Back to Authors

Harstad, Tricia

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT): Follow-up.
Brower, Jamie , Symecko, Heather , Harstad, Tricia, Merrill, Margaret S., Walsh, Michael F. , Offit, Kenneth , Hamilton, Jada G. , Balmañà, Judith , Garber, Judy E. , Domchek, Susan M. , Robson, Mark E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1527-1527

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1527 Get It

1527 Background: Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals who have had multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. The main objective of this registry is to ascertain families to allow penetrance calculations for mutations in less well characterized genes. Methods: Since September 2014, health care providers and commercial laboratories have given PROMPT information with the test results to eligible individuals. Participants with pathogenic mutations or variants of unknown significance in cancer susceptibility genes have self-enrolled in PROMPT. We have sent annual follow-up surveys to participants to capture updated personal and family histories, additional genetic testing in the family, and changes in cancer screening patterns. Results: To date, 5800 participants have enrolled in PROMPT and 2321 follow-up surveys are completed. Of those eligible for follow-up, 1980 (44%) have completed at least one survey. 134 (5.8%) reported a new cancer diagnosis since baseline. Breast cancer (37, 27.6%) and non-Melanoma skin cancer (35, 26.2%) were the most commonly reported new diagnoses. 5.7% of participants with an ATM variant, 5.2% of those with a BRCA2 variant, and 4.3% of those with a CHEK2 variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a new primary cancer diagnosis (excluding non-Melanoma skin cancer). In addition, 70 (3%) participants reported a cancer recurrence since time of last follow-up. Bone (9, 12.9%) and liver (8, 11.4%) were the most common recurrence sites. 12.7% of those with a TP53 variant, 7.1% of those with a BARD1 variant, and 3.3% of those with an ATM variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a recurrence. 59 (2.5%) participants had additional clinical genetic testing, and 555 (24%) participants reported clinical genetic testing of family members. Conclusions: PROMPT collects updated health information from participants to achieve the primary goal of determining cancer incidence among carriers of different mutations. Moreover, PROMPT has increased participant contacts through use of annual follow-up surveys and gene-specific surveys with subsets of participants. Ongoing efforts include obtaining pathology reports of new and recurrent cancer diagnoses on study.
Patients’ Medical and Psychosocial Experiences After Detection of a CDH1 Variant With Multigene Panel Testing
Hamilton, Jada G. , Brandt, Amanda , Brower, Jamie , Symecko, Heather , Christian, Stephanie N. , Harstad, Tricia, Offit, Kenneth , Long, Jessica M. , Salo‐Mullen, Erin E. , Couch, Fergus J. , Garber, Judy E. , Robson, Mark E. , Domchek, Susan M.

JCO Precision Oncology | March 28, 2019 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1-14

10.1200/po.18.00300 Get It

PURPOSE Germline CDH1 pathogenic variants (PV) are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. Although prevalence of CDH1 PV is low in the general population, detection of these variants is increasing with the growing use of multigene panel testing. Little is known about the experiences of individuals tested for CDH1 variants in the multigene panel testing era. METHODS Participants recruited from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing completed a cross-sectional self-report survey regarding CDH1 genetic testing experiences, medical management, and psychosocial adaptation. RESULTS Discordance existed in interpretations of CDH1 results; 13.3% of cases had disagreements in variant classifications among commercial laboratories, and 21.4% had disagreements between participant self-report and ClinVar classification. Survey data were available from 57 individuals reporting either PV (n = 16) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; n = 41). Those with PV were more likely than those with VUS to report receiving a recommendation for prophylactic gastrectomy, although only 40.0% of those with PV received this recommendation. Participants with VUS were less satisfied with their health care providers’ knowledge and reported less CDH1 knowledge, distress, and worry about discrimination. Participants with PV perceived greater breast cancer risks, but similar gastric cancer risks, as those with VUS. CONCLUSION Few individuals with CDH1 PV report receiving recommendations for prophylactic gastrectomy, and no differences in perceived gastric cancer risk were observed based on participants’ CDH1 results, suggesting serious unmet informational needs.
Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT): Feasible and sustainable.
Symecko, Heather , Brower, Jamie , Drogan, Christine , Harstad, Tricia, Pradhan, Nisha , Walsh, Michael F. , Offit, Kenneth , Salo‐Mullen, Erin E. , Hamilton, Jada G. , Balmañà, Judith , Couch, Fergus J. , Garber, Judy E. , Domchek, Susan M. , Robson, Mark E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1543-1543

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1543 Get It