Citations

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by elevated locoregional recurrence risk despite aggressive local therapies. New tumor-specific radiosensitizers are needed. We hypothesized that the ATR inhibitor, VX-970 (now known as M6620), would preferentially radiosensitize TNBC. Noncancerous breast epithelial and TNBC cell lines were investigated in clonogenic survival, cell cycle, and DNA damage signaling and repair assays. In addition, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models generated prospectively as part of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy study from either baseline tumor biopsies or surgical specimens with chemoresistant residual disease were assessed for sensitivity to fractionated radiotherapy, VX-970, or the combination. To explore potential response biomarkers, exome sequencing was assessed for germline and/or somatic alterations in homologous recombination (HR) genes and other alterations associated with ATR inhibitor sensitivity. VX-970 preferentially inhibited ATR-Chk1-CDC25a signaling, abrogated the radiotherapy-induced G2–M checkpoint, delayed resolution of DNA double-strand breaks, and reduced colony formation after radiotherapy in TNBC cells relative to normal-like breast epithelial cells. In vivo, VX-970 did not exhibit significant single-agent activity at the dose administered even in the context of genomic alterations predictive of ATR inhibitor responsiveness, but significantly sensitized TNBC PDXs to radiotherapy. Exome sequencing and functional testing demonstrated that combination therapy was effective in both HR-proficient and -deficient models. PDXs established from patients with chemoresistant TNBC were also highly radiosensitized. In conclusion, VX-970 is a tumor-specific radiosensitizer for TNBC. Patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a subset at particularly high risk of relapse, may be ideally suited for this treatment intensification strategy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(11); 2462–72. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Lung cancer has the highest mortality across all cancers in the world. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly mutated in lung adenocarcinomas from Asian non-smoking females. These tumors usually respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), but the outcomes vary in different patients. Though EGFR T790M, amplification of MET and other mechanisms have been shown to confer EGFR-TKI resistance, the molecular mechanisms in around 30% of patients are still unknown. To uncover novel candidate pathways of EGFR-TKI resistance, we analyzed the whole exome mutation profiles of pre-treatment, EGFR T790M-free lung adenocarcinomas with typical activating mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions). Amongst 19 non-responding (NR) tumors without significant shrinkage after gefitinib or erlotinib treatment, 67 cancer-related genes showed coding region non-synonymous single nucleotide variations (SNV) or insertion-deletions (indels) but they were not detected in 22 responding tumors. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed 14 of the 67 genes were involved in the EGFR and WNT signaling network (false discovery rate q=1.14 e-8 for EGFR and q=4.3 e-9 for WNT), including well-known TKI resistance-related genes PIK3CA, PTEN and NF1. Notably, ARID1A, which encodes a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex, showed nonsense mutations in 2 NR but not responding tumors, which were validated by Sanger sequencing. More than 40% of ARID1A mutations in lung adenocarcinomas recorded in COSMIC were nonsense mutations or frameshift indels. Loss of function mutations of ARID1A have also been reported in various cancers, together suggesting ARID1A might be a tumor suppressor but its involvement in EGFR mutant lung cancers is unknown. To investigate the potential role of ARID1A, its expression was first studied using Kaplan-Meier plotter. Low expression of ARID1A is associated with significantly better overall survival than high expression level in lung adenocarcinoma patients (p=8.5 e-7). To test whether loss of ARID1A could cause TKI resistance, ARID1A was knocked down by shRNA in HCC827 lung cancer cell line harboring EGFR exon19 deletion. MTT cell viability assay using gefitinib showed increase of IC50. Western blot assay further showed ARID1A knockdown increased phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473. Together, the findings suggest loss of ARID1A could lead to EGFR bypass and promote activation of the downstream PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to EGFR TKI resistance. Overall, our findings suggest EGFR-TKI resistance mutations could be detected before TKI drug selection. Resistant gene mutations present in pre-treatment tumors could help to predict the treatment response. More specifically, our study identified a promising gene list involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, and suggested ARID1A loss could be a novel EGFR-TKI resistance mechanism. Citation Format: Xuyuan Gao, Hang Xu, James CM Ho, Oscar SH Chan, Feng Xu, Junwen Wang, Victor HF Lee, Vicky PC Tin, Zhijie Xiao, Siqi Wang, Judy WP Yam, Maria P Wong. EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas mutation profiles reveal ARID1A might be a novel tyrosine kinase resistance pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-196.

Abstract Purpose: TNBC represents an aggressive subtype characterized by earlier relapse and worse survival compared to non-TNBC. Patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high risk of locoregional recurrence despite aggressive subsequent local therapies, including RT. Thus, new radiosensitizers that address chemoresistant TNBC (i.e residual disease after NAC) are needed. ATR plays a key role in the cellular response to replication stress and DNA damage. TNBC is characterized by G1 checkpoint loss, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and other features which increase dependence on ATR pathway signaling. We hypothesized that VX-970, a selective inhibitor of ATR, would effectively radiosensitize TNBC. Methods: Cell lines representing varying subtypes of TNBC (MDA-MB-231, HCC1806, and BT-549) and the normal breast epithelial cell line MCF10a were investigated in clonogenic survival, cell cycle, and DNA damage signaling and repair assays. In addition, Mayo Clinic (MC)TNBC1 and MCTNBC2, patient derived xenograft models (PDXs) generated prospectively from baseline and chemoresistant residual disease surgical specimens after NAC, respectively, of unique patients in the Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study were analyzed. Tumors were injected into hind-legs of athymic nude mice and animals were randomized to: 1) Vehicle 2) RT 3) VX-970 4) RT + VX-970. RT was delivered in 5 daily fractions of 2 Gy. VX-970 was administered daily 1 hour prior to RT at a dose of 60 mg/kg. Exome sequencing was assessed for germ-line and/or somatic alterations in HR genes and an ex-vivo RAD51 foci formation assay was applied to confirm the functional status of HR in each PDX model. Results: In vitro, VX-970 preferentially inhibited ATR-Chk1-CDC25a signaling, abrogated the RT-induced G2/M checkpoint, delayed resolution of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci and reduced colony formation after RT in MDA-MB-231, HCC1806, and BT-549 relative to MCF10a. In vivo, VX-970 did not exhibit single agent activity at the dose administered but markedly sensitized both MCTNBC1 and MCTNBC2 to RT, suggesting that VX-970 could overcome chemoresistant TNBC biology. For MCTNBC1 and MCTNBC2, the median time to tumor tripling was 26 vs 49 days (p=0.002) and 25 vs 43 days (p=0.006) for the RT and RT + VX-970 groups, respectively. Ex-vivo RAD51 foci formation was robust in MCTNBC1, a PDX without HR gene alterations. In contrast, there was no RT-induced RAD51 foci formation in MCTNBC2, suggesting a BRCA1 mutation in the corresponding human tumor resulted in loss of HR function in that model. Conclusion: VX-970 + RT effectively radiosensitized TNBC PDXs established from both pre-treatment biopsy specimens and chemoresistant residual tumor samples and in both HR deficient and HR proficient settings. ATR inhibition should be investigated in the clinic in combination with RT for patients with residual TNBC after NAC. Citation Format: Robert W. Mutter, Mohamed M. Kahila, Xinyi Tu, Qin Zhou, Jia Yu, Krishna R. Kalari, Liewei Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Matthew P. Goetz, Jann N. Sarkaria, Zhenkun Lou. ATR inhibition is a promising radiosensitizing strategy for chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 840.

Abstract Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. The majority of GWAS-identified disease susceptibility variants are located in noncoding regions, and causal genes underlying these associations remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study to search for novel genetic loci and plausible causal genes at known GWAS loci. We used RNA sequencing data (68 normal ovarian tissue samples from 68 individuals and 6,124 cross-tissue samples from 369 individuals) and high-density genotyping data from European descendants of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx V6) project to build ovarian and cross-tissue models of genetically regulated expression using elastic net methods. We evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expression in relation to EOC risk using summary statistics data from GWAS of 97,898 women, including 29,396 EOC cases. With a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P < 2.2 × 10−6, we identified 35 genes, including FZD4 at 11q14.2 (Z = 5.08, P = 3.83 × 10−7, the cross-tissue model; 1 Mb away from any GWAS-identified EOC risk variant), a potential novel locus for EOC risk. All other 34 significantly associated genes were located within 1 Mb of known GWAS-identified loci, including 23 genes at 6 loci not previously linked to EOC risk. Upon conditioning on nearby known EOC GWAS-identified variants, the associations for 31 genes disappeared and three genes remained (P < 1.47 × 10−3). These data identify one novel locus (FZD4) and 34 genes at 13 known EOC risk loci associated with EOC risk, providing new insights into EOC carcinogenesis. Significance: Transcriptomic analysis of a large cohort confirms earlier GWAS loci and reveals FZD4 as a novel locus associated with EOC risk. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5419–30. ©2018 AACR.

Objective: To determine whether the association between overall survival (OS) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer patients varies with tumor subtype and anatomic extent of pathologic complete response (pCR). Background: pCR after NACT predicts improved OS in breast cancer, but it is unclear whether pCR limited to the breast or axilla is also associated with OS. Methods: Women with cT1-3/cN0-1 breast cancer diagnosed in 2010 to 2014 who underwent surgery following NACT were identified in the NCDB and divided into 4 subtypes based on reported hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate OS. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with post-NACT response, defined as upstage (yp stage>clinical stage); no change (clinical stage = yp stage); overall (breast+axilla, ypT0N0), breast-only (ypT0N1/N1mic), or node-only (ypT1-3N0) pCR. Results: Of 33,162 identified patients, 20,265 experienced overall pCR (n = 6370, 19.2%), breast-only pCR (n = 494, 1.5%), node-only pCR (n = 1133, 3.4%), no stage change (n = 9641, 29.1%), or upstage (n = 2627, 7.9%). Compared with no stage change, breast-only pCR was associated with improved OS in triple-negative disease [hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.37–0.89], and node-only pCR was associated with improved OS in both triple-negative (hazard ratio = 0.55,95% CI = 0.39–0.76) and HR+/HER2− disease (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.33–0.89). For patients achieving overall (breast+axilla) pCR, unadjusted 5-year OS was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.93–0.95), with no difference between patients who were cN0 (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93–0.96) or cN1 (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92–0.96) at diagnosis. Conclusions: In node-positive patients, pCR limited to either the breast or axilla predicts survival for select receptor subtypes. In patients achieving pCR in both the breast and axilla, survival is driven by response to NACT rather than presenting cN stage.

Abstract Background Antinuclear antibody (ANA)5 testing is routinely performed during evaluation of patients with a suspected connective tissue disease (CTD), yet the question of which method is most appropriate remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of ANA testing by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), an immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and a multiplex immunoassay (MIA) in a routine laboratory population. Methods Samples (n = 1000) were collected from specimens submitted for ANA testing by EIA (Bio-Rad). All samples were subsequently analyzed by IFA (Zeus) and MIA (Bio-Rad). The sample cohort was weighted to represent the routine testing population. Diagnostic information was obtained by chart review. Results For the diagnosis of a CTD, ROC curve analysis demonstrated no significant differences between IFA (area under the curve 0.81) and EIA (0.84) (P = 0.25), with overlay of a single point for the MIA. When normalized to a specificity of approximately 90%, the sensitivities of the MIA, EIA, and IFA were 67%, 67%, and 56%, respectively. By varying the clinical cutoff, the IFA could achieve the highest sensitivity of 94%; however, the corresponding specificity was only 43%. In contrast, a strongly positive EIA had a specificity of 97%, although, at this cutoff, the sensitivity was only 40%. Conclusions Although the overall diagnostic performance of the IFA, EIA, and MIA were not statistically different, the clinical sensitivity and specificity varied dramatically based on the positive/negative cutoff. Knowledge about the performance characteristics of each method will significantly aid in the interpretation of ANA testing.