Citations

Abstract Disclosure: R.S. Douglas: Consulting Fee; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc, Immunovant, Viridian. S. Couch: None. S.T. Wester: Advisory Board Member; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. Consulting Fee; Self; Immunovant, Sling. B. Fowler: Consulting Fee; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. C. Liu: Other; Self; Walter Kluwer Health. P. Subramanian: Consulting Fee; Self; Gensight, Horizon Therapeutics plc, Viridian. R. Tang: Consulting Fee; Self; Viridian, Alexion, Valenza. Research Investigator; Self; Viridian, Horizon Therapeutics plc, Novartis, Immunovant, Vasaragen. Speaker; Self; Serono Speaker Journal Club. Q.T. Nguyen: None. K. Hsu: Employee; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. Stock Owner; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. M. Karon: Employee; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. Stock Owner; Self; Horizon Therapeutics plc. M.N. Stan: Consulting Fee; Self; Immunovant, Horizon Therapeutics plc, Sling, Genentech, ArgenX. Background: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is characterized by expansion of peri- and retro-orbital fat and muscle, often resulting in disfiguring proptosis (eye-bulging) and diplopia (double vision) which may persist chronically. Teprotumumab, an inhibitor of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, demonstrated improvements in proptosis, diplopia, inflammation and quality of life in clinical trials in patients with TED history of short duration (6-13 months), and active disease (clinical activity score [CAS] ≥4). In a published study of 31 patients with CAS≤3 and TED duration >2 years, teprotumumab reduced proptosis, diplopia and inflammation.1 We have undertaken the first randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial to evaluate teprotumumab in patients with chronic/inactive/low CAS TED. The trial has completed randomization with results available in May 2023. Here we report characteristics of the randomized patients. Methods: The trial (NCT04583735) is being conducted in 11 centers in the United States. Key inclusion criteria were age≥18 years, TED duration ≥2 years but <10 years and CAS≤1 in both eyes, ≥3mm proptosis from baseline and/normal for sex and race, or no progression in proptosis or diplopia or new inflammatory symptoms in the preceding year. Patients must have been euthyroid or mildly hypo/hyperthyroid, and not require surgical intervention through the trial. Patients could not have received teprotumumab previously, or steroids within 3 weeks before screening. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 8 infusions of teprotumumab (10 mg/kg for the first infusion and 20 mg/kg for the remaining 7 infusions) or PBO once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint is improvement in proptosis (mm) as compared with PBO from baseline at Week 24. Other endpoints include percentage of proptosis responders (improvement of ≥2mm), diplopia responders (improvement of ≥1 grade in diplopia on the Bahn-Gorman scale, 0-3), and improvement in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy- Quality of Life (GO-QoL), all at Week 24. Adverse events (AE) and AE of special interest will be reported. Results: 62 patients were randomized. 80.6% are female, mean (SD) age was 48.7 (14.94) years. 54.8% are White, 24.2 %, Black or African American, and 12.9%, Asian. Mean (SD) TED duration was 5.2 (1.77) years. 87.1% are never/former smokers. At baseline, mean (SD) proptosis in the study eye was 24.4 (2.94) mm, and mean (SD) CAS was 0.4 (0.49). 27.4% had binocular diplopia with a mean diplopia score of 2. The mean overall GO-QoL score was 63.9 indicating similar disutility as observed in the acute trial population (previously published). Results from this 24-week trial will be presented. Conclusions: Despite a long duration of TED and low “activity”, patients enrolled in this trial have high levels of proptosis and impaired quality of life at baseline. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Abstract Disclosure: R.S. Douglas: Consulting Fee; Self; Horizon, Immunovant, Viridian. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. S. Couch: Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. S.T. Wester: Advisory Board Member; Self; Horizon. Consulting Fee; Self; Immunovant, Sling. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. B.T. Fowler: Consulting Fee; Self; Horizon. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. C. Liu: Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. Other; Self; Royalties from Wolters-Kluwer. P. Subramanian: Consulting Fee; Self; Horizon, Gensight, Viridian. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. R. Tang: Consulting Fee; Self; Viridian, Alexion, Valenza. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon, Viridian, Novartis, Immunovant, Vasaragen. Speaker; Self; Serono Journal Club. Q.T. Nguyen: Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. R.N. Maamari: Research Investigator; Self; Horizon. K. Hsu: Employee; Self; Horizon. Stock Owner; Self; Horizon. M. Karon: Employee; Self; Horizon. Stock Owner; Self; Horizon. M. Stan: Consulting Fee; Self; Septerna Inc, Third Rock Ventures LLC, Genentech, MedicXi Ventures, ArgenX US Inc, Tourmaline Bio, Lassen Therapeutics, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Siemens Healthcare, Tolmar Inc, OSE, Immunotherapeutics, Roivant Sciences. Research Investigator; Self; Horizon, Immunovant, ValenzaBio, Sling Therapeutics. Background: Early inflammatory thyroid eye disease (TED) gives way to chronic disease which may lead to long-term disfiguring proptosis (eye-bulging). Teprotumumab, an IGF-1 receptor inhibitor, significantly improved signs and symptoms of newly diagnosed TED (6-13 months) with active disease (clinical activity score [CAS] ≥4) in prior studies. We present data from the first randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial (NCT04583735) with teprotumumab in chronic/low CAS TED, where disease has not regressed. Methods: Pts met all following criteria: ≥18 yrs, TED 2-10 yrs, inactive disease or >1 yr without progression in proptosis/diplopia/new symptoms, baseline (BL) CAS≤1, increased proptosis ≥3mm before TED or from normal, euthyroid/mildly hypo/hyperthyroid, no prior teprotumumab and no steroids within 3 wks of screen. Pts received teprotumumab or PBO once every 3 wks for 21 wks. Primary endpoint was improvement in proptosis(mm) from BL at Wk 24 vs PBO. Secondarily proptosis responders (≥2mm improvement), diplopia responders (≥1 grade improvement on Gorman scale 0-3) with resolved diplopia (grade 0) and improvement in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy-QoL (GO-QoL) visual function (VF) and appearance (AP) subscales were assessed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and AEs of special interest are reported. Study was solely sized/powered for proptosis. Results: 62 pts were randomized 2:1 (ITT, teprotumumab:42; PBO:20), 80.6% were female, mean(SD) age was 48.7(14.94) yrs. Mean(SD) TED duration was 5.2(1.8) yrs. 87.1% were never/former smokers. At BL, mean(SD) proptosis was 24.4(2.94) mm, mean CAS was 0.4, and 29% (teprotumumab, n=14, PBO, n=4) had diplopia with a mean score ∼2. 93%(39) of teprotumumab pts completed the study. At Wk 24, proptosis improvements from BL were significantly greater in the teprotumumab group [2.41 (0.228) mm] vs PBO [0.92(0.323) mm], P<.001. Proptosis response was observed in 26/42 (62%) of teprotumumab pts vs 5/20 (25%) of PBO, P=.01. Diplopia improvement was observed in 6/14 (43%) teprotumumab pts with resolved diplopia in 4(29%) vs 2/4(50%) in PBO and 1(25%) resolved. Significantly greater improvement from BL was observed on GO-QoL-VF for teprotumumab (8.73) vs PBO (2.41), P=.03. Change from BL on AP was 10.03 vs 7.19, P= .65. TEAEs proportions were similar: 33/41(80.5%) of teprotumumab, and 16/20(80%) of PBO pts. Hyperglycemia was reported in 6(15%) vs 2(10%) and hearing impairment in 9(22%) vs 2(10%), respectively. There were two AE discontinuations: teprotumumab (left ear conductive hearing loss with congenital anomaly) and PBO (infusion related). Conclusions: For the first time in pts with longstanding TED and low CAS/inflammation, a medical therapy, teprotumumab, produced significant improvement in proptosis as compared with PBO supporting its use regardless of TED duration or activity. The safety profile was comparable to that previously reported. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Introduction: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered >300 associations for CAD. Few loci are functionally characterized and may represent new mechanisms of disease. Hypothesis: Can an unbiased transcriptional screen for the >2000 candidate GWAS genes in endothelial cells (ECs) identify causal genes and disease-relevant pathways at CAD GWAS loci. Methods: We applied CRISPRi-Perturb-seq to knock down expression of genes within 500 Kb of coronary artery disease GWAS loci (2,300 genes in total) and measure their transcriptomic effects using single-cell RNA-seq. Validation of candidate causal genes was conducted in primary human ECs and zebrafish. Results: We identified 50 programs of co-expressed genes, which represent core cellular pathways (i.e. ribosome biogenesis) and 13 EC-specific pathways such as flow response and angiogenesis. The EC-specific programs show the greatest contribution to CAD heritability. 5 EC-specific programs have the greatest number of GWAS candidate genes. We find that 43 of 306 CAD GWAS signals converge onto these 5 gene programs, and all are regulated by genes in the cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) pathway—which coordinates KLF2/4 transcriptional responses in endothelial cells, but has not been linked to CAD risk. The strongest regulator of these programs is TLNRD1 , which we show is a new CAD gene and novel regulator of the CCM pathway. TLNRD1 loss-of-function alters actin organization and barrier function in endothelial cells in vitro , and heart development in zebrafish in vivo . Conclusions: High-throughput functional analysis of 2,300 genes proximal to CAD GWAS loci prioritized pathways—such as angiogenesis and EC migration—that are regulated by multiple risk SNPs. Our study identifies new genes that likely influence risk for CAD, identifies convergence of CAD genes into certain pathways in endothelial cells, and prioritizes study of genes in the CCM-signaling pathway for contribution to CAD risk.

ImportancePatients should have an active role in decisions about pursuing or forgoing specific therapies in treatment de-escalation trials.ObjectiveTo evaluate longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) encompassing decisional comfort and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients who elected to enroll in a clinical trial evaluating radiotherapy alone, without breast surgery, for invasive breast cancers with exceptional response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective, single-group, phase 2 clinical trial at 7 US medical centers. Women aged 40 years or older with invasive cT1-2 N0-1 M0 triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)–positive breast cancer with no pathologic evidence of residual disease following standard NST enrolled from March 6, 2017, to November 9, 2021. Validated PRO measures were administered at baseline and 6, 12, and 36 months post-radiotherapy. Data were analyzed from January to February 2023.InterventionsPRO measures included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Lymphedema (FACT-B+4), and Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS).Main Outcomes and MeasuresChanges in PRO measure scores and subscores over time.ResultsAmong 31 patients, the median (IQR) age was 61 (56-66) years, 26 (84%) were White, and 26 (84%) were non-Hispanic. A total of 15 (48%) had triple-negative disease and 16 (52%) had ERBB2-positive disease. Decisional comfort was high at baseline (median [IQR] DRS score 10 [0-25] on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating higher decisional regret) and significantly increased over time (median [IQR] DRS score at 36 months, 0 [0-20]; P < .001). HRQOL was relatively high at baseline (median [IQR] FACT-B composite score 121 [111-134] on a 0-148 scale, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL) and significantly increased over time (median [IQR] FACT-B score at 36 months, 128 [116-137]; P = .04). Perceived differences between the affected breast and contralateral breast were minimal at baseline (median [IQR] BCTOS score 1.05 [1.00-1.23] on a 1-4 scale, with higher scores indicating greater differences) and increased significantly over time (median [IQR] BCTOS score at 36 months, 1.36 [1.18-1.64]; P < .001). At 36 months postradiotherapy, the cosmetic subscore was 0.45 points higher than baseline (95% CI, 0.16-0.74; P = .001), whereas function, pain, and edema subscores were not significantly different than baseline.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial, analysis of PROs demonstrated an overall positive experience for trial participants, with longitudinal improvements in decisional comfort and overall HRQOL over time and minimal lasting adverse effects of therapy.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02945579

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) pathological inclusions are found in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD‐TDP) and Alzheimer's disease (AD‐TDP). While clinically different, TDP‐43 inclusions in FTLD‐TDP and AD can have similar morphological characteristics. However, TDP‐43 colocalizing with tau and forming “apple‐bite” or “flame‐shaped” neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCI) are only found in AD‐TDP. Here, we describe a case with AD and neuritic plaque‐associated TDP‐43. The patient was a 96‐year‐old right‐handed Caucasian woman who had developed a slowly progressive amnestic syndrome compatible with typical AD at age 80. Genetic testing revealed APOE ε3/ε4, GRN r5848 CT, and MAPT H1/H2 genotype. Consistent with the old age at onset and long disease duration, limbic‐predominant AD was found at autopsy, with high hippocampal yet low cortical neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) counts. Hippocampal and amygdala sclerosis were present. Immunohistochemistry for phospho‐TDP‐43 showed NCIs, dystrophic neurites, and rare neuronal intranuclear inclusions consistent with FTLD‐TDP type A, as well as tau NFT‐associated TDP‐43 inclusions. These were frequent in the amygdala, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, occipitotemporal gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus but sparse in the mid‐frontal cortex. Additionally, there were TDP‐43‐immunoreactive inclusions forming plaque‐like structures in the molecular layer of the dentate fascia of the hippocampus. The presence of neuritic plaques in the same region was confirmed using thioflavin‐S fluorescent microscopy and immunohistochemistry for phospho‐tau. Double labeling immunofluorescence showed colocalization of TDP‐43 and tau within neuritic plaques. Other pathologies included mild Lewy body pathology predominantly affecting the amygdala and olfactory bulb, aging‐related tau astrogliopathy, and mixed small vessel disease (arteriolosclerosis and amyloid angiopathy) with several cortical microinfarcts. In conclusion, we have identified TDP‐43 colocalizing with tau in neuritic plaques in AD, which expands the association of TDP‐43 and tau in AD beyond NFTs. The clinical correlate of this plaque‐associated TDP‐43 appears to be a slowly progressive amnestic syndrome.

Abstract Background: There are conflicting data on whether nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Using Mendelian randomization (MR), we investigated the relationship between genetic predisposition to NAFLD and risk for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) within the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan; cases n = 5,090, controls n = 8,733) and the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium (PanC4; cases n = 4,163, controls n = 3,792) were analyzed. We used data on 68 genetic variants with four different MR methods [inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, simple median, and penalized weighted median] separately to predict genetic heritability of NAFLD. We then assessed the relationship between each of the four MR methods and pancreatic cancer risk, using logistic regression to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for PC risk factors, including obesity and diabetes. Results: No association was found between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in the PanScan or PanC4 samples [e.g., PanScan, IVW OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–1.22; MR-Egger OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65–1.21; PanC4, IVW OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.90–1.27; MR-Egger OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67–1.28]. None of the four MR methods indicated an association between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in either sample. Conclusions: Genetic predisposition to NAFLD is not associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Impact: Given the close relationship between NAFLD and metabolic conditions, it is plausible that any association between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer might reflect host metabolic perturbations (e.g., obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome) and does not necessarily reflect a causal relationship between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSEThere are numerous barriers to enrollment in oncology biomarker-driven studies.METHODSThe ELAINE 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04432454 ) is an open-label phase 2 study of lasofoxifene combined with abemaciclib in patients with advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation. ELAINE 2 opened clinical sites by using a Traditional approach, which activated a site before patient identification, and the Tempus TIME Trial network, which opened a site only after identifying an eligible patient. This manuscript presents the operational metrics comparing the Traditional and TIME Trial site data.RESULTSThe study enrolled patients over 34 weeks and 16 sites (six Traditional and 10 TIME Trial) participated. Duration for full clinical trial agreement execution for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites averaged 200.5 (range, 142-257) and 7.6 days (range, 2-14), respectively. Institutional review board approval time for Traditional sites and TIME Trial sites was 27.5 (range, 12-71) and 3.0 days (range, 1-12), respectively. Duration from study activation to first consent was 33.3 (range, 18-58) and 8.8 days (range, 1-35) for Traditional and TIME Trial sites, respectively. The first patient on study was at a TIME Trial site 115 days before a Traditional site and the first seven patients enrolled were at TIME Trial sites. Traditional sites consented 23 and enrolled 16 patients, while TIME Trial sites consented 16 and enrolled 13. The trial enrolled 29 patients in 8.5 months with the anticipated enrollment duration being 12-18 months.CONCLUSIONThe TIME Trial network opened earlier and enrolled the first study patients. These results demonstrate that the Just-in-TIME model, along with a Traditional model, can improve enrollment in biomarker-driven studies.

We previously demonstrated that increased expression of the SERPINA5 gene is associated with hippocampal vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains. SERPINA5 was further demonstrated to be a novel tau-binding partner that colocalizes within neurofibrillary tangles. Our goal was to determine whether genetic variants in the SERPINA5 gene contributed to clinicopathologic phenotypes in AD. To screen for SERPINA5 variants, we sequenced 103 autopsy-confirmed young-onset AD cases with a positive family history of cognitive decline. To further assess the frequency of a rare missense variant, SERPINA5 p.E228Q, we screened an additional 1114 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases. To provide neuropathologic context in AD, we immunohistochemically evaluated SERPINA5 and tau in a SERPINA5 p.E228Q variant carrier and a matched noncarrier. In the initial SERPINA5 screen, we observed 1 individual with a rare missense variant (rs140138746) that resulted in an amino acid change (p.E228Q). In our AD validation cohort, we identified an additional 5 carriers of this variant, resulting in an allelic frequency of 0.0021. There was no significant difference between SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers and noncarriers in terms of demographic or clinicopathologic characteristics. Although not significant, on average SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers were 5 years younger at age of disease onset than noncarriers (median: 66 [60–73] vs 71 [63–77] years, P = .351). In addition, SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers exhibited a longer disease duration than noncarriers that approached significance (median: 12 [10–15]) vs 9 [6–12] years, P = .079). More severe neuronal loss was observed in the locus coeruleus, hippocampus, and amygdala of the SERPINA5 p.E228Q carrier compared to noncarrier, although no significant difference in SERPINA5-immunopositive lesions was observed. Throughout the AD brain in either carrier or noncarrier, areas with early pretangle pathology or burnt-out ghost tangle accumulation did not reveal SERPINA5-immunopositive neurons. Mature tangles and newly formed ghost tangles appeared to correspond well with SERPINA5-immunopositive tangle-bearing neurons. SERPINA5 gene expression was previously associated with disease phenotype; however, our findings suggest that SERPINA5 genetic variants may not be a contributing factor to clinicopathologic differences in AD. SERPINA5-immunopositive neurons appear to undergo a pathologic process that corresponded with specific levels of tangle maturity.