Hazim, Antonious

8579 Background: LOH may provide a means to target tumor versus normal cells, to augment the efficacy and safety of MSLN-targeted programs (Hecht et al. JCO . 2022). A2B694 is an autologous, logic-gated, Tmod CAR T therapy designed to improve tumor selectivity and decrease toxicity by integrating an MSLN CAR activator with an HLA-A*02 blocker (Hamburger et al. Mol Imm. 2020). Methods: The first-in-human, open-label, phase 1/2 EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) study of A2B694 in patients with recurrent/metastatic MSLN-expressing cancers with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH. The prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) identifies eligible patients and cryopreserves leukapheresis product. Upon progression, A2B694 is manufactured and administered after lymphodepletion. Phase 1 primary objective: evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify a recommended phase 2 dose. Results: As of 05 January 2026, 13 patients were enrolled: 8 women/5 men, median age 59 years, 11 non-Hispanic White/2 Hispanic with unknown race. Tumor types included colorectal (n = 4), ovarian (n = 3), pancreatic (n = 3), non–small cell lung adenocarcinoma (NSCLC), gastro-esophageal, and mesothelioma (n = 1 each). A2B694 dose level (DL) groups were: DL1: 1×10 8 cells (n = 3), DL2: 2×10 8 cells (n = 4), DL3: 4×10 8 cells (n = 5), and DL4: 6×10 8 cells plus low-dose IL-2 (n = 1). Lymphodepletion prior to administration of A2B694 was well-tolerated, with expected, transient cytopenias. The only adverse event reported in more than 1 patient was grade 3 neutropenia. One patient had grade 3 ICANS and 1 patient had grade 1 CRS. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or new safety signals after up to 17 months follow-up. All 13 patients received A2B694, were efficacy-evaluable, and had A2B694 detected post-infusion in peripheral blood. While A2B694 was not detected in tumor biopsies collected in patients treated at DL1 (0/2), all patients treated at DL2-DL4 with available biopsies (3/3) had detectable A2B694 in the tumor microenvironment. A patient with KRAS G12V /STK11 co-mutated NSCLC who had progressed on carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab achieved a complete response (CR) at D90 post-infusion per RECIST 1.1 by central review and had a confirmed CR at D180. In addition, PET-CT scan and ctDNA on D190 demonstrated no evidence of disease. On D243, the patient had a CNS relapse, with an ongoing non-CNS CR per RANO-BM at D284. At M12, the patient's CT showed no new findings and persistence of A2B694 in the blood was confirmed by ddPCR. Conclusions: We report the first patient with NSCLC to have a CR after CAR T. Overall, A2B694 demonstrated manageable safety and tolerability in patients with advanced solid MSLN-expressing tumors with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached; dose-escalation continues. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT) has revolutionized hematologic malignancies, yet translation to solid tumors has historically been limited. This landscape shifted significantly in 2024 with US Food and Drug Administration approvals of lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy for advanced melanoma, and afamitresgene autoleucel, an engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapy for synovial sarcoma. These approvals mark the clinical arrival of ACT for solid tumors and highlight a rapidly expanding therapeutic landscape. Beyond these indications, multiple ACT platforms including TIL, TCR, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell, CAR-natural killer, and CAR-macrophage therapies are under active clinical investigation across diverse solid tumor indications. Clinical experience to date has defined key barriers to efficacy, including impaired tumor trafficking, antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and limited cellular persistence. In parallel, rapid advances in cellular engineering are reshaping the field, with the development of armored constructs, logic-gated and multiantigen targeting strategies, innate immune–based platforms, and novel manufacturing approaches including allogeneic and in vivo cell engineering. As ACT enters clinical practice for select solid tumors, distinct toxicity profiles and logistical requirements necessitate careful patient selection and multidisciplinary coordination. Early biomarker testing, timely referral to specialized centers, and familiarity with evolving toxicity management frameworks are increasingly critical. Here, we seek to provide a practice-oriented framework for understanding emerging ACT platforms, clinical data, toxicity considerations, and implementation strategies relevant to contemporary solid tumor oncology care.

Abstract Background: Tarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand (DLL3)/CD3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) is FDA approved in patients (pts) with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), after progression on frontline chemoimmunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the immune cell profile in pts who received this therapy in standard-of-care (SOC) practice with progression free survival (PFS) less than and greater than two months (mo). Methods: Patients who received tarlatamab at Mayo Clinic Rochester and consented to immuno phenotyping of blood are included in the present study. Immune phenotyping was performed on whole blood by flow cytometry and analyzed by Kaluza. Data analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel and PRISM. Results: Eighteen patients with median age 64 (range 37-79) were included in the study. 66% of our cohort were women and 83% had present or past history of smoking, with an average of 40 pack years (range 26-60). With a median follow-up of 2 months, the median PFS for the cohort was 1.5 mo (range 0.33-2.76 months). 61% (13/18) of patients had PFS <2mo. 39% (5/18) had PFS>2mo and of which, three patients had partial response with one maintaining stable disease and one patient with mixed response. At baseline (BL), there were no difference in T cell, CD4 or CD8 cell count between patients in the PFS<2mo and PFS>2mo groups. Patients with PFS<2mo had higher exhausted CD8 T cells compared to those in the PFS>2mo group (CD8+PD1+TIGIT+CD57+, PFS<3mo vs >3mo, cells/mL: 7.14±4.28, 1.58±1.37, p=0.009). Additionally, when analyzing the B-cell population, the PFS<2mo group had lower percentage of B cells compared to the group with PFS>2mo at baseline (6.0±7.5, 10.4±14, p=0.02). At day 7, the group with PFS<2mo had lower Treg compared to the group with PFS>2mo (2.88±1.38, 4.60±1.47, p=0.02). Also, the PFS<2mo group had an increase of B cells compared to the group with PFS>2mo at day 7(<2mo vs >2mo: 10.0±14, 4.37±3.07, p=0.04). Finally, the group with PFS>2mo had decrease in total monocytes (mono), classical mono, and immunosuppressive cells (PFS<2mo vs >2mo, Mono: 340±347, 253±106, p=0.04. Classical mono: 305±283, 155±109, p=0.02. CD14+HLA-DRneg: 105.8±96, 12±39, p=0.03) compared to the group with PFS<2mo by day 7. While no changes were seen between BL and day 7 for intermediate mono in PFS<2mo group, PFS>2mo group had decreased post treatment intermediate monocytes (BL vs day 7, cells/mL, intermed mono: 32.5±15,17.7±6.2, p=0.03). Conclusion: In this study investigating the SOC outcomes of tarlatamab, early progression was associated with higher presence of exhausted CD8 T cells, B cells, and immunosuppressive monocytes. Analysis of additional patients will be shared at AACR meeting. Citation Format: Dhauna Karam Prasad, Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes, Malvika Gupta, Audrey Ma, Chen Wu, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Reagan, Rayaan Kamal, Ashley Potter, Abdullah Al-Ajmi, Syeda Mina, Sykler J. Taylor, Antonious Hazim, Anastasios Dimou, Kaushal Parikh, Mohammed Shanshal, Ailsa Luce, Anna Schwecke, Julian Molina, Aaron Mansfield, Katherine Smith, Lucy Holmes, Haidong Dong, Yi Lin, Konstantinos Leventakos. Immune cell profile changes in patients treated with tarlatamab for extensive stage small cell lung cancer in real world practice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3931.

PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly evolving in medicine. While there are existing data about the perceptions and concerns of health care workers regarding AI, those of the hematology and oncology (HemOnc) workforce remain unknown. We assessed opinions of physicians (faculty and fellows), advanced practice providers (APPs), and nurses in HemOnc on integrating AI in medical education (MedEd) and clinical practice (CP). METHODS Group-specific electronic surveys were developed. The HemOnc workforce from the three Mayo Clinic sites was invited to participate. Participation was anonymous, with data collection between November 7, 2024, and January 20, 2025. Results were reported as proportions, with 95% binomial CI when appropriate. RESULTS A total of 344 participants responded, 118 physicians (77 faculty, 41 fellows), 49 APPs, and 177 nurses. Most had used AI although less than half felt very or moderately knowledgeable about it. A total of 95% of fellows, 97% of faculty physicians, 96% of APP, and 92% of nurses believe that AI will be integrated in MedEd. A total of 94% of physicians and 88% of nonphysicians believe that this integration would be beneficial. In CP, 98% of fellows, 96% of faculty physicians, 100% of APPs, and 92% of nurses believe in AI's integration. However, 51% of physicians and 68% of nonphysicians had some concerns, including technology time, medical costs, and burnout. Nonetheless, 85% of fellows, 94% of faculty physicians, 98% of APPs, and 86% of nurses would embrace AI. CONCLUSION The majority of this single health system HemOnc's workforce endorsed AI integration into MedEd and CP but highlighted relevant concerns. Proper education, effective partnership among all stakeholders, and well-organized integration are essential for optimizing AI's incorporation into HemOnc's MedEd and CP and ensuring that it fully supports the mission of providing high-quality patient care.

1652 Background: Tarlatamab is a bispecific T-cell engager targeting DLL3 that has shown promise as a therapy in small cell lung cancer. Administering tarlatamab requires careful consideration of immune-related adverse events (AE), including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Prescribing information recommends patients to be monitored for 22-24 hours in an appropriate healthcare setting for cycle 1 (C1), days 1 and 8. At Mayo Clinic in Rochester MN (MCR), tarlatamab is initially administered in a hospital-based outpatient (HBO) setting utilizing an innovative remote patient monitoring system (RPM). In this study, we describe our RPM process and patient outcomes thus far. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated with tarlatamab from August through December 2024. All patients received tarlatamab in the HBO setting and were enrolled into RPM for C1, days 1–10. Patients attended daily HBO visits on days 1–3 and 8–10 of C1 and were required to stay within 30 minutes of the hospital with a 24-hour caregiver for 48 hours following infusion days in C1-2. Data on patient characteristics, frequency of RPM alerts, escalations, rate of CRS & ICANS, and need for hospitalizations were reported using descriptive metrics. Results: As part of RPM, patients are provided with a kit containing preconnected Bluetooth-enabled devices to measure vital signs (VS), including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), temperature (T), and pulse oximetry (SpO2). The kit also includes a cellular-enabled tablet for electronic ICANS questionnaires, which upload directly into our electronic medical record system. Patients are required to log VS four times daily, monitored in real-time by a centralized virtual RPM nursing (RN) team. Embedded decision trees trigger alerts, prompting the RN team to contact patients and follow care pathways for escalations as needed. Among the 16 patients treated, the median age was 68 years, and the median ECOG PS was 1. During the 10-day RPM period, a total of 2,233 VS entries were recorded. Of these, 88% (14/16) of patients had alerts triggered, with a median of 2 alerts per patient. Alerts were mostly for out-of-range systolic BP (56%), HR (56%), and T (25%), with none for SpO2. The RN team escalated alerts in 50% (8/16) of the patients. Overall, 38% (6/16) of patients were managed entirely in the HBO setting. Among the 63% hospitalized, 56% had CRS limited to grade (G) 2, and 31% had ICANS limited to G3. Two patients were hospitalized for other indications. The mean length of stay was 2.6 days, with no ICU admissions. Conclusions: Our experience shows that frequent monitoring required with tarlatamab can be safely and effectively executed in an outpatient setting with the utilization of an RPM system. It can potentially minimize the burden of hospitalizations for patients and the healthcare system.

e16408 Background: A2B530 is a logic-gated CEA-targeting Tmod CAR T therapy being evaluated in the EVEREST-1 (NCT05736731) phase 1/2 study. Tmod CAR T therapy addresses challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity that have limited application of CAR T therapy to solid tumors (Tabernero, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017); through use of a CEA-targeted CAR-activating receptor combined with a blocking receptor recognizing HLA-A*02, A2B530 can distinguish between tumor and normal cells (Sandberg, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022). Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors expressing CEA and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH are enrolled through the ongoing prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119). Eligible patients undergo leukapheresis and, when clinically appropriate, A2B530 is manufactured for the EVEREST-1 study. Patients undergo lymphodepletion before A2B530 infusion. The phase 1 dose escalation will evaluate safety, tolerability, manufacturing feasibility, and biomarkers starting at 1x10 8 Tmod positive cells (dose level [DL] 1) up to 6x10 8 cells and higher doses of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC; DL 5). After the recommended phase 2 dose has been established, dose expansion will confirm safety and activity. Results: As of January 15, 2025, 14 total participants were enrolled on EVEREST-1 and had received A2B530 infusion at DLs 1-5, 4 (29%) with pancreatic (PANC) and 10 (71%) with colorectal cancer. Median age was 57 years (range, 34-76), with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-6). LDC was well tolerated: neutropenia nadired at days 7-10, with recovery in all patients, and no significant episodes of prolonged cytopenia. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, grade > 3 serious adverse events (AEs), or episodes of related neurotoxicity. Most gastrointestinal AEs occurred early and were grade 1 or 2. One patient in DL 2 (2x10 8 cells) experienced possible grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which started on day 15 and resolved with supportive therapy within 2 days; later the CRS diagnosis was confounded by a positive blood culture from the participant’s central line. The low rate of CRS is consistent with the low levels of serum cytokines measured up to 28 days post-infusion. Central response assessment has been completed for the 6 participants in DLs 1-2, with a partial response observed in 1 of 3 (33%) of participants with PANC. Peak expansion shows a possible dose response. Conclusions: Treatment with A2B530 was well tolerated, showing potential clinical efficacy and a potential dose response, although these are initial results. Maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and dose escalation continues to determine the optimal phase 2 dosing of this treatment regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT05736731 .

9002 Background: The field of AI is rapidly evolving. With recent development of more user-friendly AI software, its integration into healthcare across different medical specialties, including HemOnc has emerged. Data detailing the perception and concerns of the HemOnc workforce about AI’s roles is lacking and is needed if AI is to be integrated in HemOnc CliPr and MedEd. Methods: Questionnaires about the perception and concerns regarding AI in CliPr and MedEd were created on REDCap and approved by IRB. We surveyed the entire HemOnc workforce at the 3 Mayo Clinic major sites between 11/07/24 and 01/20/25, including physicians, both faculty (FAC) and fellows (FEL), advanced practice providers (APP), and nurses (RN). Participation was voluntary. Simple statistical analyses were employed for the results. Results: 344 participants (PTP) responded to the survey, 118 physicians (41 FEL and 77 FAC), 49 APP, and 177 RN. 64% of PTP report having used AI but only 31% used it in HemOnc MedEd, and 28% in HemOnc CliPr, with 67% considering themselves to have little to no knowledge about AI. 94% of PTP believe AI will be integrated in HemOnc MedEd, with such integration being seen as beneficial by 90%. Among physicians, 85% of FEL and 92% of FAC report that fellowship programs should incorporate AI training into curricula. 95% of PTP believe AI will be incorporated into HemOnc CliPr. Meanwhile, 62% of PTP (50.8% of physicians, and 68% of APP and RN) are concerned about risks it may pose to CliPr. Nevertheless, 90% of PTP would embrace AI’s use in HemOnc. Table 1 details the perceptions and concerns about AI in HemOnc MedEd and CliPr. The main perceived risks are decreased time spent with patients (pts), and inaccuracies or worse pt care. Meanwhile, 33% believe AI would increase efficiency and quality of care, while 30% believe it would increase time spent with pts. 14% of PTP worry their role could be replaced by AI. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest assessment of HemOnc workforce’s perception and concerns about AI. Based on our survey, the HemOnc workforce, in general, endorses AI use, but with some concerns raised. While incorporation in MedEd is perceived with excitement, many envision the use in CliPr involves risks and challenges. Proper systematic education of the workforce about AI, with well-designed CliPr integration methods are needed to mitigate the legitimate existing concerns. Perceptions & concerns about AI in HemOnc MedEd & CliPr. FEL % APP % RN % FAC % AI will assist documentation in CliPr 98 82 79 92 AI will be used in pt communication 73 80 78 87 AI will screen pts for clinical trial enrollment 85 86 76 96 AI will increase the efficiency and quality of CliPr 43 37 24 46 AI will increase time spent with pts 39 27 25 38 AI will decrease time spent with pts 29 41 48 23 AI will lead to inaccuracies or worse CliPr 12 20 25 20 AI may replace the HemOnc workforce 11 16 19 5

e20120 Background: In May 2024, the FDA approved tarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand (DLL3)/CD3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager, for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other prior line of therapy. We aim to evaluate the real-world outcomes of agent. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-site single center analysis of adult patients who received tarlatamab at Mayo clinic sites including Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Data analysis was performed with Blue Sky statistics version 10.4. Results: Twenty patients with a median age 67 years (range 43-76) were included. Patients were predominantly women (55%) and all had a history of tobacco use. Metastatic disease commonly involved liver (55%) and CNS (60%). Majority (90%) had received prior PDL-1 therapy. 25% (5/20) of patients received prior gamma knife and in addition 10% (2/20) received whole brain radiation treatment in our cohort. Median time from CNS radiation and tarlatamab initiation was 4 months (range 3-28). Other characteristics, outcomes, and toxicity are presented in Table 1. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) Grade (G) 1 was observed in 45% patients. G 2, 3 and 4 CRS were observed in 5% patients respectively. G 1 CRS was managed with acetaminophen initially followed dexamethasone 10mg or methylprednisone 1g if no improvement in 24 hours. Tocilizumab was used 20% patients for G 1,2,3 and 4 CRS depending on clinical course. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) G 1 occurred in 10% patients, followed by G 2 in 15% and G 3 in 5% patients. ICANS was managed in a multidisciplinary fashion. All patients had resolution of CRS and ICANS. Conclusions: In this study investigating the real-world outcomes and toxicity of tarlatamab, a higher incidence of ICANS was observed than that reported in the DeLLphi-301 trial. The association between presence of CNS metastatic disease, prior CNS radiation and incidence of ICANS needs to be explored further. Mayo Clinic report of tarlatamab real world outcomes and toxicity. Patient Characteristics, Tarlatamab Outcomes and Toxicity Mayo Clinic Report DeLLphi-301 trial- Part 1 & 2 DeLLphi-301 trial- Part 3 ECOG no. (%) 2-4 4 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) Metastatic Disease no.(%) 19 (95) 98 (98) 32 (94) Median no. of previous lines of therapy (range) 3 (2-4) 2 (1-6) 2 (2-6) Objective Response (%) 30% 40% CRS no (%) 12 (60) 49 (49) 19 (56) ICANS no (%) 6 (30) 7 (7) 4 (12) Neutropenia Grade 3 no (%) 2 (10) 6 (6) 2 (6) Fatal CRS, ICANS or Neutropenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)