Al‐Ajmi, Abdullah

8094 Background: Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy plus immunotherapy have limited options. Whether adding lurbinectedin while continuing immune checkpoint blockade at relapse improves outcomes is unknown. We report results for the platinum-resistant cohort (progression ≤3 months from last chemotherapy) of MC1923. Methods: MC1923 is a phase II trial using a Simon optimal two-stage design. Patients were assigned to a starting dose of durvalumab 1500 mg IV plus lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m 2 IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). Accrual continued to 22 eligible patients if ≥2/9 achieved PFS6; the regimen would be considered promising if ≥7/22 (32%) were alive and progression-free at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-two patients enrolled (02/04/2022–05/21/2025); all were eligible and treated. Median age was 66 years; 32% were male; ECOG performance status was 0 in 9% and 1 in 91%; 96% had prior atezolizumab. Median cycles delivered were 4 (range 1–13). PFS6 was 4/22 (18.2%; 95% CI, 7.5–44.1%), below the prespecified threshold. Median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–5.3). ORR was 13.6% (3/22; all partial responses; 95% CI, 2.9–34.9%). At data cutoff (12/18/2025), 4 patients were alive; median follow-up was 16.8 months (range 5.5–39.6). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.3–18.6) and 1-year OS was 33.1% (95% CI, 17.6–61.9%). One (1) patient discontinued treatment with durvalumab due to AE. No treatment-related Grade 5 AEs occurred; Grade 3–4 AEs at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 32% (7/22); Grade 4 AEs occurred in 5% (1/22), all hematologic. Most common Grade 3 AEs were decreased neutrophils and white blood cells (each 9%). Conclusions: Durvalumab plus lurbinectedin demonstrated manageable toxicity in platinum-resistant ES-SCLC after chemoimmunotherapy but did not meet the prespecified PFS6 efficacy threshold, supporting the need for alternative strategies in this high-risk population. Clinical trial information: NCT04607954 .

Abstract Background: Tarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand (DLL3)/CD3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) is FDA approved in patients (pts) with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), after progression on frontline chemoimmunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the immune cell profile in pts who received this therapy in standard-of-care (SOC) practice with progression free survival (PFS) less than and greater than two months (mo). Methods: Patients who received tarlatamab at Mayo Clinic Rochester and consented to immuno phenotyping of blood are included in the present study. Immune phenotyping was performed on whole blood by flow cytometry and analyzed by Kaluza. Data analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel and PRISM. Results: Eighteen patients with median age 64 (range 37-79) were included in the study. 66% of our cohort were women and 83% had present or past history of smoking, with an average of 40 pack years (range 26-60). With a median follow-up of 2 months, the median PFS for the cohort was 1.5 mo (range 0.33-2.76 months). 61% (13/18) of patients had PFS <2mo. 39% (5/18) had PFS>2mo and of which, three patients had partial response with one maintaining stable disease and one patient with mixed response. At baseline (BL), there were no difference in T cell, CD4 or CD8 cell count between patients in the PFS<2mo and PFS>2mo groups. Patients with PFS<2mo had higher exhausted CD8 T cells compared to those in the PFS>2mo group (CD8+PD1+TIGIT+CD57+, PFS<3mo vs >3mo, cells/mL: 7.14±4.28, 1.58±1.37, p=0.009). Additionally, when analyzing the B-cell population, the PFS<2mo group had lower percentage of B cells compared to the group with PFS>2mo at baseline (6.0±7.5, 10.4±14, p=0.02). At day 7, the group with PFS<2mo had lower Treg compared to the group with PFS>2mo (2.88±1.38, 4.60±1.47, p=0.02). Also, the PFS<2mo group had an increase of B cells compared to the group with PFS>2mo at day 7(<2mo vs >2mo: 10.0±14, 4.37±3.07, p=0.04). Finally, the group with PFS>2mo had decrease in total monocytes (mono), classical mono, and immunosuppressive cells (PFS<2mo vs >2mo, Mono: 340±347, 253±106, p=0.04. Classical mono: 305±283, 155±109, p=0.02. CD14+HLA-DRneg: 105.8±96, 12±39, p=0.03) compared to the group with PFS<2mo by day 7. While no changes were seen between BL and day 7 for intermediate mono in PFS<2mo group, PFS>2mo group had decreased post treatment intermediate monocytes (BL vs day 7, cells/mL, intermed mono: 32.5±15,17.7±6.2, p=0.03). Conclusion: In this study investigating the SOC outcomes of tarlatamab, early progression was associated with higher presence of exhausted CD8 T cells, B cells, and immunosuppressive monocytes. Analysis of additional patients will be shared at AACR meeting. Citation Format: Dhauna Karam Prasad, Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes, Malvika Gupta, Audrey Ma, Chen Wu, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Reagan, Rayaan Kamal, Ashley Potter, Abdullah Al-Ajmi, Syeda Mina, Sykler J. Taylor, Antonious Hazim, Anastasios Dimou, Kaushal Parikh, Mohammed Shanshal, Ailsa Luce, Anna Schwecke, Julian Molina, Aaron Mansfield, Katherine Smith, Lucy Holmes, Haidong Dong, Yi Lin, Konstantinos Leventakos. Immune cell profile changes in patients treated with tarlatamab for extensive stage small cell lung cancer in real world practice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3931.

1652 Background: Tarlatamab is a bispecific T-cell engager targeting DLL3 that has shown promise as a therapy in small cell lung cancer. Administering tarlatamab requires careful consideration of immune-related adverse events (AE), including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Prescribing information recommends patients to be monitored for 22-24 hours in an appropriate healthcare setting for cycle 1 (C1), days 1 and 8. At Mayo Clinic in Rochester MN (MCR), tarlatamab is initially administered in a hospital-based outpatient (HBO) setting utilizing an innovative remote patient monitoring system (RPM). In this study, we describe our RPM process and patient outcomes thus far. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated with tarlatamab from August through December 2024. All patients received tarlatamab in the HBO setting and were enrolled into RPM for C1, days 1–10. Patients attended daily HBO visits on days 1–3 and 8–10 of C1 and were required to stay within 30 minutes of the hospital with a 24-hour caregiver for 48 hours following infusion days in C1-2. Data on patient characteristics, frequency of RPM alerts, escalations, rate of CRS & ICANS, and need for hospitalizations were reported using descriptive metrics. Results: As part of RPM, patients are provided with a kit containing preconnected Bluetooth-enabled devices to measure vital signs (VS), including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), temperature (T), and pulse oximetry (SpO2). The kit also includes a cellular-enabled tablet for electronic ICANS questionnaires, which upload directly into our electronic medical record system. Patients are required to log VS four times daily, monitored in real-time by a centralized virtual RPM nursing (RN) team. Embedded decision trees trigger alerts, prompting the RN team to contact patients and follow care pathways for escalations as needed. Among the 16 patients treated, the median age was 68 years, and the median ECOG PS was 1. During the 10-day RPM period, a total of 2,233 VS entries were recorded. Of these, 88% (14/16) of patients had alerts triggered, with a median of 2 alerts per patient. Alerts were mostly for out-of-range systolic BP (56%), HR (56%), and T (25%), with none for SpO2. The RN team escalated alerts in 50% (8/16) of the patients. Overall, 38% (6/16) of patients were managed entirely in the HBO setting. Among the 63% hospitalized, 56% had CRS limited to grade (G) 2, and 31% had ICANS limited to G3. Two patients were hospitalized for other indications. The mean length of stay was 2.6 days, with no ICU admissions. Conclusions: Our experience shows that frequent monitoring required with tarlatamab can be safely and effectively executed in an outpatient setting with the utilization of an RPM system. It can potentially minimize the burden of hospitalizations for patients and the healthcare system.

e20120 Background: In May 2024, the FDA approved tarlatamab, a Delta-like ligand (DLL3)/CD3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager, for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other prior line of therapy. We aim to evaluate the real-world outcomes of agent. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-site single center analysis of adult patients who received tarlatamab at Mayo clinic sites including Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Data analysis was performed with Blue Sky statistics version 10.4. Results: Twenty patients with a median age 67 years (range 43-76) were included. Patients were predominantly women (55%) and all had a history of tobacco use. Metastatic disease commonly involved liver (55%) and CNS (60%). Majority (90%) had received prior PDL-1 therapy. 25% (5/20) of patients received prior gamma knife and in addition 10% (2/20) received whole brain radiation treatment in our cohort. Median time from CNS radiation and tarlatamab initiation was 4 months (range 3-28). Other characteristics, outcomes, and toxicity are presented in Table 1. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) Grade (G) 1 was observed in 45% patients. G 2, 3 and 4 CRS were observed in 5% patients respectively. G 1 CRS was managed with acetaminophen initially followed dexamethasone 10mg or methylprednisone 1g if no improvement in 24 hours. Tocilizumab was used 20% patients for G 1,2,3 and 4 CRS depending on clinical course. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) G 1 occurred in 10% patients, followed by G 2 in 15% and G 3 in 5% patients. ICANS was managed in a multidisciplinary fashion. All patients had resolution of CRS and ICANS. Conclusions: In this study investigating the real-world outcomes and toxicity of tarlatamab, a higher incidence of ICANS was observed than that reported in the DeLLphi-301 trial. The association between presence of CNS metastatic disease, prior CNS radiation and incidence of ICANS needs to be explored further. Mayo Clinic report of tarlatamab real world outcomes and toxicity. Patient Characteristics, Tarlatamab Outcomes and Toxicity Mayo Clinic Report DeLLphi-301 trial- Part 1 & 2 DeLLphi-301 trial- Part 3 ECOG no. (%) 2-4 4 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) Metastatic Disease no.(%) 19 (95) 98 (98) 32 (94) Median no. of previous lines of therapy (range) 3 (2-4) 2 (1-6) 2 (2-6) Objective Response (%) 30% 40% CRS no (%) 12 (60) 49 (49) 19 (56) ICANS no (%) 6 (30) 7 (7) 4 (12) Neutropenia Grade 3 no (%) 2 (10) 6 (6) 2 (6) Fatal CRS, ICANS or Neutropenia 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Abstract Background Febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with a high risk for infections in patients receiving chemotherapy. Mortality estimates in pediatric patients with FN range from 0.4-3%. Extended infusion (EI) of beta-lactam antibiotics leads to improved pharmacodynamic parameters and is associated with enhanced antimicrobial activity. A recent study demonstrated significantly better overall treatment response in adult patients with documented infections and high-risk FN who received EI vs. standard infusion (SI) piperacillin-tazobactam. There are currently no studies evaluating clinical outcomes of EI beta-lactam use in pediatric patients with FN. Methods This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study with a time frame between September 2016-September 2022. The primary objective was to assess the time to fever resolution in patients with FN who received EI vs. SI of beta-lactam antibiotics. Secondary objectives included the difference in 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) between the EI and SI groups. This study included patients admitted to pediatric hematology, oncology, or BMT services at Michigan Medicine who were (1) diagnosed with FN during hospital admission or admitted for FN following chemotherapy and (2) treated with EI or SI cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or meropenem for at least 48 hours. Results A total of 87 patients were included in the study analysis (40 in the EI group and 47 in the SI group). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference in the time to fever resolution for the cohort (48.5 vs 39.1 hours, p=0.373). There were numeric non-significant differences favoring EI for 30-day mortality (0% vs. 4%, p=0.496), and avoiding need to escalate antibiotic therapy due to treatment failure (7.5% vs. 17%, p=0.214). Conclusion The small sample size limited the ability to detect differences in time to fever resolution between EI and SI beta-lactams. Although not statistically significant, secondary endpoints showed numerically lower mortality and lower rates of therapy escalation in the EI group. Disclosures Madeleine King, PharmD, BCOP, Elsevier, Inc: Board Member