Back to Authors

McCann, Jainnee

Mayo Clinic

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 2

Human Papillomavirus Test Agreement Between Self-Collected Vaginal and Clinician-Collected Cervical Specimens
Cyriac, Jissy , Theel, Elitza S. , Long, Margaret E. , Maxson, Julie, Cole, Kristin C., Lin, Iris, McCann, J P, Gallagher, Elise M., Meunier, Matthew R., Rutten, Lila J. Finney, Binnicker, Matthew J. , MacLaughlin, Kathy L. , Maxson, Julie A, McCann, Jainnee, McCann, Jainnee, Meunier, Matthew R. , Jacobson, Robert M. , Rutten, Lila J. Finney

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | May 26, 2026 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 161-168

10.1097/lgt.0000000000000962 Get It

Objectives: We evaluated agreement between human papillomavirus (HPV) tests performed on self-collected vaginal and clinician-collected cervical specimens to advance HPV self-collection as a cervical cancer screening option in our health care system. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at an academic medical center. Participants were 25–65 years old with upcoming colposcopy appointments. One cohort (n = 79) self-collected a vaginal specimen in the clinic immediately before a clinician-collected cervical specimen. The second cohort (n = 115) self-collected a vaginal specimen at home, mailed it in, and had a clinician-collected cervical specimen in the clinic. Paired specimens were evaluated for total (TPA), positive (PPA), and negative (NPA) percentage agreement. Extreme temperature stability studies were also conducted. Results: Compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens, in-clinic self-collected vaginal specimens showed a TPA, PPA, and NPA of 98%, 100%, and 97% for HPV16; 99%, 100%, and 99% for HPV18; 86%, 94%, and 79% for high-risk other (HRO) HPV. The TPA, PPA, and NPA for at-home self-collected vaginal specimens compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens were 94%, 79%, and 96% for HPV16; 95%, 43%, and 98% for HPV18; 89%, 80%, and 93% for HRO. Vaginal specimens showed prolonged stability and were unaffected by extreme temperatures. Conclusions: In general, in-clinic and at-home self-collected vaginal HPV specimens for HPV screening demonstrate high agreement with clinician-collected cervical specimens, with the exception of low PPA in the at-home self-collected vaginal HPV18 subgroup. Our findings support the use of HPV self-collection as a practical option to expand access to cervical cancer screening.
Acceptability of Vaginal Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection Among Colposcopy Clinic Attendees
MacLaughlin, Kathy L. , Cole, Kristin C., Maxson, Julie, McCann, J P, Meunier, Matthew R. , Long, Margaret E. , Mara, Kristin C. , Maxson, Julie A, McCann, Jainnee, Zhu, Xuan , Meunier, Matthew R , Mara, Kristin C , McCann, Jainnee, Jacobson, Robert M.

Women's Health Reports | April 14, 2025 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1089/whr.2025.0006 Get It

Background: Cervical cancer screening with a self-collected vaginal specimen for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2024, offering a potential solution to declining screening rates. Objective: We aimed to assess acceptability of clinic-based vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing and to evaluate associations between participants’ sociodemographics and their likelihood of choosing self-collection for future screening and the overall acceptability of using the Evalyn® brush device. We also evaluated associations between specific acceptability constructs and reported likelihood to use the device in the future and overall acceptability. Methods: Following self-collection of a vaginal specimen, participants completed an electronic survey that measured constructs from the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Associations were assessed using logistic regressions. The study was conducted at a colposcopy clinic in the Gynecology department of a midwestern academic medical center in the United States from November 2022 through July 2023. Results: Participants ( n = 81) reported high likelihood (98% likely or very likely) of choosing in-home self-collection for future screening and unanimity on overall acceptability (100% acceptable or completely acceptable) of using the device. More affirmative responses to measures on instruction understandability, ease of device use, understanding the device is used for cervical cancer screening, and perceiving self-collection improves screening rates were associated with a higher likelihood to choose self-collection for future screenings and overall acceptability of the device (all p values <0.05). Conclusion: Vaginal specimen self-collection for HPV testing was well-received in the studied population, with high acceptability and likelihood of uptake. Implementation efforts should provide user-friendly instructions and emphasize the benefits of self-collection for cervical cancer screening, particularly among people less likely to engage with clinician-collected speculum-based screening.