Cole, Kristin C.

Background Menopause-related symptoms are common but undertreated. Digital tools that support symptom assessment and patient education may improve engagement. Objective To assess whether a previsit digital menopause symptom assessment and education tool increased treatment initiation and patient engagement compared to an educational pamphlet. Design Women aged 45–55 years with upcoming primary care appointments were invited to participate. Those with a total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score ≥5 indicating bothersome menopause symptoms were included. Participants were randomized to a digital menopause symptom assessment tool or a digital educational pamphlet and completed a post-visit survey (NCT06919887). Participants Of the 14,726 women invited to participate between May 12, 2025, and December 5, 2025, there were 653 (4.4%) enrolled that met eligibility criteria. Interventions Randomized to an mHealth app called emmii or a standard digital menopause educational pamphlet. Main measures Menopause treatment initiation within 30 days of the clinical visit was assessed by electronic health data. Baseline and post-visit surveys were collected assessing patient experience, engagement, and perceived usefulness. Rates of menopause hormone therapy (HT) prescribing were compared with a reference population of nonparticipants aged 45–55 who had a primary care appointment at Mayo Clinic during the same period and received no study education materials. Key results Of 653 participants enrolled and randomized, 383 completed both the baseline and post-surveys (171 intervention and 212 control). HT initiation among study participants was significantly higher than in the reference population of women (9.3% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in HT initiation between the intervention (9.1%) and control groups (9.6%) ( p = 0.83). Initiation rates were 3.8% and 4.5%, respectively ( p = 0.64) for nonhormone therapies. Conclusions Among women with bothersome menopause symptoms, those who underwent previsit symptom screening and received educational materials had higher rates of HT initiation than women who did not participate in the study. These findings suggest that structured menopause education may improve recognition and management of menopause symptoms in routine clinical practice.

Objectives: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) remains a challenge and immediate danger in patients with acute brain injury. Current literature supports the use of a single hyperosmolar agent to reduce ICP. However, the efficacy and safety of overlapping hyperosmolar agents have not been evaluated. The objectives of this study are to analyze the ICP lowering effects and evaluate the safety profile of overlapping hyperosmolar therapy. Materials and Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included adults (≥18 y) admitted to the Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit between May 2018 and September 2024 with acute brain injury leading to intracranial hypertension refractory to a single hyperosmolar agent and an ICP monitor. They received overlapping doses of mannitol and hypertonic sodium approximately every 3 hours. We evaluated the impact of overlapping hyperosmolar therapy on ICP. Safety outcomes included acute kidney injury incidence, electrolyte disturbances, and volume status changes. Results: Forty-six patients were included in this study with a median (IQR) age of 46.5 (35.9, 62.4) years. Median (IQR) dose of mannitol was 40.1 (34.6, 50.0) g, while median (IQR) dose of hypertonic sodium was 120 (90, 125) mEq. About 86% of patients experienced a decrease in ICP after initiation of overlapping hyperosmolar therapy. Six acute kidney injuries occurred, and 7 patients experienced pulmonary edema. Median (IQR) peak sodium, chloride, and osmolar gap values were 149 (144, 155) mEq/L, 115 (111, 119) mEq/L, and 5.7 (0.7, 9.0) mOsm/kg. Conclusions: Overlapping hyperosmolar therapy may provide a transient ICP reduction without excessive adverse effects in patients with refractory ICP to a single hyperosmolar agent.

Objectives: We evaluated agreement between human papillomavirus (HPV) tests performed on self-collected vaginal and clinician-collected cervical specimens to advance HPV self-collection as a cervical cancer screening option in our health care system. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at an academic medical center. Participants were 25–65 years old with upcoming colposcopy appointments. One cohort (n = 79) self-collected a vaginal specimen in the clinic immediately before a clinician-collected cervical specimen. The second cohort (n = 115) self-collected a vaginal specimen at home, mailed it in, and had a clinician-collected cervical specimen in the clinic. Paired specimens were evaluated for total (TPA), positive (PPA), and negative (NPA) percentage agreement. Extreme temperature stability studies were also conducted. Results: Compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens, in-clinic self-collected vaginal specimens showed a TPA, PPA, and NPA of 98%, 100%, and 97% for HPV16; 99%, 100%, and 99% for HPV18; 86%, 94%, and 79% for high-risk other (HRO) HPV. The TPA, PPA, and NPA for at-home self-collected vaginal specimens compared with clinician-collected cervical specimens were 94%, 79%, and 96% for HPV16; 95%, 43%, and 98% for HPV18; 89%, 80%, and 93% for HRO. Vaginal specimens showed prolonged stability and were unaffected by extreme temperatures. Conclusions: In general, in-clinic and at-home self-collected vaginal HPV specimens for HPV screening demonstrate high agreement with clinician-collected cervical specimens, with the exception of low PPA in the at-home self-collected vaginal HPV18 subgroup. Our findings support the use of HPV self-collection as a practical option to expand access to cervical cancer screening.