Citations

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation–positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org . Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.

Abstract Objectives We investigated the impact of our laboratory’s reflex testing process for resolving ERBB2 (HER2) status on breast cancer samples that require additional workup after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), per guideline recommendations published in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Methods In total, 500 breast cancer specimens with ERBB2 FISH results in groups 2 through 4 (all reported as immunohistochemistry [IHC] equivocal [2+] at external laboratories) were resubmitted for IHC testing in our laboratory. Per the ASCO/CAP guideline, FISH was rescored when internal IHC was also equivocal (2+), targeted to tumor areas demonstrating more intense IHC staining, if observed. Results Reflex IHC/FISH testing changed the final reported ERBB2 status in 185 of 500 (37.0%) samples. Result changes included discordant IHC (n = 4 score 0, n = 132 score 1+, and n = 16 score 3+) and discordant FISH (n = 33). Numerical differences in FISH scores were comparable for targeted vs nontargeted FISH rescoring (P = .086 for ERBB2 copy number; P = .49 for ERBB2 ratio). Two cases showed larger differences in FISH scores, suggesting heterogeneity. Conclusions Retesting of breast cancer samples with equivocal IHC frequently changes IHC results, but targeted reanalysis of borderline FISH results rarely identifies significant differences in ERBB2 copy number or ratio.

Abstract Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have improved outcomes when treated with pediatric-inspired regimens. CALGB 10403 was the largest prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of using a pediatric regimen in AYAs with acute lymphoblastic leukemia up to 40 years of age. This article presents the toxicity events observed in the CALGB 10403 study and compares these toxicities vs those observed among AYAs treated on the same arm of the companion Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0232 study. Toxicities in CALGB 10403 were similar to those observed in COG AALL0232. Some grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more often reported in CALGB 10403 compared with COG AALL0232 (hyperglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminase elevation, and febrile neutropenia). Adverse events correlated with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and some with increasing age. The mortality rate in CALGB 10403 was low (4%) and similar to that in the COG AALL0232 trial. A caveat to this analysis is that only 39% of CALGB 10403 patients completed all planned protocol treatment. In COG AALL0232, although 74% of patients aged <18 years completed treatment, only 57% of patients aged ≥18 years completed treatment. This scenario suggests that issues associated with age and treating physician may be a factor. Due to its improved survival rates compared with historical controls, the CALGB 10403 regimen is now a standard of care. The hope is that the rate of protocol completion will increase as more familiarity is gained with this regimen. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00558519 (CALGB 10403) and #NCT00075725 (COG AALL0232).

Abstract Objective We sought to assess factors associated with the frequency of self‐reported prescription opioid use in persons with migraine, including demographic variables, comorbidities, headache characteristics, and patterns of consultation. Background Despite the dose‐dependent effect of opioids on migraine progression and the association with negative outcomes, migraine treatment often includes opioids. The Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment Study focuses on individuals with migraine who receive prescription acute medications, including those receiving and those not receiving opioids. Methods This web‐based panel survey identified people in the United States with migraine using a validated screener. This analysis stratified people with migraine into 4 groups based on days of monthly opioid use: non‐opioid users, ≤3 days, 4‒9 days, and ≥10 days per month. Results Of 15,133 respondents with migraine, 4701 (31%) reported acute prescription medication use for headache/migraine in the previous 3 months (mean age 45 years, 71.6% [3367/4701] female), of whom 32.5% (1528/4701) reported opioid use. About one‐third of respondents with primary care or neurology consults in the prior 6 months reported receiving an opioid, and more than half of respondents (209/391, 53.5%) with a pain clinic consultation did so. Models compared those using opioids ≤3 days/month (879/4701, 18.7%), 4‒9 days/month (304/4701, 6.5%), ≥10 days/month (345/4701, 7.3%) to non‐opioid users (3173/4701, 67.5%). Compared to non‐opioid users, infrequent users (≤3 days/month) were more likely to be male and less likely to have chronic migraine or to screen positive for anxiety and depression; and frequent opioid users (the 4‒9 days/month and the ≥10 days/month groups) were more likely to be male, to smoke, to be obese, to report greater pain interference, to have moderate to severe disability, to have symptoms of anxiety and depression, to use fewer triptans and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, and to have poor acute treatment optimization. Conclusion Among prescription medication users, this cross‐sectional analysis shows that increasing use of prescription opioids is associated with male gender, chronic migraine, more severe disability, anxiety and depression, poor acute treatment optimization, and treatment in a pain clinic.

AbstractBackground APOEε4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for AD[1]. Although plasma apoE does not cross the blood‐brain‐barrier[2], altered plasma apoE levels have been linked to increased risk of AD[3] and to unfavorable CSF Aβ42 and tau levels[4]. Translation of results from studies of apoE in rodents to the human situation is difficult due species‐specific difference for instance in lipid metabolism[5]. Here we have studied the effects of a humanized APOEε4 liver[6] on synaptic integrity, insulin signaling and gliosis in a mouse model that reproduces the human plasma profile and that retains its endogenous apoE expression in the brain.MethodTissue samples from the cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and thalamus were obtained from FRGN mice with humanized APOEε2/ε3 (n=4) versus APOEε4/ε4 (n=8) livers, and from APOEε3/ε3 (n=3) and APOEε4/ε4 (n=3) TR mice. Using established protocols[7], nuclei‐ and synaptosome‐enriched, and synaptosome‐depleted fractions were generated and analyzed for contents of markers relating to synapse integrity, gliosis and insulin signaling using western blotting. Levels of apoE4 were assessed in plasma from FRGN mice with humanized APOEε4/ε4 livers.ResultCortical and hippocampal levels of endogenous apoE, cortical levels of tubulin‐βIII, AMPAR, NMDAR, bassoon, mTOR, pAkt and a‐synuclein as well as hippocampal levels of synaptophysin, EAAT2, GFAP, NMDAR, pmTORS2448 and pIRS616 were reduced in FRGN mice with humanized APOEε4/ε4 versus APOEε2/ε3 livers (p≤0.05). Several of these findings were recapitulated in brain tissues from APOEε4/ε4 versus APOEε3/ε3 TR mice (p≤0.05). In both mouse models we observed a shift of a‐synuclein content from the synaptosomal (reduction) to the extra‐synaptosomal (increase) compartment (p<0.05). Altered expression levels of synaptic markers were also found in the thalamus and to a lesser extent in the cerebellum. Plasma levels of apoE appeared lower in the humanized APOEε4/ε4 liver mice and correlated positively to cortical levels of endogenous apoE but negatively to various markers of synaptic integrity and insulin signaling mainly in the hippocampus.ConclusionWe here provide the first evidence of a profound and negative effect of a liver APOEε4 phenotype in a human‐like setting, on key markers related to brain synaptic integrity, insulin signaling and glial cells involved in neuroinflammation.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.

AbstractBackgroundDifferences in the effectiveness of neuromodulator treatments for horizontal forehead lines dependent on depth of product administration have been described. However, knowledge in respect to the fascial anatomy of the forehead still remains elusive.AimsTo relate the fascial anatomy of the forehead to the effectiveness of neuromodulator treatments by conducting a clinical, prospective, interventional split‐face study in which injections for the treatment of horizontal forehead lines are performed differently between facial sides.MethodsThis study included a total of n = 14 patients with a mean age of 35.71 (7.8) years and mean body mass index of 21.9 (3.0) kg/m2. One side of the forehead was injected superficially by positioning the product in the superficial fatty layer, whereas the contralateral side was injected deep targeting the supraperiosteal plane (random selection). The treatment outcome was rated by the physician and by two independent observers according to a forehead line severity scale (0‐4) at 14 and at 30 days.ResultsAll three observers agreed in their ratings (ICC: 0.942) that the deep injection technique resulted in a superior outcome: D14 (superficial vs deep) 0.17 (0.4) vs 0.14 (0.4; P = .583) at rest and 1.26 (0.6) vs 0.43 (0.5; P < .001) for frontalis contraction; D30 0.17 (0.4) vs 0.14 (0.3) at rest (P = .583) and 1.21 (0.6) vs 0.43 (0.5; P < .001) for frontalis contraction.ConclusionThe results of this study underscore how detailed anatomic knowledge can enhance results of aesthetic interventions, in this case horizontal forehead line treatment with neuromodulators.

Abstract Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias during exercise and emotions which may lead to sudden cardiac death. Beta-blockers (BB) are the mainstay of therapy in patients with CPVT, but studies comparing the efficacy of different types of BB are scarce. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of different types of BB in reducing the ventricular arrhythmia (VA) severity on exercise stress test (EST) in patients with CPVT. Data was derived from the International CPVT Registry, a large retrospective cohort study. We included patients who had an EST before (pre-EST) and after start of BB (post-EST). We divided the cohort into five groups based on the first prescribed BB and compared pre-EST and post-EST. We included 428 patients (median age 18.5 [11.7–39.6] years, 240 (56.%) female), 155 (36.2%) probands) of whom 38 (8.9%) used atenolol, 131 (30.6%) bisoprolol, 82 (19.2%) metoprolol, 124 (29.0%) nadolol and 53 (12.4%) propranolol. Sex and history of aborted cardiac arrest were similar in all groups. The age at start of BB differed (p&lt;0,001): patients using bisoprolol were oldest (35.0 [15.7–35.3]) while patients using propranolol were youngest (12.3 [8.8–24.9]). Median daily BB dose in mg/kg was: 1.0 [0.8–2.3] for atenolol, 0.06 [0.05–0.10] for bisoprolol, 0.9 [0.6–1.5] for metoprolol, 1.1 [0.9–1.6] for nadolol and 1.5 [1.1–2.8] for propranolol. Resting heart rate on pre-EST and post-EST was similar in all groups. Patients using metoprolol had a significantly higher maximum heart rate post-EST compared to nadolol and propranolol (161±18 vs 136±19 and 130±22 bpm, p=0,002 and p=0,001, respectively). The VA severity decreased significantly after BB (147 (37.9%) (non-sustained) ventricular tachycardia ((NS)VT) and 120 (30.9%) no or isolated ventricular premature beat (iVPB) pre-EST vs 46 (11.4%) (NS)VT and 184 (45.7%) iVPB post-EST, p&lt;0,001). Examining the different groups, the VA severity decreased significantly after BB in all but atenolol (13 (40.6%) (NS)VT and 8 (25.0%) iVPB pre-EST vs 9 (25.0%) (NS)VT and 15 (41.7%) iVPB post-EST, p=0,103). Based on these results we conclude that all beta-blockers except atenolol are effective in reducing the VA severity on EST in patients with CPVT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): E-Rare Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2015 “Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Integrating Clinical and Basic Science”