Petersen, Gloria

Abstract Background The shared inherited genetic contribution to risk of different cancers is not fully known. In this study, we leverage results from 12 cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to quantify pairwise genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers and identify novel cancer susceptibility loci. Methods We collected GWAS summary statistics for 12 solid cancers based on 376 759 participants with cancer and 532 864 participants without cancer of European ancestry. The included cancer types were breast, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, glioma, head and neck, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and renal cancers. We conducted cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies to discover novel cancer susceptibility loci. Finally, we assessed the extent of variant-specific pleiotropy among cancers at known and newly identified cancer susceptibility loci. Results We observed widespread but modest genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers. In cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies, we identified 15 novel cancer susceptibility loci. Additionally, we identified multiple variants at 77 distinct loci with strong evidence of being associated with at least 2 cancer types by testing for pleiotropy at known cancer susceptibility loci. Conclusions Overall, these results suggest that some genetic risk variants are shared among cancers, though much of cancer heritability is cancer-specific and thus tissue-specific. The increase in statistical power associated with larger sample sizes in cross-disease analysis allows for the identification of novel susceptibility regions. Future studies incorporating data on multiple cancer types are likely to identify additional regions associated with the risk of multiple cancer types.

Abstract Introduction: Identifying families with an underlying inherited cancer predisposition is a major goal of cancer prevention efforts. Mendelian risk models have been developed to better predict the risk associated with a pathogenic variant of developing breast/ovarian cancer (with BRCAPRO), and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (PANCPRO). Given that pathogenic variants involving BRCA2 and BRCA1 predispose to all three of these cancers, we developed a joint risk model to capture shared susceptibility. Methods: We expanded the existing framework for PANCPRO and BRCAPRO to model underlying risk of pancreatic, breast, and ovarian cancer. We then validated this model on three datasets each reflecting the target populations for these models, including patients referred to a high-risk genetics clinic, patients with multiple family members with pancreatic cancer who underwent genetic testing for BRCA1/2, as well as a prospective registry of pancreatic cancer families. The new model is designated BRCAPANCPRO. Results: BRCAPANCPRO yielded good discrimination for differentiating BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers from non-carriers (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) and was reasonably well-calibrated for predicting future risk of pancreatic cancer (observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio = 0.82 [0.69, 0.94]). In these families, BRCAPANCPRO outperformed both the prior BRCAPRO and PANCPRO models. Discussion: The BRCAPANCPRO model improves the identification of families with a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 or BRCA1, particularly for families where there is the co-occurrence of pancreatic cancer in addition to breast and/or ovarian cancer. The model also improves the prediction of pancreatic cancer among families with a pancreatic cancer family history, with or without breast and/or ovarian cancer. Citation Format: Amanda L. Blackford, Erica J. Childs, Nancy Porter, Gloria Petersen, Kari Rabe, Steven Gallinger, Ayelet Borgida, Sapna Syngal, Ann Schwartz, Michele Cote, Ralph Hruban, Michael Goggins, Alison P. Klein, Giovanni Parmigiani. A risk prediction tool for individuals with a family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer: BRCAPANCPRO [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 885.

Abstract Objective: To elucidate the genetic architecture of gene expression in pancreatic tissues. Design: We performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) and allele specific expression (ASE) analyses using RNA-sequence data and 1000 Genomes (1000G) imputed GWAS genotypes from 95 fresh frozen histologically normal pancreatic tissue samples. Data from 115 pancreatic tumor-derived tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was included for comparison. Results: We identified 38,615 cis-eQTLs (corresponding to 484 Genes) in histologically normal tissues and 39,713 cis-eQTL (corresponding to 237 Genes) in tumor tissues (FDR<0.1), with the strongest effects seen near transcriptional start sites (TSS). Approximately 23% and 42% of genes with significant cis-eQTLs (eGenes) appeared to be specific for tumor and normal derived tissues, respectively. Significant enrichment of cis-eQTL variants was noted in noncoding regulatory regions marked by modified histones, DNAse hypersensitivity and bound transcription factors, in particular for pancreatic tissues (1.53-3.12 fold, P≤0.0001), indicating tissue-specific functional relevance. A common pancreatic cancer risk locus on 9q34.2 in the ABO gene (rs687289) was associated with ABO expression in histologically normal (P=5.8x10-8) and tumor-derived (P=8.3x10-5) pancreatic tissues. The high linkage disequilibrium (LD) between this variant and the O blood group generating deletion variant in exon 6 of ABO suggested that nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of the “O” mRNA could explain the eQTL. However, knock-down of crucial NMD regulators did not influence decay of the ABO “O” mRNA, indicating that a gene regulatory element influenced by pancreatic cancer risk alleles may underlie the eQTL. Conclusions: We have identified cis-eQTLs representing potential functional regulatory variants in the pancreas and generated a rich dataset for further studies on gene expression and regulation in pancreatic tissues. Citation Format: Laufey T. Amundadottir, Soren Lykke Andresen, Wenming Xiao, Jason Hoskins, Ashley Jermusyk, Lauren Rost, Irene Collins, Jinping Jia, Michael Mobaraki, Bin Zhu, Robert Kurtz, Hemang Parikh, Lei Song, Meredith Yeager, Torben Jensen, William Bamlet, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Brian Wolpin, Jill Smith, Sara Olson, Gloria Petersen, Jianxin Shi, Mingfeng Zhang. Analysis of cis-eQTLs in normal and tumor-derived pancreatic tissues reveals functional insights, including for the 9q34.1 ABO pancreatic cancer risk locus [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1442. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1442

Abstract Background: Many cancers share specific genetic risk factors, including both rare high-penetrance mutations and common SNPs identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, little is known about the overall shared heritability across cancers. Quantifying the extent to which two distinct cancers share genetic origin will give insights to shared biological mechanisms underlying cancer and inform design for future genetic association studies. Methods: In this study, we estimated the pair-wise genetic correlation between six cancer types (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate) using cancer-specific GWAS summary statistics data based on 66,958 case and 70,665 control subjects of European ancestry. We also estimated genetic correlations between cancers and 14 noncancer diseases and traits. Results: After adjusting for 15 pair-wise genetic correlation tests between cancers, we found significant (P < 0.003) genetic correlations between pancreatic and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.55, P = 0.003), lung and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.31, P = 0.001). We also found suggestive genetic correlations between lung and breast cancer (rg = 0.27, P = 0.009), and colorectal and breast cancer (rg = 0.22, P = 0.01). In contrast, we found no evidence that prostate cancer shared an appreciable proportion of heritability with other cancers. After adjusting for 84 tests studying genetic correlations between cancer types and other traits (Bonferroni-corrected P value: 0.0006), only the genetic correlation between lung cancer and smoking remained significant (rg = 0.41, P = 1.03 × 10−6). We also observed nominally significant genetic correlations between body mass index and all cancers except ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Our results highlight novel genetic correlations and lend support to previous observational studies that have observed links between cancers and risk factors. Impact: This study demonstrates modest genetic correlations between cancers; in particular, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer share some degree of genetic basis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1427–35. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract The FKBP5 gene encodes the FKBP51 immunophilin, a negative regulator of AKT. Variability in level of FKBP5 expression is a major factor contributing to variation in response to several classes of chemotherapeutic agents including gemcitabine, first line treatment for pancreatic cancer. Genetic variation of FKBP5 could influence its expression, function, and, ultimately, treatment response of pancreatic cancer. We set out to comprehensively study the role of genetic variation in FKBP5 identified by Next Generation DNA resequencing in response to gemcitabine treatment of pancreatic cancer by utilizing both tumor and germline DNA samples from 43 pancreatic cancer patients, including 19 paired tumor-normal samples. Genotype-phenotype association studies with overall survival (in tumor only) as well as with FKBP5 gene expression were performed using the same samples in which Next Generation DNA resequencing had been performed, followed by functional genomic studies of top selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In-depth resequencing identified 404 FKBP5 SNPs in both normal and tumor DNA patient samples. SNPs with the smallest p-values for association with FKBP5 survival or expression were subjected to functional genomic studies. Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that the rs73748206 “T” allele altered DNA-protein binding patterns, consistent with a significantly increased reporter gene activity. The effect of rs73748206 was also confirmed by mRNA expression studies using lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) derived from the same patients from whom DNA used for resequencing had been obtained. This comprehensive FKBP5 resequencing study provides insight into the role of inheritance in variation in response to gemcitabine therapy of pancreatic cancer. Citation Format: Katarzyna A. Ellsworth, Bruce W. Eckloff, Liang Li, Irene Moon, Brooke L. Fridley, Greg D. Jenkins, Erin Carlson, Abra Brisbin, Ryan Abo, William Bamlet, Gloria Petersen, Eric D. Wieben, Liewei Wang. Contribution of FKBP5 genetic variation to gemcitabine treatment and survival in pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2209. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2209

Abstract B24 Purpose Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States for which no recommended screening guidelines are available. An estimated 34,290 deaths related to PC is expected to occur in 2008 and the 5-year relative survival rate for this cancer is 5% for all stages combined. A person's chance of developing this cancer increases three-fold if a first-degree relative has pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess attitudes of unaffected family members in the Mayo Clinic Pancreas Cancer Family study toward PC cancer risk and future screening options. This is the first study to report such attitudes of PC family members. Subjects and Methods At-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with pancreas cancer in the kindred and primary care controls completed a survey asking about: perceived PC risk, degree of PC worry/concern, attitude toward cancer screening in general, and intentions regarding PC screening if it were a blood test or endoscopic ultrasound. Results 386 family members in 109 PC kindreds and 1058 controls completed surveys. Forty-six percent of PC family members reported that it was likely they would develop PC during their lifetime compared to 6% of controls. Forty-one percent of family members reported having thoughts regarding the possibility of getting pancreatic cancer during the past month versus 4.6% of controls. Similarly, 74% of family members reported concern about getting PC as compared to 40.6% of controls. 94% of family members reported they would be likely to undergo a blood-based PC screening test compared to 89.7% of controls. For endoscopic ultrasound, 71% of family members would be likely to undergo screening as compared to 55% of controls. All comparisons were statistically significant. Conclusion Compared to controls, PC family members perceive their personal PC risk to be high and report a higher rate of PC-related cancer worry/concern. A high percentage of family members and controls indicate receptivity to PC screening, especially if it were a blood test. If the screening is more invasive (i.e. EUS), interest declines, particularly among controls. This information can help investigators to understand and address potential motivators and barriers to recruitment for future PC studies and indicates that there is a need to develop educational interventions among these families to reduce their actual and perceived pancreatic cancer risk. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B24.