Back to Authors

Cuddy, Sarah A. M.

0000-0002-2124-2151

Mayo Clinic

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Citations 3

Efficacy of Acoramidis in Wild-Type and Variant Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Davis, Margot K. , Akinboboye, Olakunle O., Bhatt, Kunal , Fontana, Marianna, Gillmore, Julian D., Griffin, Jan M. , Grodin, Justin L. , Lam, Kaitlyn, Masri, Ahmad , Ruberg, Frederick L. , Sarswat, N., Shah, Keyur B. , Soman, Prem, Xiong, Kuangnan, Cao, Xiaofan, Lystig, Ted, Tamby, Jean‐François, Castaño, Adam , Katz, Leonid , Sinha, Uma, Fox, Jonathan C., Solomon, Scott D. , Grogan, Martha, Gillmore, Julian D , Alexander, Kevin M , Berk, John L. , Cappelli, Francesco, Cuddy, Sarah A. M. , Fontana, Marianna , Garcia-Pavia, Pablo , Gillmore, Julian D. , Judge, Daniel P. , Khouri, Michel G. , Maurer, Matthew J. , Obici, Laura , Soman, Prem , Stern, Lily Kagan , Wright, Richard, Lystig, Ted, Solomon, Scott David , Grogan, Martha

JAMA Cardiology | November 8, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 57

10.1001/jamacardio.2025.4477 Get It

Importance Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), a progressive disease caused by misfolded transthyretin (TTR), occurs as wild-type (ATTRwt-CM) or variant (ATTRv-CM) forms. p.Val142Ile is the most common variant in the US, linked to rapid progression and increased mortality. Acoramidis achieves near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization and showed clinical benefit in the 30-month ATTRibute-CM trial and through month 42 in the ongoing open-label extension (OLE). Objective To evaluate the efficacy of acoramidis in ATTRwt-CM, ATTRv-CM, and variant subgroups (p.Val142Ile and non-p.Val142Ile). Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter, phase 3, randomized placebo-controlled study took place from April 2019 to May 2023 with ongoing OLE (month 42). ATTRibute-CM enrolled 632 participants with ATTR-CM; 611 of 632 were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. There were 380 participants who continued into the OLE. These data were analyzed from January 2025 to July 2025. Interventions Oral acoramidis, 712 mg, or placebo twice daily for 30 months, followed by 12 months of open-label treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (CVH), serum TTR, 6-minute walk distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score, and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide in participants with ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM. Post-hoc analyses were conducted in variant subgroups, including p.Val142Ile. Results Overall, 552 participants with wild-type ATTR-CM (mean [SD] age, 78 [6.3] years; 92.0% male and 8.0% female) and 59 participants with variant ATTR-CM (mean [SD] age, 73 [7.7] years; 77.3% male and 22.7% female) were randomized (mITT population), including 35 with p.Val142Ile. Consistent efficacy was observed in wild-type and variant subgroups for ACM/CVH through month 30 and ACM through month 42. At month 30, acoramidis reduced the risk of ACM/first CVH vs placebo by 31% in ATTRwt-CM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = .007) and by 59% in ATTRv-CM (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81; P = .01). ACM was reduced through month 42 with HRs of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50-0.98; P = .04) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19-0.93; P = .03) in the ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM groups, respectively. Consistent treatment benefit was observed in participants with ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM for secondary end points. Within variant subgroups (p.Val142Ile vs non-p.Val142Ile), consistent treatment benefits were observed for ACM/CVH through month 30 and ACM through month 42. Conclusions and Relevance The beneficial effect of acoramidis was observed consistently in ATTRwt-CM and ATTRv-CM groups. These hypothesis-generating results indicate that further studies are warranted to better characterize the therapeutic benefit of acoramidis in variant subgroups. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03860935 ; NCT04988386
Cardiac amyloidosis detection from a single echocardiographic video clip: a novel artificial intelligence-based screening tool
Hawkes, Will, Woodward, Gary , Hamza, Izhan, Desai, Viral , Barrett‐O’Keefe, Zachary , Grogan, Martha, Davison, Halley, Maurer, Mathew S. , Helmke, Stephen , Scherrer‐Crosbie, Marielle , Soltani, Marwa , Goyal, Akash , Zaręba, Karolina M. , Cheng, Richard K. , Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos , Elissamburu, Pablo , Ronderos, Ricardo , Prado, Aldo , Sarswat, Nitasha , Addetia, Karima , Ruberg, Frederick L. , Randazzo, Michael , Al-Roub, Nora , Kidd, Liam, Lang, Roberto M. , Pellikka, Patricia A. , Barrett-O'Keefe, Zachary, Scott, Christopher , Davison, Halley N, Cheng, Richard , Kirkpatrick, James N , Koutroumpakis, Efstratios , Deswal, Anita M , Pursnani, Amit , Pellikka, Patricia A , Slivnick, Jeremy A. , Hawkes, Will, OLIVEIRA, JORGE COELHO , Akerman, Ashley, Gómez, Alberto , Grogan, Martha , Dispenzieri, Angela , Scott, Christopher G. , Cotella, Juan Ignacio , Maurer, Mathew S , Kitano, Tetsuji , Takeuchi, Masaaki , Hotta, Viviane Tiemi , Patel, Amit R. , Asch, Federico M. , O’Driscoll, Jamie M. , Strom, Jordan B. , Kidd, Liam, Cuddy, Sarah A. M. , Upton, Ross

European Heart Journal | May 26, 2025 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 40 | Pages: 4090-4101

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf387 Get It

Abstract Background and Aims Accurate differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from phenotypic mimics remains challenging using current clinical and echocardiographic techniques. The accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) screening algorithm for echocardiography-based CA detection was assessed. Methods Utilizing a multisite, multiethnic dataset (n = 2612, 52% CA), a convolutional neural network was trained to differentiate CA from phenotypic controls using transthoracic apical four-chamber video clips. External validation was conducted globally across 18 sites including 597 CA cases and 2122 controls. Classification accuracy was assessed on the entire external validation dataset, and subgroup analyses were performed both on technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy referrals, and individuals matched for age, sex, and wall thickness. Model accuracy was also compared with the transthyretin CA score and the increased wall thickness score within a subset of older heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with increased wall thickness. Results Cardiac amyloidosis patients and controls displayed similar age, sex, race, and comorbidities. After the removal of uncertain AI predictions (13%), model discrimination and classification were excellent for the entire external validation dataset [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.93, sensitivity 85%, specificity 93%], irrespective of CA subtype (sensitivity: light-chain = 84%, wild-type transthyretin = 85%, and hereditary transthyretin = 86%). Performance was maintained in subgroup analysis in patients clinically referred for technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy imaging (AUROC 0.86, sensitivity 77%, specificity 86%) and matched patients (AUROC 0.92, sensitivity 84%, specificity 91%). The AI model (AUROC 0.93) also outperformed transthyretin CA score (AUROC 0.73) and increased wall thickness (AUROC 0.80) scores. Conclusions This AI screening model—using only an apical four-chamber view—effectively differentiated CA from other causes of increased left ventricular wall thickness.