Back to Authors

Johns, Heather L.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

Leveraging Eye-Tracking to Study Nasal Analysis Skills of Trainees and Experts
Vallecillo, Tissiana G M, Staricha, Kelly L., Johns, Heather L, Hamilton, Grant S, Vallecillo, Tissiana , Vallecillo, Tissiana , Staricha, Kelly L. , Johns, Heather L., Dey, Jacob K. , Hamilton, Grant S.

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine | January 31, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/26893614261416038 Get It

Introduction: Nasal analysis is a challenging skill that otolaryngology trainees must demonstrate competency in on-board examinations. Study objective: To compare where experts and trainees focus their gaze when completing nasal analysis of a patient, as measured by eye tracking software. Methods: Participants of various training levels ( n = 27) were shown photographs of six faces from all standard angles for photographic nasal analysis. Eye-tracking data were collected. Heat and gaze maps, the time to first fixation on areas of interest, duration, and number of fixations were extracted. These metrics were compared between experts and trainees using t -tests and one-way ANOVA. Results: Qualitative comparisons of gaze patterns reveal a more comprehensive and organized approach among experts than trainees. However, quantitative measures of eye-tracking metrics, including the time to first fixations, duration, and number of fixations made by experts and trainees, were similar. Conclusions: Gaze tracking reveals more thorough and efficient eye movements among experts than trainees during nasal analysis. Further study may be useful in the development of learning tools to guide effective nasal analyses.
Realistic 3D‐printed sinus anatomical model and rigid nasal endoscopy: Unique approach to teach medical students intranasal anatomy
Johns, Heather L., Ochoa, Pablo , O’Byrne, Jamie, Sears, Victoria A. , Stokken, Janalee K., Stokken, Janalee K. , Carlson, Matthew L , Hanson, Christian, Morris, Jonathan M. , Bayan, Semirra L.

Eye & ENT Research | April 5, 2025 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 129-136

10.1002/eer3.70010 Get It

AbstractPurposeThe small and complex space of the intranasal cavity poses a challenge to teaching and learning sinonasal anatomy in undergraduate medical education. Evidence suggests that utilizing 3D‐printed (3DP) models is an effective means to comprehend anatomical structures and their spatial relationships. In this study, we introduce and evaluate the educational value of rigid nasal endoscopy on realistic 3DP and silicone‐cast sinus models as a method to teach medical students intranasal anatomy.MethodsTwelve first‐year medical students participated in an educational rigid‐nasal endoscopy workshop led by Otolaryngology PGY‐2 residents and rhinology consultants. The workshop consisted of (1) an introductory PowerPoint on rigid nasal endoscopy and basic intranasal anatomy, (2) timed trials that tested students' ability to locate intranasal anatomical structures while scoping with a rigid endoscope, and (3) pre‐ and post‐surveys.ResultsParticipants improved in their ability to locate each intranasal anatomical structure during the timed trials. Participants felt that rigid endoscopy of 3DP models was an effective method to learn intranasal anatomy compared to their traditional medical school anatomy course.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that rigid nasal endoscopy of 3DP sinus models is a potentially high‐value educational method for teaching intranasal anatomy to first‐year medical students. Students enjoyed the opportunity to learn intranasal anatomy while practicing a clinically relevant procedure ‐ rigid nasal endoscopy.
Patient Experience of Awake Laryngoscopy Procedures
Hsu, Andrea R. , Johns, Heather L., Arguelles, Ivonne, O'Byrne, J, Ekbom, Dale C. , Orbelo, Diana M. , Bayan, Semirra L. , O'Byrne, Jamie, Orbelo, Diana, Bayan, Semirra , Orbelo, Diana , O’Byrne, Jamie

Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology | February 6, 2025 | Volume: 134 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 392-404

10.1177/00034894251315339 Get It

Objective(s): To quantify and compare pre-procedure worry versus the experience of pain, gagging, and dyspnea during in-office laryngoscopy procedures in patients who did or did not receive pre-procedure anxiolytics, and to explore patient perception of intra-procedure interventions. Methods: Patients undergoing awake laryngology procedures at a quaternary care center were enrolled. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y1 and Y2 questionnaires were administered to establish baseline levels of state anxiety and trait anxiety, respectively. Pre-procedure and post-procedure surveys assessed patient perception of select interventions. Results: 34 patients were enrolled (35.3% female, 91.2% white, mean age 60 years). Pre-procedure, 51.5% of patients reported some degree of worry about pain, 61.8% about gagging, 52.9% about dyspnea, and 55.9% about having something in their nose/throat. Post-procedure, 54.5% reported experiencing pain to some degree, 63.6% had gagging, 39.4% had dyspnea, and 78.7% were bothered by having something in their nose/throat. Patients who received a pre-procedure anxiolytic were significantly more likely to report more pain compared to those who did not. The highest rated interventions were pre-procedural education (97.0% “Very helpful”), verbal reassurance (96.9%), provider communicating steps of the procedure (96.9%), and reminders to breathe (87.5%). Conclusion: For patients undergoing awake laryngology procedures, the anticipation of gagging, pain, trouble breathing, and scope-related discomfort are worrisome factors. Of these, scope-related discomfort and gagging are the most often-reported sources of intraprocedural discomfort. The interventions patients found most helpful were based on preprocedural education and clear intraprocedural communication, which suggests that purposeful communication has a role in relieving anxiety. Level of evidence: Level 4
Ability for fine needle aspiration and frozen section to predict extent of parotidectomy
Ali, Hawa M. , Sankar, George B., Stickney, Emily A., Johns, Heather L., Whaley, Rumeal D. , Rivera, Michael , Lohse, Christine M. , Tasche, Kendall K. , Abel, Kathryn M. Van , Moore, Eric J. , Van Abel, Kathryn M , Yin, Linda X , Moore, Eric J , Stickney, Emily, Price, Daniel L. , Yin, Linda X.

Head & Neck | September 27, 2023 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3006-3014

10.1002/hed.27527 Get It

AbstractIntroductionSeveral diagnostic modalities with various sensitivity and specificities can be used to evaluate a parotid mass. The aims of this project were to compare the diagnostic actionability, accuracy, and ability to accurately predict extent of surgery for FNA and frozen section during the evaluation of a parotid mass.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent parotidectomy for a parotid mass from January 1, 2015 to January 30, 2022 was conducted. Actionability was defined as a pathology diagnosis or the histologic grade of a lesion, as this provided clear and useful information for the surgeon to act upon. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing FNA and frozen section results to final pathology. Accuracy of extent of surgery was determined by comparing predicted extent of surgery from the FNA or frozen section result to the extent of surgery predicted by the final pathology.ResultsA total of 626 patients were included in this study. FNA was obtained in 396 (63%) patients, while all neoplasms were evaluated by frozen section analysis. FNA diagnosis was actionable in 318 (80%), while frozen section diagnosis was actionable in 616 (98%) patients. Exactly 294 (92.5%) FNA diagnoses were accurate compared with 600 (98%) frozen section diagnoses. The FNA diagnosis predicted appropriate extent of surgery in 294 (74%) while the frozen section diagnosis predicted appropriate extent of surgery in 600 (96%). Among the 396 patients with FNA, frozen section was significantly more likely to accurately predict appropriate extent of surgery compared with FNA (p < 0.001).ConclusionFrozen section is more likely to yield actionable and accurate results compared with FNA. Additionally, frozen section is better than FNA in predicting the appropriate extent of surgery.