Hazim, Antonious Z

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT) has revolutionized hematologic malignancies, yet translation to solid tumors has historically been limited. This landscape shifted significantly in 2024 with US Food and Drug Administration approvals of lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy for advanced melanoma, and afamitresgene autoleucel, an engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapy for synovial sarcoma. These approvals mark the clinical arrival of ACT for solid tumors and highlight a rapidly expanding therapeutic landscape. Beyond these indications, multiple ACT platforms including TIL, TCR, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell, CAR-natural killer, and CAR-macrophage therapies are under active clinical investigation across diverse solid tumor indications. Clinical experience to date has defined key barriers to efficacy, including impaired tumor trafficking, antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and limited cellular persistence. In parallel, rapid advances in cellular engineering are reshaping the field, with the development of armored constructs, logic-gated and multiantigen targeting strategies, innate immune–based platforms, and novel manufacturing approaches including allogeneic and in vivo cell engineering. As ACT enters clinical practice for select solid tumors, distinct toxicity profiles and logistical requirements necessitate careful patient selection and multidisciplinary coordination. Early biomarker testing, timely referral to specialized centers, and familiarity with evolving toxicity management frameworks are increasingly critical. Here, we seek to provide a practice-oriented framework for understanding emerging ACT platforms, clinical data, toxicity considerations, and implementation strategies relevant to contemporary solid tumor oncology care.

PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly evolving in medicine. While there are existing data about the perceptions and concerns of health care workers regarding AI, those of the hematology and oncology (HemOnc) workforce remain unknown. We assessed opinions of physicians (faculty and fellows), advanced practice providers (APPs), and nurses in HemOnc on integrating AI in medical education (MedEd) and clinical practice (CP). METHODS Group-specific electronic surveys were developed. The HemOnc workforce from the three Mayo Clinic sites was invited to participate. Participation was anonymous, with data collection between November 7, 2024, and January 20, 2025. Results were reported as proportions, with 95% binomial CI when appropriate. RESULTS A total of 344 participants responded, 118 physicians (77 faculty, 41 fellows), 49 APPs, and 177 nurses. Most had used AI although less than half felt very or moderately knowledgeable about it. A total of 95% of fellows, 97% of faculty physicians, 96% of APP, and 92% of nurses believe that AI will be integrated in MedEd. A total of 94% of physicians and 88% of nonphysicians believe that this integration would be beneficial. In CP, 98% of fellows, 96% of faculty physicians, 100% of APPs, and 92% of nurses believe in AI's integration. However, 51% of physicians and 68% of nonphysicians had some concerns, including technology time, medical costs, and burnout. Nonetheless, 85% of fellows, 94% of faculty physicians, 98% of APPs, and 86% of nurses would embrace AI. CONCLUSION The majority of this single health system HemOnc's workforce endorsed AI integration into MedEd and CP but highlighted relevant concerns. Proper education, effective partnership among all stakeholders, and well-organized integration are essential for optimizing AI's incorporation into HemOnc's MedEd and CP and ensuring that it fully supports the mission of providing high-quality patient care.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer that displays rapid proliferation and early metastatic potential. It accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancers and is strongly associated with tobacco carcinogens. Despite patients' initial response to systemic therapy, the majority develop early resistance and relapse. The outcomes of patients with metastatic SCLC are poor, prompting the need for new therapies. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape for NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) has significantly changed with the immergence of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, inroads of these therapies into SCLC have posed significant challenges due to its molecular and genomic heterogeneity. Despite the challenges of this disease, promising new first-in-class immunomodulatory agents have emerged and are currently undergoing extensive research. Herein, we review the current treatment paradigm of immunotherapy in SCLC and discuss future directions of this evolving field.

AbstractMalignant histiocytosis (MH) is an extremely rare neoplasm of the macrophage–dendritic cell lineage. We report the clinical characteristics, molecular aberrations, treatments, and outcomes of patients with MH seen at two referral centers from January 2000 to May 2023. We identified 43 patients with MH, of which 26 had histiocytic sarcoma (MH‐H), 9 interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (MH‐IDC), and 8 Langerhans cell sarcoma (MH‐LC). The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range, 3–83). Thirty‐three patients (77%) had multifocal disease, while 10 had unifocal involvement. Tumor specimens from 22 patients (51%) underwent targeted next generation sequencing, and 19 of 22 (86%) had at least one pathogenic mutation, including mutations in MAPK pathway genes (73%). The median overall survival (OS) among the entire cohort was 16 months (95% CI: 8–50). The outcomes of those with multifocal disease were significantly shorter than their unifocal counterpart: median OS of 10 months versus 50 months (p = .07). Patients with risk organ involvement (bone marrow, spleen, or liver) had significantly inferior outcomes. Chemotherapy and surgery were the most common first‐line treatments for multifocal and unifocal disease, respectively. While the outcome for patients with multifocal disease was poor, there was a subset of patients who had durable responses to treatment. Our study highlights that MH has heterogeneous clinical presentation, frequent oncogenic mutations, and prognosis, which is strongly tied to disease extent and type of organ involvement.

AbstractIntroductionAn algorithmic approach, termed the prolonged clot time profile (PROCT), consisting of initial screening with prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), reflexive mixing studies if indicated, and follow‐up assays depending on initial testing results, offers an efficient approach to delineate the etiology of a prolonged PT/aPTT. Herein, we present the outcomes of the PROCT in the outpatient setting.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of consecutive outpatients who had prolonged PT and/or aPTT noted in the routine coagulation laboratory and who had PROCT ordered in our institutional Special Coagulation Laboratory between 2010 and 2017.ResultsOne hundred and six patients, median age 55 years (IQR 30‐67), met our study criteria. Twenty‐nine patients had normal PT/aPTT, while 77 had persistent abnormalities and underwent reflexive testing. A prolonged PT, aPTT, or PT and aPTT was noted in 27 (35%), 27 (35%), and 23 (30%) respectively. Forty‐nine (64%) had an acquired condition, 17 (22%) had a congenital condition, 7 (9%) had unclear etiology, and 4 (5%) were the result of laboratory artifact. The most common known cause of an isolated prolonged PT in our study was vitamin K deficiency in 8 (10%), the most common cause of an isolated prolonged aPTT was lupus anticoagulant in 4 (5%), and the most common cause of prolonged PT and aPTT was liver disease in 11 (14%).ConclusionProlonged PT/aPTT have a wide range of causes, including artifactual prolongation or abnormalities in secondary hemostasis due to both inherited and acquired conditions.

AbstractLangerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a histiocytic neoplasm that can involve the lungs as single system (LCH‐SSL) or multisystem disease (LCH‐MSL). The role of full‐body radiographic staging to determine whether patients have LCH‐SSL or LCH‐MSL is unclear. Long‐term outcomes of LCH‐SSL versus LCH‐MSL and multisystem without lung involvement (LCH‐MSNL) are unknown. A retrospective study of adult LCH patients seen at our center from January 2000 to 2020 was performed. In Part 1, we addressed utility of whole‐body staging imaging among those presenting with isolated pulmonary signs or symptoms. Staging was defined as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (CT) or whole‐body CT obtained within 3 months of diagnosis. In Part 2, we examined the frequency of developing extra‐pulmonary disease over time and mortality in patients with LCH‐SSL. In Part 3, we compared the overall survival of LCH‐SSL, LCH‐MSL, and LCH‐MSNL. Part 1: 240 patients with LCH were identified. A total of 112 (47%) had pulmonary signs or symptoms at presentation. Thirty‐four (30%) underwent radiographic staging and only one showed evidence of extra‐pulmonary disease. Part 2: 108 (45%) were LCH‐SSL. Median follow‐up duration of 4.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9–6.0). None developed extra‐pulmonary disease. Part 3: 5‐year survival: 94% (95% CI: 84%–98%) for LCH‐SSL, 78% (95% CI: 59%–90%) for LCH‐MSL, and 75% (95% CI: 53%–89%) for LCH‐MSNL. LCH patients presenting with isolated pulmonary signs or symptoms rarely have extra‐pulmonary involvement at the time of diagnosis and generally do not develop extra‐pulmonary progression. LCH‐SSL has the best overall survival, while LCH‐MSL and LCH‐MSNL have similar clinical outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC) involving the head and neck are common, but initial presentation or recurrence limited to the cranial nerves is rare.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 21 patients with clinical perineural invasion (PNI) from CSCC and no measurable disease by RECIST 1.1. Patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were included.ResultsThe median time from symptom onset until diagnosis was 13.0 months (2.6–83.1). All patients received radiotherapy. Fourteen received concurrent systemic therapy. The median follow‐up time was 30.5 months (1.1–106.0). Ten patients recurred, with the majority being locoregional. The 2‐year overall survival rate was 85%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 21.5 months with an estimated 2‐year PFS of 44.5% (95%CI: 22.3–66.8).ConclusionsCSCCs with clinical PNI alone are difficult to diagnose and can have a long interval between appearance of symptoms and diagnosis. They can successfully be treated with chemoradiotherapy. However, many patients still suffer from locoregional recurrences.

The objectives of this article are to present a case of type II cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, explain why mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is an unusual cause of type II cryoglobulins and to discuss the aetiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. A 67-year-old woman presented with 4 months of weight loss, intermittent epistaxis and a purpuric skin rash. Prior to presentation, she was found to have an elevated rheumatoid factor. Further investigation revealed an acute kidney injury and elevated type II cryoglobulins suspicious for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, which was confirmed by kidney biopsy. Additional workup for the weight loss included biopsy of newly found splenomegaly. Pathology revealed MALT lymphoma, a rare cause of type II cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Successful medical therapy required treating the underlying malignancy with rituximab and high-dose steroids. After initial resolution of symptoms with this regimen, the patient’s vasculitis worsened, which was thought to be secondary to undertreatment of the lymphoma. Bendamustine was added to further treat the lymphoma, after which the patient recovered and was able to discharge without recurrence of symptoms at 6 months.

Abstract Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm. To date, there is a lack of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments in adult LCH to establish optimal first-line therapy. We conducted a retrospective, single-center case series evaluating the use of BRAF inhibitors in adult patients with BRAFV600E- LCH proven by biopsy. Our case series is the first to report the use of BRAF inhibitors as first-line therapy in adults with LCH. We also report the efficacy with single-agent dabrafenib in adult LCH. All but one of our patients had favorable response to targeted therapy.