Patel, Amit R.

Background: The prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is increasing, with over 300,000 new implants annually in the U.S. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has proven as a powerful modality for myocardial characterization, enabling accurate diagnosis of different cardiac conditions. In patients without devices, CMR findings have also demonstrated prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and guide clinical decision-making. However, its use in CIED patients has historically been limited due to safety and image quality concerns. Hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR imaging using wideband sequences in CIED patients. Methods: CIED patients referred for clinical CMR were included prospectively and retrospectively between January 2020 and February 2025. All patients underwent a stress CMR protocol, which included cine, wideband late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), wideband T1 mapping, and wideband stress/rest perfusion imaging. Clinical follow-up is ongoing. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, cardiac death, revascularization, or heart transplant. Results: A total of 89 patients were included (median age 69.0 [58.0–75.5] years; 62.9% male). Device types included pacemakers (33.7%), ICDs (48.3%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (16.9%). Over a median of follow-up of 613 days [355-991], 21 patients experienced a MACE. In unadjusted models, higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (per 5%) was significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65–0.95; p=0.016), as was higher stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) (per 0.25 mL/g/min increase: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–0.98; p=0.05). In contrast, greater LV myocardial mass (per 10 g) was significantly associated with a higher risk of MACE (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.52; p = 0.006), figure 1. Conclusion: The use of wideband sequences enabled the assessment of prognostic imaging value in CIED patients. LVEF remains a strong and consistent predictor of MACE in this population and LV mass was significantly associated with higher rates of MACE reflecting the influence of underlying cardiomyopathy. While stress perfusion CMR imaging showed promising trends, further studies with longer follow-up are needed to clarify its prognostic value in this population.

Abstract Background and Aims Accurate differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from phenotypic mimics remains challenging using current clinical and echocardiographic techniques. The accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) screening algorithm for echocardiography-based CA detection was assessed. Methods Utilizing a multisite, multiethnic dataset (n = 2612, 52% CA), a convolutional neural network was trained to differentiate CA from phenotypic controls using transthoracic apical four-chamber video clips. External validation was conducted globally across 18 sites including 597 CA cases and 2122 controls. Classification accuracy was assessed on the entire external validation dataset, and subgroup analyses were performed both on technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy referrals, and individuals matched for age, sex, and wall thickness. Model accuracy was also compared with the transthyretin CA score and the increased wall thickness score within a subset of older heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with increased wall thickness. Results Cardiac amyloidosis patients and controls displayed similar age, sex, race, and comorbidities. After the removal of uncertain AI predictions (13%), model discrimination and classification were excellent for the entire external validation dataset [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.93, sensitivity 85%, specificity 93%], irrespective of CA subtype (sensitivity: light-chain = 84%, wild-type transthyretin = 85%, and hereditary transthyretin = 86%). Performance was maintained in subgroup analysis in patients clinically referred for technetium pyrophosphate scintigraphy imaging (AUROC 0.86, sensitivity 77%, specificity 86%) and matched patients (AUROC 0.92, sensitivity 84%, specificity 91%). The AI model (AUROC 0.93) also outperformed transthyretin CA score (AUROC 0.73) and increased wall thickness (AUROC 0.80) scores. Conclusions This AI screening model—using only an apical four-chamber view—effectively differentiated CA from other causes of increased left ventricular wall thickness.

AbstractPurposeOverall there is a lack of evidence on the accuracy and precision of phase‐contrast (PC) MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The purpose of this study is to determine whether aortic velocity measurements are influenced by a CIED.MethodsWe scanned 21 adult patients and 8 pediatric volunteers using clinical standard PC and real‐time PC (rt‐PC) sequences with and without a CIED generator taped on human subjects (below the left clavicle for adults and children; also on the abdomen for children) to mimic image artifacts. Peak and mean velocities above the aortic valve were calculated.ResultsThe Bland–Altman analyses on peak velocity measurements in pediatric subjects showed that both the accuracy and precision worsen as the distance between the CIED and aortic valve decreases (i.e., from abdomen to below the left clavicle). Specifically, both the bias and the coefficient of variation (CV) for both clinical PC and rt‐PC increased from the abdominal position (clinical: bias = −1.1%, CV = 4.3%; rt‐PC: bias = −0.3%, CV = 3.4%) to the clavicle position (clinical: bias = −4.0%, CV = 8.1%; rt‐PC: bias = 8.2%, CV = 7.3%). A similar trend was observed for mean velocity. The mean difference in peak and mean velocity measurements between rt‐PC with CIED (either position) and clinical standard PC with no CIED was within 7.5%. In adult patients, the mean difference between rt‐PC with CIED and clinical standard PC with CIED in peak velocity was 6.9%, and the CV was 7.9%.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that aortic velocity measurements are influenced by CIED in both adult and pediatric subjects.

The PRESERVE study (NCT04972097) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NanoKnife System to ablate prostate tissue in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The NanoKnife uses irreversible electroporation (IRE) to deliver high-voltage electrical pulses to change the permeability of cell membranes, leading to cell death. A total of 121 subjects with organ-confined PCa ≤ T2c, prostate-specific antigens (PSAs) ≤ 15 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 underwent focal ablation of the index lesion. The primary endpoints included negative in-field biopsy and adverse event incidence, type, and severity through 12 months. At the time of analysis, the trial had completed accrual with preliminary follow-up available. Demographics, disease characteristics, procedural details, PSA responses, and adverse events (AEs) are presented. The median (IQR) age at screening was 67.0 (61.0–72.0) years and Gleason distribution 3 + 4 (80.2%) and 4 + 3 (19.8%). At 6 months, all patients with available data (n = 74) experienced a median (IQR) percent reduction in PSA of 67.6% (52.3–82.2%). Only ten subjects (8.3%) experienced a Grade 3 adverse event; five were procedure-related. No Grade ≥ 4 AEs were reported. This study supports prior findings that IRE prostate ablation with the NanoKnife System can be performed safely. Final results are required to fully assess oncological, functional, and safety outcomes.

BackgroundCardiac infiltration is an important cause of death in sarcoidosis. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has limited sensitivity for the detection of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is used to diagnose CS but has limitations of cost and availability. We sought to determine whether TTE‐derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be used to identify individuals with CS, despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and whether abnormal GLS is associated with major cardiovascular events (MCE).MethodsWe studied 31 patients with biopsy‐proven extra‐cardiac sarcoidosis, LVEF>50% and LGE on CMR (CS+ group), and 31 patients without LGE (CS− group), matched by age, sex, and severity of lung disease. GLS was measured using vendor‐independent speckle tracking software. Parameters of left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function were also studied. Receiver‐operating characteristic curves were used to identify GLS cutoff for CS detection, and Kaplan–Meier plots to determine the ability of GLS to predict MCE.ResultsLGE was associated with reduced GLS (−19.6±1.9% in CS− vs −14.7±2.4% in CS+, P<.01) and with reduced E/A ratio (1.1±0.3 vs 0.9±0.3, respectively, P =.01). No differences were noted in other TTE parameters. GLS magnitude inversely correlated with LGE burden (r=−.59). GLS cutoff of −17% showed sensitivity and specificity 94% for detecting CS. Patients who experienced MCE had worse GLS than those who did not (−13.4±0.9% vs −17.7±0.4%, P=.0003).ConclusionsCS is associated with significantly reduced GLS in the presence of preserved LVEF. GLS measurements may become part of the TTE study performed to screen for CS.

Background— Cardiac sarcoidosis is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and sudden death, but its risk in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is unknown. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, we sought to (1) determine the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis or associated myocardial damage, defined by the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), (2) quantify their risk of death/ventricular tachycardia (VT), and (3) identify imaging-based covariates that predict who is at greatest risk of death/VT. Methods and Results— Parameters of left and right ventricular function and LGE burden were measured in 205 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >50% and extracardiac sarcoidosis who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance for LGE evaluation. The association between covariates and death/VT in the entire group and within the LGE+ group was determined using Cox proportional hazard models and time-dependent receiver–operator curves analysis. Forty-one of 205 patients (20%) had LGE; 12 of 205 (6%) died or had VT during follow-up; of these, 10 (83%) were in the LGE+ group. In the LGE+ group (1) the rate of death/VT per year was >20× higher than LGE− (4.9 versus 0.2%, P <0.01); (2) death/VT were associated with a greater burden of LGE (14±11 versus 5±5%, P <0.01) and right ventricular dysfunction (right ventricular EF 45±12 versus 53±28%, P =0.04). LGE burden was the best predictor of death/VT (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve, 0.80); for every 1% increase of LGE burden, the hazard of death/VT increased by 8%. Conclusions— Sarcoidosis patients with LGE are at significant risk for death/VT, even with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Increased LGE burden and right ventricular dysfunction can identify LGE+ patients at highest risk of death/VT.