Till, Janice

BACKGROUND: In severely affected patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, beta-blockers are often insufficiently protective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether flecainide is associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmic events (AEs) when added to beta-blockers in a large cohort of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: From 2 international registries, this multicenter case cross-over study included patients with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in whom flecainide was added to beta-blocker therapy. The study period was defined as the period in which background therapy (ie, beta-blocker type [beta1-selective or nonselective]), left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients and was divided into pre-flecainide and on-flecainide periods. The primary end point was AEs, defined as sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The association of flecainide with AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming negative binomial distribution and random effects for patients. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (123 [50%] females; median age at start of flecainide, 18 years [interquartile range, 14–29]; median flecainide dose, 2.2 mg/kg per day [interquartile range, 1.7–3.1]) were included. At baseline, all patients used a beta-blocker, 70 (28%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 21 (9%) had a left cardiac sympathetic denervation. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4–7.2), 41 patients (17%) experienced 58 AEs (annual event rate, 5.6%). During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.0–6.0), 23 patients (9%) experienced 38 AEs (annual event rate, 4.0%). There were significantly fewer AEs after initiation of flecainide (incidence rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.38–0.83]; P =0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or during the pre-flecainide period (n=167), flecainide was associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31–0.77]; P =0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on beta-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was also associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14–0.45]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, adding flecainide to beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of AEs in the overall cohort, in symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs while on beta-blocker therapy.

Abstract Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias during exercise and emotions which may lead to sudden cardiac death. Beta-blockers (BB) are the mainstay of therapy in patients with CPVT, but studies comparing the efficacy of different types of BB are scarce. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of different types of BB in reducing the ventricular arrhythmia (VA) severity on exercise stress test (EST) in patients with CPVT. Data was derived from the International CPVT Registry, a large retrospective cohort study. We included patients who had an EST before (pre-EST) and after start of BB (post-EST). We divided the cohort into five groups based on the first prescribed BB and compared pre-EST and post-EST. We included 428 patients (median age 18.5 [11.7–39.6] years, 240 (56.%) female), 155 (36.2%) probands) of whom 38 (8.9%) used atenolol, 131 (30.6%) bisoprolol, 82 (19.2%) metoprolol, 124 (29.0%) nadolol and 53 (12.4%) propranolol. Sex and history of aborted cardiac arrest were similar in all groups. The age at start of BB differed (p&lt;0,001): patients using bisoprolol were oldest (35.0 [15.7–35.3]) while patients using propranolol were youngest (12.3 [8.8–24.9]). Median daily BB dose in mg/kg was: 1.0 [0.8–2.3] for atenolol, 0.06 [0.05–0.10] for bisoprolol, 0.9 [0.6–1.5] for metoprolol, 1.1 [0.9–1.6] for nadolol and 1.5 [1.1–2.8] for propranolol. Resting heart rate on pre-EST and post-EST was similar in all groups. Patients using metoprolol had a significantly higher maximum heart rate post-EST compared to nadolol and propranolol (161±18 vs 136±19 and 130±22 bpm, p=0,002 and p=0,001, respectively). The VA severity decreased significantly after BB (147 (37.9%) (non-sustained) ventricular tachycardia ((NS)VT) and 120 (30.9%) no or isolated ventricular premature beat (iVPB) pre-EST vs 46 (11.4%) (NS)VT and 184 (45.7%) iVPB post-EST, p&lt;0,001). Examining the different groups, the VA severity decreased significantly after BB in all but atenolol (13 (40.6%) (NS)VT and 8 (25.0%) iVPB pre-EST vs 9 (25.0%) (NS)VT and 15 (41.7%) iVPB post-EST, p=0,103). Based on these results we conclude that all beta-blockers except atenolol are effective in reducing the VA severity on EST in patients with CPVT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): E-Rare Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2015 “Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Integrating Clinical and Basic Science”

Abstract Aims In patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are sometimes ineffective and may even trigger fatal electrical storms. We assessed the efficacy and complications of ICDs placed in patients with CPVT who presented with a sentinel event of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) while undiagnosed and therefore untreated. Methods and results We analysed 136 patients who presented with SCA and in whom CPVT was diagnosed subsequently, leading to the initiation of guideline-directed therapy, including β-blockers, flecainide, and/or left cardiac sympathetic denervation. An ICD was implanted in 79 patients (58.1%). The primary outcome of the study was sudden cardiac death (SCD). The secondary outcomes were composite outcomes of SCD, SCA, appropriate ICD shocks, and syncope. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, SCD had occurred in three patients (3.8%) with an ICD and none of the patients without an ICD (P = 0.1). SCD, SCA, or appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 37 patients (46.8%) with an ICD and 9 patients (15.8%) without an ICD (P &lt; 0.0001). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred in 19 patients (24.7%) and other device-related complications in 22 patients (28.9%). Conclusion In previously undiagnosed patients with CPVT who presented with SCA, an ICD was not associated with improved survival. Instead, the ICD was associated with both a high rate of appropriate ICD shocks and inappropriate ICD shocks along with other device-related complications. Strict adherence to guideline-directed therapy without an ICD may provide adequate protection in these patients without all the potential disadvantages of an ICD.