Citations

Abstract Background TMEM106B encodes a lysosomal protein and is a genetic susceptibility factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Aptamer‐based proteomics quantifies TMEM106B protein levels in CSF. The associations of CSF TMEM106B with measures of disease severity have not been previously evaluated, and the value of CSF TMEM106B as a clinical biomarker is unknown. Method CSF TMEM106B and NfL protein levels were quantified with aptamer‐based proteomics in participants from two independent cohorts: sporadic FTLD with neuropathology‐confirmed FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP, clinically diagnosed PSP‐Richardson Syndrome, and controls (UCSF MAC, n = 95; mean age = 69 ± 6 yrs; 48% female) and familial FTLD comprised of presymptomatic and symptomatic FTLD mutation carriers with family non‐carrier controls (ALLFTD, n = 179; mean age = 49 ± 13 yrs; 53% female). The association between biomarkers and diverse measures of disease severity, including the CDR®+NACC‐FTLD and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD sum of boxes, were determined with linear regressions or mixed linear models. Associations with brain volumes were determined within the framework of voxel‐based morphometry. Result In both cohorts, at baseline, CSF TMEM106B did not differ by sex, age, FTLD phenotype, or CSF NfL. CSF TMEM106B was lower in cases with worse disease severity (Figure 1) and in participants with the protective TMEM106B rs1990622 G/G genotype, regardless of pathological diagnosis or FTLD‐causing mutation. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe longitudinal worsening in FTLD disease severity (Figure 2), basic and instrumental function, global cognition, executive function, and depression scores. These associations were weaker than those of NfL. Low CSF TMEM106B was associated with low brain volumes in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) (Figure 3A). CSF NfL negatively correlated (FWE‐corrected p < 0.05) with brain volumes in frontotemporal regions (Figure 3B). Conclusion CSF TMEM106B concentrations are influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, and correlate with disease severity and brain volume in both genetic and sporadic FTLD. Lower levels of CSF TMEM106B correlate with more severe disease and brain atrophy. Disease severity is more strongly associated with CSF NfL, while brain volumes are more strongly associated with CSF TMEM106B. CSF TMEM106B may have value as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in FTLD.

Abstract Background Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology evolves over decades, and understanding this progression is critical to the understanding of the disease and timing therapeutic interventions. Since individuals with Autosomal Dominant AD (ADAD) develop symptoms around the same age as their parent, it is possible to predict symptom onset and stage individuals by their estimated years to symptom onset (EYO). This approach does not generalize to other forms of AD, thus there is a pressing need for the timecourse of ADAD to be defined in broadly relevant terms. The objective of this project is to validate the Sampled Iterative Local Approximation (SILA) algorithm in a cohort with a known disease timecourse. SILA generates an estimate of time from amyloid positivity (A time ) based on longitudinal PET data. Method We evaluated A time in a longitudinal ADAD sample ( N = 316) with PET PiB data in three ways. First, we compared predicted age at amyloid positive (A+) to observed age at A+ for individuals who became A+ during enrollment. Next, using linear regression, we compared estimated age at A+ to estimated age at symptom onset (EYO=0). Finally, we used generalized additive models to compare the amount of variance in concurrent cognitive performance explained both A time and EYO. Result We observed a mean average error of 1.15 years between actual age at A+ ( N = 26) and the SILA‐predicted A time . Across all participants, SILA‐estimated age at A+ explained 39% of the variance in estimated age at symptom onset ( β = 0.918, p < 0.0001). Finally, we observed a nonlinear association between cognition and both A time and EYO. A time explained 19% of the variance in the general cognitive composite while EYO explained 43% of the variance. Conclusion SILA produces a valid estimate of time‐from‐amyloid positivity in ADAD. This work allows for disease stage in ADAD to be compared to staging for broad forms of AD, which was not previously possible using EYO. However, this work also illustrates that there is a high degree of heterogeneity in preclinical disease duration that is not explained by amyloid alone.

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with right anterior temporal lobe (RATL) predominant atrophy is an emerging area of interest. Recent findings by the International Working Group (IWG) have identified this subtype as having a distinct clinical profile within the FTD spectrum (Ulugut et al., 2024, A&D). However, its genetic and pathological underpinnings remain unexplored in large, multicultural cohorts. Methods Retrospective analyses encompassing clinical, genetic, pathological, and neuroimaging data from 23 IWG sites across 13 countries in Asia, Middle East, Europe, North and South America were conducted. The study included 444 patients with FTD exhibiting predominant RATL atrophy. Results Genetic screening was performed on 51% ( n = 225) of the cohort for at least the major frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) mutations including microtubule‐associated protein tau ( MAPT ), progranulin ( GRN ), and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 ( C9orf72 ), or dementia panels encompassing extended sets of genes. Of these, 81% were sporadic, showing negative results for the screened genes and a modified Goldman Score of ≥ 3, indicating a negative family history for dementia. The MAPT mutation was the most common genetic variant, identified in 7% of the screened cases (Figure 1). Pathological confirmation was available for 63 patients. Among the sporadic cases, transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 type C (TDP‐C) pathology was most prevalent (60%, n = 32), while tau‐MAPT pathology was most common in the genetic cases (38%, n = 16). Fifteen cases did not fit neatly into genetic or sporadic categories, displaying heterogeneous pathologies (Figure 2). At the initial visit, compared to genetic cases, patients with TDP‐C pathology were older, and more frequently exhibited semantic deficits, with less frequent attention difficulties and executive dysfunction. No differences were observed in sex distribution, symptom duration or disease severity between genetic and sporadic TDP‐C cases. However, left handedness was more common in TDP‐C cases (14%) compared to genetic cases (5%). Conclusion While FTD with RATL atrophy primarily appears sporadic, a significant proportion of cases exhibit genetic variants. These sporadic and genetic subtypes display distinct neuropathological features and clinical manifestations. Given the implications for therapeutic strategies, precise clinical and molecular subtyping is critical for enhancing patient management and ensuring appropriate enrollment in clinical trials.

Abstract Background Agitation is a clinically significant symptom contributing to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) but is poorly understood across the different syndromes related to Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). This study investigates sex differences in agitation across FTLD‐related syndromes and its relationship to various neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Method We analyzed data from 1,654 participants (916 males, 738 females; average ages 65.8 and 65.9, respectively) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study with a FTLD‐related syndrome: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (non‐fluent variant (nfvPPA), semantic variant (svPPA)), Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Participants’ symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios were computed to assess the likelihood of NPS comorbidities when agitation was present in males and females. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify NPS associated with agitation and how they varied by sex. Result Males were more likely to experience anxiety (bvFTD: p <0.001, CBS: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.0001), apathy (nfvPPA: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.01), depression (bvFTD: p <0.0001, PSP<0.01), disinhibition (nfvPPA: p <0.0001), PSP: p <0.001), and motor symptoms (bvFTD: p <0.01, CBS: p <0.01) when agitation was present. In contrast, females had a higher likelihood of experiencing disinhibition in svPPA ( p <0.001). These findings suggest that agitation is associated with a wider range of NPS in males than in females. Agitation and NPS are especially prominent in males with PSP. Conclusion This study reveals significant sex differences in NPS in FTLD‐related syndromes when agitation is present. Males and especially PSP, are more likely to experience a broader range of NPS in association with agitation. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences, particularly focusing on the neurobiological impact of agitation, the recognition of symptoms in the presence of greater behavioral disturbances, and potential variations from informant reports. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into the role of agitation in the presentation of NPS across FTLD‐related syndromes. Ultimately, addressing these gaps will enhance our ability to effectively treat and manage agitation in both male and female patients with FTLD‐related syndromes.

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.

Abstract Background The quantification of Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has proven valuable for diagnosing and prognosing various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, and ischemic damage. However, there is considerable variability in clinical and laboratory practices between centers, primarily due to different contexts of use (COU), analytical methods, and the application of cutoffs or scales. Additionally, for the same biochemical profile, the interpretation and reporting of results may vary from one center to another, raising concerns about the commutability of the tests. To date, no consensus has been reached among laboratories to define the most appropriate use of cutoffs or conclusions/comments based on NfL profiles. Method This international project involves 38 laboratories across 18 countries, all specialized in the biochemical diagnosis of neurological disorders. Using a questionnaire, we obtained descriptions from each center regarding their COU, pre‐analytical and analytical protocols (including the biological fluid and methods used to quantify NfL). Through a consensus approach, we developed a harmonized strategy for the use and reporting of NfL results across different centres according to their respective COU. Results Among the centers, 63% quantified NfL in the CSF, 87% in blood and 53% in both fluids. COU were as follow: frontotemporal dementia (71%), Alzheimer disease (71%), multiple sclerosis (61%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (61%), psychiatric syndrome (45%), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (32%), Parkinson disease (39%), peripheral neuropathy (29%), traumatic brain injury (21%), Huntington's disease (13%), amyloid transthyretin related (11%) and cardiac arrest (8%). Most of the centers define pathological cutoffs based on publications (50%) and take age into account for this purpose (42%). Reporting is mostly transmitted through numeric results (95%). Conclusion Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice.

Abstract Background Recent technological advances have enhanced the precision of blood‐based multiplex proteomics and their application in Alzheimer's disease. However, these approaches remain underutilized in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Familial FTLD cohorts offer a unique opportunity to study presymptomatic periods of disease that cannot be studied in sporadic cases. We leveraged NUcleic acid Linked Immuno‐Sandwich Assay (NULISAseq) to identify blood‐detectable proteins that change prior to symptom onset in familial FTLD. Method 120 FTLD mutation carriers (40 C9orf72 , 40 GRN , 40 MAPT ) and 40 age and sex‐matched noncarrier controls from the ALLFTD Consortium completed blood draws and clinical assessment. Targeted plasma proteomics was performed via NUcleic acid Linked Immuno‐Sandwich Assay (NULISAseq; 132 proteins). Disease age estimates measuring predicted symptom onset were derived from a validated model incorporating FTLD gene‐specific clinical, neuroimaging, and biomarker data. Mass linear regression models identified disease age ‘thresholds’ where individual proteins significantly diverged between each mutation carrier group and controls. NULISAseq targets were validated against orthogonal assays, specifically Simoa (plasma) and SomaScan (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Result Compared to controls, 14 plasma proteins significantly diverged ( p <.05) in C9orf72 , 24 in GRN , and 13 in MAPT . Beyond NEFL, 10 additional proteins significantly diverged in more than one mutation group, including markers of synaptic function (NPTX2, NPTXR) and vascular integrity (PGF) that deviated prior to estimated symptom onset (disease age range: ‐30 to 0). Proteins with gene‐specific signals included GFAP (increased in GRN at disease age ‐17), ENO2 (decreased in C9orf72 at disease age ‐7), and FLT1 (increased in MAPT at disease age ‐6). Plasma NULISA‐based NEFL and GFAP showed strong concordance when measured via plasma Simoa ( r s>0.88) and were among 38 targets with significant concordance when measured via CSF SomaScan ( r range: 0.16 to 0.75, p s<.05). Conclusion Alterations in plasma protein abundance are measurable in familial FTLD prior to predicted symptom onset. The validity and brain‐based relevance of blood‐detectable NULISA targets is bolstered by the observed convergence with plasma Simoa and CSF SomaScan. Replication of top hits in larger familial and sporadic FTLD sample sizes is warranted to determine generalizability and suitability for clinical trials.

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment often goes undetected by clinicians due to time constraints, limited expertise, and lack of standardized tools. Structured cognitive assessments improve detection accuracy compared to unstructured clinical judgment. In 2013, the Alzheimer’s Association published recommendations to help primary care clinicians incorporate cognitive assessments into the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit. Since then, advances in cognitive assessment tools, availability of disease‐modifying therapies, and shifting expectations around early diagnosis have highlighted the need for updated guidance. In response, the Alzheimer’s Association is developing an evidence‐based clinical practice guideline for cognitive testing in primary care, using the GRADE approach, informed by a systematic review of the best available evidence. Method A multidisciplinary panel formulated a clinical question to inform the development of this guideline. A systematic review was conducted (search range: 1999‐2024) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ten cognitive tests (5‐Cog, AD8, GPCOG, IQCODE, Mini‐Cog, MIS, MoCA, QDRS, RUDAS, and SLUMS) for the early detection of cognitive impairment (including MCI and dementia), in adults aged 55+ in ambulatory settings. The panel also narratively summarized data on emerging digital tools. Result Forty‐one studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the systematic review. Results were analyzed separately by test (including short‐IQCODE and short‐MoCA) and for primary care and for ambulatory clinic settings (e.g., neurology, memory disorder clinics), as well as for English and Spanish language, resulting in 21 separate analyses. Only three analyses, all related to MoCA, allowed for meta‐analysis. The panel will use the evidence to inform conditional recommendations for or against each specific test. Conclusion By evaluating the diagnostic performance of selected tests, this guideline aims to support healthcare professionals in primary care settings in effective triaging of individuals who may benefit from further cognitive evaluation. To enhance real‐world applicability, considerations such as administration time, ease of scoring, and diagnostic accuracy ‐ along with appropriate cut‐offs by race/ethnicity, education, and language ‐ should be prioritized. This guideline will be regularly updated over time to reflect emerging evidence and the needs of diverse populations.

Multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry (mIF/IHC) are increasingly employed antibody-based technologies that use tissue sparingly and facilitate the detection of co-localized or neighboring biomarkers. Specifically, these platforms enable spatial analyses of the tumor microenvironment as well as extended applications, for example, describing normal tissue anatomy, autoimmunity, infectious diseases, etc. mIF/IHC has greatly enhanced biomarker discovery efforts, and a growing number of studies suggest superiority to traditional IHC. Standardization of staining approaches, reporting of image analysis strategies and resultant data is critical for facilitating cross-study comparisons, validation, deployment, and generalization of findings. To address this challenge, The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) previously published two articles providing best practice guidelines for mIF/IHC staining, image analysis, and data sharing. Here, SITC convened stakeholders to develop the third article in the series, a consensus checklist for scientific reporting of mIF/IHC data to support and complement the best practice guidelines. The checklist includes critical components of mIF/IHC applications to be defined within publications such as detailed descriptions of analytical validation; image acquisition, selection, and registration methods; and cell clustering and spatial analysis strategies, amongst others. Such information will help with data reproducibility and comparison across studies towards future drug and assay development.

ABSTRACT Plerixafor (PLX) is FDA approved for use in autologous peripheral blood stem cell donors but not in allogeneic donors. This study was completed by members of the ASFA HPC Donor Subcommittee to examine the incidence and characteristics of poor mobilizers (PM) among matched related donors (MRD), as well as factors associated with PLX use in MRD. Risks of poor mobilization in MRD were older age, especially donors older than 60 years, lower baseline platelet counts, and heavier recipients. PLX use in PM was low but safe, tripling the success rate for collection. This study adds evidence to the body of literature to support use of PLX in allogeneic donors who are PM.