Fan, Audrey Peiwen

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Consortium for Clarity in Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) is a study that aims to collect standardized imaging and plasma biomarkers on 2000 Clinical Core participants enrolled across all Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) sites. We sought to summarize the known heterogeneity across centers regarding scientific focus and initial enrollment plans for CLARiTI. METHODS We developed and distributed a survey capturing information on the 36 CLARiTI site's theme/expertise, recruitment plans, and the intersection of CLARiTI with other ADRC imaging efforts. RESULTS Anticipated CLARiTI enrollees spanned 11 different categories of suspected etiologies underlying impairment. A wide range of risk factors were endorsed across sites regarding the enrollment of unimpaired individuals. Variability also existed regarding site‐level strategies in enrollment into CLARiTI versus other imaging efforts. DISCUSSION We anticipate that the 2000 individuals that will enroll into CLARiTI will reflect the clinical heterogeneity already in place across the ADRC network. Highlights The ADRC Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) will leverage and contribute to the existing Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) program by supporting standardized imaging and plasma collection across all centers. We summarize the variation in scientific focus and enrollment plans across ADRC sites participating in CLARiTI. The anticipated CLARiTI cohort will reflect the clinical heterogeneity that already exists across the ADRC network. CLARiTI will contribute to scientific goals related to the detection of multi‐etiological signatures relevant for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs).

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aβ) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aβ and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N=608; age=68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aβ+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N=291; age=72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aβ+) (Table). Aβ‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aβ‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aβ‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aβ‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aβ‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.

AbstractBackgroundNeuritic plaques with fibrillar beta‐amyloid (Aß) peptides and tau‐protein neurofibrillary tangles, hallmark features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, have been concomitantly associated with white matter (WM) integrity loss, while a unique effect of each pathology on WM integrity in a more demographically diverse population remains unknown.MethodTo examine the degree to which each pathology affects WM integrity in a more diverse non‐demented cohort, Aß and tau PET, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and cognition (memory and executive function composites) were examined from the U.S. POINTER neuroimaging participants (N = 608; age = 68.34±5.2; 61.8% females; 29% Aß+) and a subset of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants (N = 291; age = 72.85±7.3; 50% females; 39% Aß+) (Table). Aß‐positivity was determined using tracer‐specific standardized cut‐offs. Tau SUVR was estimated for each Braak stage. For WM integrity, voxel‐based GLMs were applied to FSL‐processed fractional anisotropy (FA) maps using Braak stage tau SUVR and Aß‐positivity status, along with covariates of age, sex, and b‐value profiles.ResultIn U.S. POINTER, independent from Aß‐positivity status, greater tau burden in Braak stages I and II was related to lower FA across the tracts including the superior longitudinal fasciculus, fornix (cres), corpus callosum, and anterior thalamic radiation (Figure). Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters for Braak I and II significantly predicted executive function but not episodic memory. No association between FA and tau burden in Braak stages III/IV or V/VI was found. In the ADNI sample, greater tau burden in Braak I was related to lower FA mostly in left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and left uncinate fasciculus, while negative associations with FA became more diffuse with tau load in Braak III/IV and V/VI. Average FA from supra‐threshold clusters significantly predicted both episodic memory and executive function scores. Across both samples, after accounting for tau burden in each Braak stage, there were no association between Aß‐positivity status and WM integrity.ConclusionDistinct associations between tau burden, WM integrity, and cognition were found across the studies, indicating greater impact of early tau burden on WM integrity in U.S. POINTER, accounting for Aß‐positivity status. Factors contributing to the distinct associations across studies need further investigation.