Citations

Abstract Purpose: CD4 T-cell immunity is associated with improved survival in patients with breast cancer. We previously reported a phase I trial evaluating a folate receptor alpha (FRα) vaccine administered with cyclophosphamide (CP), demonstrating excellent safety and immunogenicity. To simplify the vaccine strategy for ease of use, we report here the results of a randomized phase II trial evaluating a lower vaccine dose alongside the original dose, administered with or without CP pretreatment. Patients and Methods: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer who completed all systemic and local therapies were assigned to receive either low-dose (825 μg) or high-dose (2.5 mg) vaccine peptides plus GM-CSF in six 4-week cycles, with or without CP prior to vaccination. Safety was monitored, and immunogenicity was evaluated before and after vaccination. Results: A total of 80 patients were dosed with vaccine, and 58 patients were evaluable for immunogenicity. Vaccination was well tolerated and elicited immunity in 83% of patients. Levels of FRα-specific T cells were high, persistent, and comparable with T-cell levels against tetanus toxoid. No differences in immunity were observed between the two doses. CP pretreatment also did not affect the immune responses. Recurrences occurred in eight evaluable patients and were unrelated to the treatment arm. No patients died during the study because of their disease. Conclusions: The reduced-dose FRα vaccine is as effective as the original dose and does not require CP to generate maximal immunity. These findings may inform the design of trials testing efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer or other cancers.

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Consortium for Clarity in Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) is a study that aims to collect standardized imaging and plasma biomarkers on 2000 Clinical Core participants enrolled across all Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) sites. We sought to summarize the known heterogeneity across centers regarding scientific focus and initial enrollment plans for CLARiTI. METHODS We developed and distributed a survey capturing information on the 36 CLARiTI site's theme/expertise, recruitment plans, and the intersection of CLARiTI with other ADRC imaging efforts. RESULTS Anticipated CLARiTI enrollees spanned 11 different categories of suspected etiologies underlying impairment. A wide range of risk factors were endorsed across sites regarding the enrollment of unimpaired individuals. Variability also existed regarding site‐level strategies in enrollment into CLARiTI versus other imaging efforts. DISCUSSION We anticipate that the 2000 individuals that will enroll into CLARiTI will reflect the clinical heterogeneity already in place across the ADRC network. Highlights The ADRC Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) will leverage and contribute to the existing Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) program by supporting standardized imaging and plasma collection across all centers. We summarize the variation in scientific focus and enrollment plans across ADRC sites participating in CLARiTI. The anticipated CLARiTI cohort will reflect the clinical heterogeneity that already exists across the ADRC network. CLARiTI will contribute to scientific goals related to the detection of multi‐etiological signatures relevant for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs).

Importance Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), a progressive disease caused by misfolded transthyretin (TTR), occurs as wild-type (ATTRwt-CM) or variant (ATTRv-CM) forms. p.Val142Ile is the most common variant in the US, linked to rapid progression and increased mortality. Acoramidis achieves near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization and showed clinical benefit in the 30-month ATTRibute-CM trial and through month 42 in the ongoing open-label extension (OLE). Objective To evaluate the efficacy of acoramidis in ATTRwt-CM, ATTRv-CM, and variant subgroups (p.Val142Ile and non-p.Val142Ile). Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, phase 3, randomized placebo-controlled study took place from April 2019 to May 2023 with ongoing OLE (month 42). ATTRibute-CM enrolled 632 participants with ATTR-CM; 611 of 632 were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. There were 380 participants who continued into the OLE. These data were analyzed from January 2025 to July 2025. Interventions Oral acoramidis, 712 mg, or placebo twice daily for 30 months, followed by 12 months of open-label treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (CVH), serum TTR, 6-minute walk distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score, and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide in participants with ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM. Post-hoc analyses were conducted in variant subgroups, including p.Val142Ile. Results Overall, 552 participants with wild-type ATTR-CM (mean [SD] age, 78 [6.3] years; 92.0% male and 8.0% female) and 59 participants with variant ATTR-CM (mean [SD] age, 73 [7.7] years; 77.3% male and 22.7% female) were randomized (mITT population), including 35 with p.Val142Ile. Consistent efficacy was observed in wild-type and variant subgroups for ACM/CVH through month 30 and ACM through month 42. At month 30, acoramidis reduced the risk of ACM/first CVH vs placebo by 31% in ATTRwt-CM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = .007) and by 59% in ATTRv-CM (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81; P = .01). ACM was reduced through month 42 with HRs of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19-0.93; P = .03) in the ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM groups, respectively. Consistent treatment benefit was observed in participants with ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM for secondary end points. Within variant subgroups (p.Val142Ile vs non-p.Val142Ile), consistent treatment benefits were observed for ACM/CVH through month 30 and ACM through month 42. Conclusions and Relevance The beneficial effect of acoramidis was observed consistently in ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM groups. These hypothesis-generating results indicate that further studies are warranted to better characterize the therapeutic benefit of acoramidis in variant subgroups. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03860935 ; NCT04988386

Abstract Background We examined real-world utilization of treat-to-target (TTT) strategies and conducted a quality improvement (QI) project to improve uptake of TTT strategies in a learning health system, IBD Qorus. Methods We implemented a structured QI intervention to increase uptake of TTT in 41 gastroenterology practices in the United States, over a 13-month intervention period (November 2020 to November 2021; modified breakthrough series [BTS] collaborative), and a 10-month post-BTS observation period (December 2021 to October 2022). Through encounter-level surveys, we examined providers’ “intention to TTT” based on discussion of TTT with patients, documentation of inflammation, and intention to change therapy to TTT. We examined changes in rates of “intention to TTT,” and whether improvement in intention to TTT influenced site-level rates of remission. Results Over 13 months, there were 7932 patient visits (55% with Crohn’s disease; 47% in clinical remission); patients in 2160 visits (27%) were not in endoscopic remission. Overall, rates of intention to TTT increased from 31% to 54% (P = .06) with considerable site-to-site variability and was maintained at 49% in the post-BTS observation period. The increased rate was attributable to higher rates of testing for inflammation. Despite an increase in the rate of intention to TTT, there was no significant change in site-level achievement of remission over the same time. Conclusions Through a QI initiative in a learning health system, rates of intention to TTT increased significantly over 12-months, though overall rates remained low. Assessing patient-, provider- and practice-level barriers and facilitators for successful implementation of a TTT strategy is warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Importance The long-term outcomes of surgery for pediatric traumatic cataract are not well described; understanding these outcomes would inform parental expectations. Objective To report visual acuity (VA) outcomes and cumulative incidence of ocular complications by 5 years following lensectomy for pediatric traumatic cataract. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study was conducted across 32 sites in the US and Canada among 75 children undergoing lensectomy from birth to less than 13 years of age for unilateral traumatic cataract. Of 75 children, 60 had primary intraocular lens (IOL) placement; 15 were left aphakic. Data were collected from August 2012 to February 2020. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to May 2025. Exposure Lensectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were best-corrected VA 5 years after lensectomy; period prevalence of strabismus and glaucoma (including cases diagnosed before lensectomy); surgery for visual axis opacification (VAO); and cumulative incidence of ocular complications by 5 years. Annual data collection was from medical record reviews through 5 years following lensectomy. Results Among 75 participants, 28 (37%) were female, and median (range) age at lensectomy was 7.4 years (0.1-13 years). Median (IQR) best-corrected VA at 5 years (available for 37 participants [49%]) was 20/63 (20/35-20/159) in pseudophakic eyes (n = 29; mean [SD] age at surgery, 7.2 [3.0] years) and 20/258 (20/56-<20/800) in aphakic eyes (n = 8; mean [SD] age at surgery, 5.5 [4.3] years). Age-normal VA was achieved by 6 pseudophakic eyes (21%; 95% CI, 10%-38%) and 1 aphakic eye (13%; 95% CI, 2%-47%). The 5-year period prevalence of glaucoma was 9% in pseudophakic eyes (95% CI, 1%-16%) and 9% in aphakic eyes (95% CI, 0%-24%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of surgery for VAO was 47% in pseudophakic eyes (95% CI, 31%-60%) and 13% in aphakic eyes (95% CI, 0%-28%). The risk was greater in eyes that did not undergo an anterior vitrectomy (84%; 95% CI, 55%-94%) vs eyes that did (15%; 95% CI, 2%-26%) (age-adjusted hazard ratio, 11.4; 95% CI, 4.6-33.1; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, while only half of the study participants had a 5-year follow-up visit, achieving age-normal VA was uncommon among the cohort in whom a best-corrected VA was determined. The prevalence of glaucoma at 5 years was low among those with 5-year follow-up, while nearly half of the pseudophakic eyes needed surgery for VAO supporting the need to monitor these children.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts are common in contact and collision sports and are linked to structural brain changes and an elevated risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Identifying early in vivo structural markers remains challenging. Although diagnosis currently requires post-mortem confirmation, clinical symptoms, including cognitive impairment and behavioural changes, are reflected in the diagnosis of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome. These symptoms align with dysfunction in key brain regions—amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus—which support memory, emotion and behaviour and commonly show tau pathology in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. This study uses shape analysis to examine structural differences in these regions between former American football players and unexposed asymptomatic controls and evaluates the influence of age, head impact exposure and clinical diagnosis on brain structure. We analyzed brain morphology in former American football players (n = 163) and unexposed, asymptomatic controls (n = 53). Structural segmentation was performed with FreeSurfer 7.1, and the shape analysis pipeline was used to generate subregional reconstructions. Vertex-level morphometry, based on the logarithm of the Jacobian determinant and radial distance, quantified local surface area dilation and thickness. Group differences were examined with covariate-adjusted linear regression models contrasting football players and controls, as well as participants with and without a Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome diagnosis. Partial correlations examined the influence of age, age of first football exposure and cumulative head impact index metrics, including frequency, linear acceleration and rotational force. Models were adjusted accordingly for age, body mass index, education, race, imaging site, apolipoprotein ϵ4 status and total intracranial volume. Former football players exhibited bilateral surface area contractions in the hippocampus and amygdala, along with reduced amygdala thickness, compared to controls. Older age was associated with widespread surface contractions and thinning across all regions, except for preserved thickness in the left hippocampus. An earlier age of first exposure to football correlated with surface contractions in the thalamus and left hippocampus. Greater cumulative linear acceleration was linked to bilateral hippocampal surface contractions and reduced thickness in the left thalamus, while greater rotational force exposure was associated with hippocampal thinning. No significant structural differences were found between players with and without a diagnosis of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome. These findings extend volume-based research by revealing localized alterations in surface area dilation and thickness and emphasize the roles of age and repetitive head impact exposure in long-term brain changes.

Abstract BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in cognitively impaired individuals in specialized care settings. The overarching goal is to inform the development of a clinical practice guideline, led by the Alzheimer's Association, for use in clinical practice. METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted from January 2019 to November 2024. Studies evaluating the diagnostic test accuracy of plasma phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) and amyloid beta (Aβ) tests (p‐tau217, %p‐tau217, p‐tau181, p‐tau231, and Aβ42/Aβ40) compared to reference standard tests (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] AD biomarkers, amyloid positron emission tomography [PET], or neuropathology) in individuals with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment or dementia) in specialized care settings were included. Pooled diagnostic test accuracy measures were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Across a range of pre‐test probabilities, we evaluated how much a positive or a negative test result would lead to a change in the probability of having amyloid positivity (post‐test probability). All analyses were conducted for each test within each biomarker. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Across 49 observational studies meeting eligibility criteria, 31 different BBM tests were examined. When evaluated using a single cut‐point, the diagnostic test accuracy varied considerably across tests: the pooled sensitivity ranged from 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.2–57.4) to 91.4% (95% CI: 86.6–94.6), and the pooled specificity ranged from 61.5% (95% CI: 45.6–75.3) to 96.7% (95% CI: 87.8–99.2). Differences in post‐test probability based on a range of pre‐test probabilities varied greatly across tests. Furthermore, the certainty of evidence across tests ranged from moderate to very low. Most included studies were judged to be at high risk of bias, particularly in domains related to patient selection, index test conduct, and reference standard. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of BBMs for detecting AD pathology in cognitively impaired individuals in specialized care settings. The findings serve as a foundation for an accompanying clinical practice guideline that provides evidence‐based recommendations for BBM use in the clinical diagnostic pathway. Given continuous developments in this rapidly evolving field, ongoing evaluation will be critical to ensure the synthesized evidence and clinical guidelines remain up to date and maintain clinical relevance. Highlights This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of blood‐based biomarker (BBM) tests specifically in individuals with objective cognitive impairment seen in specialized care settings. Across 49 studies, BBM test performance varied widely. Pooled sensitivity ranged from 49.3% to 91.4% and specificity from 61.5% to 96.7%, depending on the analyte and assay platform. This review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty of evidence. This review served as the evidence base for the Alzheimer's Association's new clinical practice guidelines on BBMs, providing structured, evidence‐based guidance for implementing BBMs in the diagnostic workup of suspected Alzheimer's disease. The review underscores that BBM test performance is assay‐ and platform specific and advises clinicians and laboratory directors to interpret results in the context of the specific test used and integrate the results with a comprehensive clinical assessment.