Citations

AbstractPurposeThe small and complex space of the intranasal cavity poses a challenge to teaching and learning sinonasal anatomy in undergraduate medical education. Evidence suggests that utilizing 3D‐printed (3DP) models is an effective means to comprehend anatomical structures and their spatial relationships. In this study, we introduce and evaluate the educational value of rigid nasal endoscopy on realistic 3DP and silicone‐cast sinus models as a method to teach medical students intranasal anatomy.MethodsTwelve first‐year medical students participated in an educational rigid‐nasal endoscopy workshop led by Otolaryngology PGY‐2 residents and rhinology consultants. The workshop consisted of (1) an introductory PowerPoint on rigid nasal endoscopy and basic intranasal anatomy, (2) timed trials that tested students' ability to locate intranasal anatomical structures while scoping with a rigid endoscope, and (3) pre‐ and post‐surveys.ResultsParticipants improved in their ability to locate each intranasal anatomical structure during the timed trials. Participants felt that rigid endoscopy of 3DP models was an effective method to learn intranasal anatomy compared to their traditional medical school anatomy course.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that rigid nasal endoscopy of 3DP sinus models is a potentially high‐value educational method for teaching intranasal anatomy to first‐year medical students. Students enjoyed the opportunity to learn intranasal anatomy while practicing a clinically relevant procedure ‐ rigid nasal endoscopy.

Abstract Background and aims This post hoc analysis evaluated the corticosteroid-sparing effects of risankizumab (RZB) therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in the phase 3 induction and maintenance studies, INSPIRE and COMMAND. Methods Patients were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of intravenous RZB or placebo (PBO) induction therapy; responders to intravenous RZB were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous RZB 180 mg, 360 mg, or PBO (RZB withdrawal) maintenance therapy. Baseline corticosteroid doses were maintained during induction, with a mandatory taper beginning at maintenance week 0. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated by baseline corticosteroid use at induction week 12, while corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes were assessed at maintenance week 52 among the overall population and among patients on corticosteroids at baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results At baseline, 35.7% (348/975) of patients were taking corticosteroids. At induction week 12, greater rates were observed for clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes in RZB 1200 mg-treated patients compared with PBO, regardless of baseline corticosteroid use. RZB 180 mg and 360 mg treatment resulted in higher corticosteroid discontinuation rates (RZB 180 mg 64.9% [48/74]; RZB 360 mg 54.2% [32/59]; PBO [withdrawal] 36.8% [25/68], P ≤ .01) and corticosteroid-free clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes at week 52, compared with PBO (withdrawal). The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar regardless of baseline corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance. Conclusions The efficacy of RZB induction therapy was independent of corticosteroid use, with high rates of corticosteroid-free outcomes observed in the overall population and among patients with baseline corticosteroid use, reaffirming the potential of RZB to serve as a corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Clinicaltrial.gov numbers NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract The pharmacological provocation test is a pivotal tool in cardiac electrophysiology for the diagnosis of potential causes of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), arrhythmias, symptoms, or ECG abnormalities. The 2022 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death offered guidance on provocation testing but did not describe the indications and requirements in depth. This clinical consensus statement, led by the European Heart Rhythm Association and approved by major international stakeholders, aims to advise the general cardiologist and the arrhythmia expert who to test and when, where, and how to do it. The statement focuses on current practice for the diagnosis of subclinical arrhythmia syndromes and the causes of SCA, building upon the recommendations of the Guidelines. We address the sodium channel blocker provocation test for patients suspected of Brugada syndrome as well as the use of epinephrine, isoproterenol, adenosine, ergonovine, and acetylcholine.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.