Citations

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsWe aimed to assess the impact of setons on perianal fistula outcomes in patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (PFCD) treated with anti‐TNF therapy.MethodsWe included patients treated with their first anti‐TNF therapy for PFCD after undergoing a pelvic MRI between 2005 and 2022 from 6 North American centres. Our exposure was one or more setons at the time of anti‐TNF therapy. Our primary outcome was major adverse fistula outcome (MAFO), a composite of repeat local surgical intervention, hospitalisation, or faecal diversion for PFCD, and our secondary outcome was fistula remission defined clinically. We used 1:1 cardinality matching and propensity score weighting to control for fistula severity based on centrally read MRIs, luminal characteristics, and concomitant therapies.ResultsOur analysis included 221 patients: 81 with setons and 140 without setons. After cardinality matching, our cohorts were balanced (standardised difference < 0.1 for all covariates). Patients with setons had similar rates of MAFO (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 0.68–2.21) and fistula remission at 6 months (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.41–1.59) and 12 months (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31–1.27) compared to patients without setons. Our results remained stable when analysed by propensity score weighting and in a sensitivity analysis of patients who underwent an exam under anaesthesia. In patients with abscesses, there were lower rates of MAFO (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.19–1.25) but not statistically significant in patients with setons.ConclusionsIn this multicentre, setons were not associated with improved fistula outcomes. Future prospective controlled studies are warranted.

Abstract There are ~100 genes or copy number variants (CNVs) used in genetic testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD, or autism). These genes are protein-coding, and the associated phenotypes often extend beyond socio-behavioral traits seen in autism including cognitive/medical complexities, epilepsy, and ADHD. Here, we characterize 27 males with ASD through whole genome sequencing (WGS), delineating X-chromosome microdeletions that implicate the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) PTCHD1-AS as an ASD-susceptibility gene (OR=2.56, p=0.01). Two Ptchd1-as knockout (KO) murine models, created by removing the evolutionarily conserved exon-3, show ASD-like features in males, increasing repetitive behaviors and impairing typical social behavior and communication without overt cognitive comorbidities or ADHD-like behaviors. Hippocampus-dependent synaptic function, complex learning, and locomotor activity are unaffected in KO mice. Native nuclear-enriched mouse Ptchd1-as showed sustained expression from post-natal day-7 onward in the dorsal striatum, a predominantly GABAergic brain region implicated in ASD. Multi-omics revealed transcriptomic alterations in striatal oligodendrocyte, astrocyte and neurons impacting myelination and plasticity pathways. Disrupting Ptchd1-as led to reductions in conventional Protein Kinase-C, altered Src and GSK3α/β phosphorylation, and an enhancement of synaptic plasticity (long-term potentiation and long-term depression). Together, these findings implicate striatal molecular and circuit level dysregulation via Ptchd1-as in ASD etiology.

PURPOSE In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. METHODS ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary. RESULTS Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia. CONCLUSION BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.

AbstractBackgroundLate Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (LOAD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder. Carriers of an ɛ4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) have significantly increased risk of developing LOAD. LOAD is also strongly sex biased. Besides the well‐established role of sex hormones, the impact of genetic sex combined with APOE genotypes has not been studied. Sex chromosome dosage (SCD) is the main genetic difference between females (XX) and males (XY). Despite dosage compensation by X chromosome inactivation (XCI), some X‐linked genes remain expressed from the inactive X (Xi) and are female biased in expression. Many of these genes are related to neurological and immune functions and could contribute to neuroinflammation in AD.MethodTo understand the genetic interactions between autosomal risk (APOE) and sex‐bias in AD, we are generating isogenic sets of hiPSCs with various sex chromosome complements and APOE genotypes. We have derived XXY/XY, XY/X, and XX/X isogenic pairs by reprogramming cells from naturally mosaic individuals or by selective removal of the Xi in vitro. These lines uniquely position us to differentiate the effects of X chromosome dosage and/or presence of a Y chromosome, while minimizing genetic variability and environmental or hormonal confounders. Currently, we are also constructing APOE ɛ3 and ɛ4 alleles in our paired hiPSC lines with differing sex chromosome content using gene editing.ResultStarting from an XXY/XY isogenic pair, we have generated an hiPSC series with six different genotypes of APOE ɛ3/ɛ3, ɛ3/ɛ4 or ɛ4/ɛ4 alleles with either the XXY or XY genotype. Preliminary results in differentiated neural precursor cells show differential expression of sex‐linked genes in relation to SCD. We also observed genome‐wide changes in gene expression and DNA methylation. Subsets of autosomal sex‐biased genes were differentially affected either by X chromosome dosage, presence of a Y, or both.ConclusionThe new hiPSC lines are being differentiated to AD‐relevant cell types, including neurons, microglia, and cortical organoids, for transcriptomic and functional analyses to elucidate how APOE alleles and genetic sex interact to modulate risk in LOAD pathology.