Brower, Jamie

Abstract Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health Inc., CA) is prognostic, quantifies predicted benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, and informs clinical decisions for patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Differences in Oncotype recurrence scores (RS) in individuals with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variants (PV) have been demonstrated, but the results of this assay in patients with BC and germline PALB2 PV have not previously been described. This is of particular relevance as PALB2 BC has demonstrated biologic features similar to BRCA1/2 BC such as poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity. Methods: Patients with early-stage, HR+, HER2-, invasive breast cancer and a germline PALB2 PV were ascertained from academic cancer center databases and the Prospective Registry of MultiPlex Testing (PROMPT), an online research registry for individuals who have had multigene panel testing for inherited cancer susceptibility. Study participants (pts) were categorized by age < 50 and ≥50. Oncotype DX RS were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as those that would and would not warrant consideration of chemotherapy (≥16 and < 16, respectively, for pts < 50; ≥26 and < 26, respectively, for pts ≥50). Yates corrected Chi-square tests were used to compare RS distributions between carriers and a previously published genetically unselected reference population. Results: Oncotype DX reports were reviewed for 20 pts with BC and germline PALB2 PV. Median RS was 19 (range 6-41) overall. Four patients were diagnosed under the age of 50 (range 33-48); median RS for these individuals was 19 (range 12-41). Sixteen patients were diagnosed at age 50 or greater (median 59, range 50-70); median RS for these individuals was also 19 (range 6-31). Compared to the genetically unselected reference population, Oncotype DX RS in pts with PALB2-associated BC demonstrated a numerical but not statistically significant shift in distribution towards categories in which chemotherapy would be considered. Among pts under the age of 50, 75% had Oncotype DX RS for which chemotherapy would be considered and 25% had Oncotype DX RS for which endocrine therapy alone would likely be recommended (p=0.726 compared to reference). Among pts aged 50 and older, 25% had Oncotype DX RS for which chemotherapy would be considered and 75% had Oncotype DX RS for which endocrine therapy alone would likely be recommended (p=0.579 compared to reference). Conclusions: Compared to data from the published genetically unselected commercial database, BC associated with PALB2 PV may have higher Oncotype DX RS reflective of intrinsically less favorable biology and greater therapeutic sensitivity. Larger datasets are forthcoming to confirm presence of significant differences in Oncotype DX RS distributions between BC with and without PALB2 PV. Table 1. Oncotype DX RS distribution by age among pts with gPALB2 PV and genetically unselected reference *Jakubowski et al., J Surg Oncol 2020. PMID 3249731 Citation Format: Payal Shah, Siddhartha Yadav, Jamie Brower, Jada Hamilton, Erica Simmons, Judy Garber, Kenneth Offit, Mark Robson, Fergus Couch, Susan Domchek. Twenty-one gene recurrence scores in individuals with breast cancer associated with PALB2 germline pathogenic variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-09-03.

10585 Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health Inc., CA) is prognostic, quantifies predicted benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, and informs clinical decisions for patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Differences in Oncotype recurrence scores (RS) in individuals with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) have been demonstrated, but the results of this assay in patients with BC and germline CHEK2 or ATM PV have not previously been described. This is of particular relevance as CHEK2 BC have been associated with a worse prognosis. Methods: Prospective Registry of MultiPlex Testing (PROMPT) is an online research registry for individuals who have had multigene panel testing for inherited cancer susceptibility. We retrospectively evaluated Oncotype DX recurrence scores from PROMPT participants (pts) with PV or likely PV in CHEK2 or ATM. Mood’s median tests were used to compare median RS, and Yates corrected Chi-square tests were used to compare RS distributions between carriers and a genetically unselected reference population. Results: Oncotype DX reports were reviewed for 75 pts with 77 BC (n = 50 pts with CHEK2 PV with 51 BC; n = 24 with ATM PV; n = 1 with CHEK2 and ATM PV with 2 BC). Among CHEK2 carriers, median RS was 17 (range 2-43) overall, 17 (2-36) for pts < age 50, and 18.5 (8-43) for pts ≥age 50 (p-value 0.47), with distributions not significantly different than reference ( < 50, p = 0.70; ≥50, p = 0.93). Ten pts had low penetrance CHEK2 alleles (p.S428F or p.I157T) with median RS 16 (9-28) compared to 18 (2-43) in those with other CHEK2 alleles (p = 0.35). Among ATM carriers, median RS was 17 (1-35) overall, 17 (1-35) for pts < age 50, and 16 (11-32) for pts ≥age 50 (p = 0.51), with distributions also not significantly different ( < 50, p = 0.78; ≥50, p = 0.79). Conclusions: Unlike data seen in BC associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2, Oncotype DX RS in individuals with CHEK2 and ATM-associated BC are similar to the published genetically unselected commercial database median RS of 16, with no clear difference based on penetrance of CHEK2 allele. Proportions of patients < 50 and ≥50 with CHEK2 and ATM PV with RS within the range for chemoendocrine therapy consideration are also similar to the historical reference. The inferior prognosis that has been suggested in CHEK2 BC is not reflected in Oncotype DX RS. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: To explore the role of NBN as a pan-cancer susceptibility gene. Experimental Design: Matched germline and somatic DNA samples from 34,046 patients were sequenced using Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets and presumed pathogenic germline variants (PGV) identified. Allele-specific and gene-centered analysis of enrichment was conducted and a validation cohort of 26,407 pan-cancer patients was analyzed. Functional studies utilized cellular models with analysis of protein expression, MRN complex formation/localization, and viability assessment following treatment with γ-irradiation. Results: We identified 83 carriers of 32 NBN PGVs (0.25% of the studied series), 40% of which (33/83) carried the Slavic founder p.K219fs. The frequency of PGVs varied across cancer types. Patients harboring NBN PGVs demonstrated increased loss of the wild-type allele in their tumors [OR = 2.7; confidence interval (CI): 1.4–5.5; P = 0.0024; pan-cancer], including lung and pancreatic tumors compared with breast and colorectal cancers. p.K219fs was enriched across all tumor types (OR = 2.22; CI: 1.3–3.6; P = 0.0018). Gene-centered analysis revealed enrichment of PGVs in cases compared with controls in the European population (OR = 1.9; CI: 1.3–2.7; P = 0.0004), a finding confirmed in the replication cohort (OR = 1.8; CI: 1.2–2.6; P = 0.003). Two novel truncating variants, p.L19* and p.N71fs, produced a 45 kDa fragment generated by alternative translation initiation that maintained binding to MRE11. Cells expressing these fragments showed higher sensitivity to γ-irradiation and lower levels of radiation-induced KAP1 phosphorylation. Conclusions: Burden analyses, biallelic inactivation, and functional evidence support the role of NBN as contributing to a broad cancer spectrum. Further studies in large pan-cancer series and the assessment of epistatic and environmental interactions are warranted to further define these associations.

AbstractGermline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk is increasingly being performed with multigene panel testing with MUTYH often included on colorectal cancer‐ and polyposis‐focused panels, as well as on broader pan‐cancer panels. With up to 1%–2% of the general population being monoallelic MUTYH carriers, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in MUTYH are one of the most common findings on multigene cancer panels. However, little is known about patient experience and understanding of monoallelic MUTYH P/LP variants, nor whether such findings influence medical management recommendations and familial communication, which this study aims to better understand. Monoallelic P/LP MUTYH carriers were recruited from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) and completed a cross‐sectional self‐report survey on sociodemographic characteristics, medical and family history, experiences with MUTYH genetic testing, genetics and MUTYH knowledge, perceived cancer risk, and familial communication. Of 115 eligible PROMPT participants, 49 (43%) completed the survey who were primarily female (94%), white (96%), had a history of cancer (61%), and a median age of 51.4 years. Most participants (61%) reported satisfaction with how their healthcare provider managed their genetic test result and care, and 65% of survey participants reported their provider recommended colonoscopy based on their genetic test results. Participants' responses also reflected variable levels of knowledge regarding cancer risks and screening recommendations for MUTYH carriers. The majority (98%) of participants shared their genetic test results with at least some of their relatives; however, only 13% of eligible relatives reportedly underwent cascade testing. Taken together, this study provides needed insight into the overall experiences of monoallelic MUTYH carriers and highlights numerous areas for improvement in clinician education, communication, and management of these individuals.

e13680 Background: Multiplex genetic testing (MGT) simultaneously analyzes multiple cancer susceptibility genes and can reveal genetic variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have unclear associations with cancer risks. Little is known about how people are prepared for receiving VUS results from MGT, or whether their emotional reactions differ based on the levels of cancer risk to which they may be susceptible. Methods: We recruited participants from the online Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT). Those with only a VUS in a cancer predisposition gene completed a survey including measures of their MGT experience, distress (range 0-30; α = .87), uncertainty (0-45; α = .83), and positive experiences (0-20; α = .75). We used generalized linear modeling to examine how demographics, awareness of the possibility of VUS before testing, and level of cancer risks associated with their VUS gene were related to emotional outcomes. Results: Data were available from 661 individuals (40% response rate, 95% female, 90% white, 78% college graduate, 69% cancer history, age 23-93) with VUS in a gene of high risk (47%), moderate/low risk (35%) or limited evidence of risk (18%). Among the sample, 80.8% reported ever receiving cancer genetic counseling, and only 50.8% reported being aware of the possibility of VUS when deciding about testing. Participants reported low current distress ( M± SD= 3.25±5.19), uncertainty (9.18±8.35) and positive experiences (7.83±5.98). Distress was associated with younger age, less family cancer history, and being unaware of the possibility of VUS before testing; distress was also higher among those with VUS in a gene of high risk than those with VUS in a gene of moderate/low risk or limited evidence of risk ( ps≤.023). Uncertainty was associated with younger age, non-white race, less education, and being unaware of the possibility of VUS; uncertainty was also higher among those with VUS in a gene of high risk than those with VUS in a gene with limited evidence of risk ( ps≤.05). Fewer positive experiences were associated with more education and more family cancer history; those with VUS in a gene of high risk had fewer positive experiences than those with VUS in a gene with limited evidence of risk ( ps≤.03). Conclusions: Many individuals undergoing MGT may not fully understand the prospect of receiving VUS. Clinicians should consider patients’ background, preparation, and level of cancer risk to which they are potentially susceptible, as these factors may affect their emotional adaptation.

1508 Background: With the expansion of multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility, increasing numbers of patients are identified with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LP V) in genes which do not have a clearly actionable increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) (lifetime risk of OC >5%). However, there is concern that patients and/or providers may ascribe OC risk to such genetic findings with the potential for unnecessary oophorectomy (ooph). Methods: The Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals with a genetic alteration detected on multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. Participants self-enroll and complete baseline and annual follow-up questionnaires. PROMPT has enrolled 7388 participants (6936; 93.9% women) since September 2014. Results: 1566 women in the PROMPT registry reported ooph, the indications for which were reported as either cancer treatment (n=481, 30.7%) or benign disease (n=432, 27.6%). An additional 186 (12.8%) reported PV in genes associated with lifetime OC risk >5% ( BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP, or Lynch syndrome genes). The remaining 467 did not have guideline based indications for ooph due to OC risk and are described further here. 92 (19.7%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in genes associated with OC, 241 (51.6%) had a personal history of breast cancer (BC) and no VUS in OC genes, and 119 (25.5%) had no personal history of BC and no VUS in OC genes. The majority of women had no family history (FH) of OC in first or second degree relatives (Table). Most ooph occurred prior to age 50. Of the 405 women with CHEK2 P/LP, 11.4% reported ooph (59% under age 50 when age known), as did 13.2% (of 228) with CHEK2 VUS, 8.8% (of 261) with ATM P/LP (66.7% under age 50), and 8.3% (of 387) with ATM VUS. In addition, of the 184 women with PALB2 P/LP, 14.1% reported ooph (35.3% under age 50) as did 11.6% (of 198) with PALB2 VUS. Of those who reported provider discussions, 47.2% stated “my provider recommended this” (including >60% in the OC gene VUS group) and an additional 25.2% stated “my provider presented this as an option, but not a requirement”. In those with no FH of OC, 45.8% stated that their provider recommended ooph. Conclusions: 10-15% of women with PV/VUS in genes not associated with a high risk of OC reported ooph without a clear indication. [Table: see text]

1527 Background: Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals who have had multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. The main objective of this registry is to ascertain families to allow penetrance calculations for mutations in less well characterized genes. Methods: Since September 2014, health care providers and commercial laboratories have given PROMPT information with the test results to eligible individuals. Participants with pathogenic mutations or variants of unknown significance in cancer susceptibility genes have self-enrolled in PROMPT. We have sent annual follow-up surveys to participants to capture updated personal and family histories, additional genetic testing in the family, and changes in cancer screening patterns. Results: To date, 5800 participants have enrolled in PROMPT and 2321 follow-up surveys are completed. Of those eligible for follow-up, 1980 (44%) have completed at least one survey. 134 (5.8%) reported a new cancer diagnosis since baseline. Breast cancer (37, 27.6%) and non-Melanoma skin cancer (35, 26.2%) were the most commonly reported new diagnoses. 5.7% of participants with an ATM variant, 5.2% of those with a BRCA2 variant, and 4.3% of those with a CHEK2 variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a new primary cancer diagnosis (excluding non-Melanoma skin cancer). In addition, 70 (3%) participants reported a cancer recurrence since time of last follow-up. Bone (9, 12.9%) and liver (8, 11.4%) were the most common recurrence sites. 12.7% of those with a TP53 variant, 7.1% of those with a BARD1 variant, and 3.3% of those with an ATM variant and at least one follow-up survey have reported a recurrence. 59 (2.5%) participants had additional clinical genetic testing, and 555 (24%) participants reported clinical genetic testing of family members. Conclusions: PROMPT collects updated health information from participants to achieve the primary goal of determining cancer incidence among carriers of different mutations. Moreover, PROMPT has increased participant contacts through use of annual follow-up surveys and gene-specific surveys with subsets of participants. Ongoing efforts include obtaining pathology reports of new and recurrent cancer diagnoses on study.

PURPOSE Germline CDH1 pathogenic variants (PV) are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. Although prevalence of CDH1 PV is low in the general population, detection of these variants is increasing with the growing use of multigene panel testing. Little is known about the experiences of individuals tested for CDH1 variants in the multigene panel testing era. METHODS Participants recruited from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing completed a cross-sectional self-report survey regarding CDH1 genetic testing experiences, medical management, and psychosocial adaptation. RESULTS Discordance existed in interpretations of CDH1 results; 13.3% of cases had disagreements in variant classifications among commercial laboratories, and 21.4% had disagreements between participant self-report and ClinVar classification. Survey data were available from 57 individuals reporting either PV (n = 16) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; n = 41). Those with PV were more likely than those with VUS to report receiving a recommendation for prophylactic gastrectomy, although only 40.0% of those with PV received this recommendation. Participants with VUS were less satisfied with their health care providers’ knowledge and reported less CDH1 knowledge, distress, and worry about discrimination. Participants with PV perceived greater breast cancer risks, but similar gastric cancer risks, as those with VUS. CONCLUSION Few individuals with CDH1 PV report receiving recommendations for prophylactic gastrectomy, and no differences in perceived gastric cancer risk were observed based on participants’ CDH1 results, suggesting serious unmet informational needs.