Back to Authors

(DIAN), The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network

Mayo Clinic

No affiliation available

Citations 3

Validation of Amyloid Chronicity in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease
Christian, Bradley T, Schultz, Stephanie A. , Barthélemy, Nicolas R., Ryan, Natalie S. , Renton, Alan E., Vermunt, Lisa, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly, Shirzadi, Zahra , Strain, Jeremy F. , Chrem, Patricio, Daniels, Alisha , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Cruchaga, Carlos, Ibanez, Laura, Jucker, Mathias, Day, Gregory S, Lee, J.R, Supnet‐Bell, Charlene, Xiong, Chengjie, Schindler, Suzanne E., Wang, Guoqiao, Li, Yan, Koeppe, Robert A., Jack, Clifford R., Morris, John C., Bateman, Randall J., Benzinger, Tammie L.S., Gordon, Brian A., (DIAN), The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Wisch, Julie K. , McKay, Nicole S. , Zammit, Matthew D. , Christian, Bradley T. , Millar, Peter R , Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Renton, Alan , Vermunt, Lisa , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Cruchaga, Carlos , Ibanez, Laura , Jucker, Mathias , Day, Gregory S. , Xiong, Chengjie , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Aguillon, David , Roh, Jee Hoon , Xiong, Chengjie , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Wang, Guoqiao , Li, Yan , Koeppe, Robert A., Jack, Clifford R. , Morris, John C. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Gordon, Brian A.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 26, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_103008 Get It

Abstract Background Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology evolves over decades, and understanding this progression is critical to the understanding of the disease and timing therapeutic interventions. Since individuals with Autosomal Dominant AD (ADAD) develop symptoms around the same age as their parent, it is possible to predict symptom onset and stage individuals by their estimated years to symptom onset (EYO). This approach does not generalize to other forms of AD, thus there is a pressing need for the timecourse of ADAD to be defined in broadly relevant terms. The objective of this project is to validate the Sampled Iterative Local Approximation (SILA) algorithm in a cohort with a known disease timecourse. SILA generates an estimate of time from amyloid positivity (A time ) based on longitudinal PET data. Method We evaluated A time in a longitudinal ADAD sample ( N = 316) with PET PiB data in three ways. First, we compared predicted age at amyloid positive (A+) to observed age at A+ for individuals who became A+ during enrollment. Next, using linear regression, we compared estimated age at A+ to estimated age at symptom onset (EYO=0). Finally, we used generalized additive models to compare the amount of variance in concurrent cognitive performance explained both A time and EYO. Result We observed a mean average error of 1.15 years between actual age at A+ ( N = 26) and the SILA‐predicted A time . Across all participants, SILA‐estimated age at A+ explained 39% of the variance in estimated age at symptom onset ( β = 0.918, p < 0.0001). Finally, we observed a nonlinear association between cognition and both A time and EYO. A time explained 19% of the variance in the general cognitive composite while EYO explained 43% of the variance. Conclusion SILA produces a valid estimate of time‐from‐amyloid positivity in ADAD. This work allows for disease stage in ADAD to be compared to staging for broad forms of AD, which was not previously possible using EYO. However, this work also illustrates that there is a high degree of heterogeneity in preclinical disease duration that is not explained by amyloid alone.
Cortical asymmetry in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease progression
Pérez-Millan, Agnès , Falgàs, Neus , Borrego-Écija, Sergi, Antonell, Anna, Fernández-Villullas, Guadalupe, Esteller-Gauxax, Diana, Tort-Merino, Adrià, Bargalló, Núria, Balasa, Mircea, Lladó, Albert, Chrem, Patricio, Day, Gregory S. , Devenney, Emma , Huey, Edward D. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi, Jucker, Mathias, Roh, Jee Hoon , Vitali, Paolo , Ortíz, Ana Luisa Sosa, Llibre-Guerra, Jorge J, Gordon, Brian A., Sánchez-Valle, Raquel, (DIAN), The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Daniels, Alisha , Courtney, Laura, Ziegemeier, Angela, Skrbec, Karina, Hellm, Cortaiga, Martin, Mariana , Ziegemeier, Ellen , Bartzel, Jamie, Xiong, Chengie , Xu, Xiong, Lu, Ruijin, Li, Yan , Nie, Yuzheng , Gremminger, Emily, Perrin, Richard J. , Franklin, Erin , Ibanez, Laura, Jerome, Gina, Stauber, Jennifer, Baker, Bryce, Minton, Matthew, Cruchaga, Carlos C, Goate, Alison M, Renton, Alan E, Picarello, Danielle M. , Benzinger, Tammie L S, Hornbeck, Russ C. , Chen, Allison, Chen, Charles D., Flores, Shaney, Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly, Jackson, Kelley, Keefe, Sarah , Koudelis, Deborah, Massoumzadeh, Parinaz , Nicklaus, Joyce , Pulizos, Christine, Wang, Qing, Sabaredzovic, Edita, Scott, Jalen , Simmons, Ashlee, Rizzo, Jacqueline, Vlassenko, Andrei G. , Wang, Yong, Hassenstab, Jason, Smith, Jennifer, Stout, Sarah, Marsh, Jacob, Morris, John C, Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Xu, Jinbin , Ikonomović, Snežana, Graff-Radford, Neill R, Farlow, Martin R. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Maa, Courtney, Ishiguro, Takanobu , Ishii, Kenji, Senda, Michio, Salloway, Stephen , Bechara, Jacob A, Martins, Ralph, Fox, Nick C, Ryan, Natalie S. , Laske, Christoph , Timofejavaite, Reda, Kuder-Buletta, Elke, Graber-Sultan, Susanne, Obermueller, Ulrike, Xiong, Chengjie , Rödenbeck, Yvonne, Vӧglein, Jonathan, Méndez, Patricio Chrem, Vazquez, Silvia, Leon, Yudy Milena, Ramirez, Laura, Baena, Ana , Bocanegra, Yamile , Levey, Allan, Johnson, Erik C B, Seyfried, Nicholas T. , Ringman, John M. , Fagan, Anne M. , Mori, Hiroshi, Lopera, Francisco , Goate, Alison , Hassenstab, Jason , Borrego‐Écija, Sergi , Pérez‐Millan, Agnès , Ikeuchi, T , Vöglein, Jonathan , Roh, Jee Hoon , Vitali, Paolo , Gordon, Brian A , Bateman, Randall J , Sánchez-Valle, Raquel , Day, Gregory S , Xiong, Chengjie , Hassenstab, Jason , Borrego-Écija, Sergi , Goate, Alison M , Bosch, Beatríz , Antonell, Anna, Fernández‐Villullas, Guadalupe , Esteller, Diana , Tort‐Merino, Adrià , Balasa, Mircea , Lladó, Albert , Aguillon, David , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Jucker, Mathias , Kasuga, Kensaku , Vöglein, Jonathan , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Gordon, Brian A. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Supnet, Charlene , Lu, Ruijin, Wang, Guoqiao , Ibanez, Laura , Cruchaga, Carlos , Fulton‐Howard, Brian , Banks, Jessica N , Flores, Shaney , Goyal, Manu S. , Hobbs, Diana A. , Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , McCullough, Austin , McKay, Nicole S. , Wang, Yong , Smith, Jennifer, Stout, Sarah H., Aschenbrenner, Andrew J. , Karch, Celeste M. , Marsh, Jacob A. , Holtzman, David M. , Berman, Sarah , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Senda, Michio , Niimi, Yoshiki , Schofield, Peter R. , Brooks, William S. , Bechara, Jacob , Cash, David M. , Laske, Christoph , Fougère, Christian la , Reischl, Gerald , Lee, Jae Hong , Allegri, Ricardo , Surace, Ezequiel , Vazquez, Silvia, Ramírez, Laura, Serna, Laura, Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masters, Colin L. , Noble, James M. , Lopera, Francisco Javier

Brain Communications | December 18, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcaf488 Get It

Abstract The cortical asymmetry index evaluates the cortical thickness asymmetry between hemispheres. We investigated cortical asymmetry index in asymptomatic and symptomatic mutation carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease to explore the brain asymmetry within the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Sixty baseline T1-weighted MRI scans were obtained from the Clinic Barcelona cohort. Baseline and longitudinal MRI data from 564 participants within the dominantly inherited Alzheimer network observational study were used as an independent, confirmatory cohort. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma neurofilament light chain levels were included when available. Cortical thickness was calculated using Freesurfer and cortical asymmetry index was calculated via an open-source pipeline. Cross-sectional analyses examined cortical asymmetry index differences based on clinical classification and APOE ε4 status, adjusting for age, sex and estimated years from onset, while correlations were assessed with age, estimated years from onset, mini-mental state examination scores, and neurofilament light. Longitudinal cortical asymmetry index evolution was modelled using generalized additive models in the dominantly inherited Alzheimer network observational study cohort, incorporating age, sex, and the interaction between group and estimated years from onset. The cortical asymmetry index successfully distinguished asymptomatic mutation carrier and symptomatic mutation carriers from healthy controls in the Clinic Barcelona cohort and symptomatic mutation carriers from controls in dominantly inherited Alzheimer network observational study. Higher cortical asymmetry index in mutation carriers (asymptomatic mutation carrier and symptomatic mutation carriers combined) and in symptomatic mutation carriers were associated with higher plasma neurofilament light levels, a closer proximity to symptom onset, and lower mini-mental state examination in the Clinic Barcelona cohort. In the dominantly inherited Alzheimer network observational study cohort, mutation carriers exhibited increased cortical asymmetry index compared to controls and correlated with elevated neurofilament light (plasma and Cerebrospinal fluid), lower mini-mental state examination, and a closer proximity to symptom onset. APOE3/3 carriers showed greater asymmetry than other APOE genotypes and significant cortical asymmetry index differences between asymptomatic mutation carrier and symptomatic mutation carriers. Longitudinally, cortical asymmetry index increased over time significantly in symptomatic mutation carriers. These findings underscore brain asymmetry as a potential biomarker for early Alzheimer’s disease progression in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease, with implications for detection and monitoring tracking disease-related neuroanatomical changes.
Increasing hub disruption parallels dementia severity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease
Tu, Jiaxin Cindy , Millar, Peter R , Strain, Jeremy F. , Eck, Andrew, Adeyemo, Babatunde, Daniels, Alisha , Huey, Edward D. , Day, Gregory S. , Hassenstab, Jason , Méndez, Patricio Chrem, Perrin, Richard J. , Jack, Clifford R. , Betzel, Richard F. , Wheelock, Muriah D. , Network, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Wheelock, Muriah D , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , Hassenstab, Jason , Daniels, Alisha, Karch, Celeste M. , Huey, Edward D., McDade, Eric, Igor, Yakushev, Hassenstab, Jason, Morris, John, Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Ibanez, Laura , Jucker, Mathias , Bateman, Randall J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M. , Eggebrecht, Adam T. , Gordon, Brian A. , (DIAN), The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network

Network Neuroscience | June 11, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1265-1290

10.1162/netn_a_00395 Get It

Abstract Hub regions in the brain, recognized for their roles in ensuring efficient information transfer, are vulnerable to pathological alterations in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Computational simulations and animal experiments have hinted at the theory of activity-dependent degeneration as the cause of this hub vulnerability. However, two critical issues remain unresolved. First, past research has not clearly distinguished between two scenarios: hub regions facing a higher risk of connectivity disruption (targeted attack) and all regions having an equal risk (random attack). Second, human studies offering support for activity-dependent explanations remain scarce. We refined the hub disruption index to demonstrate a hub disruption pattern in functional connectivity in autosomal dominant AD that aligned with targeted attacks. This hub disruption is detectable even in preclinical stages, 12 years before the expected symptom onset and is amplified alongside symptomatic progression. Moreover, hub disruption was primarily tied to regional differences in global connectivity and sequentially followed changes observed in amyloid-beta positron emission tomography cortical markers, consistent with the activity-dependent degeneration explanation. Taken together, our findings deepen the understanding of brain network organization in neurodegenerative diseases and could be instrumental in refining diagnostic and targeted therapeutic strategies for AD in the future.