6%, mean age 60.3 ± 13.7 years; 1096 females, 37.4%, mean age 59.1 ± 13.8 years). After propensity score matching (1:1ratio), 1092 males and females were compared. There were no significant sex differences in early mortality (adjusted odd ratios (aOR): 1.04 [95% CI 0.69–1.57]), 30‐day readmissions (aOR: 1.05 [95% CI 0.86–1.30]), or nonhome discharge (aOR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.60–1.31]). Females had higher odds of leukopenia (aOR: 1.26 [95% CI 1.06–1.50]) but lower odds of acute kidney injury (aOR: 0.68 [95% CI 0.52–0.88]).ConclusionsNo sex differences were found in hospital outcomes, including early mortality, 30‐day readmission, and nonhome discharge after CAR T‐cell therapy.

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) imposes a significant mortality burden. Understanding demographic influences on the location of AS-related death is crucial for advancing equitable end-of-life care. Therefore, we investigated how demographic factors influence the location of death among AS patients in the United States. Methods: We completed a cross-sectional study utilizing US mortality data from the CDC’s WONDER database for 2019. All files related to decedents with AS identified as the primary cause of death were obtained, including demographic information and death locations (i.e., inpatient facilities, outpatient/ER facilities, home, or hospice/nursing facilities). Associations between demographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and education) and place of death were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models, yielding odds ratios (ORs). Results: In 2019, most AS-related deaths occurred in inpatient facilities (38.3%, n = 5062), home (29.2%, n = 3859), or hospice/nursing facilities (28.6%, n = 3775). Higher odds of inpatient death were observed among Black (OR 1.67, p < 0.001) and Hispanic individuals (OR 1.91, p < 0.001) compared to White decedents. Those aged >85 years were more likely to die at home (OR 1.76, p < 0.001) or in hospice/nursing facilities (OR 7.80, p < 0.001). Males had increased odds of inpatient death (OR 1.09, p = 0.044) but decreased odds of hospice/nursing facility death (OR 0.87, p = 0.003). Higher education levels were associated with increased odds of home death (OR 1.33, p = 0.023) and decreased odds of hospice/nursing facility death (OR 0.71, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Demographic factors significantly influence the location of death among AS patients, emphasizing the need for culturally and socioeconomically tailored interventions to promote equitable end-of-life care.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have decline in cognitive domains including memory, language, visuospatial, and/or executive function and brain pathology including amyloid‐β and tau deposition, neurodegeneration, and frequent vascular co‐pathologies detectable by neuroimaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. However, molecular disease mechanisms are complex and heterogeneous. It is necessary to develop cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers reflecting brain molecular perturbations in AD. We identified blood‐based gene and co‐expression network level changes associated with AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis and AD‐related phenotypes.MethodWe performed differential gene expression and weighted gene co‐expression network analysis, followed by meta‐analysis, using blood transcriptome data of 391 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and 654 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The neuroimaging phenotypes include microhemorrhages, infarcts, amyloid burden, hippocampal volume, and white matter hyperintensities. The cognitive phenotypes include standardized cognitive subtest scores and composite scores for memory, language, visuospatial, and executive function.ResultFive out of 18 modules(M) are significantly associated with diagnosis or cognition (FDR‐adjusted p<0.05). M1 and M15 both positively associates with memory, M1 positively associated with language and M15 with visuospatial function. M1 and M15 are enriched in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with language and executive function, respectively. M2 negatively associates with logical memory delayed recall scores(LMDR), memory, executive, and language functions and is enriched in DEGs for these phenotypes. M8 negatively associates with memory, language and executive functions and is enriched in DEGs for memory and language. M12 positively associates with LMDR. M1 and M15 are down‐regulated while M2 and M8 are up‐regulated in AD/MCI patients. Cell‐type enrichment analysis showed M2 is enriched in monocytes and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes; M15 in B cells (FDR <0.05). Gene ontology terms enriched in these modules indicated broad consistency with their cell types.ConclusionWe identified five modules significantly associated with AD/MCI or cognitive phenotypes using blood transcriptome data. These findings nominate blood transcriptome changes and their enriched biological processes as potential pathomechanisms in cognitive decline and AD/MCI development. We aim to investigate these blood transcripts as potential biomarkers for AD or AD‐related phenotypes and therapeutic targets through additional replication and experimental validation studies.

AbstractBackgroundSystemic inflammation plays a pivotal role in many chronic diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Assessing the composition of immune pathways in neurodegenerative diseases can contribute to precision medicine. Using publicly available transcriptomic data, we sought to elucidate transcriptional networks pertinent to inflammatory pathways across brain regions and peripheral blood in AD/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and peripheral blood in Parkinson’s disease (PD).MethodFor the AD/MCI vs. control dataset, we analyzed bulk‐RNAseq collected from 6 brain regions of donors from ROSMAP, Mayo Clinic, and Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) brain banks available from the AMP‐AD consortium. Ante‐mortem, blood RNAseq expression data was retrieved from the AMP‐AD Emory Vascular cohort and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). We also collected blood‐derived microarray expression data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). For the PD vs Control dataset, blood‐derived bulk‐RNAseq from the PDBP and PPMI cohorts were available through the AMP‐PD consortium. Following quality control, normalization, and residual generation to account for biological and technical variables, co‐expression network modules and their enriched pathways were identified using WGCNA within each dataset. Module/trait correlation tests for aging and diagnosis (cases [AD/MCI or PD] vs control) phenotypes were evaluated. Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were executed to identify enriched pathways and brain or blood cell types within the modules. Modules were tested for preservation across cohorts.ResultWe identified conserved immune signatures across brain regions and cohorts. Modules involved in immune response were preserved across all cohorts. Blood consensus modules involved in immune response were preserved in the brain and vice versa. Some immune modules were associated with AD/MCI, PD, and/or aging. Brain immune modules are significantly associated with aging and/or AD. Significant correlations (q<0.05) with PD diagnosis were present. In the MCSA and Emory vascular cohorts, there were no significant (q<0.05) associations between modules and diagnosis, while in ADNI there were nominal (p<0.05) associations.ConclusionPreserved transcriptional immune networks were identified across blood and brain and across two neurodegenerative diseases. Expanding gene co‐expression network analyses to other diseases and integrating additional omics measures and phenotypes can further strengthen these findings to unravel the immune signatures across complex diseases.

Background: CLL is one of the most common types of leukemia in the United States, with an estimated 20,700 new cases in 2024. Although cBTKis have become the standard of care for CLL/SLL in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is a known side effect. Further, clinical outcomes often worsen as patients progress beyond 1st-line therapy (1L), and the frequency of CV adverse events (CVAEs) may increase with age and as patients progress to 2nd-line or later therapies (2L+). This research evaluated the real-world incidence of CVAEs and clinical outcomes in patients who initiated cBTKi between 2020 and 2023. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with CLL/SLL who initiated cBTKi treatment (index date) between 2020-2023 in the United States were identified using claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database and followed up to 36 months post-index. Cohorts were assessed as those initiating 1L or 2L+, reflecting treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients. Results were presented for patients with an incident CVAE (not present pre-index) and those without. Demographics, incident CVAEs, overall survival (OS) and proportion of patients who discontinued index cBTKi therapy, initiated next treatment or experienced death (NT+D) were assessed. Time to CV event (TTCE) for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were determined using a Kaplan-Meier (KM) model and Log rank test. Results: Overall, 2,163 eligible patients were identified with a mean ± SD age of 73.8 ± 9.2 years, and 40.6% were female. Of these, 1,958 (90.5%) were included in the 1L cohort and 205 (9.5%) in the 2L+ cohort; 619 (31.6%) and 63 (30.7%) patients had CVAEs, respectively. The mean ± SD [median] observation period was 1.6 ± 0.9 [2.0] years in 1L and 1.5 ± 1.0 [1.0] years in 2L+. The most common cBTKi (in 1L and 2L+) at index were ibrutinib (55.5% and 55.6%), followed by acalabrutinib (40.3% and 38.5%), and zanubrutinib (4.1% and 5.9%). At 12-months post-index, the proportion of 1L patients with and without CVAEs who discontinued treatment was 44.9% and 41.6%, rising to 65.6% and 59.0% by 36-months post-index, respectively. For those in 2L+, 50.8% and 40.8% of those with and without CVAEs discontinued treatment by 12-months; 68.3% and 55.6% discontinued by 36-months. Among those with and without CVAEs, NT+D in 1L patients was 35.9% and 22.5% within 12-months post-index and 56.9% and 32.8% by 36-months. In the 2L+ cohort, 46.0% and 31.7% experienced NT+D by 12-months, rising to 63.5% and 41.5% by 36-months. OS in 1L patients was 84.7% and 93.1% in those with and without CVAEs at 12-months and 69.1% and 88.0% at 36-months. For 2L+ patients, OS was 71.4% and 88.0% at 12-months and decreased to 54.0% and 80.3% at 36-months, among those with and without CVAEs, respectively. The most common incident CVAEs following cBTKi initiation in the 1L and 2L+ cohorts were hypertension (31.2% and 21.7%), heart failure (14.6% and 17.7%), atrial fibrillation (13.9% and 18.4%), atrial flutter (13.3% and 16.9%), and ventricular arrythmias (13.0% and 14.5%). The occurrence of incident CVAEs between 1L patients who received acalabrutinib and ibrutinib was 3.4% and 13.2% for atrial fibrillation, 2.7% and 12.7% for atrial flutter, 9.3% and 31.0% for hypertension, and 6.8% and 11.7% for ventricular arrythmias. For 2L+, the proportion experiencing CVAEs with index acalabrutinib or ibrutinib were 8.6% and 14.8% for atrial fibrillation, 7.6% and 14.8% for atrial flutter, 10.5% and 25.0% for hypertension, and 10.1% and 8.8% for ventricular arrythmias. Among acalabrutinib and ibrutinib patients, KM estimates (medians not reached) in 1L showed that 84% and 72% of patients would not experience a CVAE by 12 months, with 57% and 52% not experiencing a CVAE at 36-months (p&lt;0.001); 2L+ KM estimate rates were 77% and 73% at 12-months and 64% and 60% at 36-months (p=0.28). Mean TTCE for acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in 1L was 2.2 and 1.9 years with 1.6 and 1.2 years in 2L+. Summary/Conclusion: Utilizing real-world evidence from patients with CLL/SLL receiving cBTKIs, this study highlights the CV disease burden among patients who incur new CV events in 1L or later lines of therapy. This research underscores the need for innovative therapies with improved efficacy and CV safety profiles that delay progression to later lines of therapy, as well as careful CV monitoring to allow for early management and improved outcomes.

Background: Although Covalent BTKis have revolutionized treatment of CLL/SLL, cardiotoxicity is a known side effect, which can increase the total costs to the healthcare system. This study evaluated the real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients who did and did not experience incident cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) during cBTKi treatment. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with CLL/SLL who initiated ibrutinib or acalabrutinib treatment (index date) between 2020-2023 in the United States were identified using claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database and followed up to 36 months post-index. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the presence of an incident CVAE during treatment with index cBTKi, defined as the occurrence of a CVAE not present in a patient's medical history. HCRU and costs were evaluated on a per 1,000 patient-months basis. Z tests and univariate gamma general linear models were used to compare HCRU and cost rates. HCRU between those who received ibrutinib or acalabrutinib were also assessed. Results: Overall, 2,069 eligible patients were identified with a mean ± SD age of 73.7 ± 9.1 years, and 40.4% were female. The mean ± SD [median] treatment-specific observation period was 11.4 ± 9.5 [8.5] months. Of the total cohort, 442 (21.4%) experienced at least one incident CVAE, while 1,627 patients (78.6%) experienced no CVAEs. Among those without a pre-index history of the specific CV AE of interest, the proportion of patients with incident events were 21.4% for hypertension, 9.8% for atrial fibrillation, 9.2% for atrial flutter, and 9.6% for ventricular arrhythmias. Patients who experienced an incident CVAE had 4,334 total days with medical service compared to 3,138 days in those who did not (p&lt;0.001). The drivers of differences in total medical service days between those with and without CVAEs were inpatient days (690 vs 230), followed by outpatient days (2,798 vs 2,425), other visits (e.g., hospice; 662 vs 375), and emergency room (ER) visits (184 vs 109). Total days with medical service were 3,458 in those who received ibrutinib and 3,410 with acalabrutinib. Total healthcare cost rates in those who experienced an incident CVAE were $20,250,560 compared to $17,413,460 in those without CVAEs (p&lt;0.001). Inpatient costs drove differences in total costs between those with CVAEs and those without ($3,417,948 vs $915,839, p&lt;0.001), followed by outpatient ($2,415,060 vs $1,769,628, p&lt;0.01) and ER costs ($186,820 vs $87,585, p&lt;0.001). Pharmacy costs were the largest contributor to total cost rates for both cohorts ($14,016,900 for those with a CVAE vs $14,473,270 without any CVAEs, p&lt;0.001). Regarding specific incident CVAEs, the cost difference in total costs between those with and without the event were $3,789,820 for atrial fibrillation (higher in those with the event), $3,867,160 for atrial flutter, $3,674,860 for ventricular arrhythmias, and $721,840 for hypertension. Inpatient costs were the largest driver in total cost differences between those with and without the specific CVAE of interest; inpatient cost differences were $3,255,699 higher in those with atrial fibrillation, $3,436,913 with atrial flutter, and $3,299,371 with ventricular arrhythmia. For hypertension, pharmacy costs drove differences in total costs and were $346,570 higher in those with the CVAE. Summary/Conclusion: Overall, the economic burden remains high in patients treated for CLL/SLL, especially in cBTKi patients experiencing an incident CVAE. These findings highlight the importance of careful treatment selection, safety monitoring, and early management of CVAEs in order to improve patient outcomes and reduce the downstream impacts on healthcare resources and costs.

Background: The optimal timing of pacemaker reimplantation following transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) remains unclear. Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of timing to pacemaker reimplantation after TLR of infected CIED on hospital outcomes. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients aged ≥18 years who underwent new pacemaker implantation with percutaneous approach following TLR of infected CIED from 2017 to 2020 were identified. The study population was stratified based on the timing of pacemaker reimplantation following TLR of infected CIED: early (<5 days) vs delayed (≥5 days). Weighted-propensity-score matched conditional multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the impact of the timing on various outcomes. Results: In our study, 469 (66.9%) patients received early device reimplantation, and 232 (33.1%) patients received delayed device reimplantation (≥5 days). Post-procedurally, patients in the delayed group had a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay (95% CI OR: 42.37 (6.36 – 282.11); p<0.01) and non-home discharge (95% CI OR: 2.00 (1.35 – 2.95), p<0.01). There was no significant difference between both groups in the early mortality, 30-day readmission, and procedural complications. Conclusion: Our study suggests that time-to-device reimplantation from TLR of infected CIED did not affect the overall short-term in-hospital outcomes. However, delayed device reimplantation was associated with a higher rate of prolonged hospital stay and non-home discharge.