Back to Authors

Schalper, Kurt A

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5692-4833

Mayo Clinic

Yale Cancer Center

Citations 2

AI-derived CD8⁺ cytotoxic T-cell immune signatures from baseline H&E images to predict immunotherapy benefit over chemotherapy in non–small cell lung cancer: Blinded validation in CheckMate-227 (CM227).
Barrera, Cristian , Safta, Wiem, Mutha, Pushkar, Grootendorst, Diederik J., Mustatea, Oana, Eddy, Nathanial, Pathak, Tilak, Gregorio, Miguel Lopez de Rodas, Schalper, Kurt A , Ramalingam, Suresh S., Velcheti, Vamsidhar, Madabhushi, Anant, Mutha, Pushkar , Khorrami, Mohammadhadi , Grootendorst, Diederik J., Eddy, Nathanial R., Rodas, Miguel López de , Ramalingam, Suresh S. , Madabhushi, Anant

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 8534-8534

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.8534 Get It

8534 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has transformed treatment for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but not all patients (pts) benefit, underscoring the need for predictive biomarkers to guide IO versus chemotherapy (Ch). CheckMate 227 (CM227; NCT02477826) showed a survival benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo+ipi) over Ch in stage IV NSCLC. CD8⁺ T cells are key mediators of antitumor immunity and are associated with IO benefit. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)–based pipeline (VIGOR-CD8) that predicts spatial CD8⁺ immune signatures from routine baseline H&E whole-slide images using histopathology foundation model embeddings (H-Optimus-0) and virtual gene expression modeling (HE2Gene), and evaluated its ability to identify pts who do and do not derive IO benefit over Ch in CM227. Methods: 1,598 pts with advanced NSCLC were analyzed, including multi-institutional retrospective cohorts (n = 487; 65 for patch-level CD8⁺ prediction and overall survival (OS), 422 for patient-level OS) and a blinded CM227 validation subset (n = 1,111). For orthogonal validation, 86,470 H&E patches were co-registered with quantitative CD8⁺ immunofluorescence. H-Optimus-0 and HE2Gene immune-related embeddings were used to train a random forest classifier to predict patch-level CD8⁺ probability. Patch-level probabilities were aggregated into a patient-level CD8⁺ signature and dichotomized into biomarker-positive (B⁺) and biomarker-negative (B⁻) groups by the training-set median. Cox models assessed the impact of VIGOR-CD8 on OS. In CM227, prognostic and predictive utility were evaluated using treatment-specific analyses; investigators were blinded to outcomes, and models were trained on independent, non-overlapping cohorts. Results: VIGOR-CD8 was associated with longer OS in the testing cohort (n = 422; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87, p = 0.00163) and CM227 (n = 1,111; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67–0.96, p = 0.016), irrespective of treatment type and PD-L1 expression. Among pts with evaluable PD-L1, B⁺ pts treated with nivo+ipi had superior OS versus Ch (n = 617; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58–0.90, p = 0.003), while in B⁻ pts there was no significant OS difference between treatment arms (n = 130; HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.79–1.75, p = 0.436), supporting a predictive rather than purely prognostic role for VIGOR-CD8. Conclusions: An AI-derived CD8⁺ immune signature from routine baseline H&E slides was associated with favorable OS in CM227 and predicted differential benefit from nivo+ipi versus Ch. VIGOR-CD8 may help identify advanced NSCLC pts most likely to benefit from first-line dual IO, but further validation in independent and prospective trials is warranted.
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Standards for Reporting of Multiplex Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence Assays (STORMI)
Sater, Sam, Bifulco, Carlo B, Rodriguez-Canales, Jaime, Yeong, Joe, Akturk, Guray, Angelo, Michael, Ballesteros-Merino, Carmen, Bankhead, Peter, Basu, Subham, Blando, Jorge M, Brajkovic, Saska, Cassano, Marco, Chen, Benjamin J , Coskun, Ahmet F, Cottrell, Tricia R, Andrea, Carlos E De, Edwards, Robin H, Engle, Logan L , Fan, Rong , Feldman, Michael, Fox, Bernard A. , Galon, Jerome, Gartrell, Robyn, Gnjatic, Sacha, Green, Benjamin F, Hellebust, Anne, Hewitt, Stephen, Hollmann, Travis J, Horn, Lucas A , Howat, William J, Hoyt, Clifford C, Jensen, Shawn M, Kulasinghe, Arutha, Lassoued, Wiem , Lott, Steven, Mansfield, James, Marwitz, Sebastian , Netto, George, Page, David B. , Parra, Edwin, Rodig, Scott J, Salgado, Roberto, Schapiro, Denis, Schalper, Kurt A , Sunshine, Joel C , Surace, Michael J, Szalay, Alexander S, Thurin, Magdalena, Villasboas, Jose C, Wharton, Keith, Wistuba, Ignacio I, Yearley, Jennifer H, Yuan, Yinyin, Zaki, Geroge, Ziai, James, Gnjatic, Sacha , Netto, George J. , Egelston, Colt , Engle, Logan L , Ernstoff, Marc S. , Fan, Rong , Fox, Bernard A , Gulley, James L , Horn, Lucas A , Lassoued, Wiem , Marwitz, Sebastian , Page, David B , Rimm, David , Schalper, Kurt A , Sunshine, Joel C , Taube, Janis M , Gnjatic, Sacha , Sater, Sam, Bifulco, Carlo B, Rodriguez-Canales, Jaime, Yeong, Joe Poh-Sheng , Akturk, Guray, Angelo, Michael, Ballesteros-Merino, Carmen, Bankhead, Peter, Basu, Subham, Blando, Jorge M, Brajkovic, Saška, Cassano, Marco , Chen, Benjamin J , Coskun, Ahmet F, Cottrell, Tricia R, Andrea, Carlos E De, Edwards, Robin H, Feldman, Michael, Galon, Jérôme , Gartrell, Robyn, Green, Benjamin F, Hellebust, Anne, Hewitt, Stephen, Hollmann, Travis J, Howat, William J, Hoyt, Clifford C, Jensen, Shawn M, Kulasinghe, Arutha, Lott, Steven, Mansfield, James, Parra, Edwin, Rodig, Scott J, Salgado, Roberto, Schapiro, Denis , Surace, Michael J, Szalay, Alexander S. , Thurin, Magdalena, Villasboas, Jose C, Wharton, Keith, Wistuba, Ignacio I. , Yearley, Jennifer H, Yuan, Yinyin, Zaki, Geroge, Ziai, James

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | December 21, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e012280

10.1136/jitc-2025-012280 Get It

Multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry (mIF/IHC) are increasingly employed antibody-based technologies that use tissue sparingly and facilitate the detection of co-localized or neighboring biomarkers. Specifically, these platforms enable spatial analyses of the tumor microenvironment as well as extended applications, for example, describing normal tissue anatomy, autoimmunity, infectious diseases, etc. mIF/IHC has greatly enhanced biomarker discovery efforts, and a growing number of studies suggest superiority to traditional IHC. Standardization of staining approaches, reporting of image analysis strategies and resultant data is critical for facilitating cross-study comparisons, validation, deployment, and generalization of findings. To address this challenge, The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) previously published two articles providing best practice guidelines for mIF/IHC staining, image analysis, and data sharing. Here, SITC convened stakeholders to develop the third article in the series, a consensus checklist for scientific reporting of mIF/IHC data to support and complement the best practice guidelines. The checklist includes critical components of mIF/IHC applications to be defined within publications such as detailed descriptions of analytical validation; image acquisition, selection, and registration methods; and cell clustering and spatial analysis strategies, amongst others. Such information will help with data reproducibility and comparison across studies towards future drug and assay development.