Back to Authors

League, Stacy C.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines
Monaghan, Sara A. , Eck, Steven , Bunting, Silvia T., Dong, Xiangyang X., Durso, Robert J., Gonneau, Christèle , Hays, Amanda , Illingworth, Andrea , League, Stacy C., Linskens, Eleni , McCausland, Megan, McCloskey, Thomas W., Rolf, Nina , Wallace, Paul K. , Litwin, Virginia , Kern, Wolfgang , Deeb, George , Nash, Veronica, Olteanu, Horatiu , Wallace, Paul K , Olteanu, Horatiu , Kern, Wolfgang , Shi, Min

Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry | August 22, 2024 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 252-266

10.1002/cyto.b.22202 Get It

AbstractThe Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62—Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit‐for‐purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory‐initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).
Defining the mild variant of leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II (SLC35C1‐congenital disorder of glycosylation) and response to l‐fucose therapy: Insights from two new families and review of the literature
Tahata, Shawn , Raymond, Kimiyo , Quade, Marie, Barnes, Sara, Boyer, Suzanne, League, Stacy C., Kumánovics, Attila , Abraham, Roshini S. , Jacob, Eapen, Menon, Prem K., League, Stacy, Abraham, Roshini, Boyer, Suzanne , Morava, Éva

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | March 26, 2022 | Volume: 188 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2005-2018

10.1002/ajmg.a.62737 Get It

AbstractLeukocyte adhesion deficiency type II (LAD II, also known as SLC35C1‐congenital disorder of glycosylation) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth and cognitive impairment, peripheral neutrophilia, recurrent infections, and the Bombay blood phenotype. A subset of patients with a milder presentation has been described with short stature and developmental delay but minimal immune and hematologic features. Some patients with LAD II benefit from oral fucose therapy, though this has not been previously studied in patients with milder disease. In this study, we describe two new patients from separate families with the milder variant of LAD II and review the published literature on this rare disorder. We demonstrate improvement in speech and cognition, CD15 expression, and core fucosylation of serum glycoproteins after 27 months of oral fucose supplementation in one patient. These patients further support the stratification of this disorder into distinct subtypes, a classical severe and an attenuated variant, and provide preliminary evidence of benefit of fucose therapy in the latter group.