Back to Authors

Wang, Kimberly

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-7353

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Presentation, surgical outcome, and supplementary motor area syndrome risk of posterior superior frontal gyrus tumors
Jusué-Torres, Ignacio , White, Jaclyn J., Bouchal, Samantha M. , Hsu, Andrea R. , Ha, Yooree , Pumford, Andrew D. , Hong, Sukwoo , Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Wang, Kimberly , Helal, Ahmed , Brown, Desmond A., Jusue-Torres, Ignacio , Bouchal, Samantha M , Bauman, Megan M. J. , Brown, Desmond , Parney, Ian F.

Journal of Neurosurgery | August 31, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-12

10.3171/2024.5.jns231850 Get It

OBJECTIVE Following resection of posterior superior frontal gyrus (PSFG) tumors, patients can experience supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome consisting of contralateral hemiapraxia and/or speech apraxia. Given the heterogeneity of PSFG tumors, the authors sought to determine the risk of postoperative deficits and assess predictors of outcomes for all intraparenchymal PSFG tumors undergoing surgery (biopsy or resection), regardless of histology. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of adult PSFG-region tumors undergoing biopsy or resection by a single surgeon. RESULTS A total of 106 consecutive patients undergoing 123 procedures (21 biopsies, 102 resections) fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anaplastic astrocytomas were the most frequent among resected tumors (39% vs 29%), while glioblastomas were most common among biopsies (38% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001). The biopsy cohort was more likely to have tumor involvement outside the PSFG (90% vs 62%) (p = 0.011), most commonly in the motor cortex (67% vs 31%) (p = 0.005). Seizures were the most common presenting symptom in the resection cohort (p = 0.017), while motor deficits were more common in the biopsy cohort (58% vs 29%) (p < 0.001). Immediate postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 71 cases (58%), but only 3 of the deficits were permanent at 6 months of follow-up (2%). Postoperative SMA syndrome occurred in 48 cases (47%) and was significantly associated with involvement of the motor cortex (p = 0.018) or cingulate gyrus (p = 0.023), which were also significant in multivariate analysis as risk factors for SMA syndrome. However, postoperative SMA syndrome was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.51). There were no perioperative deaths, but corpus callosum involvement (p < 0.001), contrast enhancement (p = 0.003), and glioblastoma pathology (p = 0.038) predicted worse overall survival in patients undergoing resection. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of all patients undergoing resection of PSFG-region tumors experience a postoperative SMA syndrome. Individuals with corpus callosum and/or motor cortex involvement may be at an increased risk of experiencing SMA syndrome. However, these deficits are usually transient, and the risk of permanent new deficits is very low (3%). Preoperative characteristics including corpus callosum involvement and tumor enhancement—in addition to pathology—might serve as predictors of overall survival within this patient population.
A step toward equal representation? A cross-sectional analysis of the gender composition of neurosurgical editorial boards from 2000 to 2020
Bauman, Megan M. J. , Wang, Kimberly , Bhandarkar, Archis R. , Scheitler, Kristen M. , Bauman, Megan , Clarke, Michelle J.

Journal of Neurosurgery | November 5, 2021 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1752-1759

10.3171/2021.6.jns21474 Get It

OBJECTIVE At present, females constitute less than 10% of neurosurgeons in the US, despite representing approximately half of all medical students. Multiple barriers have been described for females entering the neurosurgical field, particularly academic neurosurgery. Understanding the environment that female neurosurgeons face and any potential barriers preventing career advancement is needed to recruit, promote, and retain females in neurosurgery. METHODS The gender composition of editorial boards for 5 high-impact neurosurgery journals was analyzed from 2000 to 2020. The names of editorial board members were obtained directly from the journal administration, physical copies of the published journal, or publicly available data through each journal’s website. The gender, degrees, academic titles, H-index, and country were determined for each individual and statistical tests were performed to identify significant differences. RESULTS Of the 466 identified individuals that served on at least one editorial board between 2000 and 2020, there were 36 females (7.7%) and 430 males (92.3%). There were no significant differences between males and females serving on multiple editorial boards. Most females possessed an additional graduate degree (58.3%), while only one-third of males (33.5%) obtained such a degree (p = 0.002). In addition, males had significantly higher average H-indices than females (p = 0.002). These trends were also observed when analyzing only US-based editorial board members. Although females were more likely overall to be identified as associate professors, males were more likely to be appointed as full professors (p = 0.001); this trend did not remain true in the US-based cohort. When analyzing the editorial boards for individual journals, all 5 journals experienced an increase of female representation since 2000 or since their inception after 2000. The highest proportion of females for a single journal was 27.3% in 2020. All other journals ranged from 11.0% to 13.5% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS When entering the field of neurosurgery, females continue to face significant social and academic barriers. While the proportion of females on editorial boards for neurosurgery journals in 2020 is consistent with the proportion of practicing female neurosurgeons, there is a statistically significantly higher likelihood that females possess additional graduate degrees and lower H-indices compared to their male counterparts. The authors encourage neurosurgical journals to continue expanding female representation on editorial boards.
International trends in grant and fellowship funding awarded to women in neurosurgery
Wang, Kimberly , Bhandarkar, Archis R. , Bauman, Megan M. J. , Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Rotter, Juliana , Scheitler, Kristen M. , Renfrow, Jaclyn J. , Bauman, Megan , Clarke, Michelle J.

Neurosurgical Focus | March 1, 2021 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 3 | Pages: E5

10.3171/2020.12.focus20846 Get It

OBJECTIVE Metric tracking of grant funding over time for academic neurosurgeons sorted by gender informs the current climate of career development internationally for women in neurosurgery. METHODS Multivariate linear trend analysis of grant funding awarded to neurosurgeons in the NIH and World Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) was performed. Traveling fellowships for international neurosurgery residents sponsored by the AANS and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) were also analyzed. RESULTS Within the US, funding awarded to female neurosurgeons has remained static from 2009 to 2019 after adjusting for inflation and overall trends in NIH funding (β = −$0.3 million per year, p = 0.16). Internationally, female neurosurgeons represented 21.7% (n = 5) of project leads for World RePORTER grants. Traveling fellowships are also an important building block for young international female neurosurgeons, of which 7.4% (n = 2) of AANS international traveling fellowships and 19.4% (n = 7) of AANS/CNS pediatrics international traveling fellowships are women. CONCLUSIONS Over the past decade, funding has increased in neurosurgery without a concordant increase in funding awarded to women. Recognition of this trend is essential to focus efforts on research and career development opportunities for women in neurosurgery. Worldwide, female neurosurgeons head one-fifth of the funded project leads and constitute a minority of international traveling fellowships awarded by organized neurosurgery.