Citations

Abstract Introduction: Identifying families with an underlying inherited cancer predisposition is a major goal of cancer prevention efforts. Mendelian risk models have been developed to better predict the risk associated with a pathogenic variant of developing breast/ovarian cancer (with BRCAPRO), and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (PANCPRO). Given that pathogenic variants involving BRCA2 and BRCA1 predispose to all three of these cancers, we developed a joint risk model to capture shared susceptibility. Methods: We expanded the existing framework for PANCPRO and BRCAPRO to model underlying risk of pancreatic, breast, and ovarian cancer. We then validated this model on three datasets each reflecting the target populations for these models, including patients referred to a high-risk genetics clinic, patients with multiple family members with pancreatic cancer who underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/2, as well as a prospective registry of pancreatic cancer families. The new model is designated BRCAPANCPRO. Results: BRCAPANCPRO yielded good discrimination for differentiating BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers from non-carriers (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) and was reasonably well-calibrated for predicting future risk of pancreatic cancer (observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio = 0.82 [0.69, 0.94]). In these families, BRCAPANCPRO outperformed both the prior BRCAPRO and PANCPRO models. Discussion: The BRCAPANCPRO model improves the identification of families with a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 or BRCA1, particularly for families where there is the co-occurrence of pancreatic cancer in addition to breast and/or ovarian cancer. The model also improves the prediction of pancreatic cancer among families with a pancreatic cancer family history, with or without breast and/or ovarian cancer. Citation Format: Amanda L. Blackford, Erica J. Childs, Nancy Porter, Gloria Petersen, Kari Rabe, Steven Gallinger, Ayelet Borgida, Sapna Syngal, Ann Schwartz, Michele Cote, Ralph Hruban, Michael Goggins, Alison P. Klein, Giovanni Parmigiani. A risk prediction tool for individuals with a family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer: BRCAPANCPRO [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 885.

The anti‐parallel nature of DNA permits continuous synthesis of DNA on the leading strand and discontinuous DNA synthesis on the lagging strand. On the lagging strand, Okazaki fragments are joined by the catalytic action of DNA ligase I. An individual with a DNA ligase I deficiency exhibited growth retardation, sunlight sensitivity and severe immunosuppression, likely due to accumulation of DNA damage. Surprisingly, little is known about the DNA damage response (DDR) in DNA ligase I‐deficient cells. We utilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to address this question. We uncovered a novel pathway, which facilitates ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) on lysine 107. Unlike PCNA ubiquitination at lysine 164 in response to UV irradiation, which triggers translesion synthesis and is dependent on Rad6 and Rad18, modification at lysine 107 requires the E2 variant Mms2 in conjunction with Ubc4 and Rad5. Surprisingly, DNA ligase I‐deficient cdc9‐1 cells that carry a PCNAK107R mutation are inviable, because they cannot activate a robust DDR. Our data show that depending on the type of damage that a cell encounters, PCNA is ubiquitinated at different lysine residues. We propose a “DNA Damage code” that allows cells to recognize different types of DNA damage through differential PCNA ubiquitination, allowing the cells to activate the appropriate repair response.

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.

TPS779 Background: 4-10% of PDAC patients harbor pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes, including APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, and TP53. For families with such pathogenic variants, the greatest potential impact of germline testing is to identify relatives with the same variant (cascade testing), thereby providing the opportunity for early detection and interception of PDAC and other associated cancers. Numerous factors limit cascade testing in real-world practice, including family dynamics, widespread geographic distribution of relatives, access to genetic services, and misconceptions about the importance of germline testing, such that the preventive benefits of cascade testing are often not fully realized. The primary aim of this study is to analyze two alternative strategies for cascade testing in families with inherited PDAC risk. Methods: 1000 individuals with a confirmed pathogenic germline variant in any of the above genes in a 1st/2nd degree relative and a 1st/2nd degree relative with PDAC will be remotely enrolled through the study website (www.GENERATEstudy.org) and randomized between two methods of cascade testing (individuals with prior genetic testing will be ineligible): Arm 1 will undergo pre-test genetic education with a pre-recorded video and live interactive session with a genetic counselor via a web-based telemedicine platform (Doxy.me), followed by germline testing through Color Genomics; Arm 2 will undergo germline testing through Color Genomics without dedicated pre-test genetic education. Color Genomics will disclose results to study personnel and directly to participants in both arms. All participants will have the option of pursuing additional telephone-based genetic counseling through Color Genomics. The primary outcome will be uptake of cascade testing. Secondary outcomes will include self-reported genetic knowledge, cancer worry, distress, decisional preparedness, familial communication, and screening uptake, which will be measured via longitudinal surveys. Enrollment is underway nationwide as of May, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03762590.

TPS4162 Background: 4-10% of PDAC patients harbor pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes, including APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, and TP53. For families with such pathogenic variants, the greatest potential impact of germline testing is to identify relatives with the same pathogenic variant (cascade testing), thereby providing the opportunity for early detection and cancer interception of PDAC and other associated malignancies. Numerous factors limit cascade testing in real-world practice, including family dynamics, widespread geographic distribution of relatives, access to genetic services, and misconceptions about the importance of germline testing, such that the preventive benefits of cascade testing are often not fully realized. The primary aim of this study is to analyze two alternative strategies for cascade testing in families with inherited PDAC susceptibility. Methods: 1000 individuals (from approximately 200 families) with a confirmed pathogenic germline variant in any of the above genes in a 1st/2nd degree relative and a 1st/2nd degree relative with PDAC will be remotely enrolled through the study website (www.generatestudy.org) and randomized between two different methods of cascade testing (individuals with prior genetic testing will be ineligible): Arm 1 will undergo pre-test genetic education with a pre-recorded video and live interactive session with a genetic counselor via a web-based telemedicine platform (Doxy.me), followed by germline testing through Color Genomics; Arm 2 will undergo germline testing through Color Genomics without dedicated pre-test genetic education. Color Genomics will disclose results to study personnel and directly to participants in both arms. Participants in both arms will have the option of pursuing additional telephone-based genetic counseling through Color Genomics. The primary outcome will be uptake of cascade testing. Secondary outcomes will include participant self-reported genetic knowledge, cancer worry, distress, decisional preparedness, familial communication, and screening uptake, which will be measured via longitudinal surveys. Enrollment will begin February, 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03762590.

9505 Background: D (BRAF inhibitor) + T (MEK inhibitor) combination therapy is associated with rapid clinical responses and has improved clinical outcomes in pts with BRAFV600–mutant MM, but long-term (˃ 3 y) clinical efficacy and safety data are limited. The longest follow-up to date of a randomized trial evaluating D+T at the approved dose (150 mg BID/2 mg QD [150/2]) was of the phase II study BRF113220 (part C; median, 45.6 mo) in which durable outcomes were achieved in some pts with BRAFV600–mutant MM (3-y OS, 38%). Here, we report updated 5-y landmark analyses to further characterize the impact of D+T in MM. Methods: Pts with BRAFV600–mutant mm enrolled in BRF113220 part C (NCT01072175) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monotherapy D (150 mg BID), D+T (150 mg BID/1 mg QD), or D+T (150/2). Pts who progressed on D alone could cross over to the D+T 150/2 arm. Pt disposition, pt demographics, and 4- and 5-y efficacy and safety were analyzed for both the D-alone and D+T (approved 150/2 dose) arms. Results: This updated analysis represents an additional ≈ 2 y of follow-up (D and D+T arms; n = 54 each). As of 13 Oct 2016, 45 pts (83%) on D alone had crossed over to D+T. 20 pts were ongoing (D, n = 7 [13%]; D+T, n = 13 [24%]); 80% of D pts and 70% of D+T pts had died. D+T OS remained superior to D alone. The 4- and 5-y OS rates with D+T were 30% and 28%, respectively, demonstrating a stabilization of the OS curve. The PFS curve for D+T also remained stable (4- and 5-y: both 13%). Consistent with earlier results, the best OS for pts who received D+T was seen in pts with normal LDH (5-y, 45%) and normal LDH with disease in < 3 organ sites (5-y, 51%). At the 5-y landmark, 1 additional pt who received D+T improved from a partial to a complete response. Additional follow-up revealed no new safety signals with D+T. Detailed analyses of D crossover pts, responders, and post-progression therapy will be presented. Conclusions: This longest follow-up to date of BRAF + MEK inhibitor combination therapy in pts with BRAFV600–mutant mm revealed stable OS and PFS lasting ≥ 5 y with consistent tolerability. These results demonstrate that some pts with mm can achieve durable benefit with D+T therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01072175.

Significance Much of the inherited susceptibility to pancreatic cancer remains unexplained. Germline variants that cause protein misfolding and impaired secretion of pancreatic enzymes such as CPA1 (encoding carboxypeptidase A1) can cause pancreatic acinar cell endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We investigated the hypothesis that pancreatic cancer could arise from germline variants in genes encoding pancreatic secretory enzymes that induce pancreatic acinar cell stress. We find ∼1% of 1,579 patients with pancreatic cancer vs. 1 of 2,012 controls have germline variants in the genes encoding CPA1 and CPB1 (carboxypeptidase B1) that impair secretion of its protein product and induce ER stress. These findings implicate pancreatic acinar cell stress as a mechanism of pancreatic cancer susceptibility.

Abstract Individuals from pancreatic cancer families are at increased risk, not only of pancreatic cancer, but also of melanoma, breast, ovarian, and colon cancers. While some of the increased risk may be due to mutations in high-penetrance genes (i.e., BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, p16/CDKN2A or DNA mismatch repair genes), common genetic variants may also be involved. In a high-risk population of cases with either a family history of pancreatic cancer or early-onset pancreatic cancer (diagnosis before the age of 50 years), we examined the role of genetic variants previously associated with risk of pancreatic, breast, ovarian, or prostate cancer. We genotyped 985 cases (79 early-onset cases, 906 cases with a family history of pancreatic cancer) and 877 controls for 215,389 SNPs using the iSelect Collaborative Oncological Gene-Environment Study (iCOGS) array with custom content. Logistic regression was performed using a log-linear additive model. We replicated several previously reported pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci, including recently identified variants on 2p13.3 and 7p13 (2p13.3, rs1486134: OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13–1.63; P = 9.29 × 10−4; 7p13, rs17688601: OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63–0.93; P = 6.59 × 10−3). For the replicated loci, the magnitude of association observed in these high-risk patients was similar to that observed in studies of unselected patients. In addition to the established pancreatic cancer loci, we also found suggestive evidence of association (P &lt; 5 × 10−5) to pancreatic cancer for SNPs at HDAC9 (7p21.1) and COL6A2 (21q22.3). Even in high-risk populations, common variants influence pancreatic cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1185–91. ©2016 AACR.