Back to Authors

Hsu, Andrea R.

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4956-6177

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Patient Experience of Awake Laryngoscopy Procedures
Hsu, Andrea R. , Johns, Heather L., Arguelles, Ivonne, O'Byrne, J, Ekbom, Dale C. , Orbelo, Diana M. , Bayan, Semirra L. , O'Byrne, Jamie, Orbelo, Diana, Bayan, Semirra , Orbelo, Diana , O’Byrne, Jamie

Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology | February 6, 2025 | Volume: 134 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 392-404

10.1177/00034894251315339 Get It

Objective(s): To quantify and compare pre-procedure worry versus the experience of pain, gagging, and dyspnea during in-office laryngoscopy procedures in patients who did or did not receive pre-procedure anxiolytics, and to explore patient perception of intra-procedure interventions. Methods: Patients undergoing awake laryngology procedures at a quaternary care center were enrolled. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y1 and Y2 questionnaires were administered to establish baseline levels of state anxiety and trait anxiety, respectively. Pre-procedure and post-procedure surveys assessed patient perception of select interventions. Results: 34 patients were enrolled (35.3% female, 91.2% white, mean age 60 years). Pre-procedure, 51.5% of patients reported some degree of worry about pain, 61.8% about gagging, 52.9% about dyspnea, and 55.9% about having something in their nose/throat. Post-procedure, 54.5% reported experiencing pain to some degree, 63.6% had gagging, 39.4% had dyspnea, and 78.7% were bothered by having something in their nose/throat. Patients who received a pre-procedure anxiolytic were significantly more likely to report more pain compared to those who did not. The highest rated interventions were pre-procedural education (97.0% “Very helpful”), verbal reassurance (96.9%), provider communicating steps of the procedure (96.9%), and reminders to breathe (87.5%). Conclusion: For patients undergoing awake laryngology procedures, the anticipation of gagging, pain, trouble breathing, and scope-related discomfort are worrisome factors. Of these, scope-related discomfort and gagging are the most often-reported sources of intraprocedural discomfort. The interventions patients found most helpful were based on preprocedural education and clear intraprocedural communication, which suggests that purposeful communication has a role in relieving anxiety. Level of evidence: Level 4
Presentation, surgical outcome, and supplementary motor area syndrome risk of posterior superior frontal gyrus tumors
Jusué-Torres, Ignacio , White, Jaclyn J., Bouchal, Samantha M. , Hsu, Andrea R. , Ha, Yooree , Pumford, Andrew D. , Hong, Sukwoo , Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Wang, Kimberly , Helal, Ahmed , Brown, Desmond A., Jusue-Torres, Ignacio , Bouchal, Samantha M , Bauman, Megan M. J. , Brown, Desmond , Parney, Ian F.

Journal of Neurosurgery | August 31, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-12

10.3171/2024.5.jns231850 Get It

OBJECTIVE Following resection of posterior superior frontal gyrus (PSFG) tumors, patients can experience supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome consisting of contralateral hemiapraxia and/or speech apraxia. Given the heterogeneity of PSFG tumors, the authors sought to determine the risk of postoperative deficits and assess predictors of outcomes for all intraparenchymal PSFG tumors undergoing surgery (biopsy or resection), regardless of histology. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of adult PSFG-region tumors undergoing biopsy or resection by a single surgeon. RESULTS A total of 106 consecutive patients undergoing 123 procedures (21 biopsies, 102 resections) fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anaplastic astrocytomas were the most frequent among resected tumors (39% vs 29%), while glioblastomas were most common among biopsies (38% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001). The biopsy cohort was more likely to have tumor involvement outside the PSFG (90% vs 62%) (p = 0.011), most commonly in the motor cortex (67% vs 31%) (p = 0.005). Seizures were the most common presenting symptom in the resection cohort (p = 0.017), while motor deficits were more common in the biopsy cohort (58% vs 29%) (p < 0.001). Immediate postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 71 cases (58%), but only 3 of the deficits were permanent at 6 months of follow-up (2%). Postoperative SMA syndrome occurred in 48 cases (47%) and was significantly associated with involvement of the motor cortex (p = 0.018) or cingulate gyrus (p = 0.023), which were also significant in multivariate analysis as risk factors for SMA syndrome. However, postoperative SMA syndrome was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.51). There were no perioperative deaths, but corpus callosum involvement (p < 0.001), contrast enhancement (p = 0.003), and glioblastoma pathology (p = 0.038) predicted worse overall survival in patients undergoing resection. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of all patients undergoing resection of PSFG-region tumors experience a postoperative SMA syndrome. Individuals with corpus callosum and/or motor cortex involvement may be at an increased risk of experiencing SMA syndrome. However, these deficits are usually transient, and the risk of permanent new deficits is very low (3%). Preoperative characteristics including corpus callosum involvement and tumor enhancement—in addition to pathology—might serve as predictors of overall survival within this patient population.