Citations

Abstract Background Guidelines acknowledge that discordant low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) may be severe, but verifying this can be challenging. Right heart catheterization during exercise is considered the gold standard evaluating ventricular hemodynamics. No invasive studies have compared the hemodynamic response of discordant LG and severe AS during exercise. Purpose To describe exercise hemodynamics in patients with asymptomatic discordant AS and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and to identify the variables associated with the steepness of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)/cardiac output (CO) slope defined as (peak exercise PCWP-rest PCWP)/(peak exercise CO-rest CO). Methods Patients with aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.5 cm² underwent right heart catheterization at rest and during maximal exercise measuring pulmonary artery pressures, PCWP, CO and PCWP/CO slope. Patients were stratified in three groups: 1) discordant LG AS (AVA ≤1.0 cm² and mean gradient <40 mmHg); 2) moderate AS (AVA >1.0 cm²) and 3) high-gradient severe AS (AVA ≤1.0 cm² and mean gradient ≥40 mmHg). Results Among 86 patients, 17 (20%) had discordant LG, 49 (57%) moderate, and 20 (23%) high-gradient severe AS. The PCWP/CO slope was significantly steeper in discordant LG: median 3.3 mmHg/L/min (interquartile range: 2.2 mmHg/L/min) and high-gradient severe AS: 2.7 mmHg/L/min (1.5 mmHg/L/min) compared to moderate AS: 1.9 mmHg/L/min (2.0 mmHg/L/min), p=0.004. In a linear regression model adjusted for age, sex and rest PCWP, systemic arterial compliance and AS severity were significantly associated with the PCWP/CO slope. Furthermore, patients with discordant LG AS had a leftward and upward shift in the PCWP/CO slope. Conclusions Discordant LG and high-gradient severe AS had similar hemodynamic response to exercise with steeper PCWP/CO slope than in moderate AS, suggesting that discordant LG AS is a severe form of AS. In addition, the left-upward shift in PCWP/CO slope for discordant LG compared to high-gradient severe AS indicates that, this group also has latent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction physiology.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is key in diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI). After MI, the clinically observed half-life of cTn has been reported to be 7 to 20 hours, but this estimate reflects the combined elimination and simultaneous release of cTn from cardiomyocytes. More precise timing of myocardial injuries necessitates separation of these 2 components. We used a novel method for determination of isolated cTn elimination kinetics in humans. METHODS: Patients with MI were included within 24 hours after revascularization and underwent plasmapheresis to obtain plasma with a high cTn concentration. After at least 3 weeks, patients returned for an autologous plasma retransfusion followed by blood sampling for 8 hours. cTn was measured with 5 different high-sensitivity cTn assays. RESULTS: Of 25 included patients, 20 participants (mean age, 64.5 years; SD, 8.2 years; 4 women [20%]) received a retransfusion after a median of 5.8 weeks (interquartile range, 5.0–6.9 weeks) after MI. After retransfusion of a median of 620 mL (range, 180–679 mL) autologous plasma, the concentration of cTn in participants’ blood increased 4 to 445 times above the upper reference level of the 5 high-sensitivity cTn assays. The median elimination half-life ranged from 134.1 minutes (95% CI, 117.8–168.0) for the Elecsys high-sensitivity cTnT assay to 239.7 minutes (95% CI, 153.7–295.1) for the Vitros high-sensitivity cTnI assay. The median clearance of cTnI ranged from 40.3 mL/min (95% CI, 32.0–44.9) to 52.7 mL/min (95% CI, 42.2–57.8). The clearance of cTnT was 77.0 mL/min (95% CI, 45.2–95.0). CONCLUSIONS: This novel method showed that the elimination half-life of cTnI and cTnT was 5 to 16 hours shorter than previously reported. This indicates a considerably longer duration of cardiomyocyte cTn release after MI than previously thought. Improved knowledge of timing of myocardial injury may call for changes in the management of MI and other disorders with myocardial injury.

Abstract Aims To assess the reproducibility of interpreting hypoattenuated thickening (HAT) and peridevice leak (PDL) using cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging following Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Methods and results In this multicentre retrospective reproducibility study, 100 anonymized post-LAAC cardiac CT scans were evaluated within the same cardiac phase by an experienced and a novice rater blinded to prior evaluations. All scans were evaluated twice by each rater, assessing overall HAT and PDL categories as well as specific associated findings based on suggested algorithms for post-LAAC interpretation. Inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were evaluated using absolute agreement, Cohen’s kappa, and Kendall’s tau for categorical variables, and mean difference, Bland–Altman plots, limits of agreement (lower and upper), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for continuous variables. Within overall categories of both HAT and PDL, substantial agreement (kappa ≥0.61) and reliability (Kendall’s tau-b ≥ 0.75) were observed. Specifically, identifying high-grade HAT (kappa ≥0.78) and distal patency (kappa ≥0.85) displayed the highest agreement within HAT and PDL interpretation. Meanwhile, measuring the height of the proximal screw hub cove represented the least reliable HAT assessment among both inter- and intra-rater comparisons (ICC < 0.75), while suspected leak mechanism represented the least reproducible PDL measure. Conclusion Despite only minimal training of one rater, overall high levels of inter- and intra-rater agreement and reliability were observed across the chosen algorithms for interpretation of HAT and PDL following Watchman FLX LAAC. The prognostic implications of the included variables are to be explored in future trials and registries.

AbstractWith an annual cumulative occurrence of approximately 15,000 in North America, all childhood cancers are rare. Very rare cancers as defined by both the European Cooperative Study Group for Rare Pediatric Cancers and the Children's Oncology Group fall into two principal categories: those so uncommon (fewer than 2 cases/million) that their study is challenging even through cooperative group efforts (e.g., pleuropulmonary blastoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor) and those that are far more common in adults and therefore rarely studied in children (e.g., thyroid, melanoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor). Treatment strategies for these latter tumors are typically based on adult guidelines, although the pediatric variants of these tumors may harbor different genetic signatures and demonstrate different behavior. If melanoma and differentiated thyroid cancer are excluded, other rare cancer types account for only 2% of the cancers in children aged 0 to 14. This article highlights several of the most common rare tumor types.

AbstractThe Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62—Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit‐for‐purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory‐initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).

With an annual cumulative occurrence of approximately 15,000 in North America, all childhood cancers are rare. Very rare cancers as defined by both the European Cooperative Study Group for Rare Pediatric Cancers (EXPeRT) and the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) fall into two principal categories: those so uncommon (fewer than 2 cases/million) that their study is challenging even through cooperative group efforts (e.g. pleuropulmonary blastoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor) and those that are far more common in adults and therefore rarely studied in children (e.g. thyroid, melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor). [1](#ref-0001) Treatment strategies for these latter tumors are typically based on adult guidelines, although the pediatric variants of these tumors may harbor different genetic signatures and demonstrate different behavior. If melanoma and differentiated thyroid cancer are excluded, other rare cancer types account for only 2% of the cancers in children aged 0 to 14.[1](#ref-0001) This article highlights several of the most common rare tumor types.