Back to Authors

Sliwinski, Martin J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9611-7558

Mayo Clinic

Pennsylvania State University

Citations 2

Clinical Practice Guideline on Cognitive Assessments for the Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: A report from the Alzheimer's Association
Tampi, Malavika P. , Rentz, D., Ko, Fred C, Bell, Karen L. , Brangman, Sharon A. , Carrillo, Maria, Forester, Brent P. , Jones, Dana C, Kulshreshtha, Ambar, Loveless, Jennifer, Sliwinski, Martin J. , Snyder, Heather M. , Tangalos, E. G., Rentz, Dorene M. , Fields, Noelle L. , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Kulshreshtha, Ambar , Mahinrad, Simin , Pilcher, Lauren , Snyder, Peter J. , Tangalos, Eric G.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70861_108896 Get It

Abstract Background Cognitive impairment often goes undetected by clinicians due to time constraints, limited expertise, and lack of standardized tools. Structured cognitive assessments improve detection accuracy compared to unstructured clinical judgment. In 2013, the Alzheimer’s Association published recommendations to help primary care clinicians incorporate cognitive assessments into the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit. Since then, advances in cognitive assessment tools, availability of disease‐modifying therapies, and shifting expectations around early diagnosis have highlighted the need for updated guidance. In response, the Alzheimer’s Association is developing an evidence‐based clinical practice guideline for cognitive testing in primary care, using the GRADE approach, informed by a systematic review of the best available evidence. Method A multidisciplinary panel formulated a clinical question to inform the development of this guideline. A systematic review was conducted (search range: 1999‐2024) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ten cognitive tests (5‐Cog, AD8, GPCOG, IQCODE, Mini‐Cog, MIS, MoCA, QDRS, RUDAS, and SLUMS) for the early detection of cognitive impairment (including MCI and dementia), in adults aged 55+ in ambulatory settings. The panel also narratively summarized data on emerging digital tools. Result Forty‐one studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the systematic review. Results were analyzed separately by test (including short‐IQCODE and short‐MoCA) and for primary care and for ambulatory clinic settings (e.g., neurology, memory disorder clinics), as well as for English and Spanish language, resulting in 21 separate analyses. Only three analyses, all related to MoCA, allowed for meta‐analysis. The panel will use the evidence to inform conditional recommendations for or against each specific test. Conclusion By evaluating the diagnostic performance of selected tests, this guideline aims to support healthcare professionals in primary care settings in effective triaging of individuals who may benefit from further cognitive evaluation. To enhance real‐world applicability, considerations such as administration time, ease of scoring, and diagnostic accuracy ‐ along with appropriate cut‐offs by race/ethnicity, education, and language ‐ should be prioritized. This guideline will be regularly updated over time to reflect emerging evidence and the needs of diverse populations.
Cognitive vulnerability to glucose fluctuations: A digital phenotype of neurodegeneration
Fonseca, Luciana Mascarenhas , Beeri, Michal Schnaider , Jung, Laneé , Kudva, Yogish C. , Rizvi, Shafaq, Bulger, Jane , Janess, Kamille , Sliwinski, Martin J. , Weinstock, Ruth S. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Kivisäkk, Pia , Germine, Laura , Kudva, Yogish, Hawks, Zoë , Grinspoon, Elizabeth Anne , Pratley, Richard E. , Rickels, Michael R. , Chaytor, Naomi

Alzheimer's & Dementia | March 2, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.70001 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cognition is reduced at low and high glucose, reflecting cognitive vulnerability to glucose (CVG) fluctuations. The impact of glucose fluctuations on the aging brain remains unclear. We examined whether CVG is associated with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and neurodegeneration. METHODS Participants included N = 114 adults with type 1 diabetes assessed for processing speed and sustained attention using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We characterized associations between CVG and amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40, phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) 181 and 217, neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein. RESULTS CVG was associated with all plasma biomarkers, except Aβ 42/40. CVG for sustained attention exhibited strong associations with p‐tau biomarkers that persisted across covariate specifications. DISCUSSION CVG may be a useful digital phenotype of AD. It remains unclear whether CVG contributes to versus arises from neurodegeneration. We consider possible mechanisms linking cognitive vulnerability and long‐term glucose variability to the development of neuropathology. Highlights Cognitive vulnerability to glucose (CVG) may be a useful digital phenotype of neurodegeneration. We used cognitive ecological momentary assessment and continuous glucose monitoring to investigate CVG's associations with plasma biomarkers. Associations of CVG for sustained attention and phosphorylated tau 181 remained significant across covariates. We discuss possible mechanisms relating glucose variability, cognition, and neurodegeneration.