Back to Authors

McCausland, Megan

Mayo Clinic

Q2 Solutions (United States)

Citations 2

Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines
Monaghan, Sara A. , Eck, Steven , Bunting, Silvia T., Dong, Xiangyang X., Durso, Robert J., Gonneau, Christèle , Hays, Amanda , Illingworth, Andrea , League, Stacy C., Linskens, Eleni , McCausland, Megan, McCloskey, Thomas W., Rolf, Nina , Wallace, Paul K. , Litwin, Virginia , Kern, Wolfgang , Deeb, George , Nash, Veronica, Olteanu, Horatiu , Wallace, Paul K , Olteanu, Horatiu , Kern, Wolfgang , Shi, Min

Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry | August 22, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 252-266

10.1002/cyto.b.22202 Get It

AbstractThe Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62—Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit‐for‐purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory‐initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).
Ly9 (CD229)-Deficient Mice Exhibit T Cell Defects yet Do Not Share Several Phenotypic Characteristics Associated with SLAM- and SAP-Deficient Mice
Graham, Daniel B. , Bell, Michael P., McCausland, Megan, Huntoon, Catherine J., Deursen, Jan van, Faubion, William A. , Crotty, Shane , McKean, D J

The Journal of Immunology | April 23, 2014 | Volume: 176 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 291-300

10.4049/jimmunol.176.1.291 Get It

Abstract Signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) family receptors are critically involved in modulating innate and adaptive immune responses. Several SLAM family receptors have been shown to interact with the adaptor molecule SAP; however, subsequent intracellular signaling is poorly defined. Notably, mutations in SLAM-associated protein (SAP) lead to X-linked lymphoproliferative disease, a rare but fatal immunodeficiency. Although the SLAM family member Ly9 (CD229) is known to interact with SAP, the functions of this receptor have remained elusive. Therefore, we have generated Ly9−/− mice and compared their phenotype with that of SLAM−/− and SAP−/− mice. We report that Ly9−/− T cells exhibit a mild Th2 defect associated with reduced IL-4 production after stimulation with anti-TCR and anti-CD28 in vitro. This defect is similar in magnitude to the previously reported Th2 defect in SLAM−/− mice but is more subtle than that observed in SAP−/− mice. In contrast to SLAM−/− and SAP−/− mice, T cells from Ly9−/− mice proliferate poorly and produce little IL-2 after suboptimal stimulation with anti-CD3 in vitro. We have also found that Ly9−/− macrophages exhibit no defects in cytokine production or bacterial killing as was observed in SLAM−/− macrophages. Additionally, Ly9−/− mice differ from SAP−/− mice in that they foster normal development of NKT cells and mount appropriate T and B cell responses to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. We have identified significant phenotypic differences between Ly-9−/− mice as compared with both SLAM−/− and SAP−/− mice. Although Ly9, SLAM, and SAP play a common role in promoting Th2 polarization, Ly-9 is uniquely involved in enhancing T cell activation.