Kittleson, M.

Introduction: Patients with variant transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRv-CM) experience early onset disease, rapid progression, and poor outcomes due to amyloid aggregated from destabilized tetrameric TTR. Acoramidis, a highly selective, oral TTR stabilizer, achieves ≥90% TTR stabilization and is approved in the USA, EU, Japan, and UK for adults with wild-type (ATTRwt-CM) or ATTRv-CM. In the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study and its open-label extension (OLE), acoramidis reduced both the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) through Month 30 and risk of ACM through Month 42 by 36%. Research Question: Is acoramidis efficacy in ATTRv-CM consistent with that observed in the overall ATTRibute-CM population? Methods: In ATTRibute-CM, participants with ATTR-CM were randomized 2:1 to acoramidis HCl 800 mg or PBO, twice daily (BID) for 30 months. After Month 30, all participants enrolled in the OLE received acoramidis HCl 800 mg BID. Genotype (ATTRwt-CM or ATTRv-CM) was captured at randomization; efficacy was analyzed separately in ATTRv-CM. Time-to-event analyses used a stratified Cox model with terms for treatment, baseline 6MWT, genotype, genotype×treatment interaction, stratified by randomization NT-proBNP and eGFR levels. ACM was analyzed at Month 42 (ATTRibute-CM 30 months + OLE 12 months). Results: The ATTRv-CM group comprised 59 patients (39 acoramidis, 20 PBO). Baseline characteristics were mostly similar in both groups ( Table ). The three most common variants reported were p.V142I (n=35), p.I88L (n=7), and p.T80A (n=5). Compared with PBO, acoramidis reduced the risk of ACM/first CVH through Month 30 by 59% (acoramidis, 46.2%; PBO, 75.0%; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21–0.81; P =0.011; Fig 1 ) and ACM through Month 42 by 59% (continuous acoramidis, 30.8%; PBO to acoramidis, 60.0%; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.93; P =0.032; Fig 2 ) , with Kaplan–Meier curves separating at Months 5 and 10, respectively. Conclusions: In ATTRibute-CM, acoramidis use was associated with clinical benefit in the ATTRv-CM group as demonstrated by a 59% risk reduction in both ACM/first CVH at Month 30, and ACM at Month 42 compared to PBO. These previously unreported findings support the hypothesis that near complete TTR stabilization observed experimentally with acoramidis across multiple TTR mutations translates into improvement in long-term outcomes. Further validation by individual TTR variant is warranted.

ImportanceThe advanced ambulatory heart failure (HF) population comprises patients who have progressed beyond the pillars of recommended stage C HF therapies but can still find meaningful life-years ahead. Although these patients are commonly encountered in practice, national databases selectively capture the small groups accepted for heart transplant listing or left ventricular assist devices. The epidemiology, trajectories, and therapies for other ambulatory patients with advanced HF are poorly understood.ObservationsIn December 2022, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute convened a team of experts to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities for the ambulatory population with limiting daily symptoms and transition toward refractory end-stage D HF, designated as stage C2D. This article summarizes the findings from that 3-day workshop. Workshop participants surveyed the initial challenges and knowledge gaps for (1) recognition of ambulatory C2D HF, (2) estimation of the magnitude of the affected population and identifiable subpopulations, and (3) physiologic phenotypes, such as low cardiac output, right HF, cardiorenal syndromes, congestive hepatopathy and frailty, which offer distinct targets for existing and emerging therapies. Social drivers of HF and patient preferences for quality/length of survival were highlighted as essential modifiers for personalization of therapies.Conclusions and RelevanceTen key points summarized workshop findings, with target cohorts for study proposed as a crucial next step. This workshop summary is intended as a call for action to address knowledge gaps and develop new strategies to improve outcomes in the large ambulatory population with C2D HF.

Abstract Background Characterization of transplant transmitted infections associated with drowned organ donors and the recipients is not well delineated, posing challenges for optimal management and prophylaxis strategies. Broader organ sharing may pose additional considerations due to pathogen variation. Methods We reviewed 22 potential donor disease transmission events (PDDTEs) from drowned donors reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) from 2017-2022 to estimate the incidence of PDDTEs among all US drowned organ donors and identify the most common pathogens in this setting. We also characterized donor/recipient epidemiology, infection timing and risk factors, and recipient survival. Results From 2017-2022, drowning was the mechanism of death in 777/74,232 (1.0%) of all US organ donors, from whom 2500 organs were transplanted. Among the 22 PDDTEs, there were 70 organ recipients. The median donor age was 17.5 years (range 1-70 years) and lung recipients accounted for 5/70 organ recipients. All PDDTE reports were submitted due to recipient disease, and index cases occurred 2-19 days post-transplant. 7/22 (7/777 drowned donors, 0.9%) PDDTEs were associated with pathogens consistent with plausible waterborne transmission, of which 4 were due to invasive molds (Zygomycetes and Scedosporium) and 3 were due to bacteria (Pseudomonas and Legionella). Of the 21 organ recipients from these 7 donors, 8 had proven or probable infections. 6/8 recipients had severe infection with 3 deaths, all from invasive mold infections. There were no identifiable infection risk factors related to drowning water source, donor immersion time, or geographic region. However, donor/recipient regional discordance occurred in 5/21 recipients, demonstrating the trend in broader organ sharing. Conclusion Though rare, organ recipients are at risk for transplant transmitted infection from drowned donors, particularly invasive mold infections. All infections occurred within the first month after transplant with high associated mortality. Though optimal management and prophylaxis strategies in these scenarios remain uncertain, post-transplant vigilance for early infection is paramount. Disclosures Helen S. Te, MD, CVS Caremark: Advisor/Consultant Lara A. Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, Aicuris: clinical research contract, paid to institutio|Ansun BioPharma: clinical research contract, paid to institution|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: clinical research contract, paid to institutio|Merck: clinical research contract, paid to institutio|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: clinical research contract, paid to institutio Anil J. Trindade, MD, CareDx, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|CareDx, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|TFF Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Grant/Research Support

ABSTRACTBackgroundCoccidioidomycosis is a fungal infection that poses a serious risk when transmitted through organ transplantation. We analyzed cases reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee from 2013 to 2022.MethodsDonors and/or recipients who had positive Coccidioides immitis/posadasii serology, pathology, and/or culture were included in this study. Cases adjudicated as ‘proven’ or ‘probable’ were analyzed for donor infection risk factors, the timing of infection, transmission by organ type, clinical manifestations, and recipient outcomes. Patient and facility identifiers were removed prior to review.ResultsDuring this time period, 73 potential instances of Coccidioides donor disease transmission events were reported. Among them, infection was transmitted from seven deceased donors to eight recipients. All seven deceased donors had prior infection or exposure to regions where coccidioidomycosis is endemic. Of 20 individuals receiving organs from these donors, eight developed infection, resulting in a 40% transmission rate. The median time to diagnosis post‐transplant was 39 days. Disseminated disease occurred in six recipients, five of whom died from the infection. Notably, none of the recipients who received prophylactic antifungal treatment died from the infection.ConclusionDespite its rarity, donor‐derived Coccidioides infection is a serious concern, particularly due to the high mortality rate in the early post‐transplant period. To mitigate these risks, a thorough assessment of donor exposure history, coupled with donor serology and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, can effectively guide post‐transplant antifungal prophylaxis. Prompt reporting is crucial to prevent Coccidioides infections among other recipients. image

AbstractBackgroundBetter access to direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has broadened the utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid testing (NAT) positive organs with excellent outcomes. However, DAA therapy has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation.AimTo determine the risk of HBV transmission or reactivation with utilization of HBV core antibody positive (HBcAb+) and HCV NAT positive (HCV+) organs, which presumably required DAA therapy.MethodsThe number of HBcAb+ donors with delineated HCV NAT status was obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database. The number of unexpected HBV infections from transplanted organs adjudicated as “proven” or “probable” transmission was obtained from the OPTN Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee database. A chart review of the donors of “proven” or “probable” cases was conducted.ResultsFrom January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, 7735 organs were procured from 3767 HBcAb+ donors and transplanted into 7469 recipients; 545 (14.5%) donors were also HCV+. HBV transmission or reactivation occurred in seven recipients. The rate is not significantly different between recipients of HCV+ (0.18%, 2/1115) and the HCV NAT negative (HCV‐) organs (0.08%, 5/6354) (p = 0.28) or between recipients of HCV+ and HCV‐ livers as well as non‐liver organs. HBV transmission or reactivation occurred within a median of 319 (range, 41–1117) days post‐transplant in the setting of missing, inadequate, or truncated prophylaxis.ConclusionHBV reactivation associated with DAA therapy for HBcAb+ HCV+ organs is less frequent than reported in the non‐transplant population, possibly due to the common use of HBV prophylaxis in the at‐risk transplant population. image

Introduction: Testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended for patients with new-onset heart failure (HF). There are limited data on the association between testing for CAD during index hospitalization for patients with the new-onset HF and early readmission rates and readmission mortality. Hypothesis: CAD testing for new-onset HF during index hospitalization may reduce 30-day readmission rates and readmission-related mortality. Methods: Patients hospitalized for new-onset HF were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database of the United States. Clinical characteristics, 30-day readmission rates, readmission-related mortality were compared in patients with or without testing for CAD during index hospitalization. CAD testing includes coronary angiography, coronary CT angiography, cardiac MRI, nuclear imaging or cardiac stress test. Results: Between January 2016 and November 2019, of 151,172 patients hospitalized for new-onset HF, 30,444 (20.1%) patients underwent testing for CAD during index hospitalization. Younger patients, males, and patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had more frequent testing for CAD. Only 9.5% of CAD-tested patients received percutaneous coronary intervention during the index hospitalization. Patients with CAD testing had lower 30-day readmission rates than those without testing (11.4% vs 14.3%, P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.87). Patients with CAD testing had lower 30-day readmission-related mortality rates than those without testing (0.5% vs 0.9%, P<0.001; adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04). Readmission rate for HF at 30 days was 2.3% for patients with CAD testing vs 3.5% for those without testing (P<0.001; adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.76). There was a significant interaction between HF type (HFrEF vs HF with preserved EF) and CAD testing on 30-day readmission rates (P for interaction <0.001). Conclusions: Testing for CAD during index hospitalization for patients with new-onset HF was associated with reduced 30-day readmission rates. There was substantial decrease in readmission for HF and readmission-related mortality in patients who underwent CAD testing during index hospitalization.

Disease-modifying therapies in both light chain and transthyretin amyloidosis have improved patient functional status and survival. Conceivably, as heart failure may progress despite amyloid therapies, more patients may be considered for heart transplantation. In earlier eras, extra-cardiac amyloid deposits significantly reduced post-heart transplant patient survival and functional status compared to the non-amyloid population. In the modern era, transplant centres have reported improved outcomes in amyloidosis as patient selection has grown more stringent. Importantly, systematic candidate evaluation should assess the degree of extra-cardiac involvement, the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies and downstream effects on patients’ nutrition and frailty. This review outlines such an overall approach while also considering that organ-specific selection criteria may vary between individual transplant centres. A methodical approach to patient evaluation will promote better understanding of the prevalence and severity of extra-cardiac disease in amyloidosis patients referred for heart transplantation and of any disparities in decision outcomes in this population.

AbstractBackgroundDecisions to transplant organs from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) nucleic acid test‐positive (NAT+) donors must balance risk of donor‐derived transmission events (DDTE) with the scarcity of available organs.MethodsOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data were used to compare organ utilization and recipient outcomes between SARS‐CoV‐2 NAT+ and NAT– donors. NAT+ was defined by either a positive upper or lower respiratory tract (LRT) sample within 21 days of procurement. Potential DDTE were adjudicated by OPTN Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.ResultsFrom May 27, 2021 (date of OTPN policy for required LRT testing of lung donors) to January 31, 2022, organs were recovered from 617 NAT+ donors from all OPTN regions and 53 of 57 (93%) organ procurement organizations. NAT+ donors were younger and had higher organ quality scores for kidney and liver. Organ utilization was lower for NAT+ donors compared to NAT– donors. A total of 1241 organs (776 kidneys, 316 livers, 106 hearts, 22 lungs, and 21 other) were transplanted from 514 NAT+ donors compared to 21 946 organs from 8853 NAT– donors. Medical urgency was lower for recipients of NAT+ liver and heart transplants. The median waitlist time was longer for liver recipients of NAT+ donors. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for NAT+ donors for all organ types. Outcomes for hospital length of stay, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day graft loss were similar for all organ types. No SARS‐CoV‐2 DDTE occurred in this interval.ConclusionsTransplantation of SARS‐CoV‐2 NAT+ donor organs appears safe for short‐term outcomes of death and graft loss and ameliorates the organ shortage. Further study is required to assure comparable longer term outcomes. image