Citations

Background: Shock is a highly dreaded complication of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). However, few data exist on its incidence and association with prognosis. Methods: We evaluated 2704 TAAAD patients [mean age 61.4 ± 14.5, (67.6%) male] from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Results: Shock was present at arrival in 407 (15.1%) TAAAD patients. These patients demonstrated no difference in age (61.5 ± 15.2 with shock vs. 61.4 ± 14.4 years without; p=0.873), but were more likely to have history of hypertension (83.1% vs. 73.0%; p<0.001), atherosclerosis (36.5% vs. 21.7%, p<0.001) and diabetes (12.3% vs. 7.0%, p=0.001) than patients without shock. They had more surgical management (90.9% vs. 86.0%; p=0.007). In-hospital complications such as hypotension (49.8% vs. 28.6%; p<0.001), coma (11.4% vs. 5.8%; p<0.001), tamponade (33.6% vs. 18.2%; p<0.001) and myocardial ischemia/infarction (19.7% vs. 13.7%; p=0.006) were more common among shock patients. Overall in-hospital mortality (30.2% vs. 23.9%; p=0.007) and mortality by management (surgical: 24.6% vs. 19.1%; p=0.015; medical: 88.9% vs. 53.3%, p<0.001) were higher among shock patients. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in shock patients are displayed in Table 1. Among hospital survivors, Kaplan-Meier estimates of follow-up mortality were similar between groups (p=0.609). Conclusions: Shock occurred in 15.1% of patients with TAAAD and was associated with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, but not long-term mortality.

AbstractIntroductionVentricular tachycardia storm or electrical storm (ES) is a common complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The factors contributing to ES and outcomes are less studied. The study aimed to determine the factors associated with ES and the probability of survival in patients undergoing LVAD in three tertiary centers over a span of 15 years.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2020. ES was defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia over a period of 24 h with no identifiable reversible cause. Detailed chart reviews of the electronic health records within the Mayo Clinic and outside medical records were performed.ResultsA total of 883 patients who underwent LVAD implantation were included in our study. ES occurred in 7% (n = 61) of patients with a median of 13 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 5–297 days) following surgery. We found 57% of patients (n = 35) developed ES within 30 days, while 43% (n = 26) patients developed ES at a median of 545 (IQR 152–1032) days after surgery. Following ES, 26% of patients died within 1 year. Patients with ES had a significant association with a history of ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks before the procedure. ES was significantly associated with reduced survival compared to patients without ES (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.39–2.64, p < .001).ConclusionFollowing LVAD implantation, the rate of ES was 7% with majority of ES occurring within 30 days of LVAD. Risk factors for ES included pre‐implant history of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shock. ES was significantly associated with reduced survival compared to patients without ES.

Background Extended sedentary behavior is a risk factor for chronic disease and mortality, even among those who exercise regularly. Given the time constraints of incorporating physical activity into daily schedules, and the high likelihood of sitting during office work, this environment may serve as a potentially feasible setting for interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Methods and Results A randomized cross‐over clinical trial was conducted at an employee wellness center. Four office settings were evaluated on 4 consecutive days: stationary or sitting station on day 1 (referent), and 3 subsequent active workstations (standing, walking, or stepper) in randomized order. Neurocognitive function (Selective Attention, Grammatical Reasoning, Odd One Out, Object Reasoning, Visuospatial Intelligence, Limited‐Hold Memory, Paired Associates Learning, and Digit Span) and fine motor skills (typing speed and accuracy) were tested using validated tools. Average scores were compared among stations using linear regression with generalized estimating equations to adjust standard errors. Bonferroni method adjusted for multiple comparisons. Healthy subjects were enrolled (n=44), 28 (64%) women, mean±SD age 35±11 years, weight 75.5±17.1 kg, height 168.5±10.0 cm, and body mass index 26.5±5.2 kg/m 2 . When comparing active stations to sitting, neurocognitive test either improved or remained unchanged, while typing speed decreased without affecting typing errors. Overall results improved after day 1, suggesting habituation. We observed no major differences across active stations, except decrease in average typing speed 42.5 versus 39.7 words per minute with standing versus stepping ( P =0.003). Conclusions Active workstations improved cognitive performance, suggesting that these workstations can help decrease sedentary time without work performance impairment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06240286.

Abstract Background Pancreatic cysts (PC) are increasingly detected through abdominal imaging, prompting exploration of alternatives such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst ablation (EUS-PCA) due to the risks and costs associated with surgery. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis of EUS-PCA's short-term efficacy and complications for PC management. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and TRIP electronic databases. The primary outcome was cyst resolution (partial and complete) and persistence on imaging 12 months after ablation. The secondary outcome was procedure-related adverse events. Results Eight studies were eligible for analysis. Complete cyst resolution on imaging 12 months after EUS ablation was 50% [95% CI 36, 63, I2 = 85.31%]. Partial cyst resolution was 27% [95% CI 15, 41, I2 = 87.07%], and cyst persistence was 17% [95% CI 11, 24, I2 = 62.11%]. The rate of complete resolution varied depending on the treatment agent (for ethanol 29% [95% CI 10, 53], lauromacrogol 51% [95% Cl 36, 67], ethanol and paclitaxel 63% [95% CI 48, 76], paclitaxel and gemcitabine 67% [95% CI 45, 83], ethanol, paclitaxel and gemcitabine 61% [95% CI 39, 80]). Post-procedure adverse events included abdominal pain in 4% [95% CI 0, 11], pancreatitis in 3% [95% CI 1, 5], and fever in 1% [95% CI 0, 3] of all patients. Conclusion The treatment of pancreatic cysts with EUS ablation results in acceptable levels of complete resolution, and low incidence of severe adverse events. The effectiveness of this treatment is further enhanced when chemoablative agents are employed.

Abstract Background: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a state where patients have more than 10% clonal plasma cells or a serum monoclonal protein &gt; 3g/dl but no evidence of end organ damage. Patients with SMM are at risk of developing active multiple myeloma (defined by the CRAB criteria). The best stratification system with respect to the risk of progression to active myeloma is the 20/2/20 (20% plasma cells, M protein &gt;2.0 g/dl, and involved to uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain ratio &gt;20). The presence of ≥2 criteria predicts a 50 - 60% risk of progression within 2 years. Thus, many patients considered ‘high-risk’ may not progress in this time frame, and patients with ≤1 risk factor can progress to active myeloma. Therefore, improved risk stratification methods are needed to correctly identify patients at high risk of progression. We hypothesized that Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis of serum combined with artificial intelligence (AI) can correctly risk stratify patients with SMM. Methods: We identified 192 SMM patients: 96 who progressed and 96 who did not progress within 2 years of diagnosis. We used stored sera from the time of diagnosis to perform FTIR to determine differences in the spectra of patients who did/did not progress and train an AI algorithm. A randomized 10-fold cross-validation analysis was performed using 172 samples (86 from each group) for training and the remaining 20 for testing to assess the model across 10 independent iterations. Subsequently, we blindly tested the trained model against an independent set of serum samples (N=24) from patients who progressed ≤3 years of diagnosis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the FTIR AI algorithm output compared to the clinical outcome data. Results: From the 96 patients who progressed, 48 had complete data for the 20/2/20 risk stratification. 11 patients (23%) had ≤1 of the criteria and so would have been considered at low likelihood to progress. Of the 96 who did not progress within 2 years, 49 had complete data for risk stratification. Of these, 27 (55.1%) met the high-risk criteria of the 20/2/20 classification and would have been predicted to progress within 2 years. FTIR/AI model correctly identified the patients at risk of progression (95% accuracy) with AUC of 0.96. Similarly, it was able to classify patients who did not progress within 2 years of diagnosis (94% accuracy) with an AUC of 0.96. FTIR/AI correctly predicted the patients at risk of progression within 2 years (90%) and 3 years (87.5%) in the blinded validation group with an AUC of 0.89 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusion: Analysis of serum in patients with newly diagnosed SMM with FTIR is able to correctly identify those at risk of progression within 2 or 3 years of diagnosis with an accuracy of ~90% in a blinded external validation study. FTIR may, therefore, be used to assess SMM patient risk before committing to potentially toxic therapy. Citation Format: David Dingli, Darlyna Khonkhammy, Caden Gunnarson, Grant Schlauderaff, Dan Q. Pham, Ali Khammanivong. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of serum [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6170.

Abstract Background Long‐term outcomes of sterile lead management strategies of lead abandonment (LA) or transvenous lead extraction (TLE) remain unclear. Methods We performed a retrospective study of a population residing in southeastern Minnesota with follow‐up at the Mayo Clinic and its health systems. Patients who underwent LA or TLE of sterile leads from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2011, and had follow‐up for at least 10 years or until their death were included. Results A total of 172 patients were included in the study with 153 patients who underwent LA and 19 who underwent TLE for sterile leads. Indications for subsequent lead extraction arose in 9.1% ( n = 14) of patients with initial LA and 5.3% ( n = 1) in patients with initial TLE, after an average of 7 years. Moreover, 28.6% of patients in the LA cohort who required subsequent extraction did not proceed with the extraction, and among those who proceeded, 60% had clinical success and 40% had a clinical failure. Subsequent device upgrades or revisions were performed in 18.3% of patients in the LA group and 31.6% in the TLE group, with no significant differences in procedural challenges (5.2% vs. 5.3%). There was no difference in 10‐year survival probability among the LA group and the TLE group ( p = .64). Conclusion An initial lead abandonment strategy was associated with more complicated subsequent extraction procedures compared to patients with an initial transvenous lead extraction strategy. However, there was no difference in 10‐year survival probability between both lead management approaches.