Citations

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs necessitate a reassessment of routine preoperative practices. Despite low transfusion rates in elective colorectal operations, many hospitals continue to perform routine preoperative type and screen testing. OBJECTIVE: To assess perioperative blood transfusion rates and determine preoperative and surgical factors associated with transfusions to determine whether the routine preoperative type and screen testing are necessary for elective abdominal colorectal surgeries, particularly in the setting of minimally invasive surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Mayo Clinic, 2019–2023. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing elective abdominal colorectal operations. Exclusion criteria included emergent operations and nonabdominal procedures. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative and immediate postoperative (≤72 hours) blood product transfusion. Secondary outcomes assessed associations between transfusion rates, surgical approach, and preoperative variables. RESULTS: Among 4652 patients, 2770 underwent minimally invasive surgery and 1882 underwent open procedures. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion rates were lower in minimally invasive procedures (3.0% colectomy, 4.5% proctectomy) compared to open procedures (8.7% colectomy, 21.5% proctectomy). Open proctectomy was the strongest predictor of transfusion (OR 12.05; 95% CI, 8.94–16.26; p < 0.0001) followed by open colectomy (OR 2.59; 95% CI, 2.04–3.30; p < 0.0001). Preoperative factors including ASA class IV (OR 5.21; 95% CI, 1.09–24.82; p < 0.0382) and anemia (OR 4.14; 95% CI, 3.09–5.55; p < 0.0001) were also significantly associated with red blood cell transfusion. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study may introduce selection bias. In addition, institutional practice patterns may limit the generalizability of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery have very low rates of perioperative blood transfusions; thus, routine preoperative type and screen testing is likely unnecessary for this patient cohort. However, patients undergoing planned open operations, likely due to procedural complexity, and those who are ASA class IV, have preoperative anemia, or have anal cancer have higher transfusion risks and may benefit from selective testing. Implementing a risk-stratified approach based on surgical technique and patient comorbidities could potentially reduce unnecessary testing and associated health care costs. See Video Abstract. RE-TIPIFICACIÓN Y EVALUACIÓN PREOPERATORIAS: CÓMO IDENTIFICAR CUÁNDO ES NECESARIA UNA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVA ANTECEDENTES: El aumento en los costos de la atención médica exigen la reevaluación de las practicas preoperatorias de rutina. A pesar de las bajas tasas de transfusión en la cirugía colorrectal electiva, muchos hospitales continúan realizando pruebas de tipo y de cribado preoperatorios de forma rutinaria. El poresente estudio evalúa las tasas de transfusiones sanguíneas perioperatorias e identifica los factores asociados con éstas transfusiones para determinar la necesidad de pruebas de tipo y de cribado preoperatorios de forma rutinaria en cirugías colorrectales abdominales electivas. OBJETIVO: Evaluar las tasas de transfusión sanguínea perioperatoria y determinar los factores preoperatorios y quirúrgicos asociados con las transfusiones, con el fin de determinar si las pruebas de tipo y de cribado preoperatorias de forma rutinaria son necesarias en cirugías colorrectales abdominales electivas, en particular en el contexto de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. ESCENARIO: Clínica Mayo, 2019-2023. PACIENTES: Pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugías colorrectales abdominales electivas. Los criterios de exclusión incluyeron operaciones de emergencia y procedimientos no abdominales. INTERVENCIONES: Ninguna. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: El resultado primario fue la incidencia de transfusión de hemoderivados intraoperatoriamente y postoperatoria inmediata (≤72 horas). Los resultados secundarios evaluaron la asociación entre las tasas de transfusión, el abordaje quirúrgico y las variables preoperatorias. RESULTADOS: De 4652 pacientes, 2770 se sometieron a cirugía mínimamente invasiva y 1882 a laparotomía. Las tasas de transfusión eritrocitaria perioperatoria fueron menores en los procedimientos mínimamente invasivos (3,0 % colectomía, 4,5 % proctectomía) que en los procedimientos abiertos (8,7 % colectomía, 21,5 % proctectomía). La proctectomía abierta fue el predictor más sólido de transfusión (OR: 12,05; IC del 95 %: 8,94-16,26; p < 0,0001), seguida de la colectomía abierta (OR: 2,59; IC del 95 %: 2,04-3,30; p < 0,0001). Los factores preoperatorios, incluyendo la clase ASA IV (OR 5,21; IC del 95 %: 1,09-24,82; p < 0,0382) y la anemia (OR 4,14; IC del 95 %: 3,09-5,55; p < 0,0001), también se asociaron significativamente con la transfusión de glóbulos rojos. LIMITACIONES: La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio puede introducir sesgo de selección. Además, los patrones de práctica institucional pueden limitar la generalización de los hallazgos. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva electiva tienen tasas muy bajas de transfusiones sanguíneas perioperatorias, por lo que las pruebas de detección y tipo de sangre preoperatorias de rutina probablemente sean innecesarias para esta cohorte de pacientes. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a cirugías abiertas planificadas, probablemente debido a la complejidad del procedimiento, y aquellos con clase ASA IV, anemia preoperatoria o cáncer anal, tienen mayor riesgo de transfusión y podrían beneficiarse de pruebas selectivas. La implementación de un enfoque estratificado por riesgo basado en la técnica quirúrgica y las comorbilidades del paciente puede reducir las pruebas innecesarias y los costos de atención médica asociados. (Traducción—Dr. Xavier Delgadillo)

Background and purpose New Zealand White Rabbits are a useful preclinical model for neurovascular research. Inducing right common carotid artery aneurysms in New Zealand White Rabbits gives researchers the ability to test neurovascular devices in vivo. This study takes advantage of archived angiograms to obtain vascular measurements of interest for future research in rabbit models. Methods Rabbit angiograms from endovascular studies conducted in-house between 2005 and 2024 were analyzed using ImageJ at points of interest along the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Using scale references, the diameters of various New Zealand White Rabbit (2.5–3.5 kg) arteries were measured for aneurysm models and controls. Anatomic vascular variations were categorized and recorded. Results Measurable artery diameters at 39 points of interest were recorded for 170 female New Zealand White Rabbits. Type 1 vascular anatomy was the most common rabbit aortic arch, characterizing 85% of identifiable rabbit anatomies in this study. Conclusion By making these measurements available, this study simplifies future neurovascular studies, allowing for vasculature to be selected by size depending on the application. Additionally, the study offers insight into the relationship between elastase-induced aneurysms and surrounding vasculature size and draws size comparisons between some key arteries of interest.

Background: Despite mounting clinical evidence for the utility of orthobiologics in nonoperative management of orthopaedic pathology, the market for orthobiologic therapies remains largely unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, giving rise to a wide range of pricing for these therapeutics by different provider types. Purpose: To determine the availability and pricing for platelet-rich plasma (PRP), amniotic or adipose “stem cell,” and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis among orthopaedic sports medicine and alternative providers (eg, chiropractic clinics and stand-alone “regenerative medicine” clinics) in a major metropolitan city. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Orthopaedic sports medicine providers in the Chicagoland area were identified through the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) surgeon databases. Alternative clinics offering orthobiologic injections were systematically compiled using Yelp! and Google search listings and reviews. Clinics were contacted using a standardized telephone script. Data were collected for each site on the types of injections offered, whether price was disclosed over the telephone, the price of injections offered, and the source of stem cell injections if they were provided. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the mean price between practices. F tests for equality of variances were used to compare the variability in prices between practice types. Results: A total of 25 unique orthopaedic sports medicine practices (comprising 80 AOSSM/AANA surgeons) and 40 alternative clinics offered PRP, stem cell, and/or BMC injections, as indicated over the telephone. There was no difference in likelihood of offering PRP ( P = .698) or BMC injections ( P = .340). However, alternative clinics were significantly more likely to offer stem cell injections ( P < .001). There was no difference in the willingness to disclose the price for PRP ( P = .269), stem cell injections ( P = .302), and BMC ( P = .528) or the source of what each clinic advertised as stem cell injections ( P = .630). The mean price for a single PRP injection was significantly higher ( P = .011) and significantly more variable ( F statistic = .139; P < .001) at alternative clinics. Similarly, the mean price for a single stem cell injection was significantly higher ( P < .001) and significantly more variable ( F statistic = 0.080; P = .025) at alternative clinics. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that orthobiologic knee injections are highly prevalent for in-clinic use within the Chicago metropolitan area, with PRP being the most commonly used therapeutic. When compared with orthopaedic sports medicine providers, alternative clinics were more likely to offer stem cell injections and charge a significantly greater and more variable amount per PRP and stem cell treatment.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

ABSTRACTIntroduction and ObjectiveProcedural therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) most often include intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) injections, sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Despite their proven efficacy, real‐world data on therapy continuation and crossover rates between these modalities remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal patterns of treatment continuation and therapy crossover among women receiving procedural OAB treatments.MethodsWe conducted a multi‐institutional retrospective cohort study of women with idiopathic OAB who underwent index BTX, SNM, or PTNS between 2014 and 2022. Patients were identified using electronic medical records, and follow‐up data were collected through December 31, 2023. The primary outcomes included duration of maintenance treatments and crossover to another procedural therapy for OAB. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis estimated rates of continued treatment, and a log‐rank test assessed differences in crossover rates among treatment groups.ResultsA total of 506 women met inclusion criteria: 266 (52.6%) received BTX, 114 (22.5%) underwent SNM, and 126 (24.9%) received PTNS. Ongoing treatment rates were lowest for PTNS, with only 17.1% maintaining therapy between 3 and 5 years and 26.1% crossing over to another procedure within 3 years. Among BTX patients, 65.2% underwent repeat treatment within 3 years, and 9.5% of patients crossed over to another procedure within 3 years. Of those with 5 or more years of follow‐up, 39.1% of patients continued with BTX procedures in the 3–5‐year follow‐up timeframe. Among SNM patients, the cumulative revision rates were 7.6% at 1 year and 10.9% at 2 years. 13.1% of patients crossed over from SNM to another procedure within 3 years (the vast majority to BTX).ConclusionsPTNS had the lowest ongoing therapy rates and the highest crossover rates. BTX and SNM demonstrated similar crossover rates. These findings underscore the importance of individualized patient counseling and treatment selection based on expectations of therapy persistence. Future research should focus on optimizing patient selection, improving long‐term adherence strategies, and evaluating novel or combined therapeutic approaches for OAB management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Upper limb motor recovery is limited and affects functional outcomes in stroke survivors. Recent randomized controlled trials have assessed the role of combining vagus nerve stimulation with standard neurorehabilitation. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of pairing implanted vagus nerve stimulation (I-VNS) with rehabilitation therapy in ischemic stroke patients and to provide a framework for its integration into standard clinical practice. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for articles published from inception to July 2024. Randomized controlled trials and follow-up studies assessing the efficacy and/or safety of I-VNS in stroke rehabilitation were included. The outcomes included upper limb motor function and adverse events related to intervention. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and a random-effects model was generated for the meta-analysis using the Meta package in R. RESULTS: The final analysis included 8 studies, with a cumulative sample size of n = 498 patients who underwent I-VNS–paired rehabilitation for upper extremity weakness in unilateral supratentorial stroke. The intervention group (I-VNS) included 245 patients (49.1%) whereas the control group had 252 patients (50.6%). The mean age was 59.0 ± 10.01 years in the intervention group and 61.0 ± 9.7 years in the control group. The intervention group included 155 male patients (63.2%), and the control group had 165 male patients (64.4%). The meta-analyses showed statistically significant improvement in upper limb motor function in the I-VNS–paired rehabilitation group with a mean difference of 2.73 (95% CI: 1.32-4.13; P = .04) in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity score. Only one study reported a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature provides high-level evidence that I-VNS–paired rehabilitation improves functional outcomes and has a favorable safety profile in patients with poststroke upper extremity weakness.

Introduction: This study evaluated the impact of parallel-level patient transfers on bed utilization efficiency within the Mayo Clinic Health System in Southern Minnesota, focusing on optimizing resources across tertiary and critical access hospitals. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 179,066 Emergency Department visits (2018–2022) was conducted, with ~2% involving parallel-level transfers for observation or admission. Machine learning was utilized to identify patients suitable for parallel transfers based on demographics, comorbidities, and clinical factors. A Random Forest model with an AUROC of 0.87 guided transfer decisions. Saved patient days were calculated as the difference between the actual LOS and the benchmark LOS based on Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs). Generalized estimating equations analyzed length of stay (LOS) differences, adjusted for confounders, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (v.26). Results: The mean patient age was 56 years (SD = 17.2), with 51.4% being female. Saved patient days increased from ~600 to 5200 days over the study period. Transferred patients had a 5.7% longer unadjusted LOS compared to non-transferred patients (95% CI: 2.9–8.6%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, the LOS difference was not significant (adjusted mean difference: 0.4%, 95% CI: −1.7–2.5%, p = 0.51). Conclusions: Parallel-level transfers increased saved patient days, reflecting enhanced resource utilization. However, the adjusted LOS differences were not significant, highlighting the need for robust transfer protocols and controlled studies to confirm these findings.