Kammeraad, Janneke A.E.

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events (AEs) even while treated with β-blockers. The aim was to develop a model for individualized prediction of AEs in patients with RYR2-mediated CPVT on β-blocker monotherapy. Methods The derivation and independent validation cohorts included 743 and 129 patients, respectively. AEs were defined as arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), and sudden cardiac death. Near-fatal or fatal AEs (nf/fAEs) included all AEs except for arrhythmic syncope. Prediction models using Cox regression were developed and internally and externally validated. Results A total of 102 (13.7%) patients in the derivation cohort and 24 (18.6%) patients in the validation cohort experienced ≥1 AE over a median follow-up of 5.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.7] and 2.4 (IQR, 4.4) years, respectively. Predictors of AE were arrhythmic syncope or SCA prior to diagnosis and age at β-blocker initiation. In the derivation and validation cohorts, the optimism-corrected C-indices of the models for AE were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–0.72] and 0.59 (95% CI 0.48–0.71), respectively. For nf/fAEs, ventricular arrhythmia severity before β-blocker initiation was a fourth independent predictor, and C-indices of the models in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47–0.72), respectively. In the derivation cohort, calibration slopes were 1.00 (95% CI 0.59–1.41) for AE and 1.00 (95% CI 0.69–1.32) for nf/fAE. Conclusions These externally validated risk prediction models using clinical parameters accurately distinguished CPVT patients on β-blocker monotherapy at low and high risk for future AEs while treated with β-blockers. These models provide guidance for implementation of clinical management therapies to prevent AEs in patients with CPVT.

Abstract Aims In patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), a rare inherited arrhythmia syndrome, arrhythmic events can be prevented by medication and lifestyle recommendations. In patients who experience breakthrough arrhythmic events, non-adherence plays an essential role. We aimed to investigate the incidence and potential reasons for non-adherence to medication and lifestyle recommendations in a large, international cohort of patients with CPVT. Methods and results An online multilingual survey was shared with CPVT patients worldwide by their cardiologists, through peer-recruitment, and on social media from November 2022 until July 2023. Self-reported non-adherence was measured using the validated Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and a newly developed questionnaire about lifestyle. Additionally, validated questionnaires were used to assess potential reasons for medication non-adherence. Two-hundred-and-eighteen patients completed the survey, of whom 200 (92%) were prescribed medication [122 (61%) female; median age 33.5 years (interquartile range: 22–50)]. One-hundred-and-three (52%) were prescribed beta-blocker and flecainide, 85 (43%) beta-blocker, and 11 (6%) flecainide. Thirty-four (17%) patients experienced a syncope, aborted cardiac arrest or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock after diagnosis. Nineteen (13.4%) patients were exercising more than recommended. Thirty (15%) patients were non-adherent to medication. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–12.0, P = 0.019], flecainide monotherapy compared to combination therapy (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.6–31.0, P = 0.010), and a higher agreement with statements regarding concerns about CPVT medication (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3, P < 0.001) were independently associated with non-adherence. Conclusion The significant rate of non-adherence associated with concerns regarding CPVT-related medication, emphasizes the potential for improving therapy adherence by targeted patient education.

BACKGROUND: In severely affected patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, beta-blockers are often insufficiently protective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether flecainide is associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmic events (AEs) when added to beta-blockers in a large cohort of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: From 2 international registries, this multicenter case cross-over study included patients with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in whom flecainide was added to beta-blocker therapy. The study period was defined as the period in which background therapy (ie, beta-blocker type [beta1-selective or nonselective]), left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients and was divided into pre-flecainide and on-flecainide periods. The primary end point was AEs, defined as sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The association of flecainide with AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming negative binomial distribution and random effects for patients. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (123 [50%] females; median age at start of flecainide, 18 years [interquartile range, 14–29]; median flecainide dose, 2.2 mg/kg per day [interquartile range, 1.7–3.1]) were included. At baseline, all patients used a beta-blocker, 70 (28%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 21 (9%) had a left cardiac sympathetic denervation. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4–7.2), 41 patients (17%) experienced 58 AEs (annual event rate, 5.6%). During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.0–6.0), 23 patients (9%) experienced 38 AEs (annual event rate, 4.0%). There were significantly fewer AEs after initiation of flecainide (incidence rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.38–0.83]; P =0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or during the pre-flecainide period (n=167), flecainide was associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31–0.77]; P =0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on beta-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was also associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14–0.45]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, adding flecainide to beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of AEs in the overall cohort, in symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs while on beta-blocker therapy.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the ZonMW Priority Medicines for Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs (grant 113304045 to Dr Van der Werf) and the Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative: the Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Federation of University Medical Centres, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (PREDICT2 to Dr. Wilde). Background In patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), β-blocker may be insufficiently protective. A randomized clinical trial showed that flecainide reduces ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in CPVT and small retrospective cohort studies suggest that this translates into a reduction of arrhythmic events. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of flecainide when added to β-blockers for the prevention of arrhythmic events (AE) in a large cohort of patients with CPVT using paired analysis. Methods From two international registries, this multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients with a clinical and/or genetic diagnosis of CPVT using flecainide as an adjunct to β-blockers. The study period, which comprised a pre- and on-flecianide period, was defined as the period in which background therapy, i.e. β-blocker type (β1-selective or nonselective), left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients. The primary endpoint was AEs, defined as SCD, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), appropriate ICD shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The effect of flecainide on AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming Poisson distribution and random effects for patients. Results Two-hundred forty-seven patients (median age at start of flecainide 18 years [IQR 14-29], 123 [50%] female, median flecainide dose 2.2 mg/kg/day [IQR 1.7-3.1]) were included. At baseline, 70 (28%) patients had an ICD and 21 (9%) had a LCSD performed. Nonselective β-blockers were used by 133 (54%) patients. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 0.4-7.2), 41 patients experienced 58 AEs. During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (IQR 1.0-6.0), 23 patients experienced 38 AEs. There was a significant reduction in AEs after initiation of flecainide (OR 0.55 [0.38-0.83]; p=0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or before the initiation of flecainide (n=167), flecainide was associated with a significant reduction in AEs (OR 0.49 [0.31-0.77]; p=0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on β-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was associated with a significant reduction in AEs (OR 0.25 [0.14-0.45]; p&lt;0.001). Conclusion Flecainide was associated with a reduction in AEs when added to β-blockers in patients with CPVT in the overall cohort, symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs on β-blocker therapy.

Background: Symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for recurrent arrhythmic events. β-Blockers decrease this risk, but studies comparing individual β-blockers in sizeable cohorts are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between risk for arrhythmic events and type of β-blocker in a large cohort of symptomatic children with CPVT. Methods: From 2 international registries of patients with CPVT, RYR2 variant–carrying symptomatic children (defined as syncope or sudden cardiac arrest before β-blocker initiation and age at start of β-blocker therapy <18 years), treated with a β-blocker were included. Cox regression analyses with time-dependent covariates for β-blockers and potential confounders were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR). The primary outcome was the first occurrence of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or syncope. The secondary outcome was the first occurrence of any of the primary outcomes except syncope. Results: We included 329 patients (median age at diagnosis, 12 [interquartile range, 7–15] years, 35% females). Ninety-nine (30.1%) patients experienced the primary outcome and 74 (22.5%) experienced the secondary outcome during a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range, 2.8–12.5) years. Two-hundred sixteen patients (66.0%) used a nonselective β-blocker (predominantly nadolol [n=140] or propranolol [n=70]) and 111 (33.7%) used a β1-selective β-blocker (predominantly atenolol [n=51], metoprolol [n=33], or bisoprolol [n=19]) as initial β-blocker. Baseline characteristics did not differ. The HRs for both the primary and secondary outcomes were higher for β1-selective compared with nonselective β-blockers (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.31–3.17]; and HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.20–3.30], respectively). When assessed separately, the HR for the primary outcome was higher for atenolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.44–4.99]), bisoprolol (HR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.47–7.18]), and metoprolol (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.08–4.40]) compared with nadolol, but did not differ from propranolol. The HR of the secondary outcome was only higher in atenolol compared with nadolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.30–5.55]). Conclusions: β1-selective β-blockers were associated with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmic events in symptomatic children with CPVT compared with nonselective β-blockers, specifically nadolol. Nadolol, or propranolol if nadolol is unavailable, should be the preferred β-blocker for treating symptomatic children with CPVT.

Abstract Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias during exercise and emotions which may lead to sudden cardiac death. Beta-blockers (BB) are the mainstay of therapy in patients with CPVT, but studies comparing the efficacy of different types of BB are scarce. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of different types of BB in reducing the ventricular arrhythmia (VA) severity on exercise stress test (EST) in patients with CPVT. Data was derived from the International CPVT Registry, a large retrospective cohort study. We included patients who had an EST before (pre-EST) and after start of BB (post-EST). We divided the cohort into five groups based on the first prescribed BB and compared pre-EST and post-EST. We included 428 patients (median age 18.5 [11.7–39.6] years, 240 (56.%) female), 155 (36.2%) probands) of whom 38 (8.9%) used atenolol, 131 (30.6%) bisoprolol, 82 (19.2%) metoprolol, 124 (29.0%) nadolol and 53 (12.4%) propranolol. Sex and history of aborted cardiac arrest were similar in all groups. The age at start of BB differed (p&lt;0,001): patients using bisoprolol were oldest (35.0 [15.7–35.3]) while patients using propranolol were youngest (12.3 [8.8–24.9]). Median daily BB dose in mg/kg was: 1.0 [0.8–2.3] for atenolol, 0.06 [0.05–0.10] for bisoprolol, 0.9 [0.6–1.5] for metoprolol, 1.1 [0.9–1.6] for nadolol and 1.5 [1.1–2.8] for propranolol. Resting heart rate on pre-EST and post-EST was similar in all groups. Patients using metoprolol had a significantly higher maximum heart rate post-EST compared to nadolol and propranolol (161±18 vs 136±19 and 130±22 bpm, p=0,002 and p=0,001, respectively). The VA severity decreased significantly after BB (147 (37.9%) (non-sustained) ventricular tachycardia ((NS)VT) and 120 (30.9%) no or isolated ventricular premature beat (iVPB) pre-EST vs 46 (11.4%) (NS)VT and 184 (45.7%) iVPB post-EST, p&lt;0,001). Examining the different groups, the VA severity decreased significantly after BB in all but atenolol (13 (40.6%) (NS)VT and 8 (25.0%) iVPB pre-EST vs 9 (25.0%) (NS)VT and 15 (41.7%) iVPB post-EST, p=0,103). Based on these results we conclude that all beta-blockers except atenolol are effective in reducing the VA severity on EST in patients with CPVT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): E-Rare Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2015 “Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Integrating Clinical and Basic Science”

Background: Risk stratification in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia remains ill defined. Heart rate recovery (HRR) immediately after exercise is regulated by autonomic reflexes, particularly vagal tone, and may be associated with symptoms and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Our objective was to evaluate whether HRR after maximal exercise on the exercise stress test (EST) is associated with symptoms and ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included patients ≤65 years of age with an EST without antiarrhythmic drugs who attained at least 80% of their age- and sex-predicted maximal HR. HRR in the recovery phase was calculated as the difference in heart rate (HR) at maximal exercise and at 1 minute in the recovery phase (ΔHRR1′). Results: We included 187 patients (median age, 36 years; 68 [36%] symptomatic before diagnosis). Pre-EST HR and maximal HR were equal among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis had a greater ΔHRR1′ after maximal exercise (43 [interquartile range, 25–58] versus 25 [interquartile range, 19–34] beats/min; P <0.001). Corrected for age, sex, and relatedness, patients in the upper tertile for ΔHRR1′ had an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% CI, 1.6–7.4) of being symptomatic before diagnosis ( P <0.001). In addition, ΔHRR1′ was higher in patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias at EST off antiarrhythmic drugs (33 [interquartile range, 22–48] versus 27 [interquartile range, 20–36] beats/min; P =0.01). After diagnosis, patients with a ΔHRR1′ in the upper tertile of its distribution had significantly more arrhythmic events as compared with patients in the other tertiles ( P =0.045). Conclusions: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia patients with a larger HRR following exercise are more likely to be symptomatic and have complex ventricular arrhythmias during the first EST off antiarrhythmic drug.

Abstract Aims In patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are sometimes ineffective and may even trigger fatal electrical storms. We assessed the efficacy and complications of ICDs placed in patients with CPVT who presented with a sentinel event of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) while undiagnosed and therefore untreated. Methods and results We analysed 136 patients who presented with SCA and in whom CPVT was diagnosed subsequently, leading to the initiation of guideline-directed therapy, including β-blockers, flecainide, and/or left cardiac sympathetic denervation. An ICD was implanted in 79 patients (58.1%). The primary outcome of the study was sudden cardiac death (SCD). The secondary outcomes were composite outcomes of SCD, SCA, appropriate ICD shocks, and syncope. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, SCD had occurred in three patients (3.8%) with an ICD and none of the patients without an ICD (P = 0.1). SCD, SCA, or appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 37 patients (46.8%) with an ICD and 9 patients (15.8%) without an ICD (P &lt; 0.0001). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred in 19 patients (24.7%) and other device-related complications in 22 patients (28.9%). Conclusion In previously undiagnosed patients with CPVT who presented with SCA, an ICD was not associated with improved survival. Instead, the ICD was associated with both a high rate of appropriate ICD shocks and inappropriate ICD shocks along with other device-related complications. Strict adherence to guideline-directed therapy without an ICD may provide adequate protection in these patients without all the potential disadvantages of an ICD.