Citations

ABSTRACTIntroductionLung transplantation has been evolving since its inception in 1963. Over recent years, literature has suggested a shift in the perioperative strategy of mechanical support toward extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the preferred modality of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in lung transplantation. The Survey of ECLS Application in Lung transplantation (SEAL) was designed to elucidate the current practice patterns of perioperative ECLS within the United States.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, a physician from 62 adult lung transplantation centers across the United States of America (USA) was surveyed on their institutional practices regarding the perioperative management of lung transplantation patients, with a focus on mechanical support.ResultsThe survey completion rate was 74% (46/62 eligible institutions). Most transplant centers utilize venoarterial (VA) ECMO (78%, 36/46) and/or venovenous (VV) ECMO (93%, 29/43) as a bridge to lung transplantation. When ECLS is used intraoperatively, 61% of (28/46) responding programs use VA ECMO as their preferred support. All programs use transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) intraoperatively, 85% (33/39) cannulate for ECMO centrally, and 74% (29/39) use a combination of inhaled and intravenous anesthesia while using ECMO intraoperatively. Most programs do not use antifibrinolytic during VA ECMO (62%, 28/45). Anticoagulation management and VA ECMO flows throughout the procedure showed considerable variation.ConclusionData from SEAL illustrates that though there are some practice commonalities within the United States, there is also quite a bit of variability in practice. Multiple dominant practices within the USA are consistent with a recently published International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus.

Background and Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD). (a) Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can be utilised to improve dyspnoea and quality of life in patients with chronic lung conditions, including both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. (b) This study aims to determine if PR can be a useful therapy to improve functional capacity and self-reported measures of dyspnoea in patients with CTD-ILD. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of CTD-ILD at a tertiary centre were prospectively enrolled to receive PR in this study. The primary outcome was a change in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) between baseline and 8 weeks after PR. The secondary outcome measures included pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS→) Dyspnoea, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), which were collected before and at 8 weeks after PR. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the data analysis. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1 . Following PR, there was a statistically significant improvement in the 6MWT ( Figure 1 ). Improvement in scores was observed in LCQ and the symptom domain of the SGRQ. Trends towards improvement were noted in PROMIS → Dyspnoea scores. Conclusion: In CTD-ILD patients, an 8-week course of PR led to improvements in functional capacity (6MWT) and certain quality of life domains (LCQ and symptom domain of SGRQ). Future studies are required to determine the longer-term benefit of PR in CTD-ILD patients and if these improvements are sustained.

ImportanceThe advanced ambulatory heart failure (HF) population comprises patients who have progressed beyond the pillars of recommended stage C HF therapies but can still find meaningful life-years ahead. Although these patients are commonly encountered in practice, national databases selectively capture the small groups accepted for heart transplant listing or left ventricular assist devices. The epidemiology, trajectories, and therapies for other ambulatory patients with advanced HF are poorly understood.ObservationsIn December 2022, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute convened a team of experts to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities for the ambulatory population with limiting daily symptoms and transition toward refractory end-stage D HF, designated as stage C2D. This article summarizes the findings from that 3-day workshop. Workshop participants surveyed the initial challenges and knowledge gaps for (1) recognition of ambulatory C2D HF, (2) estimation of the magnitude of the affected population and identifiable subpopulations, and (3) physiologic phenotypes, such as low cardiac output, right HF, cardiorenal syndromes, congestive hepatopathy and frailty, which offer distinct targets for existing and emerging therapies. Social drivers of HF and patient preferences for quality/length of survival were highlighted as essential modifiers for personalization of therapies.Conclusions and RelevanceTen key points summarized workshop findings, with target cohorts for study proposed as a crucial next step. This workshop summary is intended as a call for action to address knowledge gaps and develop new strategies to improve outcomes in the large ambulatory population with C2D HF.

ABSTRACT Background There has been a lack of updated epidemiological data on the incidence and survival outcomes for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the United States over the last two decades. Methods A retrospective, population‐based study was conducted utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to identify patients with SCLC from 2000 to 2020. Trends in cancer incidence, incidence‐based mortality rates, 1‐year relative survival rates and 1‐year observed survival were evaluated utilizing the SEER database. Results The database identified a total of 188,426 SCLC patients during the study period from 2000 through 2020. The age‐adjusted incidence rate slowly declined, on average, by 3% (95% CI: −3.2% to −2.8%) each year from 9 per 100,000 in 2000 to 4.6 per 100,000 in 2020. The decline is evident for all age groups, sexes, and races. Incidence‐based mortality also declined slowly from 6.6 in 2005 to 3.5 in 2020. However, survival outcomes, including 1‐year relative survival and 1‐year observed survivals, have not improved significantly over the last two decades. Conclusion This study found that the incidence of SCLC has decreased from 2000 to 2020, likely due to a reduction in smoking rates, underscoring the importance of smoking abstinence. An improvement in incidence‐based mortality is likely related to an enhanced medical care and a decrease in the incidence of SCLC, but the lack of improvement in survival outcomes reflects the need for more effective systemic therapy.

Background Our study was designed to determine the safety, efficacy, and immunological effects of perioperative pembrolizumab in early-stage NSCLC. Methods This is a single-arm phase II study of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with untreated, clinical stage IB to IIIA NSCLC. Patients received two doses of 200 mg pembrolizumab, surgery, standard adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by four doses adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary objective of this study was to determine surgical feasibility rate, and secondary objectives are pathological response rate, treatment adverse events, efficacy data, and exploratory analysis of biomarkers. Results 30 patients initiated perioperative pembrolizumab, and 25 completed tumor resection. At median follow-up of 59 months after surgical resection, seven patients had disease progression, while six had died representing. A 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) from time of surgery was 72.0% (56.4%–91.9%) and overall survival (OS) from time of surgery was 75.8% (60.7%–94.7%). Major pathological response (MPR) was found in seven tumors (28%) including two complete responses (4%). Across all treated patients, four receiving neoadjuvant and four receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab experienced treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher with no grade 5 events. Plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels increased across our patient cohort over time from baseline until postsurgery and remained elevated at the end of treatment. There was a significant difference between mean plasma PCSK9 levels for patients with MPR versus all other patients on study when checked postoperatively. Conclusions Perioperative pembrolizumab was safe and effective with promising MPR rate, PFS, and OS.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer that displays rapid proliferation and early metastatic potential. It accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancers and is strongly associated with tobacco carcinogens. Despite patients' initial response to systemic therapy, the majority develop early resistance and relapse. The outcomes of patients with metastatic SCLC are poor, prompting the need for new therapies. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape for NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) has significantly changed with the immergence of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, inroads of these therapies into SCLC have posed significant challenges due to its molecular and genomic heterogeneity. Despite the challenges of this disease, promising new first-in-class immunomodulatory agents have emerged and are currently undergoing extensive research. Herein, we review the current treatment paradigm of immunotherapy in SCLC and discuss future directions of this evolving field.

Abstract Background Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) can experience hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) correlated with lung infection by ammonia-producing Ureaplasma species. HS in LTRs can be managed by Ureaplasma-directed antibiotic therapy; however, Ureaplasma species lack a cell wall, limiting treatment options. Precise guidelines for Ureaplasma-directed antibiotic therapy in LTRs is lacking, and antibiotic resistance may complicate treatment. Here, levofloxacin (LEV), azithromycin (AZM), and doxycycline (DOX) were tested against isolates of U. urealyticum and U. parvum with varying antibiotic resistance profiles, and efficacies compared.Fig 1.Antibiotic prophylaxis of murine infection by antibiotic resistant Ureaplasma isolates. Mice were prophylaxed with levofloxacin (LEV; 100 mg/kg SQ), azithromycin (AZM; 100 mg/kg PO), or doxycycline (DOX; 100 mg/kg IP) 12 hours prior to infection with isolates of Ureaplasma parvum or Ureaplasma urealyticum resistant to one or none of the antibiotics. 18 hours after infection, mice were sacrificed and lungs harvested, with resulting Ureaplasma loads quantified (color changing units: CCU). Control animals (CTRL) were given no antibiotics. Significance between groups was determined via Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. * p ≤0.05, **p ≤0.01, ***p ≤0.001. Methods Mice were immunosuppressed using a combination of tacrolimus (1.2 mg/kg daily), mycophenolate mofetil (40 mg/kg daily), and methylprednisolone (20 mg/kg weekly) to mimic immunosuppression given to LTRs. Prophylactic antibiotics were given 12 hours prior to infection, including either LEV (100 mg/kg subcutaneously), AZM (100 mg/kg orally), or DOX (100 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Mice were then infected with Ureaplasma isolates resistant to one or none of the antibiotics, including U. parvum IDRL-10774 (fully susceptible), U parvum IDRL-10774R (IDLR-10774 with evolved AZM resistance; serial passage in sub-MIC AZM), U. parvum IDRL-11160 (LEV resistant), and U. urealyticum ATCC-33175 (DOX resistant). Mice were euthanized 18 hours post-infection, and lung bacterial loads (color changing units; CCU/gram) quantified. Results The effect of various antibiotic treatments against mouse lung infections with the four Ureaplasma isolates is displayed in Fig 1. Infection with IDRL-10774 (fully susceptible) and IDRL-11160 (LEV resistant) was only prevented by doxycycline (p=0.09 and p=0.01, respectively). For IDRL-10774, insignificant mean reductions (possibly due to a high standard deviation in the controls) were observed for both LEV (-106.9 CCU/g) and AZM (-105.25 CCU/g). IDRL-10774R (evolved AZM resistance) showed a complete loss of susceptibility to AZM compared to unevolved IDRL-10774. ATCC-33175 (DOX resistant) was not reduced by any antibiotics tested. Conclusion DOX was the most effective antibiotic tested, preventing lung infection by all isolates, except a DOX resistant isolate. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with nearly half of all patients diagnosed at an advanced stage. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) harness the host immune system to combat malignant cells. ICIs, which target programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4), have transformed the treatment landscape for advanced NSCLC. While a subset of patients experiences a long-term durable response, most patients will develop disease progression. New drugs targeting novel pathways are being tested in clinical trials to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy and overcome resistance patterns. This review aims to summarize the currently available ICIs for advanced NSCLC and describe emerging immunotherapies with recently published data from phase I/II clinical trials.

Abstract Introduction We describe the safety of sotorasib monotherapy in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss practical recommendations for managing key risks. Methods Incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were pooled from 4 clinical trials: CodeBreaK 100 (NCT03600883), CodeBreaK 101 (NCT04185883), CodeBreaK 105 (NCT04380753), and CodeBreaK 200 (NCT04303780) and graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Adverse events were deemed sotorasib-related per investigator causality assessment. Results In the pooled population (n = 549), TRAEs were reported in 388 (70.7%) patients (grade 1: 124 [22.6%]; grade 2: 117 [21.3%]; grade ≥ 3: 147 [26.8%]). Gastrointestinal and hepatic TRAEs, including diarrhea (171 [31.1%]), nausea (80 [14.6%]), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 68 [12.4%]), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 67 [12.2%]) were the most common (≥10%). Dose interruption and dose reduction of sotorasib resulted in the resolution of &gt;90% of diarrhea events; median time to resolution were 18.0 days and 22.0 days, respectively. Similar trends were observed for elevated ALT and AST events. Patients who stopped immunotherapy &lt;3 months before initiating sotorasib had a higher incidence of treatment-related hepatotoxicity (80/240 [33.3%]) than those who stopped immunotherapy ≥3 months before initiating sotorasib (26/188 [13.8%]). Treatment-related pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD) and corrected QT (QTc) prolongation were observed in 9 (1.6%) and 4 (0.7%) patients, respectively. Two (0.4%) patients died with TRAEs, 1 with ILD whose ultimate cause of death was disease progression, and the other with an unknown cause. Conclusions Sotorasib has a well-characterized safety profile in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, and key risks are manageable with dose modification.

Targeted therapies have changed the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer and led to improved patient survival across all stages of lung cancer. Newer advances in common and novel oncogenic drivers continue to occur at vigorous speed, making it challenging to stay up to date with the rapidly evolving field. In this article, we review the emerging perspectives in the treatment of actionable targets in lung cancer. We focus on the development of newer KRAS-directed therapies, particularly on non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and RAS-GTP inhibitors. We also describe the current standard of care for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC and dive into the novel treatments expected to be in the clinic soon. A similar approach is taken toward MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations as emerging targets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Finally, we conclude this review with the current body of evidence for targeting TROP-2 as a novel target, potentially of importance in post-targeted therapy scenarios.